User talk:대한민국 헌법

August 2018

Hello, I'm Hhkohh. I noticed that you recently removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Hhkohh (talk) 16:53, 8 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Histmerge

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give User:대한민국 헌법 a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into AFC Champions League clubs performance comparison. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. Hhkohh (talk) 03:16, 9 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, you did absolutely nothing wrong in creating this page this way. Please feel free to do it again if you wish to create another article. Nyttend (talk) 11:39, 9 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Never mind. I have created a blank page for this user. Pinging Nyttend Hhkohh (talk) 13:43, 9 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

August 2018

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Hhkohh (talk) 02:15, 14 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Football/Archive 118 Hhkohh (talk) 00:55, 20 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

October 2018

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. Hhkohh (talk) 11:05, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, 대한민국 헌법. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, 대한민국 헌법. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Daegu FC in Asian football moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Daegu FC in Asian football, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 02:33, 5 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, Gyeongnam FC in Asian football

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Gyeongnam FC in Asian football. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Gyeongnam FC. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Gyeongnam FC. If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Jmertel23 (talk) 22:24, 7 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, Daegu FC in Asian football

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Daegu FC in Asian football. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Daegu FC. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Daegu FC. If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Hhkohh (talk) 05:27, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

February 2019

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Snowflake91 (talk) 10:06, 18 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia. Snowflake91 (talk) 10:25, 21 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Template:2019 AFC Champions League group tables, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Hhkohh (talk) 17:14, 21 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you remove or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia again, as you did at UEFA Youth League, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Hhkohh (talk) 17:17, 21 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I noticed that you may have recently made edits while logged out. Wikipedia's policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow the use of both an account and an IP address by the same person in the same setting and doing so may result in your account being blocked from editing. Additionally, making edits while logged out reveals your IP address, which may allow others to determine your location and identity. If this was not your intention, please remember to log in when editing. See also 124.111.89.80 (talk · contribs · WHOIS) Hhkohh (talk) 17:24, 21 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

AFC 챔피언스리그

AFC 챔피언스리그와 아시안클럽챔피언십 역사와 기록이 승계되는지가 지금 AFC 자료에서 어떨때는 승계하고 어떨때는 분리하고 모호한 것으로 알고 있습니다.

저도 명확하게 확정이 되었으면 좋겠는데 아무튼 아래 링크에서 토론열고 여기 축구 기여 전문으로 하시는 외국인분들과 토론을 하셔서 총의를 모아 주시기 바랍니다. 아직 불분명한 관계로 FC 서울 문서는 과거처럼 승계하는 것으로 다시 수정했습니다.

Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Football

Footwiks (talk) 09:51, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

March 2019

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did on Template:2019 K League 1 table. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Hhkohh (talk) 15:39, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Template:2019 K League 1 table. Hhkohh (talk) 18:39, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hi, 대한민국 헌법, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question.

However, there is a small issue with your username. As it is in a non-Latin alphabet script it may not display correctly for many other users. Although usernames like yours are not prohibited, Wikipedia's signature guideline and username policy encourage you, as a courtesy to other users, to alter your signature so that it also includes a transliteration of your username using Latin characters, so others can see it correctly. For the how-to of tailoring your username, please see WP:CUSTOMSIG.

For a translation of the above message, please click the link below that matches your primary language.

Thanks, and feel free to message me about anything. Paris1127 (talk) 22:28, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit on Template:All-time AFC Champions League table

Why did you remove the color and best result record from Template:All-time AFC Champions League table? (And now there are also extra columns that weren't removed properly.) --Portalian (talk) 18:37, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 22

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2018 Uzbekistan Super League, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page FC (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:41, 22 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

May 2019

Hello, I'm SLBedit. An edit that you recently made seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want to practice editing, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! SLBedit (talk) 22:27, 6 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to List of UEFA Cup and Europa League winning managers, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Matt294069 (talk) 22:51, 7 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Template:AFC Champions League seasons

Your recent editing history at Template:AFC Champions League seasons shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Frietjes (talk) 19:02, 8 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

July 2019

Hello, I'm DuncanHill. I noticed that you recently removed content from Leader of the Labour Party (UK) without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. DuncanHill (talk) 14:13, 23 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

AFC Champions League

Take this to talk page first, and you simply deleted everything prior 2002 without creting a new article for 1967-2002 = vandalism, and by the way UEFA doesnt include 1955-1992 seasons in their handbook either, but we have everything in the same articles. Snowflake91 (talk) 09:07, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

See UEFA1 and 2, there is no season prior 1992 either, so are European Cup and UEFA CL two different competitions? No. Snowflake91 (talk) 09:14, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Soccerway, rsssf, and many other media sources (i.e CCTV – " They beat Saudi side Al Ittihad to win the AFC Champions League title for a record third time") are counting it as the same competition and is included like that at wikipedia, same as UEFA) Snowflake91 (talk) 09:21, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

According to AFC, Suwon claimed the Asian title in 2001 and 2002, the club have yet to achieve anything like a similar level of success in the AFC Champions League, with their best performance coming with a run to the semi-finals in 2011. See 2018 ACL Guide.

