Jump to content

User talk:3PPYB6/Archives/2021

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
You are currently viewing an archive of messages on 3PPYB6's talk page from 2021.

Please do not edit this page. It is only for historical reference.

If you are seeking to revive a discussion here, copy-paste the discussion onto my talk page.

Thank you. — 3PPYB6 — TALK — CONTRIBS — 02:53, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

[edit]

Hi 3PPYB6! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! Pahunkat (talk) 18:19, 11 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

RedWarn configuration file protection

[edit]

Hi 3PPYB6, I saw this at WP:RFPP and was about to respond when I saw it had been self-reverted. In any case, I wanted to let you know that JavaScript files that are subpages of your user page, like your RedWarn configuration, are automatically protected per WP:PPINDEF so that no one but you and interface administrators can edit them. The latter are very well-trusted editors and they won't edit your config files unless absolutely necessary. If you already knew that and were just testing RedWarn out, then feel free to disregard. Happy editing! clpo13(talk) 23:02, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, it seems pretty unreasonable to add a protection request randomly, and out of the blue. Since I just installed RedWarn several minutes ago, I didn’t really know what to do. :P Thanks for letting me know about this. 3PPYB6 (talk) 23:05, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red

[edit]

Hi there, 3PPYB6, and welcome to Women in Red. It's good to hear you intend to help us chip away at the gender gap. You can find advice on how to draft women's biographies at Ten Simple Rules and Primer for creating women's biographies. Given your interest in foreign languages, you might find some interesting women to write about by looking through our Redlist index. Please let me know if you run into any difficulties or need assistance. Happy editing!--Ipigott (talk) 07:29, 11 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Derek Chauvin mugshot (June 2021).jpeg

[edit]
⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Derek Chauvin mugshot (June 2021).jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:19, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Amalie Wolff-Malcolmi (November 13)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Theroadislong (talk) 15:30, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, 3PPYB6! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 15:30, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
There is an existing article on the German Wikipedia that only cites one source. But, yes, I was fully prepared for this decline of the submission. Thanks, Theroadislong, for pointing out these mistakes. — 3PPYB6 — TALK — CONTRIBS — SANDBOXES — LOGS — 17:10, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

TROUTED

[edit]

Whack!

You've been whacked with a wet trout.

Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that you did something silly.

You have been trouted for placing stuff that clearly isn’t an edit war on WP:ANI. — 3PPYB6 — TALK — CONTRIBS — SANDBOXES — LOGS — 14:25, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ooh… boy… I really have to simmer down… — 3PPYB6 — TALK — CONTRIBS — SANDBOXES — LOGS — 14:32, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

December 2021 at Women in Red

[edit]
Women in Red | December 2021, Volume 7, Issue 12, Numbers 184, 188, 210, 214, 215, 216


Online events:


See also:


Other ways to participate:

Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Innisfree987 (talk) 00:10, 27 November 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Some advice for the anti vandal

[edit]

1. You don't need to give 4 individual warnings before reporting an account/IP. Giving 2/3 is usually enough.

2. You can report those accounts/IPs at AIV, and I see you're using RedWarn, just click on the 3 dots while on their talk page.

3. 3RR does not apply while reverting obvious vandalism. – AssumeGoodWraith (talk | contribs) 01:51, 7 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I also have a recent changes filter that makes it easier: here – AssumeGoodWraith (talk | contribs) 01:52, 7 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for the late reply, but thank you, @AssumeGoodWraith. I’ll bear this in mind when reverting vandalism. Thank you. — 3PPYB6 — TALK — CONTRIBS — SANDBOXES — LOGS — 15:51, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Rollback granted

[edit]

Hi 3PPYB6. After reviewing your request, I have temporarily enabled rollback on your account until 2022-01-10. Keep in mind these things when using rollback:

  • Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
  • Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
  • Rollback should never be used to edit war.
  • If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
  • Use common sense.

