User talk:62.121.129.170

Welcome!

Hello! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay. You are welcome to edit anonymously; however, creating an account is free and has several benefits (for example, the ability to create pages, upload media and edit without one's IP address being visible to the public).

Create an account

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Randykitty (talk) 10:25, 3 September 2023 (UTC)

September 2023

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for block evasion.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Aoidh (talk) 02:57, 4 September 2023 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

62.121.129.170 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I've been accused on truly absurd grounds of "long term abuse", by an editor who I've certainly never had any previous dealings with. They make their accusation because of # "abrasive edit summaries" #: their own edit summaries are far more than abrasive - calling someone an incredible asshole is a gross violation of WP:NPA. # very focused on removing adjectives like "famous", "prominent", etc., #: See WP:NPOV, WP:WTW. If you actually find it suspicious that someone would edit in a way that is consistent with guidelines and policies, you've really got very serious problems. # geolocates to Poland #: since when was that a cause for concern to anyone? Racist much? As a result of this extraordinary report, I've been blocked, and another editor has taken it upon themselves to undo every single edit I made, restoring incorrect grammar, false claims, policy and guideline violations, and literal nonsense to articles. That is an act of wanton vandalism. There is no other way to describe it. Unless, of course, you feel that readers of the encyclopaedia are actually better served by nonsense text that coherent English? So to reiterate, you have blocked me for # editing in accordance with policies and guidelines # allegedly being "abrasive", even though the person who felt this way has no qualms about calling someone "an incredible asshole" # being from Poland. You should undo this preposterous block. You should reassess very carefully the thought process that led you to apply it. And you should undo the wanton vandalism perpetrated by the user who undid all of my clear, obvious improvements to articles. 62.121.129.170 (talk) 16:26, 4 September 2023 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Removing talk page access. This is clearly BKFIP. RickinBaltimore (talk) 16:59, 4 September 2023 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

---