User talk:3 s h a r d u l 3
June 2020
[edit]Hello, I'm Binksternet. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Fourth wall, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Binksternet (talk) 06:58, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
July 2020
[edit]Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Kevin De Bruyne. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.
- If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
- If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 14:53, 20 July 2020 (UTC)
August 2020
[edit]Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Ayodhya dispute, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. — kashmīrī TALK 09:18, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Burhan Wani. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. — kashmīrī TALK 09:19, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
Controversial topic area alert
[edit]This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
— Newslinger talk 09:18, 11 October 2020 (UTC)
October 2020
[edit]Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at Hindutva, you may be blocked from editing. — Newslinger talk 09:19, 11 October 2020 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Burhan Wani. — kashmīrī TALK 09:38, 11 October 2020 (UTC)
Notification: Blocked
[edit]{{unblock|your reason here}}
below. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 10:44, 13 October 2020 (UTC)Welcome!
[edit]
|
Discretionary sanctions notification
[edit]This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
FDW777 (talk) 11:49, 31 October 2020 (UTC)
November 2020
[edit]Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to List of states with nuclear weapons, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. ‐‐1997kB (talk) 08:11, 2 November 2020 (UTC)
November 2020
[edit]Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to RationalWiki has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
- ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
- For help, take a look at the introduction.
- The following is the log entry regarding this message: RationalWiki was changed by 3 s h a r d u l 3 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.884255 on 2020-11-10T18:14:50+00:00
Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 18:14, 10 November 2020 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Satya Nadella, you may be blocked from editing. Schazjmd (talk) 18:58, 10 November 2020 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Aaditya Thackeray. SUN EYE 1 10:34, 13 November 2020 (UTC)
November 2020
[edit]Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Rachel Maddow has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
- ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
- For help, take a look at the introduction.
- The following is the log entry regarding this message: Rachel Maddow was changed by 3 s h a r d u l 3 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.857187 on 2020-11-18T13:56:24+00:00
Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 13:56, 18 November 2020 (UTC)
Discretionary sanctions notification
[edit]This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
Schazjmd (talk) 15:21, 18 November 2020 (UTC)
November 2020
[edit]{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 19:02, 18 November 2020 (UTC)