User talk:2A02:8084:6021:AD80:7C11:74A8:FDB3:7AB9

Welcome!

Hi 2A02:8084:6021:AD80:7C11:74A8:FDB3:7AB9! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! Love of Corey (talk) 18:55, 15 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

October 2021

Hello, I'm Love of Corey. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Killing of David Amess have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. Love of Corey (talk) 18:55, 15 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Editors are expected to treat each other with respect and civility. On this encyclopedia project, editors assume good faith while interacting with other editors, which you did not appear to do at Talk:Killing of David Amess. Here is Wikipedia's welcome page, and it is hoped that you will assume the good faith of other editors and continue to help us improve Wikipedia! Thank you very much! Love of Corey (talk) 18:57, 15 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If I had assumed bad faith I would have reverted your edit, as you did mine. This goes both ways: when someone writes something that is true, and properly cited, the onus is on yourself to argue the point. You invite debate (in a revert of an edit no less), but your position is not actually logically consistent. While I am on the fence about whether the nationality has undue weight for the lede, censoring it altogether from the article is harder to defend. One cannot infer motive from nationality, but the same can be equally said of sex or age. Either demographics are okay to be reported or they are not, anything else smacks of bad faith.

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.