Jump to content

User talk:Wgolf: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
→My sandbox: new section
Line 19: Line 19:


{{tb|JohnCD|What type of warning or whatever on this one page?|ts=20:52, 27 August 2011 (UTC)}}
{{tb|JohnCD|What type of warning or whatever on this one page?|ts=20:52, 27 August 2011 (UTC)}}
lies eat booty


== Welcome messages ==
== Welcome messages ==

Revision as of 17:52, 6 March 2014


Deletion of Moussa Diallo

Hi :) I understand you have suggested deletion of the article about the Danish/Malian musician Moussa Diallo due to lack of references. I noted the other day, that other authors had added several references along with much more info about Diallo's international work (filmscores and charity work for children). But now the page seems to have gone too. And this time without at note to me or anyone else!

I have been an author for Wikipedia (both Danish and English) for several years and as educated journalist/reporter in both Denmark and the US I fully approve, acknowledge and understand the use and need for valid references. However lately I've seen almost all my work deleted regardless. Some for good reason - but other articles deleted I simply don't understand. Please tell me, that our beloved Wikipedia is not turning in to an exclusive club of elitist scholars able to understand extremely long and complicated formula for creating content? We have Encyclopedia Britannica for that. :-)

Best wishes

Kenneth Ley Milling journalist

CSD unspecified on Wicked Loving Lies

Hi, I wanted to let you know that I have removed your WP:CSD, in which you did not list a specific reason for why it should be deleted, on Wicked Loving Lies. I do not see any criteria that appears to be applicable. If there is a specific Criteria for Speedy Deletion that you think applies, feel free to re-tag the article, but I think you may have more success with an alternative Deletion Processs. Monty845 01:50, 27 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry I was in a hurry and had to go and left off the reason. It looked like an article with nothing listed on what it was. Wgolf (talk) 01:51, 27 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, Wgolf. You have new messages at JohnCD's talk page.
Message added 20:52, 27 August 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

lies eat booty

Welcome messages

Thanks for doing New Page Patrol. Where you put a speedy tag on an article, and the author is new and has no Welcome message on their talk page, it is a good idea to add one before the speedy notice - it makes it friendlier and less WP:BITEy, and gives them useful links so that they may learn and do better next time. {{firstarticle}} is a good one in those circumstances: it should be subst-ed, so you would type {{subst:firstarticle|articlename}}. There is an oddity about that one: it automatically adds your signature, so for once you shouldn't add ~~~~. There is good advice for speedy taggers at WP:10CSD and WP:A7M. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 20:52, 27 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]


New Page Patrol survey

New page patrol – Survey Invitation

Hello Wgolf! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you.

  • If this invitation also appears on other accounts you may have, please complete the survey once only.
  • If this has been sent to you in error and you have never patrolled new pages, please ignore it.

Please click HERE to take part.
Many thanks in advance for providing this essential feedback.

You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey. Global message delivery 13:51, 26 October 2011 (UTC)

Well almost every film from the early Oscars have a page now

Added Wonder of Women a few days ago. Which means every film from the first 3 Oscars have a page. Now there is a page for a film named The Right to Love but its a different one then the one that was nominated, even if the same year.-which I just put as a template on some pages as The Right to Love. (On such stuff like the cinematographer page) Overall this is looking nice-since unless if I'm mistaken, I believe that is the only film now that has no page from the first 10 Oscars that is not a short film or nominated in the short live Dance cat. Wgolf (talk) 01:36, 21 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, great work! Thanks! Joseph A. Spadaro (talk) 03:40, 21 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

re: Oscar nominated cinematographers

Great work. Yes, it's tough to find sources, but the main Oscar page is a good place to start. For example, this is the page for the 3rd Academy Awards to use as a WP:RS. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 19:00, 24 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Again, great work in starting the missing articles. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 19:28, 28 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! Dan653 (talk) 22:11, 25 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quick review

Jack Alexander Brooks

There actually was a reference in Jack Alexander Brooks, but it was buried in a syntax error. I've now fixed it. It's not a good reference, but it's something. I've thrown a refimprove tag on the article; maybe somebody else can do better. --Alexbook (talk) 02:44, 1 February 2014 (UTC) Yeah it was like how earlier tonight I found some film that had the wrong name listed as a director for years as someone changed it and never had it go back to normal. Well, I'm sure someone will fix your page! Wgolf (talk) 02:46, 1 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Something strange happening when using WP:PAGCUR?

