User talk:115.70.203.105

Welcome!

Interested in becoming a regular contributor to Wikipedia? Create an account!

Your host, 105.203.70.115.static.exetel.com.au (115.70.203.105), is registered to Exetel Broadband and may be shared by multiple users, so you might receive messages on this page that were not intended for you.

To have your own user pages, keep track of articles you've edited in a watchlist, and have access to a few other special features, please consider registering an account! It's fast and free.

If you are autoblocked repeatedly, contact your Internet service provider or network administrator and request it contact Wikimedia's XFF project about enabling X-Forwarded-For HTTP headers on its proxy servers so that blocks will affect only the intended user. Administrators: review contributions carefully if blocking this IP address or reverting its contributions. If a block is needed, consider a soft block using Template:Anonblock. In response to vandalism from this IP address, abuse reports may be sent to its network administrator for investigation.

Network administrators or other parties wishing to monitor this IP address for vandalism can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.

March 2017

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Patrick Smith (journalist) have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Materialscientist (talk) 11:28, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Recent edit to John J. Pershing

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you made a change to an article, John J. Pershing, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Materialscientist (talk) 22:49, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 23:54, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

June 2017

Hello, I'm Gulumeemee. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Scotch College, Melbourne have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Gulumeemee (talk) 05:20, 6 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

July 2017

Hello, I'm Telfordbuck. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Huaynaputina have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Telfordbuck (talk) 01:31, 25 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Timeline of Melbourne history. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 09:31, 26 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hello, I'm JJMC89. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Scotch College, Melbourne— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. — JJMC89 (T·C) 23:33, 30 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Xavier College. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. — JJMC89 (T·C) 23:45, 30 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did with this edit to Jane Hume. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 02:24, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Billy Picken. I dream of horses If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{U|I dream of horses}} to your message (talk to me) (My edits) @ 04:50, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

August 2017

To edit, please log in.

Editing by unregistered users from your shared IP address or address range may be currently disabled due to abuse. However, you are still able to edit if you sign in with an account. If you are currently blocked from creating an account, and cannot create one elsewhere in the foreseeable future, you may follow the instructions at Wikipedia:Request an account to request that volunteers create your username for you. Please use an email address issued to you by your ISP, school or organization so that we may verify that you are a legitimate user on this network. Please reference this block in the comment section of the form.

Please check on this list that the username you choose has not already been taken. We apologize for any inconvenience. —k6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 02:41, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

November 2017

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Phillis Wheatley. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. EvergreenFir (talk) 01:18, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

November 2017

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Good Luck to the Rider has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Good Luck to the Rider was changed by 115.70.203.105 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.939796 on 2017-11-15T03:03:27+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 03:03, 15 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

February 2018

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Timeline of conflict in Anglo-Saxon Britain. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. Wilfridselsey (talk) 09:25, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Byteflush. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Chinese New Year— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. byteflush _Talk 04:05, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Chinese New Year. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Chinese New Year was changed by 115.70.203.105 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.902515 on 2018-02-12T04:07:17+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 04:07, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Chinese New Year, you may be blocked from editing. byteflush _Talk 04:09, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Sulfhemoglobinemia. -Nott Nott 00:36, 26 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

To edit, please log in.

Editing by unregistered users from your shared IP address or address range may be currently disabled due to abuse. However, you are still able to edit if you sign in with an account. If you are currently blocked from creating an account, and cannot create one elsewhere in the foreseeable future, you may follow the instructions at Wikipedia:Request an account to request that volunteers create your username for you. Please use an email address issued to you by your ISP, school or organization so that we may verify that you are a legitimate user on this network. Please reference this block in the comment section of the form.

Please check on this list that the username you choose has not already been taken. We apologize for any inconvenience. -- ferret (talk) 22:24, 26 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

August 2018

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Paul Erik ^{(talk)(contribs)} 02:22, 27 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

September 2018

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Lenovo. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 01:34, 10 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

To edit, please log in.

Editing by unregistered users from your shared IP address or address range may be currently disabled due to abuse. However, you are still able to edit if you sign in with an account. If you are currently blocked from creating an account, and cannot create one elsewhere in the foreseeable future, you may follow the instructions at Wikipedia:Request an account to request that volunteers create your username for you. Please use an email address issued to you by your ISP, school or organization so that we may verify that you are a legitimate user on this network. Please reference this block in the comment section of the form.

