User talk:Симпатизер

This is Симпатизер's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tatjana Ječmenica Table Tennis player (October 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Greenman was:

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Tatjana Ječmenica Table Tennis player and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Tatjana Ječmenica Table Tennis player, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Greenman (talk) 21:19, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Симпатизер! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Greenman (talk) 21:19, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Greenman I hope i sorted out all issues about in line citation. The sources added to all relevant information on the page. Work on the sorce of images is also underway. Thank you for consideration. Симпатизер

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tatjana Ječmenica (January 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by MurielMary were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Thanks for creating this draft. There is not enough evidence that the subject meets the notability criteria for a biography on Wikipedia. Please read the criteria and add detail to the draft if possible. Also, the draft needs to be written in paragraphs, not in note form (the first section is written as notes).

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Tatjana Ječmenica and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Tatjana Ječmenica, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

MurielMary (talk) 10:59, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tatjana Ječmenica (table tennis) (February 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Rollidan were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Not enough reliable sources to pass notability guidelines Rollidan (talk) 09:03, 3 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Tatjana Ječmenica (table tennis) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Tatjana Ječmenica (table tennis), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Rollidan (talk) 09:03, 3 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Paid editing

Hello Симпатизер. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Симпатизер. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Симпатизер|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Theroadislong (talk) 15:07, 11 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Theroadislong,

You are mistaken – I am not being directly or indirectly compensated for my edits, not at all.

All I wish is that a nice story about young and talented girl, an exemplary sportsman finds a place on Wikipedia.

I am a beginner with Wikipedia and I am very keen to follow and keep up to Wikipedia values and standard.

Best regards, Симпатизер (talk) 19:29, 11 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Tatjana Ječmenica (table tennis) has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Tatjana Ječmenica (table tennis). Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 15:19, 11 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tatjana Ječmenica (table tennis) (July 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Primefac was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The references provided are all reliable, but all of the are simply statistics tables. Given that we require significant coverage of subjects to indicate their notability, it fails this metric. Please add additional independent reliable sources that discuss the subject in detail.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Tatjana Ječmenica (table tennis) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Tatjana Ječmenica (table tennis), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Primefac (talk) 14:33, 12 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Primefac,

My aim was to provide absolutely accurate information and reliable and independent references. References listed below provide full coverage of subject and indicate their notability:

- Vujin, Vladimir (2010): The Sport Coryphaeus of the City of Novi Sad (in Serbian), Novi Sad, Serbia, Dnevnik Newspaper 2010, pp 77-79 ISBN 978-86-7966-017-6

- Farkas, Gizela (25 December 1969). "Training of the table tennis player". Olimpikon: 2.

- Popov Dusan (1997) Encyclopedia of the City of Novi Sad (in Serbian, Novi Sad, Serbia. Prometej Izdavacka kuca https://www.prometej.rs Platoneum part of SANU Serbian academy of Science and Art https://www.sanu.ac.rs pp Book 9 page 305 ISBN86-84097-23-8

- Uzorinec, Zdenko (1981). Od Sarajeva do Novog Sada [From Sarajevo to Novi Sad] (in Croatian). Zagreb, Croatia: Table Tennis Association of former Yugoslavia, Publication held at National and University Library in Zagreb (www.nsk.hr). p. 249.

Unfortunately these publications are not published on the Internet. The publications and all articles are from the time 1960-1970 when young lady made her achievements and when the Internet was not known. Also there may be other publication with coverage on the subject with the same issue, not visible on the Internet.

Best regards Симпатизер (talk) 09:22, 13 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tatjana Ječmenica (table tennis) (October 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MurielMary was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Tatjana Ječmenica (table tennis) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

MurielMary (talk) 08:20, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi MurielMary, I appreciate your comments on proposed article. I would like to say proposed article is about a young female table tennis player, one of the most talented European junior table tennis players at that time, time between 1960 and 1970. As you may understand, from that time in last century, when there were no electronic media, i.e., the internet and from a country, Former Yugoslavia, that no longer exist, there is not much information saved.

However, must say there is significant coverage about the mentioned table tennis player, this is shown specially in following resources:

1. Vujin, Vladimir (2010). Sentimental Scrapbook, The Sport Coryphe of the City of Novi Sad (in Serbian). Novi Sad, Serbia: Dnevnik newspaper 2010 Novi Sad, Serbia. pp. 77–79. ISBN 978-86-7966-017-6.

Publication held at Archives of the city of Novi Sad

2. Uzorinac, Zdenko (1978). 50 years of Table Tennis Association of Yugoslavia, 1928-1978 (in Croatian). Zagreb, Croatia: Published by Table Tennis Association of Former Yugoslavia, Printed by Graphic Institute of Croatia 1978. (gzh.hr). pp. 54, 126, 127, 130, 182, 183, 192, 193, 197, 198, 199, 207 & 209.

Publication held at National and University Library in Zagreb (www.nsk.hr)

3. Uzorinac, Zdenko (1988). 60 Years of Table Tennis Association of Yugoslavia, 1928-1988 (in Slovenian). Ljubljana, Printed by PRINT GRAFIKA VECKO Ljubljana, 1988: Table Tennis Association of Slovenia. pp. 168, 232, 236, 241, 257, 258.

Publication held at National and University Library in Zagreb (www.nsk.hr)

18. Popov, Dusan (1997). Encyclopedia of the City of Novi Sad (in Serbian). Novi Sad, Serbia: Prometej - Izdavačka kuća https://www.prometej.rs- Platoneum part of SANU Serbian Academy of Science and Art https://www.sanu.ac.rs/. pp. Book 9, page 305. ISBN 86-84097-23-8.

