User talk:חיים 11

Multiple copies

Hello. On Wikipedia, if you want an article to be reachable through different titles (both an English one and a Hebrew one, for example, for an article on an Israeli organization), the way to have that happen isn't by creating multiple copies of the same article. Instead, create it under the title most likely to be used by people speaking English, and then create redirects under the other title(s) that lead to the full article. This is what I've done at Amutat hayim and Amotat hayim. —Largo Plazo (talk) 09:39, 22 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of VEANVEU

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on VEANVEU requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Razer^{Text me} 16:29, 9 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: VEANVEU (December 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Kiteinthewind was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The draft reads like an advertisement, and has scant references (besides bible verses) that supports its notability. In addition, it should be noted that this article was already deleted once via a G11 speedy delete. Please work on finding more sources that can attest to this corporation's notability.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:VEANVEU and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:VEANVEU, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and save.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Kiteinthewind ^{Leave a message!} 16:55, 25 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! חיים 11, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Kiteinthewind ^{Leave a message!} 16:55, 25 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

March 2018

Hello, I'm Tgeorgescu. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Noah seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Tgeorgescu (talk) 10:58, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Noah again

Since there is a lot of doubt that Noah even existed, we clearly cannot state his birth and death dates as though they are real. Doug Weller talk 11:00, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

March 2018

Your recent editing history at Noah shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Tgeorgescu (talk) 11:08, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at Shem, you may be blocked from editing. Tgeorgescu (talk) 11:10, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You really need to stop this

These are not historically attested people. See my comment above. Doug Weller talk 11:12, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Schneider Children's Medical Center

Hello חיים 11,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Schneider Children's Medical Center for deletion, because it seems to be copied from another source, probably infringing copyright.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to rewrite it in your own words, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Natureium (talk) 18:16, 15 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Blind Spot (2021 film) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Blind Spot (2021 film), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Roller26 (talk) 18:43, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Blind Spot (2021 film) has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Blind Spot (2021 film). Thanks! Fade258 (talk) 07:58, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Blind Spot (2021 film) (July 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Fade258 was:

See this Wikipedia: Notability (films).

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Blind Spot (2021 film) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Blind Spot (2021 film), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Fade258 (talk) 08:00, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Blind Spot (2021 film)

Hello, חיים 11. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Blind Spot (2021 film), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 09:01, 11 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Blind Spot (2021 film)

Hello, חיים 11. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Blind Spot".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 08:03, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]