User talk:188.23.179.183

October 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Talk:Hassan Nasrallah, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. The reverted edit can be found here. Thank you. Gfoley4 | Wanna chat? 01:53, 14 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page Talk:Hassan Nasrallah. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Sven Manguard _Talk 02:02, 14 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Zain Verjee. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Sven Manguard _Talk 02:05, 14 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Zain Verjee

Regarding this article... since the article is about a living person, it falls under the Biographies of Living People policies on Wikipedia. Under BLP, articles have significantly stricter rules regarding edits that may be untrue, biased, or libelous. In your edit summary recently (diff), you wrote, "rvv everything is a fact here do a google search for yourself , wiki refuses to show the facts". First of all, since this is a BLP, all claims must be reliably sourced. I should not have to perform Google searches myself to confirm your edits. Please provide relevant and appropriate sources for the facts that you claim. In addition, Wikipedia is a work in progress, and therefore reaches consensus on issues based on edits and reversions. If you look closely at the revert I made, I didn't just remove everything that you added. I've kept some pieces that I thought were okay and were cited either in-line or in another part of the article.

Look, I've done a Google search, and I can't come up with anything that substantiates your claims. I'm not claiming that I'm the best researcher out there, and if you point me in the direction of some reliable sources, I will gladly take them into consideration. However, everything I've read so far points to the fact that you are incorrect on multiple claims, including her religion and origin. Again, this is a biography of a living person and extreme care must be taken when making contentious edits. Please discuss these issues further on the article's talk page. Thanks for taking the time to read this message. Amit ► 03:38, 14 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is the final warning that you will receive regarding your disruptive edits, such as this edit you made to Talk:Barack Obama. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing without further notice. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 08:02, 14 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is the final warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits.

The next time you make a personal attack, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 ^{> haneʼ} 08:05, 14 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 days for attempting to harass other users. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|Your reason here}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. 7 08:06, 14 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

188.23.179.183 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

[no unblock reason given]

Decline reason:

Please provide a reason why you should be unblocked. Favonian (talk) 08:25, 14 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.