Publication held at Archives of the city of Novi Sad

19. ^ Uzorinec, Zdenko (1981). Od Sarajeva do Novog Sada [From Sarajevo to Novi Sad]. Zagreb, Croatia: Table Tennis Association of former Yugoslavia,

Publication held at National and University Library in Zagreb (www.nsk.hr). p. 249.

All these sources are reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Apart from these there are many coverages in daily newspapers from the time as well.

It is correct, she didn’t win any European or World Championship, however she did very well on many international competitions.

And as a matter of fact, at that time Table Tennis was not a part of the Olympic Games. Obviously, in that view the circumstances were not favorable for Tatjana Jecmenica.

I would like to keep it up to Wikipedia high standard. I believe I did my best. I believe this article deserves to be approved and once the article is published on Wikipedia there may be more people to support it with additional information. Thank you for your consideration.

Faithfully, Симпатизер Симпатизер (talk) 10:16, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tatjana Ječmenica (table tennis) (October 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MurielMary was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Tatjana Ječmenica (table tennis) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

MurielMary (talk) 09:19, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi MurielMary,

I must reiterate the proposed article is about a young female table tennis player, one of the most talented European junior table tennis player at time between 1960 and 1970. A nice story about young sportswoman that was unfortunate to have a short however successful and promising career. It is unfortunate then there were no electronic media, i.e. the internet and from a country, Former Yugoslavia, that no longer exist, there is not much information saved.

However, there are significant coverages about the mentioned table tennis player, this is shown specially in following resources:

1. Vujin, Vladimir (2010). Sentimental Scrapbook, The Sport Coryphe of the City of Novi Sad (in Serbian). Novi Sad, Serbia: Dnevnik newspaper 2010 Novi Sad, Serbia. pp. 77–79. ISBN 978-86-7966-017-6.

Publication held at Arhives of the city of Novi Sad

2. Uzorinac, Zdenko (1978). 50 years of Table Tennis Association of Yugoslavia, 1928-1978 (in Croatian). Zagreb, Croatia: Published by Table Tennis Association of Former Yugoslavia, Printed by Graphic Institute of Croatia 1978. (gzh.hr). pp. 54, 126, 127, 130, 182, 183, 192, 193, 197, 198, 199, 207 & 209.

Publication held at National and University Library in Zagreb (www.nsk.hr)

3. Uzorinac, Zdenko (1988). 60 Years of Table Tennis Association of Yugoslavia, 1928-1988 (in Slovenian). Ljubljana, Printed by PRINT GRAFIKA VECKO Ljubljana, 1988: Table Tennis Association of Slovenia. pp. 168, 232, 236, 241, 257, 258.

Publication held at National and University Library in Zagreb (www.nsk.hr)

20. Popov, Dusan (1997). Encyclopedia of the City of Novi Sad (in Serbian). Novi Sad, Serbia: Prometej - Izdavačka kuća https://www.prometej.rs- Platoneum part of SANU Serbian Academy of Science and Art https://www.sanu.ac.rs/. pp. Book 9, page 305. ISBN 86-84097-23-8.

Publication held at Arhives of the city of Novi Sad

21. ^ Uzorinec, Zdenko (1981). Od Sarajeva do Novog Sada [From Sarajevo to Novi Sad]. Zagreb, Croatia: Table Tennis Association of former Yugoslavia,

Publication held at National and University Library in Zagreb (www.nsk.hr). p. 249.

All these sources are reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Apart from these there are many coverages in daily newspapers from the time as well.

She didn’t win any European or World Championship, however she did very well on many international competitions.

It is known, at that time Table Tennis was not a part of the Olympic Games. Obviously, in that view the circumstances were not favorable for Tatjana Jecmenica.

I believe this article deserves to be approved and trust once the article is on Wikipedia there shall be more people to support it with additional information. Thank you for your consideration.

Faithfully, Симпатизер Симпатизер (talk) 14:32, 18 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tatjana Ječmenica (table tennis) (March 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Curb Safe Charmer was:

The proposed article does not have sufficient content to require an article of its own, but it could be merged into the existing article at Tatjana Ječmenica. Since anyone can edit Wikipedia, you are welcome to add that information yourself. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Tatjana Ječmenica (table tennis) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 18:51, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Curb Safe Charmer, I respect your opinion about the proposed article however must stress that you are misled by the title of proposed article and an existing article with the similar name.

Proposed article Tatjana Jecmenica (table tennis player) is about a young woman, born in 1949, one of the most talented and promising European woman table tennis player in period 1960-1970, about a sport career that abruptly ended at age 18.

The article, Tatjana Jecmenica, you suggest being merged is about another young woman, Tatjana Jecmenica, Tennis player, born in 1978.

Two sport personalities with same name however different sport and different age.

Please reconsider your decision and take into account that is very hard to provide more detailed results and get verified sources as period 1960-1970, was an era without the internet and without electronic media.

Once again, the proposed article Tatjana Jecmenica (table tennis player) is about a young, European most talented and promising table tennis player in period 1960-1970 in the last century.

Regards,

Спонзор Симпатизер (talk) 02:02, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tatjana Ječmenica (table tennis) has been accepted

Tatjana Ječmenica (table tennis), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Primefac (talk) 20:13, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Primefac

Thank you for approving the article Tatjana Ječmenica (table tennis). It is exciting to see the article on Wikipedia online. Also thank you for cleaning and adding the value to the article. I would like to thank to all your colleagues as well for valuable comments and suggestions. Must stress this has been an exciting learning time for me and again, thank you for all comments and contributions.

Kind regards, Симпатизер (talk) 02:08, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:56, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]