Hi, Wgolf. I received notifications regarding changes made by you to Oleynik, Melnychuk, Sydorenko and Kuzmenko with no edit to the pages and no edit summary. They're all dated for 2 February, 2014, yet none show up it your contributions.

I'm wondering whether 'Page Curation' is triggering off some false readings when you browse through pages (i.e., interpreting a check as an 'nx' without leaving any form of edit summary).

Do you have any way of tracking whether it's done the same to other normal checks using it on pages not on my watchlist? I was considering installing it for my own usage, but don't want to deploy a buggy tool. Cheers, in advance, for any info you could supply! --Iryna Harpy (talk) 03:22, 2 February 2014 (UTC) That is odd-I don't think I have even gone to those pages.[reply]

Wgolf (talk) 03:23, 2 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm. Something weird going on. Would you like me to forward my email notifications to you for your reference? --Iryna Harpy (talk) 03:26, 2 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It's okay, but it looks like it might be a bug. Wgolf (talk) 03:27, 2 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I suspect so. You should probably report it. I'll send on the email notifications (should you need to reference them for reporting purposes). --Iryna Harpy (talk) 03:30, 2 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Actually, rather than starting off a labour-intensive troubleshooting session for what may have just been a momentary glitch, I've kept the emails and a screen-capture of my watchlist. If you get any more reports about PAGCUR doing the same thing to other articles, just leave me a quick note on my talk page and I'll be able to access them for you. Happy editing! --Iryna Harpy (talk) 04:11, 2 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Just to let you know that another list of these has appeared on a sequence of Ukrainian surname disambiguation pages (Shvets, Polishchuk (surname), etc.). Is Page Curation supposed to leave an automatic edit summary? Something is definitely going wrong. --Iryna Harpy (talk) 23:18, 2 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I did mark a bunch of surname pages as patrolled earlier

Wgolf (talk) 23:19, 2 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Shouldn't the program automatically add a generic edit summary? If so, it isn't working as the summary fields are being left blank. --Iryna Harpy (talk) 23:41, 2 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Introducing Twinkle

Hi there. I noticed that you help out in tagging new pages for maintenance or for deletion. I wanted to introduce you to Twinkle. Twinkle is a set of javascript functions that give autoconfirmed users many new options to assist them in anti-vandalism, tagging pages for maintenance or deletion, provides rollback links, welcome users, warn users, and much much more.

Many Wikipedians use Twinkle. So why not join the crowd? It's free and easy to use. Before using, you may want to read the Twinkle Documentation to familiarize yourself with the features. You may find that your editing experience on Wikipedia is much easier with this tool. Thanks, and I hope I helped! K6ka (talk | contribs) 16:49, 7 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

verify

For the momment I finished with Olimpia Rotunda ,can you see for other issues and remove the last one? Catalin070697 (talk) 20:21, 7 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

User:Kuruma Matrimony Telugu

...was blocked, not banned. There's an important difference. Cheers, JohnCD (talk) 21:25, 7 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings

Thank you for watching my contributions and for the reviewing my articles. Jolicnikola (talk) 22:17, 7 February 2014 (UTC) You are welcome Wgolf (talk) 22:18, 7 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Rock Comet

Thanks for reviewing my article! :-) exoplanetaryscience (talk) 01:09, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

FYI

I removed a couple messages that people had mistakenly placed on your userpage, sorry if you wanted to keep them there. Mark Arsten (talk) 01:44, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

sockpuppet?

I noticed that on Pichpitch's talk page you expressed concern that Physics0x01 might be a sockpuppet. Do you have a name for the suspected sock? I'm not going to open an SPI, but I did want to look at the edits and if they're close enough, I might tag it on the user's page. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 08:20, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Some baklava for you!

thanks for review ...where from are you? himayun (talk) 18:02, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Category... How to do it. Thanks

Hello from Paris,

Thank you for your message about category but, for the moment, I don't find the right way to categorised the Bernie Adam article ??? I'm gonna try right now to find the way by myself.

Category : "French Musicians" and "living person"

Thanks again for your help.

