Jump to content

User talk:APPU/Archives/2021/September

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Misuse of honorific_prefix parameter

Hi there, re: this edit, this is a misuse of the |honorific_prefix= parameter. See the Template:Infobox person instructions. Thank you. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 18:04, 10 March 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Aman Dhattarwal (March 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by SamHolt6 were:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
SamHolt6 (talk) 18:46, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
Teahouse logo
Hello, AppuSunkad! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! SamHolt6 (talk) 18:46, 10 March 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Aman Dhattarwal (March 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
KylieTastic (talk) 19:50, 10 March 2021 (UTC)

March 2021

Information icon Hello, I'm JBchrch. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Darshan (actor), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. JBchrch (talk) 20:00, 10 March 2021 (UTC)

Information icon Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Darshan (actor). Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Diff: [1] Cyphoidbomb (talk) 19:37, 11 March 2021 (UTC)

Information icon Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Disha Ravi, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. Vikram Vincent 13:22, 15 March 2021 (UTC)

Indic Script

We do not add Indic Scripts in the leads and infoboxes of India-related articles as per WP:NOINDICSCRIPT policy like you did here. Thanks - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 14:11, 11 March 2021 (UTC)

Note that we do not add honorifics as per WP:NCIN, specific section here. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 16:29, 18 March 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Devagiri (March 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Hulged was:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Consider adding sources to the draft, then I may accept it.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
–Hulged ⟨talk⟩ 08:44, 29 March 2021 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Devagiri has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Devagiri. Thanks! –Hulged ⟨talk⟩ 08:52, 29 March 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Devagiri, Karnataka has been accepted

Devagiri, Karnataka, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

–Hulged ⟨talk⟩ 10:16, 29 March 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of World Leader

Please do not create hoaxes on Wikipedia, as you did at World Leader. Doing so is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia—and then to correct them if possible. If you would like to make test edits, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Eostrix  (🦉 hoot hoot🦉) 07:31, 2 April 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Supreme Lord

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that Supreme Lord, a page that you created, has been tagged for deletion. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Eostrix  (🦉 hoot hoot🦉) 07:31, 2 April 2021 (UTC)

"Sabka Baap" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Sabka Baap. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 April 2#Sabka Baap until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Eostrix  (🦉 hoot hoot🦉) 07:33, 2 April 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Aman Dhattarwal (April 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Devonian Wombat was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Devonian Wombat (talk) 11:00, 12 April 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Aman Dhattarwal (April 13)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by -noah- was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Clearly not yet notable. Would need news coverage to establish notability such as DanTDM
Noah 💬 20:35, 13 April 2021 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Hypocorism, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Appu. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 05:54, 17 April 2021 (UTC)

Move of disambiguation page

Your move of the disambiguation page Modi to Modi (Disambiguation) has been reversed. If you think that Narendra Modi should be the primary topic for the term Modi, and that the disambiguation page should be moved to Modi (disambiguation) (note the correct lower-case d), please initiate a move discussion to determine consensus. It might well be the right thing to do, but it's not, I think, something that should be done unilaterally without discussion.—ShelfSkewed Talk 15:14, 3 May 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Maikalal Jaikishan

A tag has been placed on Maikalal Jaikishan requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a recently created redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer, or other unlikely search term.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. signed, Rosguill talk 18:21, 21 May 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Munawar Faruqui

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Munawar Faruqui requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Munawar Faruqui. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. BEACHIDICAE🌊 14:28, 4 June 2021 (UTC)

"Munawar" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Munawar. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 June 4#Munawar until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Jogesh 69 (talk) 20:52, 4 June 2021 (UTC)

"Faruqui" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Faruqui. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 June 4#Faruqui until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Jogesh 69 (talk) 21:00, 4 June 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of User:AppuSunkad

The page User:AppuSunkad has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appeared to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, or you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Primefac (talk) 22:51, 4 June 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Munawar Faruqui for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Munawar Faruqui is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Munawar Faruqui (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Thryduulf (talk) 20:02, 7 June 2021 (UTC)

List of nicknames of prime ministers of India

Hi, Just wondering if you have strong source to claim that Manmohan Singh's nickname is Sonia's puppet, The accidental prime minister.--25 CENTS VICTORIOUS ☣✅ 06:37, 12 June 2021 (UTC)

Ay Yo Appu (talk) 21:53, 18 June 2021 (UTC)

Notice

The article Diminutives of popular names has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not needed as an article

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. wizzito | say hello! 02:32, 25 June 2021 (UTC)

