Jump to content

User talk:2PeterElls

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Testing (Peter Ells (talk) 22:39, 2 January 2014 (UTC))[reply]

TSC

[edit]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Toward a Science of Consciousness

Real name policy

[edit]

Hello, you have made changes to the Panpsychism article and have created Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Toward a Science of Consciousness. These and other factors, together with your username 2PeterElls, suggest that you are purportedly Peter Ells, author of Panpsychism and former participant of the Toward a Science of Consciousness conference.

Wikipedia has a policy, called the WP:REALNAME policy, which aims to protect notable individuals from being impersonated on Wikipedia. Current circumstances at Wikipedia point to a significant risk of such an impersonation. Please familiarize yourself with the WP:REALNAME policy and follow it as you see fit. We apologize for the inconvenience. Thank you. vzaak 22:59, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Vzaak:, Thank you for alerting me to this. I am indeed the author of Panpsychism and have given short talks at concurrent sessions of Toward a Science of Consciousness conferences. I do not consider myself to be a notable person (I hold an MA in philosophy). The conference itself is prestigious however, and the plenary speakers are top names in the field. The only change to the Panpsychism page was to correct the spelling of my name (from 'Peters' to 'Peter'), which I hope is not controversial. Regards, (Peter Ells (talk) 23:40, 6 January 2014 (UTC))[reply]
Hello, you have self-identified as a specific individual (whether notable or not) and are therefore required to fulfill the WP:REALNAME policy. Thanks, and apologies again for the inconvenience. vzaak 00:22, 7 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
@Vzaak:, Do you mean I have to email the address on WP:REALNAME to prove who I say I am? (Peter Ells (talk) 00:34, 7 January 2014 (UTC))[reply]
You may use the email method to confirm your identity, or you may use the link-to-here method as described in WP:REALNAME. Best, vzaak 00:49, 7 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
@Vzaak:, Will do (Peter Ells (talk) 00:58, 7 January 2014 (UTC))[reply]
@Vzaak: User:2PeterElls has successfully identified to OTRS as Peter Ells. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 19:09, 7 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Toward a Science of Consciousness (January 6)

[edit]
Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! DES (talk) 23:25, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Teahouse logo
Hello! 2PeterElls, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!

I've resubmitted this page after significant editing (Peter Ells (talk) 12:36, 27 January 2014 (UTC))[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Draft:Toward a Science of Consciousness (March 4)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Thank you for your
contributions to Wikipedia!
  • Please remember to link to the submission!
Kevin Rutherford (talk) 00:47, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Toward a Science of Consciousness, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Biennially, John Horgan and ASSC (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 5 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

(test) The Signpost: 05 March 2014

[edit]

The Signpost: 12 March 2014

[edit]

The Signpost: 19 March 2014

[edit]

The Signpost: 26 March 2014

[edit]

The Signpost: 02 April 2014

[edit]

The Signpost: 09 April 2014

[edit]

The Signpost: 23 April 2014

[edit]

The Signpost: 30 April 2014

[edit]

May 2014

[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Stuart Hameroff may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • meeting in 1994 that brought together approximately 300 people interested in consciousness studies (e.g., [[David Chalmers]], [[Christof Koch]], [[Bernard Baars]], [[Roger Penrose]], [[Benjamin Libet]

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 13:44, 4 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 07 May 2014

[edit]

The Signpost: 14 May 2014

[edit]

The Signpost: 21 May 2014

[edit]

The Signpost: 28 May 2014

[edit]

The Signpost: 04 June 2014

[edit]

The Signpost: 11 June 2014

[edit]

The Signpost: 18 June 2014

[edit]

The Signpost: 25 June 2014

[edit]

The Signpost: 02 July 2014

[edit]

The Signpost: 09 July 2014

[edit]

Your draft article, User:2PeterElls/sandbox

[edit]

Hello 2PeterElls. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "sandbox".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|User:2PeterElls/sandbox}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save page", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 20:21, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 16 July 2014

[edit]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Portrait of Elena Ene D-Vasilescu.jpg

[edit]

A tag has been placed on File:Portrait of Elena Ene D-Vasilescu.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 02:23, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Elena Ene D-Vasilescu for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Elena Ene D-Vasilescu is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elena Ene D-Vasilescu until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. buidhe 19:24, 3 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Elena Ene D-Vasilescu.jpg

[edit]
Notice

The file File:Elena Ene D-Vasilescu.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused and low quality

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ixfd64 (talk) 19:38, 16 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=User_talk:2PeterElls&oldid=1060641562"