User talk:78.190.51.205

November 2024

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to 2000s in fashion have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see the Introduction to Wikipedia, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: 2000s in fashion was changed by 78.190.51.205 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.918651 on 2024-11-20T06:40:44+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 06:40, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia. While objective prose about beliefs, organisations, people, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. WiiUf 🐉 08:41, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

1 78.190.51.205 (talk) 08:45, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

2 78.190.51.205 (talk) 08:46, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kestrel Web Server (November 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SafariScribe was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kestrel Web Server and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 04:24, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

for things such as software development anything other than primary sources are usually unavailable and reliable sources are very limited, is it possible to make an exception for secondary sources rule since bias isn't concern as things like politics

I removed one unreliable source from stackoverflow, not sure if github that belongs to the microsoft's own repos are considered unreliable 78.190.51.205 (talk) 13:54, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, 78.190.51.205! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 04:24, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kestrel Web Server (November 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kestrel Web Server and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 14:30, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

secondary sources are not available then what to do 78.190.51.205 (talk) 14:50, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Kestrel Web Server has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Kestrel Web Server. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 14:37, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hello 78.190.51.205! The thread you created at the Teahouse, Reliable sources for a topic in software development, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.

See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk) 03:09, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.