Jump to content

User talk:2603:6080:604:9299:491D:2C8F:F0D:19B

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Your recent AfC submissions

[edit]

Hi; I've noticed your interest in writing drafts on astronomical objects. I just want to make sure you're aware, but Wikipedia has specific guidelines on what articles we have on astronomical objects: Wikipedia:Notability (astronomical objects). Please do not submit drafts without providing WP:SECONDARY sources that demonstrate it meets those guidelines. Perryprog (talk) 01:47, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: NGC 5582 (February 6)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Perryprog were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Perryprog (talk) 01:52, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, 2603:6080:604:9299:491D:2C8F:F0D:19B! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Perryprog (talk) 01:52, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: NGC 5582 (February 6)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by MarioJump83 were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
MarioJump83! 04:17, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: NGC 5546 (February 7)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Perryprog were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Perryprog (talk) 17:27, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: NGC 3608 (February 7)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Perryprog were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Perryprog (talk) 17:39, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

February 2021

[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Draft:NGC 5582, you may be blocked from editing. Perryprog (talk) 17:51, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. JavaHurricane 05:09, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: NGC 5582 (February 7)

[edit]
Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Perryprog was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Rejecting. Has been repeatedly resubmitted with no improvement despite multiple notices across multiple drafts that secondary sources are necessary to meet WP:NASTRO.
Perryprog (talk) 18:15, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: NGC 3902 has been accepted

[edit]
NGC 3902, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You may wish to consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Theroadislong (talk) 21:58, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: NGC 5582 (February 8)

[edit]
Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by JavaHurricane was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: This draft has been resubmitted after a rejection. Please do not resubmit this draft. It will not be considered again. Any further submissions will be regarded as disruptive editing and the draft may be nominated for deletion.
JavaHurricane 05:02, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]