And stop adding two different sections in the list of finals since this is completely uneeded and there should be only one table in the "list" articles, and you didnt even do it properly, for example why the hell is the first section called "List of finals" and the second one "AFC Champions League", and both tables are using different formatting? All this half-done edits which only add unnecessary mess will be reverted on sight, the table as it was is perfectly fine, it is already clearly noted in the table that the competition was rebranded (Asian Club Championship era (1967–2002) and AFC Champions League era (2002–present)). Snowflake91 (talk) 10:57, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

October 2019

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at 2019 World Athletics Championships – Men's 50 kilometres walk. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 22:40, 6 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm GhostOfDanGurney. I noticed that you recently removed content from 2019 Canadian federal election without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. GhostOfDanGurney (talk) 11:40, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disruptive Editing

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Spy-cicle💥 ^Talk? 18:26, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia. Snowflake91 (talk) 09:35, 2 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

See this link, even AFC includes pre-2004 winners as official, its the SAME competition just re-branded into a new format and name, now stop changing this as it has been like this for 10+ years and you are the only one that apparently has problems with that. Snowflake91 (talk) 10:33, 2 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ANI Notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Spy-cicle💥 ^Talk? 14:47, 10 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:23, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism on Chungnam Asan FC

Hello, I'm NearMiddayNight. I noticed that you recently removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. You actions on the Chungnam Asan FC appear to be vandalism in an attempt to either turn the page into a stub or selective removal of information on this football team. If your actions were innocent in nature please give me feedback. I'm happy to be wrong on things such as this. --NearMiddayNight ^{Feel free to come talk with me.} 00:47, 19 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

February 2020

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at 2020 AFC Champions League. Flix11 (talk) 23:39, 20 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

March 2020

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in List of FIFA Women's World Cup finals, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Sounder Bruce 04:34, 13 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Template:South Korean political parties

Hello. I don't think the template should have been removed from all the articles you removed it from. The template should be expanded to include all the defunct and extraparliamentary parties, as is standard for most countries. Just thought I should give you a heads up that I'm going to rollback all your recent edits removing the template. Cheers, Number 5 7 08:45, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

June 2020

Please do not use styles that are unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles, as you did in List of UEFA Cup and Europa League finals. There is a Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Per WP:MOSFLAG. Mattythewhite (talk) 09:24, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

I noticed your recent edit to Template:UEFA Champions League performance by club does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! Walter Görlitz (talk) 02:32, 26 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Offer to translate into English

Hi, I am willing to create a new English article translated from the Korean wikipedia or to expand an English article of your choice in return for your work in expanding ko:도어군.--Epiphyllumlover (talk) 19:11, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of AFC Champions League clubs performance comparison

The article AFC Champions League clubs performance comparison has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

clubs performance comparison are not notable according: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/EHF Champions League clubs performance comparison

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Malo95 (talk) 08:45, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of AFC Champions League clubs performance comparison for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article AFC Champions League clubs performance comparison is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AFC Champions League clubs performance comparison until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Malo95 (talk) 14:13, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

August 2020

Hello, I'm JalenFolf. I noticed that you recently removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Jalen Folf (talk) 08:30, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

References for UEFA Europa League clubs performance comparison

Hi mate. Just wanted to consult you about removing references that I added to this page. Do you have some better references that could be used or suggestion on how to implement them? Since we should defenetly add some sort of references to it (page was nominated for deletion mainly because it was missing them imo). All the best. Nightfall87 (talk) 14:27, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation

Hello, 대한민국 헌법! I saw you recently edited a page related to the Green party and green politics. There is a WikiProject that has been formed - WikiProject Green Politics and I thought this might be something you'd be interested in joining! So please head on over to the project page and take a look! Thanks for your time.

Me-123567-Me (talk) 21:58, 12 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

September 2020

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Template:People Power Party (South Korea)/meta/color, you may be blocked from editing. Do not change content without proper explanations! Vif12vf/Tiberius (talk) 13:39, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

October 2020

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to List of MLS Cup finals, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. Sounder Bruce 07:21, 4 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

U.S. election articles

The template you created for the 2020 U.S. presidential election is redundant. Another template already exists which contains all of this information plus much more. Please do not remove the existing template and replace it with the new one. Thank you. --Spiffy sperry (talk) 04:59, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

November 2020

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at 2020 United States presidential election in Alabama, you may be blocked from editing. Please don't remove Jorgensen from the infoboxes of state subpages before final results are in. Also, it is a best practice to use edit summaries, especially for potentially controversial edits. ― Tartan357 ^Talk 08:03, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

OK대한민국 헌법 (talk) 08:06, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to 2020 United States Senate election in New Mexico, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Why did you remove Walsh's photo? Leave an edit summary when you remove content. ― Tartan357 ^Talk 21:36, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Political articles style guidelines

Hi 대한민국 헌법,

I have reverted several of your edits to certain articles relating to several Canadian provincial Legislative Assemblies. Style guidelines for these sorts of things have been established and perfected over the years. For political party names, these are typically influenced by the party's own branding practices. Please do not deviate from the community-established naming standards when editing pages, as that may be considered Disruptive Editing if it happens too often or persistently. If you are not familiar with the various standards to be used, please leave the editing to someone that is.