If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:Administrators' guide/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into trouble or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! -- TNT (talk • she/they) 00:41, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Just a note I was on the edge of not granting rollback due to some minor areas of concern (see above for example) - please work slowly and carefully, and don't be afraid to ask for help -- TNT (talk • she/they) 00:43, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Alright, @TheresNoTime! I’ll see what I do in the next month with rollbacking, and if I feel as though I’m worthy enough, I’ll re-apply when the right expires. — 3PPYB6 — TALK — CONTRIBS — SANDBOXES — LOGS — 00:43, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@TheresNoTime:
Just a note: I felt quite skeptical applying in the first place, due to violating WP:0RR and possibly WP:1RR. But, after checking some comments at WP:TEA, I was convinced to apply. Also, the IP in which I (nearly) edit-warred with was in fact an open proxy… I should trout myself for the trout above… — 3PPYB6 — TALK — CONTRIBS — SANDBOXES — LOGS — 00:46, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Sounds good to me, we're all always learning - I believe in giving everyone a chance regardless Feel free to ping me/leave me a talk page message in a few weeks and I'll extend it -- TNT (talk • she/they) 00:48, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@TheresNoTime — Hopefully you don’t mind this, but I would like you to review my contributions using rollback. If you feel as though I’m worthy of an extension, you can grant it, otherwise, you can let it expire, or even revoke it. Thank you. — 3PPYB6 — TALK — CONTRIBS — 15:19, 7 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hey I've extended your rollback permissions indefinitely - it will no longer expire. Keep up the good work! -- TNT (talk • she/her) 03:03, 9 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@TheresNoTime — Thanks! I’ll use this to continue to be a valued asset to this project. Again, thank you! — 3PPYB6 — TALK — CONTRIBS — 03:10, 9 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Double warnings

[edit]

Hiya there, 3PPYB6! RedWarn developer here. I was alerted by TheresNoTime at the Wikimedia Discord about your double warnings, and thought that I should give you a heads up about it. You currently have your rollback completion action set to warn a user automatically after reverting, which already files the warning for you. This means you no longer need to manually put in another warning using the "Warn User" button. To change this, find "Once a rollback is complete..." in your RedWarn preferences, and set this to whatever action you wish to perform (or "Let me choose", as I've set with mine so that I can customize my warnings). Hope this helps! Chlod (say hi!) 14:48, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Chlod: Silly me… I’ll have to customize my settings later… feel free to press the emergency slap button on my user page. :P — 3PPYB6 — TALK — CONTRIBS — SANDBOXES — LOGS — 14:52, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Survey about History on Wikipedia (If you are resident in the United States)

[edit]

I am Petros Apostolopoulos, a Ph.D. candidate in Public History at North Carolina State University. My Ph.D. project examines how historical knowledge is produced on Wikipedia. You must be 18 years of age or older, reside in the United States to participate in this study. If you are interested in participating in my research study by offering your own experience of writing about history on Wikipedia, you can click on this link https://ncsu.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_9z4wmR1cIp0qBH8. There are minimal risks involved in this research.

If you have any questions, please let me know. Petros Apostolopoulos, paposto@ncsu.edu Apolo1991 (talk) 17:52, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Apolo1991:
Sorry for the late reply, but I’m going to decline this opportunity. Hope you understand… — 3PPYB6 — TALK — CONTRIBS — SANDBOXES — LOGS — 17:01, 16 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Trouted

[edit]

Whack!

You've been whacked with a wet trout.

Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that you did something silly.

You have been trouted for having a COMPLETELY NONSENSE SIGNATURE. Thank YOU. — 3PPYB6 — TALK — CONTRIBS — 16:50, 18 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Jack Ninte - Record Producer for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jack Ninte - Record Producer is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jack Ninte - Record Producer until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

DMySon (talk) 13:00, 19 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@DMySon:
I wasn’t the one who created this article, but you should see my thoughts on the deletion discussion page. Thank you. — 3PPYB6 — TALK — CONTRIBS — 13:10, 19 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

WHALED

[edit]


Smash!

You've been squished by a whale!
Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know you did something really silly.

You have been squished because YOU EDITED AN ARTICLE THAT WAS A COPYVIO!! — 3PPYB6 — TALK — CONTRIBS — 16:55, 19 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Trouted

[edit]

Whack!

You've been whacked with a wet trout.

Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that you did something silly.

You have been trouted for NOT GIVING ANYONE THE CHANCE TO EDIT THEMSELVES! — 3PPYB6 — TALK — CONTRIBS — 13:28, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

… I should take a wikibreak… — 3PPYB6 — TALK — CONTRIBS — 13:30, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

January 2022 Women in Red

[edit]
Happy New Year from Women in Red Jan 2022, Vol 8, Issue 1, Nos 214, 216, 217, 218, 219


Online events:


Other ways to participate:

  • Encourage someone to become a WiR member this month.
Go to Women in RedJoin WikiProject Women in Red

Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:01, 28 December 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Happy New Year!

[edit]
3PPYB6,
Thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia, and a Happy New Year to you and yours! CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 21:28, 31 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
– Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year}} to user talk pages.
@CAPTAIN RAJU — The same to you, too! Wishing you a happy and safe 2022! — 3PPYB6 — TALK — CONTRIBS — 21:31, 31 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=User_talk:3PPYB6/Archives/2021&oldid=1159806210"