User talk:930310

What Wikipedia is not

Wikipedia is not a free webhost. As you have had a page taken to MFD before, I strongly suggest you read the user page guidelines, WP:NOTWEBHOST and WP:FAKEARTICLE and either you work on improving Oldest people by year of birth with citations and contribute to the Encyclopedia as per WP:HERE, or you save your table and host it elsewhere. CommanderLinx (talk) 16:31, 10 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This is a draft for a future update of the page you mentioned. So the material here will be used in the future, when there is enough confidence that it is correct. 930310 (talk) 16:36, 10 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of User:930310/sandbox

User:930310/sandbox, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:930310/sandbox and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:930310/sandbox during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 20:25, 16 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Arbitration Committee notice

You are involved in a recently-filed request for clarification or amendment from the Arbitration Committee. Please review the request at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification and Amendment#Amendment request: Longevity and, if you wish to do so, enter your statement and any other material you wish to submit to the Arbitration Committee. Additionally, the Wikipedia:Arbitration guide may be of use.

Thanks, -- Ricky81682 (talk) 09:27, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Motion: Longevity

The Arbitration Committee has resolved by motion that:

Standard discretionary sanctions are authorized for all pages related to longevity, broadly construed.

For the Arbitration Committee, L235 (t / c / ping in reply) 22:53, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Discuss this at: Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard#Motion: Longevity

Articles for deletion/Ramona Trinidad Iglesias-Jordan: Request for examples of significant coverage

Hi. You recently voted "keep" in the discussion @ Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ramona Trinidad Iglesias-Jordan. Please note that there is no specific notability guideline for "oldest person," and any reliance on such a guideline or presumed precedent is misplaced. All such "oldest persons" must satisfy the general notability guidelines per WP:GNG, as well as other suitability guidelines such as WP:NOPAGE, in order to have a stand-alone article. You are respectfully requested to please provide links to what you believe are the three best examples of significant coverage of the subject in independent, reliable sources per GNG, so other editors may evaluate whether such persons are notable. Thank you. Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 23:43, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/153.151.83.197, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Mr. Guye (talk) 01:43, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

November 2015

Hello, I'm Legacypac. Your recent edit to the page Anders Engberg appears to have added incorrect information, so I have removed it for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Stop putting unprovable and unsourced claims in Wikipedia Legacypac (talk) 17:44, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

(==December 2015==

Welcome!

Hello, 930310, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you are enjoying editing and want to continue. Some useful pages to visit are:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Contributing to Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Simplified Manual of Style
Wikipedia Teahouse (a user-friendly help forum)
The Wikipedia Adventure (a fun game-like tour to help get you oriented within Wikipedia)

You can sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

If you need any help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}} before the question. We're so glad you're here! 7&6=thirteen (☎) 7&6=thirteen (☎) 13:40, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Request for enforcement of ArbComm Discretionary Sanctions against you

See here [1] Legacypac (talk) 12:03, 24 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Notice that you are now subject to an arbitration enforcement sanction

The following sanction now applies to you:

Topic ban from Longevity broadly construed

You have been sanctioned for the reasons provided in response to this arbitration enforcement request.

This sanction is imposed in my capacity as an uninvolved administrator under the authority of the Arbitration Committee's decision at age#Final decision and, if applicable, the procedure described at Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions. This sanction has been recorded in the log of sanctions. If the sanction includes a ban, please read the banning policy to ensure you understand what this means. If you do not comply with this sanction, you may be blocked for an extended period, by way of enforcement of this sanction—and you may also be made subject to further sanctions.

You may appeal this sanction using the process described here. I recommend that you use the arbitration enforcement appeals template if you wish to submit an appeal to the arbitration enforcement noticeboard. You may also appeal directly to me (on my talk page), before or instead of appealing to the noticeboard. Even if you appeal this sanction, you remain bound by it until you are notified by an uninvolved administrator that the appeal has been successful. You are also free to contact me on my talk page if anything of the above is unclear to you. Spartaz ^Humbug! 19:25, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Request for 5 minute survey

Hi! I'm a researcher from the University of Minnesota conducting a study on LGBT user contributions to Wikipedia. Would you be willing to answer a short five minute survey? If so, I would appreciate if you could drop me an email at leung085@umn.edu — Preceding unsigned comment added by Weiwensg (talk • contribs) 22:41, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Emma Morano

I had to remove your edit to the talk page as you are topic banned from longevity articles. As per WP:TBAN this also includes talk pages. CommanderLinx (talk) 00:52, 28 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Jadwiga Szubartowicz

Thanks for your interest. I've changed "verified" to "certified" as a certificate was sent.--Ipigott (talk) 15:24, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]