User talk:81.170.143.64

April 2021

Hello, I'm Girth Summit. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Talk:White genocide conspiracy theory have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. GirthSummit _(blether) 05:18, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Genocide_denial. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges.

Hi, please follow the WP:BRD cycle, I reverted your addition with the linked reasons: 1. no source has been given, 2. wikipedia is not a realiable source, 3. this is original research WP:OR. Please discuss these at the talk page, instead of edit warring. Mvbaron (talk) 09:27, 22 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Mvbaron. I have already answered you on the page in question. Your reasons are invalid because: The example self-references Wikipedias strict denial of the supposed genocide of white and / or european people by claiming they are conspiracy theories or myths. I am not stating that the white genocide theory or great replacement theories are correct or true. If there is a factual error in my example, please point it out.

Hi, you have not made a section on the Genocide_denial Talk page, please revert your edit and post a new section there so that we can discuss it. --Mvbaron (talk) 09:34, 22 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No. You are welcome to make this section, otherwise I ask you to leave the page alone as your reasons are clearly erronous.

I'm starting to think you haven't even read my edit. If you have nothing more to add, please leave me alone. 81.170.143.64 (talk) 09:38, 22 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

81.170.143.64 (talk) 09:36, 22 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Genocide denial, you may be blocked from editing. NonsensicalSystem^(error?)_(.log) 09:48, 22 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I think I am making a perfectly valid point, and will keep making it until you(?) ban me. I know it wasn't going to last long anyway, and you beggars can have your echochambers to yourself after you ban me.81.170.143.64 (talk) 09:50, 22 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your additions are WP:OR and entirely unsourced. Please also read WP:NONAZIS. NonsensicalSystem^(error?)_(.log) 09:58, 22 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have read them. I am not a nazi and this is not original research. Wikipedia clearly states that theories claiming [[White genocide] are myths and conspiracy theories. Why does it not make a good example to Genocide denial? You are acting ridicilous about this denying of denial.

[[WP:NONAZIS] specifically say "This page is not an encyclopedia article, nor is it one of Wikipedia's policies or guidelines, as it has not been thoroughly vetted by the community." so how is it relevant?

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Genocide denial. DoebLoggs (talk) 10:26, 22 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 60 hours for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Acroterion (talk) 11:08, 22 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.