Sourcing

Information icon Thank you for contributing to the article Jaggi Vasudev. However, please do not use unreliable sources such as blogs, your own website, websites and publications with a poor reputation for checking the facts or with no editorial oversight, expressing views that are widely acknowledged as extremist, that are promotional in nature, or that rely heavily on rumors and personal opinions, as one of Wikipedia's core policies is that contributions must be verifiable through reliable sources, preferably using inline citations. If you require further assistance, please look at Help:Contents/Editing Wikipedia, or ask at the Teahouse. Thank you. Kuru (talk) 01:23, 28 June 2021 (UTC)

"Miss King" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Miss King. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 June 30#Miss King until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. signed, Rosguill talk 17:31, 30 June 2021 (UTC)

Mononymous names

Hi. Please note that, as per MOS:PSEUDONYM, mononymous names are added. -- DaxServer (talk) 10:59, 1 July 2021 (UTC)

July 2021

Information icon Hello, I'm KyloRen3. I noticed that you recently removed content from Stan Swamy without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. KyloRen3 (talk) 06:31, 6 July 2021 (UTC)

Because according to MOS:PSEUDONYM, it is not always necessary to spell out why the article title and lead paragraph give a different name if the common name is an understandable hypocorism. Appu (talk) 08:36, 6 July 2021 (UTC)
Stop icon

Your recent editing history at Rajneesh shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. tgeorgescu (talk) 16:29, 26 July 2021 (UTC)

Vishwanath Pratap Singh

If you think that the article on Vishwanath Pratap Singh should be moved, please use the process for disputed moves at WP:RM. Have a nice day.-- Toddy1 (talk) 17:49, 7 July 2021 (UTC)

Information icon Please stop move-warring. The convention is that disputed moves have to be proposed at WP:RM and that we go back to the name before the disputed move until a decision is made at WP:RM.-- Toddy1 (talk) 19:13, 7 July 2021 (UTC)

Dhananjaya Y. Chandrachud

If you think that the article on Dhananjaya Y. Chandrachud should be renamed, please use the process at WP:RM for a contested move.-- Toddy1 (talk) 22:27, 7 July 2021 (UTC)


"Jaggi"

Thanks for your contributions to the article on Jaggi Vasudev!

On that article's talk page, I object to your recent changes in which the article's subject is now consistently referred to by his given name as "Jaggi".

I'd appreciate if you could respond to this objection. Thank you! ARK (talk) 13:26, 24 July 2021 (UTC)

Thank you very much for taking the time. Vasudev is a patronymic, this can be confirmed since sources cite his father's name as BV Vasudev where Vasudev is clearly his given name if you're familiar with south Indian naming conventions and especially south Karnataka naming conventions where initials B and V would stand for the person's native village and father followed by the person's given name which would be Vasudev.
But because these conventions cause confusion to others, people nowadays have been adopting a new convention where the person's given name is accompanied by only their father/husband's name ahead or behind, this thing can be seen consistently in Sadhguru's case too, where his mother's name is Susheela Vasudev, and his name Jagadish Vasudev and also his daughter's name Radhe Jaggi.
One such famous example in the mainstream is of Dr Rajkumar and his children Puneeth Rajkumar and Raghavendra Rajkumar were the children adopted a different naming convention than their father's.
And I completely understand your concern:

But even if "Vasudev" turned out to be a legitimate patronym, I'm not sure that the article's status of being written in Indian English warrants the use of the subject's given name as their primary name, merely on the strength of a regional preference for this usage in some parts of India. Surely, the international convention of using a person's surname as their primary polite name is perfectly good Indian English as well, and it doesn't come with the semantic undertow of implying a slight or belittlement to the subject.

But I have no take on this as I have used Jaggi only because the English Wikipedia has a template to do so and many South Indian subject's pages also have followed the practice.
I don't think I am the right person to speak for or against not addressing the subject by their father's name. Appu (talk) 16:06, 24 July 2021 (UTC)
Thanks!
May I assume, then, that you won't oppose the reversion of all instances of "Jaggi" to either "Jaggi Vasudev" or "Vasudev"? ARK (talk) 10:28, 25 July 2021 (UTC)
You certainly can assume that way. Appu (talk) 10:42, 25 July 2021 (UTC)
Thanks, done! ARK (talk) 14:09, 25 July 2021 (UTC)

Unblock request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

APPU/Archives/2021 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello seniors, I'm a law-abiding user of Wikipedia, and I am certainly sure that I ideally should not be blocked. I use a mobile and a PC to edit Wikipedia and since I use same network I wonder why the mobile device is blocked from editing. And I don't have any intention to vandalise articles or manipulate consensus, my contribution history is a good example of that. I hope I will be unblocked. Thank you the volunteers' time. Have a great time. Appu (talk) 20:10, 29 July 2021 (UTC)

