Jump to content

User talk:60.241.84.63

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Your submission at Articles for creation: 2023 Cajon Pass runaway train (September 16)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Gorden 2211 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Gorden 2211 (talk) 00:04, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I realized it was a work in progress. 60.241.84.63 (talk) 21:07, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, 60.241.84.63! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Gorden 2211 (talk) 00:04, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Southern Pacific 4404 (September 18)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ca was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Ca talk to me! 12:04, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Did you mean by mentioning one in the further reading? because I was trying to make the citations work properly if Southern Pacific 4404 could get past the AfC submissions. And the reason I am asking this is because I am confused if you meant by the further reading or if you want me to search for more references on the locomotive. 60.241.84.63 (talk) 21:06, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
By the sounds of that, it is very close, all it needs is more references that suit it good and then BANG!. It will get FREEDOM! 220.240.166.58 (talk) 01:01, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Southern Pacific 5239 (September 19)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Trainsandotherthings was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Trainsandotherthings (talk) 01:54, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Western Rail Inc. (September 19)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Trainsandotherthings was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Trainsandotherthings (talk) 01:58, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Southern Pacific 5472 (September 19)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Trainsandotherthings was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Trainsandotherthings (talk) 02:03, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Norfolk and Western 2174 (September 19)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Trainsandotherthings was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Trainsandotherthings (talk) 23:55, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Chicago and North Western 7009 has a new comment

[edit]
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Chicago and North Western 7009. Thanks! Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 18:57, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Chicago and North Western 7009 has been accepted

[edit]
Chicago and North Western 7009, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You may wish to consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 18:57, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Southern Pacific 5472 for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Southern Pacific 5472 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Southern Pacific 5472 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Pi.1415926535 (talk) 06:24, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Union Pacific 3967 for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Union Pacific 3967, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Union Pacific 3967 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:04, 6 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, 60.241.84.63. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "2023 Cajon Pass runaway train".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. plicit 14:05, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Chicago and North Western 7009 for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Chicago and North Western 7009 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chicago and North Western 7009 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

TarnishedPathtalk 09:40, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]