User talk:77.134.227.100

Welcome!

Interested in becoming a regular contributor to Wikipedia? Create an account!

Your IP address, 77.134.227.100, is registered to SFR SA, France, an Internet service provider through which multiple users may connect to the Internet via proxy, so you may receive messages on this page that were not intended for you.

To have your own user pages, keep track of articles you've edited in a watchlist, and have access to a few other special features, please consider registering an account! It's fast and free.

Review contributions carefully if blocking this IP address or reverting its contributions. If a block is needed, administrators should consider a soft block using Template:Anonblock.

If you are autoblocked repeatedly, contact your Internet service provider or network administrator and request it contact Wikimedia's XFF project about enabling X-Forwarded-For HTTP headers on its proxy servers so that blocks will affect only the intended user. In response to vandalism from this IP address, abuse reports may be sent to its network administrator for investigation.

Network administrators, to monitor this IP address for vandalism, can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.

March 2020

Hello, I'm Sakiv. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Gérard Larcher have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. Thanks. Sakiv (talk) 19:40, 4 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

April 2020

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Template:Largest cities of Hungary, you may be blocked from editing. JamesHSmith6789 (talk) 01:09, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Template:Largest cities of Hungary. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. JamesHSmith6789 (talk) 01:09, 27 April 2020 (UTC) Hello, I'm Tridwoxi. I noticed that you recently removed content from Sonia Peres without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ~ Tridwoxi (talk) (contribs) 15:47, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

453/5000 Hello.

I absolutely do not want to disturb the proper functioning of Wikipedia. I want to improve the content of the articles; these are the motivations for my changes. I offer better photos and, for the largest cities of Hungary, a table similar to cleui found in articles about other countries.

My approach is absolutely not disruptive. I absolutely do not understand your aggressive attitude.

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

I noticed your recent edit to Carrie Symonds does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! Abbyjjjj96 (talk) 16:33, 10 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

May 2020

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Jill Biden, you may be blocked from editing. Amkgp (talk) 20:53, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Carla Bruni. BSMIsEditing (talk) 16:41, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

June 2020

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Brigitte Macron, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Got a smart idea^{Tell me about it📩} 16:04, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Disruptive editing, not responding to feedback

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 36 hours for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 21:34, 12 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

June 2020

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 18:21, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

September 2020

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Nobutaka Machimura. Sakiv (talk) 14:31, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hello, I'm PCN02WPS. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Katerina Sakellaropoulou, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. PCN02WPS (talk | contribs) 14:18, 24 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Karl Carstens, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Denniss (talk) 21:19, 29 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

October 2020

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Johannes Rau, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Denniss (talk) 06:41, 5 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

November 2020

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that in this edit to Quirinal Palace, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 18:34, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

December 2020

Hello, I'm Denisarona. I noticed that you recently removed content from Paolo Gentiloni without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Denisarona (talk) 13:57, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Aldo Moro, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Denisarona (talk) 14:00, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Francesco Cossiga, you may be blocked from editing. Denisarona (talk) 14:02, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Paolo Gentiloni. Denisarona (talk) 13:52, 28 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

February 2021

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Mario Draghi. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose their editing privileges on that page. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to result in loss of your editing privileges. Thank you. Ritchie92 (talk) 13:16, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Carlo Azeglio Ciampi, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. ThatIPEditor (talk) 21:28, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Welcome!

Hello! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay. You are welcome to edit anonymously; however, creating an account is free and has several benefits (for example, the ability to create pages, upload media and edit without one's IP address being visible to the public).

Create an account

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! 🌀Ae geou2🌀← talk 22:40, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

April 2021

Hello, I'm Yamaguchi先生. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Italian cuisine have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 19:53, 5 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

June 2021

Hello, I'm CycloneYoris. I noticed that you recently removed content from Nicolas Sarkozy without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. CycloneYoris ^talk! 21:35, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Brigitte Macron, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Drill it (talk) 11:56, 16 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to use disruptive, inappropriate or hard-to-read formatting, as you did at Karl Dönitz, you may be blocked from editing. There is a Wikipedia Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Stop putting small fonts in the infobox. See MOS:SMALLFONT. Binksternet (talk) 23:36, 23 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Paul von Hindenburg. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Binksternet (talk) 13:06, 24 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

July 2021

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Enrico Letta, you may be blocked from editing. I see you have already been warned about this. The guidance at MOS:SMALL tells us not to use {{small}} templates and formatting in infoboxes, as the text there is already quite small. Kindly stop adding them (and edit-warring to re-add them). — JohnFromPinckney (talk / edits) 22:34, 4 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Enrico Letta. — JohnFromPinckney (talk / edits) 23:02, 4 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Nomination of List of Italian presidents by longevity for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Italian presidents by longevity, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Italian presidents by longevity until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:03, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sebastian Kurz