Decline reason:

To help you, we need to know your IP address. If you do not want to give it publicly, you may use WP:UTRS. 331dot (talk) 20:50, 29 July 2021 (UTC)

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

notice that around your edit at 20th century

there are no people's names mentioned. That is on purpose. Please consider redoing your edit without mentioning any specific names. Thank you, Carptrash (talk) 14:56, 30 July 2021 (UTC)

sure Appu (talk) 16:56, 30 July 2021 (UTC)

Jawaharlal Nehru

Hi. Please do not remove the {{Citation needed}} template without adding sources or without giving any explanation as you did twice (Special:Diff/1037644912 and Special:Diff/1037643510). -- DaxServer (talk) 20:56, 7 August 2021 (UTC)

August 2021

Information icon Hello, I'm DaxServer. I noticed that you recently removed content from Sundar Pichai without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. -- DaxServer (talk) 20:59, 7 August 2021 (UTC)

Information icon Hello, I'm Tayi Arajakate. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Ramachandra Guha, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Tayi Arajakate Talk 13:51, 18 August 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Rathee

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Rathee, was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. QueerEcofeminist[they/them/their] 07:01, 10 August 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Aman Dhattarwal for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Aman Dhattarwal is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aman Dhattarwal until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Celestina007 (talk) 22:09, 16 August 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Dr. Carolyn Salter

Notice

The article Dr. Carolyn Salter has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable politician who lost House of Reps election. Fails WP:NPOL and WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JTtheOG (talk) 06:28, 18 August 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Dr. Carolyn Salter for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dr. Carolyn Salter is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dr. Carolyn Salter until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

JTtheOG (talk) 09:33, 18 August 2021 (UTC)

Appu, the discussion is in progress at AfD, I suggest you leave your comments there rather than at the article's talk page. Kind regards, Wilhelm Tell DCCXLVI talk | fings wot i hav dun 08:05, 25 August 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of List of largest ruling leaders by population for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of largest ruling leaders by population is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of largest ruling leaders by population until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Ab207 (talk) 14:11, 30 August 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Gradeup

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Gradeup requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gradeup. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. DMySon (talk) 07:26, 31 August 2021 (UTC)

Gradeup moved to draftspace

An article you recently recreated, [Gradeup]], was deleted via this deletion discussion in 2018. The deletion was also discussed in 2019 here. I've moved your 2021 draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Shirt58 (talk) 10:33, 31 August 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Gradeup Logo.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Gradeup Logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Tol (talk | contribs) @ 22:27, 31 August 2021 (UTC)

Vibha Padalkar moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Vibha Padalkar, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Pillechan (പിള്ളേച്ചനോട് പറ) 15:26, 5 September 2021 (UTC)

Moving article when there is a discussion in progress

Can you explain why you moved Dr. Rajkumar to Dr Rajkumar? I don't see a edit summary or an update from you at Talk:Dr Rajkumar#Dr title without the dot. Jay (Talk) 15:36, 8 September 2021 (UTC)

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for File:The Free Voice- On Democracy, Culture And The Nation.jpeg

Thanks for uploading File:The Free Voice- On Democracy, Culture And The Nation.jpeg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (Talk • Contribs • Owner) 13:45, 9 September 2021 (UTC)

Mahatma Gandhi

Information icon Hello, I'm Fowler&fowler. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Mahatma Gandhi have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. Fowler&fowler«Talk» 16:02, 9 September 2021 (UTC)

Non-free rationale for File:The Free Voice- On Democracy, Culture And The Nation.jpeg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:The Free Voice- On Democracy, Culture And The Nation.jpeg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F6 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — JJMC89 (T·C) 19:58, 9 September 2021 (UTC)

Non-free rationale for File:The Case That Shook India.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:The Case That Shook India.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F6 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — JJMC89 (T·C) 22:33, 9 September 2021 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Nehru and Bose— Parallel Lives.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Nehru and Bose— Parallel Lives.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 10 September 2021 (UTC)

April 2021

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia. Eostrix  (🦉 hoot hoot🦉) 07:34, 2 April 2021 (UTC)

Patronymic name template

Please refrain from changing the wording and/or format of the template {{Indian patronymic}} without obtaining consensus per WP:BRD — DaxServer (talk to me) 16:01, 26 September 2021 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=User_talk:APPU/Archives/2021/September&oldid=1062116291"