Jump to content

User talk:62.252.205.73

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

July 2019

[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Bang Bang (will.i.am song) has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 10:13, 14 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Jay Leno, you may be blocked from editing. GirthSummit (blether) 10:16, 14 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

March 2020

[edit]

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you change genres in pages without discussion or sources, as you did at A No No. Binksternet (talk) 16:17, 9 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

March 2022

[edit]

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you change genres in pages without discussion or sources, as you did at M People. Binksternet (talk) 06:34, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to change genres without discussion or sources, as you did at Dawn FM, you may be blocked from editing. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 07:52, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Stop changing genres, we already have a discussion at the article's talk page regarding the genre of the album. If you keep changing genres without discussion, you be blocked from editing. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 08:07, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

[edit]
Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:MariaJaydHicky per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/MariaJaydHicky. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  firefly ( t · c ) 09:58, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

December 2023

[edit]

Stop icon Do not use multiple IP addresses to disrupt Wikipedia, like you did at I Don't Wanna Cry. Such attempts to avoid detection, circumvent policies or evade blocks or sanctions will not succeed. You are welcome to contribute constructively to Wikipedia, but your recent edits have been reverted or removed. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Block evasion by User:MariaJaydHicky. Binksternet (talk) 18:04, 17 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock request

[edit]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

62.252.205.73 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Please can I be unblocked. Thanks 62.252.205.73 (talk) 12:20, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

  • the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
  • the block is no longer necessary because you:
    1. understand what you have been blocked for,
    2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
    3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. 331dot (talk) 12:34, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblock request

[edit]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

62.252.205.73 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Thankyou for taking the time to review this block. Unfortunately I can't comment on the reasons for the block as I have not edited before from this addressso am unfamiliar with the behaviour that lead to the block. What would you suggest I do? 62.252.205.73 (talk) 12:53, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

In that case, you are free to edit but must sign in to your account. If you don't have an account, WP:ACC is available to you. Yamla (talk) 09:17, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=User_talk:62.252.205.73&oldid=1242336160"