Please check on this list that the username you choose has not already been taken. We apologize for any inconvenience. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 01:36, 10 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

October 2019

Hello, I'm Andritolion. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Craig Foster— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. andritolion (talk) 04:07, 16 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

November 2019

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Henry III of England. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. LizardJr8 (talk) 23:06, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

March 2020

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Treaty (song) has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Treaty (song) was changed by 115.70.203.105 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.901085 on 2020-03-16T23:04:57+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 23:04, 16 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Laterthanyouthink. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. Thanks. Laterthanyouthink (talk) 00:01, 17 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

September 2020

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Phillip Island has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Phillip Island was changed by 115.70.203.105 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.887808 on 2020-09-04T06:52:17+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 06:52, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

October 2020

Hello, I'm HMSLavender. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Most livable cities—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. lavender|^{(formerly HMSSolent)}|lambast 02:31, 13 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

February 2021

Hello, I'm Steve M. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Dark Souls—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Steve M (talk) 00:02, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Dark Souls. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Dylsss^{(talk contribs)} 00:05, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Dark Souls, you may be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Dark Souls was changed by 115.70.203.105 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.957668 on 2021-02-05T00:06:47+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 00:06, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

February 2022

Hello, I'm LizardJr8. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Serengeti National Park—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. LizardJr8 (talk) 04:13, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Kebab. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Philipnelson99 (talk) 04:14, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Kebab, you may be blocked from editing. Philipnelson99 (talk) 04:15, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Kebab. Philipnelson99 (talk) 04:16, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

To edit, please log in.

Editing by unregistered users from your shared IP address or address range may be currently disabled due to abuse. However, you are still able to edit if you sign in with an account. If you are currently blocked from creating an account, and cannot create one elsewhere in the foreseeable future, you may follow the instructions at Wikipedia:Request an account to request that volunteers create your username for you. Please use an email address issued to you by your ISP, school or organization so that we may verify that you are a legitimate user on this network. Please reference this block in the comment section of the form.

Please check on this list that the username you choose has not already been taken. We apologize for any inconvenience. Slon02 (talk) 04:35, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

March 2023

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Yeidji—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 01:22, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

115.70.203.105 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

what? i was 5 years old during that first edit and have never been on those sites which i was blocked for 'editing'. I honestly know who did this on my account and this ip didn't even exist 5 years ago? this computer is brand new and i've only been using it for about 5 days... i've never edited a single wikipedia page ever in my entire life. i'm only a kid and i know nobody else uses my computer... so what is going on and why am i blocked? and that's not even my IP! what the heck is going on?! well actually that IP is my IP backwards but :/ seriously i've never edited wiki in my life

Decline reason:

Feel free to create an account.--jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 04:18, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

115.70.203.105 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

uhm I can't even make a account. I've tried multiple times... also I don't know how to reply with wiki editor... so can Jpgordon review this and reply/can I get an account? is that how it works here? I have absolutely no idea at all.

Decline reason:

The block is indeed a hard block, meaning account creation has also been blocked. All those warnings and earlier blocks have nothing to do with you ... this is an IP address, so others likely had it before you, especially seeing as it's an IPv4 address (it is independent of your computer ... think of it as having the same relationship to your computer as a parking space has to a car). It's obviously been around longer than 5 years, otherwise it wouldn't have been logged in our servers. If you'd like to create an account, try doing it from another computer that might well connect to a different IP. — Daniel Case (talk) 06:27, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

115.70.203.105 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

yep, i've come back and as it turns out that's my routers address (I checked the IP of all my other computers...) so all of my computers share that address... so i've read the unblock request page and i've got no idea what to do. i wanted to try requesting an account from volunteers but i don't know if my situation fits that kind of thing. i also don't want to waste anybody's time, so what should I do? I realise that this is like a parking space but I still don't understand how another person used my router? by the way could someone inform me how I am supposed to reply so I don't have to create another request? anyway I think my two options are either request an account to be created by volunteers or get unblocked by an administrator.

Decline reason:

To respond without making an unblock request, simply leave off the unblock request template/formatting and just type a standard comment without it. Yes, you should request an account. 331dot (talk) 08:35, 15 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Since you know you can Wikipedia:Request an account, please do so. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 02:50, 15 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.