Jump to content

User talk:198.188.60.205

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

November 2011

[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Choking, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. TJRC (talk) 21:36, 14 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Natural resource with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Wknight94 talk 22:20, 14 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

December 2011

[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to History of the United Arab Emirates, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Shuipzv3 (talk) 22:11, 5 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Jona Weinhofen, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. The reverted edit can be found here. nprice (talk) 19:56, 9 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Jona Weinhofen with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Wikipelli Talk 19:58, 9 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

December 2011

[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Ethanol, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

  • Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
  • ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place "{{helpme}}" on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Ethanol was changed by 198.188.60.205 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.96177 on 2011-12-13T21:23:39+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 21:23, 13 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Ethanol. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. The reverted edit can be found here. --some jerk on the Internet (talk) 21:29, 13 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Flunitrazepam, you may be blocked from editing. The reverted edit can be found here. --some jerk on the Internet (talk) 21:31, 13 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Ethanol, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. The reverted edit can be found here. --some jerk on the Internet (talk) 21:32, 13 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]


You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. -- Ed (Edgar181) 21:54, 13 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Louise Nevelson. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --Kbh3rdtalk 02:28, 24 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

January 2012

[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Big L, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

  • Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
  • ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place "{{helpme}}" on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Big L was changed by 198.188.60.205 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.891328 on 2012-01-09T21:50:46+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 21:51, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Tobacco. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. The reverted edit can be found here. Glacialfox (talk) 18:46, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

January 2012

[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Bell Gardens High School, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Jona Weinhofen. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

January 2012

[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Martin Luther King, Jr. Day, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Please do not add or significantly change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did with this edit to Martin Luther King, Jr. Day. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Jim1138 (talk) 00:30, 21 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

January 2012

[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Evan Hunter, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Chicago Fire Soccer Club with this edit, even if you intend to fix them later. Such edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you.  Velella  Velella Talk   20:10, 23 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Bridge with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. Mark91it's my world 22:27, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

January 2012

[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Saybrook University, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

February 2013

[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Hello, I'm Excirial. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to Antonín Dvořák, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, Excirial (Contact me,Contribs) 21:12, 26 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Eos. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

  • If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
  • ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place "{{helpme}}" on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Eos was changed by 198.188.60.205 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.963539 on 2013-02-27T22:52:39+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 22:52, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I believe that you may have inadvertently submitted a test edit in an active article. Please use your sandbox if you would like to experience, or let me know if I am mistaken or you have any questions! Thank you, and happy editing Jackson Peebles (talk) 17:53, 19 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

March 2013

[edit]

Hello, I'm Lugia2453. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to Central Intelligence Agency, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, Lugia2453 (talk) 20:32, 19 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Central Intelligence Agency with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Lugia2453 (talk) 20:48, 19 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Montebello High School, you may be blocked from editing. – S. Rich (talk) 01:00, 21 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at White House Chief of Staff, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. – S. Rich (talk) 01:01, 21 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

April 2013

[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Schurr High School with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Funnyfarmofdoom (talk to me) 17:33, 8 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Schurr High School with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. DVdm (talk) 17:35, 8 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Amanda Brown (singer). —DerHexer (Talk) 20:30, 8 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  Floquenbeam (talk) 22:21, 8 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

April 2019

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Adam9007. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Vera Rubin— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Adam9007 (talk) 17:59, 26 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]