User talk:73.242.3.106

ATTENTION

The coronavirus panic is currently overcoming our nation (and most of the world, with the highly notable exception of Sweden). Wikipedia suppresses any attempt to stand up to it, because they are acting (as if) under the control of the media and government. This is destroying all of our lives (much more than the virus itself ever could), and is the most important thing there is to say right now. Yet Wikipedia pretends it can't be said at all, and that it's simply 'disruptive' - as free speech inherently is, if it's about anything important. Anyone that can't tolerate the truth becomes in effect a liar himself. The non-page Censorship in Wikipedia is also a lie.

September 2020

Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. I am glad to see that you are discussing a topic. However, as a general rule, talk pages such as Talk:Herd immunity are for discussion related to improving the article in specific ways based on reliable sources and the project policies and guidelines, not for general discussion about the topic or unrelated topics, or statements based on your thoughts or feelings. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. Thank you. Meters (talk) 01:12, 18 September 2020 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from using talk pages such as Talk:September 2020 Western United States wildfires for general discussion of the topic or other unrelated topics. They are for discussion related to improving the article in specific ways, based on reliable sources and the project policies and guidelines; they are not for use as a forum or chat room. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. See here for more information. Thank you. Meters (talk) 01:13, 18 September 2020 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

As can be seen this topic is still under censorship at Wikipedia. See above - as long as you don't let me tell the truth you propagate lies.

November 2020

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you use talk pages for inappropriate discussions, as you did at Talk:2020 United States presidential election. GorillaWarfare (talk) 01:25, 9 November 2020 (UTC)

Why do you thiink the truth is 'inappropriate'? Is Wikipedia really just a subsidiary of the Democrats now? Really?

You are clearly WP:NOTHERE to build an encyclopedia if all you're going to do are make accusations against editors and the encyclopedia as a whole, complain about perceived political bias, and other ephemera that's not conducive to editing. If you can't recognize what you're doing is inappropriate, we can't help you. Symmachus Auxiliarus (talk) 01:35, 9 November 2020 (UTC)

First, I've observed, and it's not hard to see, that WP:NOTFORUM is never enforced to remove opinions on the orthodox side; bias hardly has to be conscious to be bias. And I'd like to be here to help build an encyclopedia, if obstacles weren't thrown in my way.

Not a Forum is about misuse of Wikipedia pages. I remove not a forum violations without any consideration of point of view. Meters (talk) 02:16, 9 November 2020 (UTC)

If you want to explain more about this scamdemic power machine, you're welcome to tell my Talk Page your side of the truth. If not, fine. But it's relatively unregulated there, nobody needs to be bothered while trying to actually work. You can even ping likeminded editors, throw a party, wake people up. Just don't upload any hate speech, kiddie porn, trade secrets, copyrighted material or memes. InedibleHulk (talk) 06:00, 9 November 2020 (UTC)

You are one of the prime examples of the political bias I point out. There's no arguing with people like you, even if you were serious.

What did I do? Not asking to argue, just wondering. I try to be neutral here, and 95% of the time I have to fight for it, it's against leftists who think leftist opinion is factual because there's more leftist media to repeat it. If you don't want to drop by, fine. But don't lump me in with those people, please! InedibleHulk (talk) 16:11, 10 November 2020 (UTC)

I won't be taking the time to examine that claim in detail. I simply notice you (and had no specific intent against you) repeatedly expressing anti-Trump viewpoints on that same talk page, and figuring you'd never get warned for it.

I doublechecked, and the closest I see to an anti-Trump viewpoint is me clarifying that a story said he got a few thousand sketchy votes, in response to an anti-Trumper suggesting Trump made the story up. If anything, I'm anti-Biden there, reminding editors that Harris brought him this far and that claiming victory is contingent on the actual president submitting. In general, I like how few innocent people have been blown up by drones these past four years, relative to the prior fifteen, and have repeatedly called Clinton the greater evil and CNN the bigger liar on this site, in no uncertain terms. I'm skeptical about all kinds of bullshit the mainstream American press belittles and censors people for reasonably doubting. JFK, 9/11, Iraq, bin Laden, Russian interference, George Floyd, this COVID inflation. But I've never been blocked by Wikipedia for spreading truth regarding any of that, because I use the proper pages, am generally respectful to opponents and don't disrupt articles to prove a point after the first warning. You've been warned, made your point, now carry on like I have since 2012, helpfully and civilly, picking your spots instead of pulverizing any one horse into dust, eh? InedibleHulk (talk) 07:37, 12 November 2020 (UTC)

I already have with regard to you. I'm sorry if I miscontrued your point, but remember the only reason you got into this is that you came to my talk page with a message seeming to ridicule me and my viewpoint. Again, I looked over the history only cursorily and am not going to go through your whole history here to try to find what you believe. I don't like ordinary political debate, anyway, and have kept away from politics here until what happened in March could not be ignored. Now please quit bothering me here.

I was honestly intrigued, no ridicule, argument or bother intended. You seemed like you were trying to say something. But OK, that's all. InedibleHulk (talk) 13:24, 12 November 2020 (UTC)

IP, you've been ranting since March, you've been warned multiple times by various editors, you've been blocked many times (the last for three months), your blocks have had to include your talk page access, and you're at a level 4 warning again. WP:DROPTHESTICK Meters (talk) 21:11, 10 November 2020 (UTC)

Unfortunately it's not dead!

January 2021

Please refrain from attempting to make unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been disallowed by an edit filter. If you would like to experiment, please use the the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. CLCStudent (talk) 23:52, 20 January 2021 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

July 2022

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Wikipedia:Sandbox. Nythar^T.C 21:32, 14 July 2022 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

---