Jump to content

User talk:131.247.244.234

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

February 2008

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Brain, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. (EhJJ) 23:26, 6 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

September 2008

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Taurus (astrology). When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --Nathanael Bar-Aur L. (talk) 01:50, 14 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Taurus (astrology), without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. --Nathanael Bar-Aur L. (talk) 05:41, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or delete portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to Taurus (astrology), you will be blocked from editing. --Nathanael Bar-Aur L. (talk) 03:58, 20 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is your 4th warning for your disruption to the taurus article. Use the talk page to discuss further changes to the article. — Realist2 19:35, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Aphrodite

[edit]

Aphrodite was a Greek goddess, therefore female, so to refer to a man as an Aphrodite is silly and incorrect. By the way, I am a woman and I added the description that you said was sexist. That's rich considering that I'm a feminist. Who said a feminist cannot recognise and acknowledge feminine beauty?--jeanne (talk) 05:59, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I know very well who Aphrodite is, and I think the description should be removed if it cannot encompass men. This isn't about "feminine beauty," it's about acknowledging that both the men and women born under this sign (Taurus) can exhibit the same physical traits and auras. The description you've given only attributes such characteristics to women, which is completely unfair and untrue, so yes, it is indeed sexist. Whether or not you continue to change what I have assiduously rectified is your own prerogative, but it shall remain sexist, your reversions notwithstanding.

November 2008

[edit]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you delete or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. Please discuss the removal of sourced content on the article talk pageRealist2 12:30, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you delete or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. — Realist2 02:36, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Taurus (astrology). Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. Tim Vickers (talk) 03:12, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.