User talk:87rohit.sharma

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Shirdi Sai Baba.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page. Please remember to link to the submission!
You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! j⚛e decker ^talk 15:58, 18 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Discretionary sanctions notification

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

--RegentsPark (comment) 12:39, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Qutb Minar and Qutb complex

Hi. Please note that there are two articles for the Qutb complex. The Qutb Minar article covers the tower while the Qutb complex article covers the rest of the site. --RegentsPark (comment) 11:51, 13 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

October 2020

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Qutb Minar; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. RegentsPark (comment) 14:32, 13 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Alivardi (talk) 15:43, 23 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Warning

It appears that you either don't understand our policies and guidelines or you don't care about them. Both situations are problematic and if this continues any further then your editing privileges will be revoked. —SpacemanSpiff 19:08, 23 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Another warning

Um, you have added a chunk of text directly from the British Library source, without attribution, on Gadarmal Devi temple.

That is a straight Copyright Violation, forbidden on Wikipedia.

Further, the text makes no sense as it stands - we have no idea who Bloch is or why he'd be important, and nor does the reader of the not-very-good source text. You can't just add stuff randomly; it has to make sense, be relevant, and be in your own words, or else directly attributed and quoted as well (obviously) as being cited, viz "John Smith, director of the Temple Research Group at the University of Umptytum, said that Robert Block argued ..."[ref]

I do hope this is clear, as it's fundamental to editing here. All the best, Chiswick Chap (talk) 18:49, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

December 2020

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages, as you did with Prashant Patel umrao. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion, which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. DMySon 07:01, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/87rohit.sharma. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. GirthSummit _(blether) 14:08, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]