User talk:Ȝeſtikl/Archive 1

This is an archive of past discussions with User:Ȝeſtikl. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Archive 1

Welcome!

Hello, Ȝeſtikl, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Americium did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask a question on your talk page. Again, welcome. ComplexRational (talk) 20:13, 9 August 2019 (UTC)

@ComplexRational: Thanks for letting me know! So, how do I "refer to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media." What counts as reliable?Ȝeſtikl (talk) 20:29, 9 August 2019 (UTC)

In general, a source is considered reliable when it is published after being refereed or fact-checked. Usually, reference books and scientific journal articles, as well as certain websites whose credibiliy can be verified, are considered reliable; WP:SOURCE gives a more comprehensive overview of what is generally accepted. As such, it so happens that many of the sources cited in the americium article fit into one of these categories.

When citing a source, you must be careful to ensure two things: the writing must be your own to avoid plagiarism, and whatever is written must directly reflect what is in the source, whether it is a fact or clear implication (of the authors). In other words, you must cite the facts and only the facts; drawing new conclusions from sources is considered original research and is not accepted here. Also, it is not necessary to directly quote source content; paraphrasing is the best way to go as long as it does not resemble the source too closely.

Finally, to cite a source in an article, <ref></ref> tags are used in the source editor (I’m not familiar with the visual editor) along with a citation template; the specifics of how to cite are covered in detail on the individual pages and in this guide.

I hope this answers your question. Happy editing! ComplexRational (talk) 20:49, 9 August 2019 (UTC)

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, Ȝeſtikl/Archive 1. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by David Biddulph (talk) 11:48, 10 August 2019 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template.

Your thread has been archived

Hi Ȝeſtikl! You created a thread called Reliable Sources at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread.

Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 13 August 2019 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Nanfeng County

Hello! Your submission of Nanfeng County at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! ComplexRational (talk) 19:37, 28 August 2019 (UTC)

Jiankang Subdistrict moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Jiankang Subdistrict, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Geolodus (talk) 18:11, 3 September 2019 (UTC)

@Geolodus: Ok. I created it because there was a disambig that pointed to it. Should I get rid of the disambig link? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ȝeſtikl (talk • contribs) 20:04, 3 September 2019 (UTC)

Probably, until a referenced article on the subject exists. Geolodus (talk) 17:58, 4 September 2019 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hi Ȝeſtikl! You created a thread called 81.200.82.123 at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread.

Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:00, 11 September 2019 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

		The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		This is for your valuable efforts for countering Vandalism and protecting Wikipedia from it's threats. I appreciate your effort. You are a defender of Wikipedia. Thank you. PATH SLOPU 10:29, 28 September 2019 (UTC)

"Lantsong" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Lantsong. Since you had some involvement with the Lantsong redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 11:45, 28 September 2019 (UTC)

Recent edit to Caprock, New Mexico

Hello, and thank you for your recent contribution. While the content of your edit may be true, I have removed it because its depth or nature of detail are not consistent with our objectives as an encyclopedia. I recognize that your edit was made in good faith and hope you will familiarize yourself with what Wikipedia is not so we may collaborate in the future. Thank you! Shaun 03:32, 30 September 2019 (UTC)

@Shaun: Hi, Shaun. I went through WP:NOT but I didn’t find what I did wrong with adding a zip code. Could you please clarify? Thank you. Ȝeſtikl (talk) 10:56, 30 September 2019 (UTC)

Rollback granted

{{safesubst:require subst|template=Rollback granted 3|1=

Hi Ȝeſtikl. After reviewing your request for "rollbacker", I have temporarily enabled rollback on your accountfor three months. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback:

Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
Rollback should never be used to edit war.
If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
Use common sense.

If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:Administrators' guide/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! Beeblebrox (talk) 22:14, 2 October 2019 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hi Ȝeſtikl! You created a thread called The Girl Who Had Everything at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread.

Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 9 October 2019 (UTC)

Pending changes reviewer granted

Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:

Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes, the guideline on reviewing
Wikipedia:Pending changes, the summary of the use of pending changes
Wikipedia:Protection policy#Pending changes protection, the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators.

—Tom Morris (talk) 18:03, 11 October 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Zhang Dinghuang

Thanks for cleaning this up--are you going to continue with rest of the draft, or else I will deal with it. but you're much more qualified. DGG ( talk ) 06:20, 5 November 2019 (UTC)

@DGG: Yes, I have been planning to, but didn’t have much time recently. Any help is appreciated. :) Ȝeſtikl _{(t c e)} 10:45, 5 November 2019 (UTC)

Yuzhang Subdistrict moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Yuzhang Subdistrict, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 02:51, 7 November 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Jiankang Subdistrict concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Jiankang Subdistrict, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:37, 5 February 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Jiankang Subdistrict

Hello, Ȝeſtikl. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Jiankang Subdistrict".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! JMHamo (talk) 11:35, 4 March 2020 (UTC)

Draft:Yuzhang Subdistrict concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Yuzhang Subdistrict, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:44, 8 April 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Yuzhang Subdistrict

Hello, Ȝeſtikl. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Yuzhang Subdistrict".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 04:33, 8 May 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Similar to Township Units of China

Hello, Ȝeſtikl. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Similar to Township Units of China".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:26, 4 November 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:01, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Yuzhang Subdistrict

Hello, Ȝeſtikl. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Yuzhang Subdistrict, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:03, 9 December 2021 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Yuzhang Subdistrict

Hello, Ȝeſtikl. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Yuzhang Subdistrict".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:40, 7 July 2022 (UTC)