User talk:94.10.99.121

April 2020

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

You’ve already been blocked once in your short stay here. Please take note of our edit warring policy and stop undoing edits repeatedly to avoid another block for that. There’s a talk page discussion at the article’s talk page. Please participate there rather than reverting further. Thank you. Sergecross73 msg me 02:19, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

4. April 2020

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to use inappropriate or abusive edit summaries, as you did at Mario & Sonic at the Olympic Games Tokyo 2020, you may be blocked from editing. TheImaCow (talk) 19:00, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

April 2020

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. -- ferret (talk) 19:13, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

94.10.99.121 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I only undid an edit once, than after that I began to discuss it on the talk page just before I was blocked. I do not feel as though I did enough to warrant this block, especially given the talk page discussion I initiated. The user who blocked me also told me in his edit summery to "discuss it before I do it again"; this is precisely what I did, but I was, for some reason, still blocked. 94.10.99.121 (talk) 19:16, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You were edit warring and uncivil. PhilKnight (talk) 20:09, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Obvious disruptive editing, incivility, edit warring, and this is after a block for the same only days ago. -- ferret (talk) 19:21, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

All you have to do is check the page history to see this is a lie. You made the change 4 times, were warned about it yesterday, and refused to comment on the talk page discussion started yesterday as well. Sergecross73 msg me 19:25, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I edited an article, then went the talk page and started a discussion about the issue, and then, AFTER that, you reverted by edit, told me to read up on policies and to discuss it, then, for some reason, blocked me, despite previously telling me to go discuss the issue. How is it fair to block me under those circumstances, even IF I had been blocked before a few days ago? Also I didn't notice the talk page discussion. If I had, I would have discussed the issue there. That is admittedly my bad. --94.10.99.121 (talk) 19:31, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You were warned of edit warring, and just kept on undoing edits. All the while calling people names too. You’re hardly an innocent party here. Sergecross73 msg me 19:53, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.