User talk:Мит Сколов/2017-2022
Welcome!
[edit]
|
Ways to improve Pchelovodstvo
[edit]Hi, I'm Zakhx150. Мит Сколов, thanks for creating Pchelovodstvo!
I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. It would be useful to add in references to this publication which aren't directly related to it. Secondary sources are important here. See WP:VER for further information.
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.
Zakhx150 (talk) 13:41, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on Arthur Riggs (geneticist), but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source, so I removed it. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Materialscientist (talk) 06:43, 8 May 2017 (UTC)
Ways to improve Amir Ishemgulov
[edit]Hi, I'm Boleyn. Мит Сколов, thanks for creating Amir Ishemgulov!
I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. This has no references - is the external link actually a reference? All articles on living people need WP:INLINECITED sources, without these,someone may nominate this for deletion, although he is a notable person.
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.
Boleyn (talk) 16:23, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
Edit war warning
[edit]
Your recent editing history at Apitherapy shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Jytdog (talk) 12:49, 31 August 2017 (UTC)
- [1] --Мит Сколов (talk) 13:07, 31 August 2017 (UTC)
- [2] --Мит Сколов (talk) 17:40, 3 September 2017 (UTC)
Notice
[edit]
Please carefully read this information:
The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding Complementary and Alternative Medicine, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.Alexbrn (talk) 02:50, 4 September 2017 (UTC)
Please read MEDHOW and format citations accordingly. It is not hard. Jytdog (talk) 09:33, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]
Hello, Мит Сколов. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
A page you started (Alexander Ivanovich Tikhonov) has been reviewed!
[edit]Thanks for creating Alexander Ivanovich Tikhonov, Мит Сколов!
Wikipedia editor Abishe just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
Thanks for creating this.
To reply, leave a comment on Abishe's talk page.
Learn more about page curation.
Abishe (talk) 16:49, 15 December 2017 (UTC)
Apitherapy
[edit]Why are you so interested in this quackery? What is your connection? Guy (Help!) 09:25, 19 January 2018 (UTC)
Apitherapy is not «quackery». Insects — it is very potential important actives for part of future in medicine. See for example new article in «Acta Pharmaceutica Sinica B» (top pharmacology research journal based in China, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences journal) — «Insects: an underrepresented resource for the discovery of biologically active natural products» PMC 5518667. And from conclusions from it: «Undoubtedly, this is partly due to negative cultural attitudes towards insects, particularly in the West. However, public perception of insects should not deter scientific pioneers from advancing these largely untapped resources. Indeed, if given the proper attention, insect-derived substances hold great promise for the future of natural product drug discovery.»
What is my connection? Ah, I have a connection! Do you know what Lyme disease is? Do you know what: «While most patients are treated successfully with go-to antibiotics, some 10 to 20 percent remain sick.» [3] Do you know what, WHO says that we desperately need new antibiotics, while we are have a effects problem with the old ones, in particular, it is proved with regard to Lyme disease ([4])?
I’m volunteer coordinator Bee venom therapy for Lyme disease Russian community. And one more thing: in Russia apitherapy is legal, with support from scientists, society and the state. --Мит Сколов (talk) 10:21, 19 January 2018 (UTC)
- Do you mean Lyme disease or "chronic Lyme disease"? The two are entirely different. Guy (Help!) 11:51, 19 January 2018 (UTC)
- Besides, if you are involved with Apitherapy (which I don't believe in at all, which is why I don't edit it) you should be staying off that page because you have a conflict of interest! TomBarker23 (talk) 12:43, 19 January 2018 (UTC)
ANI
[edit]
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Guy (Help!) 11:49, 19 January 2018 (UTC)
January 2018
[edit]Your recent editing history at Vassya Bankova shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Scr★pIronIV 21:30, 19 January 2018 (UTC)
Notice that you are now subject to an arbitration enforcement topic ban
[edit]
The following topic ban now applies to you:
You are indefinitely banned from editing any page, or making any edits related to the topic of apitherapy, broadly construed.
