User talk:15amoryblaine

Welcome

Hi! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Some other site policies and guidelines you may find useful

"Truth" is not the criteria for inclusion, verifiability is.
We do not publish original thought nor original research. We merely summarize reliable sources without elaboration or interpretation.
Reliable sources typically include: articles from magazines or newspapers (particularly scholarly journals), or books by recognized authors (basically, books by respected publishers). Online versions of these are usually accepted, provided they're held to the same standards. User generated sources (like Wikipedia) are to be avoided. Self-published sources should be avoided except for information by and about the subject that is not self-serving (for example, citing a company's website to establish something like year of establishment).
Articles are to be written from a neutral point of view. Wikipedia is not concerned with facts or opinions, it just summarizes reliable sources. This usually means that secular academia is given prominence over any individual sect's doctrines, though those doctrines may be discussed in an appropriate section that clearly labels those beliefs for what they are.

Reformulated:

"Truth" is not the only criteria for inclusion, verifiability is also required.
Always cite a source for any new information. When adding this information to articles, use <ref>reference tags like this</ref>, containing the name of the source, the author, page number, publisher or web address (if applicable).
We do not publish original thought nor original research. We're not a blog, we're not here to promote any ideology.
A subject is considered notable if it has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject.
Reliable sources typically include: articles from magazines or newspapers (particularly scholarly journals), or books by recognized authors (basically, books by respected publishers). Online versions of these are usually accepted, provided they're held to the same standards. User generated sources (like Wikipedia) are to be avoided. Self-published sources should be avoided except for information by and about the subject that is not self-serving (for example, citing a company's website to establish something like year of establishment).
Articles are to be written from a neutral point of view. Wikipedia is not concerned with facts or opinions, it just summarizes reliable sources. Real scholarship actually does not say what understanding of the world is "true," but only with what there is evidence for. In the case of science, this evidence must ultimately start with physical evidence. In the case of religion, this means only reporting what has been written and not taking any stance on doctrine.
Material must be proportionate to what is found in the source cited. If a source makes a small claim and presents two larger counter claims, the material it supports should present one claim and two counter claims instead of presenting the one claim as extremely large while excluding or downplaying the counter claims.
We do not give equal validity to topics which reject and are rejected by mainstream academia. For example, our article on Earth does not pretend it is flat, hollow, and/or the center of the universe.

Also, not a policy or guideline, but something important to understand the above policies and guidelines: Wikipedia operates off of objective information, which is information that multiple persons can examine and agree upon. It does not include subjective information, which only an individual can know from an "inner" or personal experience. Most religious beliefs fall under subjective information. Wikipedia may document objective statements about notable subjective claims (i.e. "Christians believe Jesus is divine"), but it does not pretend that subjective statements are objective, and will expose false statements masquerading as subjective beliefs (cf. Indigo children).

You may also want to read User:Ian.thomson/ChristianityAndNPOV. We at Wikipedia are highbrow (snobby), heavily biased for the academia.

Wikipedia is an encyclopedia. All we do here is cite, summarize, and paraphrase professionally-published mainstream academic or journalistic sources, without addition, nor commentary. We're not a directory, nor a forum, nor a place for you to "spread the word".

If<ref>I'm not saying that you do, but if...</ref> you are here to promote pseudoscience, extremism, fundamentalism or conspiracy theories, we're not interested in what you have to say.

Happy Editing! OgamD218 (talk) 17:46, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Old W&M alumni graduation years

I wanted to check with you before reverting this edit you made. Where did you get the sources for those graduation years? SportsGuy789 (talk) 04:20, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi SportsGuy789, I got them from this book that I found in the Swem Library at W&M. <ref>{{cite book |last1=College of William & Mary |title=A PROVISIONAL LIST OF ALUMNL GRAMMAR SCHOOL STUDENTS, MEMBERS OF THE FACULTY, AND MEMBERS OF THE BOARD OF VISITORS OF THE COLLEGE OF WILLIAM AND MARY IN VIRGINIA. FROM 1693 TO 1888 |url=https://digitalarchive.wm.edu/handle/10288/13856 |access-date=17 February 2022}}</ref> 15amoryblaine (talk) 12:35, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Awesome thanks! I just fixed some formatting on those entries and added the reference. SportsGuy789 (talk) 18:51, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Phi Beta Kappa chapter numbers

The field was left blank since no source was available that those particular numbers were assigned to those particular numbers. The other numbers are reference. Please provide references that (for example) Washington and Jefferson was chapter 123.Naraht (talk) 12:47, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

PA Superior Court

Hi, thanks for updating the Superior Court page, but do you have a source that Judges Lane/Beck took office today? VietPride10 (talk) 23:14, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, my mistake about that. It turns out that Judge Beck was sworn on January 5 while Judge Lane was sworn on January 18. I will make the edits and link sources promptly. 15amoryblaine (talk) 02:06, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]