Hello,

I understand you desire for consistency and it's correct that most articles on politicians feature succession boxes. However, succession boxes are only useful and interesting when they provide the reader with additional information not included in the Infobox. A succession box listening less offices than the infobox itself – as in the case of Kurz – seems clearly superfluous to me. Also, all succession boxes I've seen to date are contained within navboxes to render a compact and space-saving layout. So I don't really see why this succession box should be any different. Colonestarrice (talk) 15:43, 14 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, thank you for your message. Yes, my approach stems from a concern for consistency. The succession boxes recall the main functions performed by the personality concerned. I think that it is superfluous to mention parliamentary functions, especially as predecessors and successors do not exist in this case. The same problem applies to his role as Secretary of State for Integration. It's all very well to respect customs and that's what I wanted to do. It is better not to clutter up the article, and this is particularly true of the biographies of politicians, so that the main roles that justify the public's interest are highlighted. 18:58, 14 October 2021 (UTC)

Third opinion

I have reviewed the comments and the situation regarding this.

Response to Colonestarrice comments: The succession box is for easy navigation and visibility of the order of succession of a specific title a person can occupy. In infoboxes:
1) There is not as strong of a focus, and multiple lengths of office occupy the same space. In succession boxes multiple mandates get multiple boxes.
2) There are offices that do not have lines of succession.
Therefore, there is a distinction and a use for the reader. Succession boxes are helpful navigation. People reading them are interested in easily being able to see the offices a person occupied and who else occupied them.

Response to 77.134.227.100 comments: You are right that "Member of Parliament" does not fit a succession box. A particular representative position, yes, but not a general title. However, in looking at the edit history of the article, you have removed more than just that. For example, "Chairman of the Young People's Party" is legitimate to include, since it is in the article. You have stated "The main offices are more than sufficient". These succession boxes exist, like everything else, ultimately for readers. So if it helps the readers, things like that should be left. They were already determined to be notable enough for the Wikipedia article, so they're notable to put there, as well. In fact, if the infobox is considered too cluttered, it also might be better to move some of these offices to succession boxes, a reader of which would definitely be more interested in.

Conclusion: The succession boxes should be kept. General titles do not belong in succession boxes, but offices with a clear predecessor(s) and successor(s) do.

Pinging Colonestarrice (talk) + User:77.134.227.100
Dege31 (talk) 16:03, 15 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your opinion. If the succession box is contained within a navbox (like on every other article), I would fully support going with this suggestion. Colonestarrice (talk) 16:45, 15 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

October 2021

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in Helmut Kohl, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. See MOS:TEXTSIZE. ‑‑Neveselbert (talk · contribs · email) 19:01, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Frank-Walter Steinmeier, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. MoonlightVector^{Talk page} 14:56, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Colonestarrice (talk) 18:52, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that in this edit to Wiesław Chrzanowski, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 11:29, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

December 2021

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for making (or attempting to make) disruptive edits that repeatedly triggered the edit filter.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Amortias (T)(C) 12:37, 5 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

March 2022

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Omar Sharif, you may be blocked from editing. Binksternet (talk) 23:42, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

May 2022

Hello, I'm Wesoree. I noticed that you recently removed content from Geraldo Alckmin without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Wesoree (Talk Contribs) 17:58, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to engage in subtle vandalism by making unexplained changes to information, as you did at Portugal, you may be blocked from editing. Etriusus 16:29, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at George Papandreou. Pulpfiction621 (talk) 13:48, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Ministry of Culture (Italy)

Roman College links to a defunct school. I undid your edit. Please check your links before saving. Thank you Adakiko (talk) 09:48, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

June 2022

Hello, I'm Akalanka820. I noticed that you recently removed content from Template:Kyriakos Mitsotakis sidebar without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Please do explain in edit while removing mass content. I reverted it in good faith Akalanka820 (talk) 09:39, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Removing the order from leaders

Hello,

I'm looking over WP:MOS, and I'm not seeing where adding a person's order (as in 37th Prime Minister of Finland) is a violation. Since you're making mass changes, can you be more specific as to which section mentions this? Hey man im josh (talk) 16:36, 26 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I just found that you were incorrect in your edits. Your comments state that it is against WP:MOS to add that someone is the nth of their office position.

Per Template:Infobox officeholder, it is absolutely appropriate to state an officeholder is the nth holder of the office. Hey man im josh (talk) 16:45, 26 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

September 2022

Hello, I'm Raydann. I noticed that you recently removed content from Romano Prodi without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Raydann (talk) 14:22, 25 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

October 2022

Hello, I'm Trg5503. I noticed that you recently removed content from Bronisław Komorowski without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Trg5503 ^(talk) 16:00, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.