You have been sanctioned pursuant to your violation of our policy on conflicts of interest; while you have every right to support apitherapy in general, you may not use Wikipedia to do so, as it threatens our project's neutral point of view and damages the integrity of our content. Editing with a COI is problematic enough without disruptively edit warring, which you were doing even as an AN/I complaint against you was open.
This topic ban is imposed in my capacity as an uninvolved administrator under the authority of the Arbitration Committee's decision at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Acupuncture#Final decision and, if applicable, the procedure described at Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions. This sanction has been recorded in the log of sanctions. Please go to WP:TBAN and read the information there to see what a topic ban is. If you do not comply with the topic ban, you may be blocked for an extended period, to enforce the ban.
If you wish to appeal against the ban, please say so below or on my talk page and I will explain how to do it. Swarm ♠ 06:08, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
@Wakari07 I wanted to say. That all people. Anxiety, a precursor of changes of a planetary scale. Environment, if that understand? New challenges, including for public health. And we desperately need effective and affordable means! But there is something that gives some hope. In the field of medicine, this, for example, is apitherapy. And the time will come and we recollect it!.. And one more thing. Science: how does it work? -@Calton Have you heard anything about Metaphysics? I just asked (epistemologically). --Мит Сколов (talk) 18:15, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
Sources
[edit]Can you please add your sources to Sergey Gauthier? 'External links' just means 'suggestions for further reading' - if these were actually your sources, can you change the heading? Also all sources for biographies of living people need to be WP:INLINECITED. Thanks, Boleyn (talk) 18:37, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
Citation formats
[edit]Thank you for adding a link at Adolf Seilacher. I have put it in the citation template for you, but it would be appreciated if you could follow the same template formatting as is used in the article, naming the publisher and adding the date at least - this is not a lot to ask, and I appreciate you are not a native English speaker. All the best, Chiswick Chap (talk) 10:19, 28 February 2018 (UTC)
Thank you for being one of Wikipedia's top medical contributors!
[edit]- please help translate this message into your local language via meta
|
The 2017 Cure Award |
| In 2017 you were one of the top ~250 medical editors across any language of Wikipedia. Thank you from Wiki Project Med Foundation for helping bring free, complete, accurate, up-to-date health information to the public. We really appreciate you and the vital work you do! Wiki Project Med Foundation is a user group whose mission is to improve our health content. Consider joining here, there are no associated costs. |
Thanks again :-) -- Doc James along with the rest of the team at Wiki Project Med Foundation 02:44, 26 April 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Мит Сколов. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Мит Сколов. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
April 2019
[edit]
Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Diane Francis. Thank you.
See also WP:COI in case it might apply. --Ronz (talk) 15:50, 4 April 2019 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for May 20
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited European Academy of Sciences, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Felix Otto (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:05, 20 May 2019 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for June 15
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Joseph Thornton (biologist), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page NCSE (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:47, 15 June 2019 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for November 8
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Robert R. Caldwell, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hawking (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:39, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Disambiguation link notification for September 13
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Susan Trumbore, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page BES.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:58, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for September 30
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Alexander Maysuryan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Armenian.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:19, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
I have sent you a note about a page you started
[edit]Hello, Мит Сколов
Thank you for creating Dmitri Chorny.
User:Doomsdayer520, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
Thank you for this new article, but note that other editors have questioned whether Chorny is notable enough for inclusion in Wikipedia. For pointers, follow the links in the notice at the top of the page. Note that sources are needed that discuss Chorny in his own right, as opposed to events in which he participated or people with whom he collaborated. If this issue is not addressed, future editors could call for the article to be deleted.
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Doomsdayer520}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
DOOMSDAYER520 | TALK | CONTRIBS 21:29, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Disambiguation link notification for December 22
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited President of the American Association for the Advancement of Science, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Claire Fraser.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:14, 22 December 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Disambiguation link notification for June 7
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Wendy Foden, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page BES.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:10, 7 June 2022 (UTC)