Regards, Brycecordry (talk) 07:09, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

November 2020

This is your only warning; if you remove or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia again, as you did at United States women's national soccer team, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Seany91 (talk) 14:34, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you remove or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia again, as you did at Africa Cup of Nations, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Seany91 (talk) 07:43, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:53, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Materialscientist (talk) 09:11, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

December 2020

Hello, I'm S.A. Julio. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to 2023 FIFA Women's World Cup qualification (inter-confederation play-offs) have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. S.A. Julio (talk) 07:02, 25 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Esteghlal Club in 2007

Hi, you returned my edit on page Asian Club Championship and AFC Champions League records and statistics, you are wrong, Esteghlal Club reached this competition in 2007. see 2007 AFC Champions League, and left after his group, so he has climbed into this competition. AaliJenab (talk) 16:11, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

https://www.the-afc.com/documents/2020-afc-champions-league-group-stage-programme 대한민국 헌법 (talk) 02:31, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

January 2021

This is your only warning; if you remove or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia again, as you did at Libertarian Party (United States), you may be blocked from editing without further notice. ― Tartan357 ^Talk 05:21, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not remove reference without explanation Hhkohh (talk) 06:09, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. Thanks! Hhkohh (talk) 06:10, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AFC 챔피언스리그 결과 테이블 본문서에 기재하지 마세요

https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Football/Clubs 대륙별 대항전 경기결과가 위키백과 클럽 문서에 대륙별 대항전 모든 경기결과 테이블이 권고되는 항목도 아니고 현재 위키백과 내의 유럽 구단들 비롯해서 대부분의 축구단의 본문서에 대륙 클럽대항전 경기결과를 일일히 기재하지 않습니다.

근래 대한민국 헌법님이 한국 구단 문서마다 ACL 경기 결과 테이블 일일히 포함시키고 있는데 일단 FC 서울 ACL 경기결과는 FC Seoul in Asian football에 옮겨놓았으니 걱정하지 마시고요...

그리고 AFC 챔피언스리그 경기결과 테이블을 한국 구단 포함 모든 아시아 구단 본문서에 넣고 싶으시면 토론을 열어서 총의를 얻고 먼저 유럽 구단 문서부터 UEFA 챔피언스리그 등등 UEFA 클럽대항전 경기 결과를 본문서에 포함시키세요.

그래서 이것이 스탠다드화 되면 님이 원하시는대로 다른 유저들도 각 축구단 문서에 대륙별 대항전 경기결과 테이블 포함시킬겁니다. Footwiks (talk) 08:55, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

January 2021

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. -- ferret (talk) 13:46, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:State results of the 2020 U.S. presidential election

Template:State results of the 2020 U.S. presidential election has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. - CHAMPION ^{(talk) (contributions) (logs)} 07:34, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

February 2021

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Template:Presidents of South Korea, you may be blocked from editing. Kiteinthewind ^{Leave a message!} 02:01, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

March 2021

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Template:UEFA Champions League performance by club. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Please stop changing historical nations in European football articles to the current nations. The one at the time the event happened should be listed. Walter Görlitz (talk) 06:22, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at 2022 FIFA World Cup qualification, you may be blocked from editing. Jalen Folf (talk) 15:11, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

2021 AFC Champions League qualifying play-offs

Your recent editing history at 2021 AFC Champions League qualifying play-offs shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Giant Snowman 07:26, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

May 2021 - Blocked

Having read through your talk page, and seeing that you recently just deleted valid data from Template:Parliaments in Europe, and removed the template from multiple pages all without explanation. Since your talk page is completely covered with final warnings for disruptive editing, and deletions without explanations, and you absolutely refuse to provide explanations or communicate in any manner, I feel I have no choice but to block you indefinitely from editing this project. It seems that you're never going to change your pattern of edits no matter how much people try to communicate with you, you have not used an article talk page for an explanation in over a year and a half. You are just going to ignore everything and you're never going to become a collaborative editor. Canterbury Tail talk 00:07, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

OK. I'm so sorry... I will keep the wiki rule. I reflect on the past 5 years of my wiki life.대한민국 헌법 (talk) 04:54, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry...

OK. I'm so sorry... I will keep the wiki rule. I reflect on the past 5 years of my wiki life. I must record edit summary. Please unblock my account...대한민국 헌법 (talk) 17:06, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please follow the instructions in the template above for how to request an unblock, and someone will come along and review it. Canterbury Tail talk 17:14, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

대한민국 헌법 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Insert your reason to be unblocked here 대한민국 헌법 (talk) 18:28, 16 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 21:06, 16 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

OK. I'm so sorry... I will keep the wiki rule. I reflect on the past 5 years of my wiki life. I must record edit summary. Please unblock my account...대한민국 헌법 (talk) 18:28, 16 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]