User talk:2409:40D4:2006:9F21:4974:DC65:BE4D:B05A

October 2024

Hi 2409:40D4:2006:9F21:4974:DC65:BE4D:B05A! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of Rajpurohit several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree at Talk:Rajpurohit, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. AntiDionysius (talk) 15:52, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Sir/ Ma'am @AntiDionysius

There is this person @vedant katyayan with a couple of different ip addresses and he is trying to erase the history of Rajpurohits which has been well researched, cited and referenced. He has vested interests and malice intentions behind the same. He is negating all the facts and sources of reputed historians and is continuously whitewashing his point of view in order to defame our caste as well as ancestors. He has done the same with CHARANS earlier and now he is doing with RAJPUROHITS. Its my sincere request to kindly block and debar him. 2409:40D4:2006:9F21:4974:DC65:BE4D:B05A (talk) 16:02, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I don't have blocking power and I have frankly no idea who's right or wrong in the content dispute - and I don't care, because you're not allowed to edit war even if you're right. Please stop reverting the article. Others will also be asked to stop reverting the article. Then go to the talk page and work it out via discussion. AntiDionysius (talk) 16:04, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you have solid reason to believe someone is in fact using multiple accounts or IP addresses, you can make a report at WP:SPI. AntiDionysius (talk) 16:05, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 16:12, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

2409:40D4:2006:9F21:4974:DC65:BE4D:B05A (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Either there is a single person with multiple ip addresses or there is a some people with malice intentions who are trying to defame RAJPUROHIT caste and its legendary warriors. They are deleting all the matter all the crucial matter and whitewashing their vested interests and basically manipulating the history. I myself being a Rajpurohit have researched and studied well about history of Rajpurohits. I assure that the information which was there earlier were absolutely correct and there are even references which these people are erasing. I am dejected as my caste, my ancestors, their legacy is misrepresented and I am unable to do anything. Kindly unblock and if possible give me powers of admin of the page so that it can be secured and no one in future can edit it as per their vested interests.

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you:
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 16:23, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to ', a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practices;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures, you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.