Jump to content

User talk:81.187.88.97

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions so far. I hope you like the place and decide to stay.

Here are some links to pages you may find useful:

You don't have to log in to read or edit articles on Wikipedia, but if you wish to acquire additional privileges, you can simply create a named account. It's free, requires no personal information, and lets you:

If you edit without using a named account, your IP address (81.187.88.97) is used to identify you instead.

I hope that you, as a new Wikipedian, decide to continue contributing to our project: an encyclopedia of human knowledge that anyone can edit. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, or you can click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. We also have an intuitive guide on editing if you're interested. By the way, please make sure to sign and date your talk page comments with four tildes (~~~~).

Happy editing! —Cpt.a.haddock (talk) (please ping when replying) 14:09, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A toast...

[edit]

... for tickling my ribs at Equifax :) And what could be more of a toast than this? Zazpot (talk) 18:40, 11 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

June 2022

[edit]
Stop icon

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Both of you are edit warring. ~~ lol1VNIO (I made a mistake? talk to mecontribs) 20:38, 14 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

[edit]

Information icon Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. ~~ lol1VNIO (I made a mistake? talk to mecontribs) 21:00, 14 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your (blatant) conflict of interest

[edit]

Your obsession with a particular page, TerraCycle, and adding as much negative content to it as possible, proves under any test that you have a conflict of interest. You really ought to be booted from editing this particular page given the poor quality of your writing and your obsession over marketing, over and over again, ad nauseam, the "panorama" documentary that discusses the company for all of five minutes. 47.198.242.207 (talk) 20:09, 7 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

July 2022

[edit]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on TerraCycle. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

  1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
  2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. CNMall41 (talk) 00:54, 31 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

@CNMall41: you are deleting factual, sourced content without giving a clear reason, instead of discussing it on the talk page of the article. 81.187.88.97 (talk) 00:57, 31 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]