User talk:000099999AB

August 2024

Hello, I'm Yuthoob. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Baalveer have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Yuthoob (talk) 09:00, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Ravensfire. I noticed that you made a comment on the page Baalveer that didn't seem very civil, so it may have been removed. Wikipedia is built on collaboration, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Please don't use personal attacks on Wikipedia as you did in your edit-summary here [1]. It's not helpful and makes a collaborative environment challenging. You need to assume good faith towards them and calmly discuss the edits on the article talk page. Focus on the edits and content, not on the editors. Ravensfire (talk) 18:50, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Baalveer shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. M S Hassan (talk | contributions) 14:55, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. M S Hassan (talk | contributions) 11:01, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Baalveer 3 Title Card.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Baalveer 3 Title Card.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:39, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Baalveer Returns Title Card.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Baalveer Returns Title Card.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:40, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Baalveer Title Card.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Baalveer Title Card.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:41, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

September 2024

Your recent editing history at Vansh Sayani shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. M S Hassan 📬✍🏻 11:44, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Vansh Sayani for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Vansh Sayani is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vansh Sayani until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Ravensfire (talk) 13:47, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A belated welcome!

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, 000099999AB! I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may still benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! User:Significa liberdade (talk) 21:50, 30 September 2024 (UTC) Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 21:43, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Significa liberdade Thank you! 000099999AB (talk) 02:08, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

Aladdin (1992 Disney film)

added a link pointing to Indian

Aladdin (Disney character)

added a link pointing to Indian

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 19:53, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

October 2024

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Aladdin – Naam Toh Suna Hoga, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. M S Hassan 📬✍🏻 11:29, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@M S Hassan I understand, what you want to say. I just removed the excessive detailing and structurised the previously unorganised cast list. I know that the article lacks references and I will add them for sure. But, at least give me some time. Everything takes time and multiple issues can't be resolved at once. The article displayed an issue of "Excessive detailing of plot" which I had solved. but you reverted it. please only edit the concerned part instead of reverting the entire edit. I respect that you are an extended-confirmed user, but you need to use the talk page as much as we do. As of now, I am reverting your edits and I'll add the references by tomorrow. Please be patient and do not revert back.

-000099999AB 000099999AB (talk) 16:19, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@000099999AB Alright, take your time. I'm glad you understand. M S Hassan 📬✍🏻 16:42, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@M S Hassan Thank you for your kind cooperation. I have added the references for main characters. Those regarding rest characters and series information, I'll add by tomorrow. 000099999AB (talk) 17:04, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@000099999AB Thank you for your contribution. However, the recent references you added from IndiaForums, IWMBuzz, and TellyChakkar are considered unreliable according to Wikipedia:WikiProject Film/Indian cinema task force#Generally used sources, so I suggest that you remove them. M S Hassan 📬✍🏻 08:45, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at Aladdin (Disney character), you may be blocked from editing. ☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(ring-ring) 14:13, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Aladdin (1992 Disney film). The source you provided makes no claim that the TV series is based on the film; neither does the main article for the series. DonIago (talk) 17:35, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

November 2024

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at List of characters in Yeh Rishta Kya Kehlata Hai. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. BusterD (talk) 16:10, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 13

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jodha Akbar, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Amer.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:52, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]