Kind regards. BAFan4everBAFan4ever (talk) 10:06, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fast interrupt request

I think I am with Shirt58 on this one; I don't see anything meriting a speedy, or overly promotional. I tagged is a stub missing context, though. I suggest we take any further discussion to the talk; the creator is active there too. Cheers, --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 10:55, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fedor Glushchenko

Now for this article: You tagged the one before it pretty good, I forgot to put the Stub template, but this one is actually a Start since it have over 2 complete sections. I removed the stub per that criteria.--Mishae (talk) 15:58, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Edit conflict

Sorry about the edit conflicts on Sat Kaival Saheb. I removed the speedy delete tag with the intention of readding the tag with copyvio, but you got in there an instant ahead of me. Safiel (talk) 23:36, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


A barnstar for you!

The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar
For beating me to the punch several times on a few articles that needed csd tagging keep up the good work. Jguard18 Critique Me 01:46, 13 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewed Article Comment

Why should the article be listed as unreviewed? Please respond on my talk page Science Saturdays (talk) 04:47, 13 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It's still reviewed nonetheless. Reviewed means somebody looked over it, problematic or not. Am I wrong? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Science Saturdays (talk • contribs) 04:50, 13 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

David Morley (paediatrician)

Thank you for reviewing David Morley (paediatrician). --Winelight (talk) 07:58, 13 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

DJ Scorpio: World No.2 Hardcore-Techno DJ from Torquay

In that case you might as well delete every famous DJ/Artist from wikipedia altogether then hey because if you ask anyone up and down the country thats into Hardcore-Techno (not Happy Hardcore) and ask if they've heard of him a true Technoist would definetily say yes especially DJ Producer (No.1) who Scorpio goes back to back with. Most people in the Dance Scene have heard of Deathchant Records and Producer's own Rebel Scum Records. You don't see Scorpio in Torquay because he gets too much harrassment from fans so he'll go out to one of the small towns on the outskirts of Torquay just to do shopping!!. It's funny how it recognised DJ Hype I suppose it's because he's from London and not somewhere else??StatoatTBC (talk) 11:53, 13 February 2014 (UTC)[1][reply]

Quick revisit

Hi, thanks for assessing page "V. Srinivas Goud". I have made the changes to make it more neutral. can you please re asses it and check if it is neutral. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mohan times (talk • contribs) 12:06, 13 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Hello, this is cowhen 1966. Thanks for alerting me about my uncategorised section. I have dealt with the issue. Could you kindly remove the box now please. Regards, — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cowhen1966 (talk • contribs) 01:20, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you once again Wgolf! New editors like me find Wikipedia vey confusing at the best of times. Editors like you make things just that little bit bearable. I am still getting my head around referencing :) Regards, Cowhen. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cowhen1966 (talk • contribs) 01:30, 14 February 2014 (UTC) Howicus, I recognize you from the live chat. Now! I am also an aspiring editor, and I hope that I will be seen as being fair and adhering to Wikipedia's ethical policies. Just wielding your powers for yeilding sake is an abuse of power and it is against Wikipedia's policies. If you Bothered to take the time to read the correspondence between myself and Wgolf you would realise that Wgolf KINDLY asked me to categorise my Article- Something that such an EXPERT like you did not pick up on. Thanking him and asking him to remove the box was purely based on the Box regarding the categorization. I Was at no point referring to the hideous box at the top. But people like you and Santaku and Huon on the live desk are DRUNK with power! I am systematically and speedily working on my referencing so that I can move to other articles. But when people like yourselves try and make it harder for people tp progress to the next stage then it becomes PERSONAL. If you do not like the way I work or other people work Wikipedia has a method of Arbitration. Oh by the way, I hope I'm not talking to a BOT D — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cowhen1966 (talk • contribs) 09:40, 14 February 2014 (UTC) ThanksCowhen1966 (talk) 15:11, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

53rd and 6th

It appears you maybe confused as to what is going on. I am nominating this article for undeletion so you speedy request is not appropriate. This is a discussion at WP:DRV. Thanks! Valoem talk 18:43, 14 February 2014 (UTC) Oh okay sorry I thought someone made another page with no content ha ha, sorry about that, thanks. Wgolf (talk) 18:43, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


In response to: proposed deletion of The Dance Diaries

Sir please excuse this page for one or two days as I am building a page about an upcoming film and I am gathering information about it from different people. I will try to get references and websites as you demand and will build this page, not fully but enough to meet the demands of wikipedia.

Thank You, Shahmeer12 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shahmeer12 (talk • contribs) 18:40, 15 February 2014 (UTC) You have 1 week, so don't feel rushed, just don't remove the tag is all (and go to places like IMDB, ect) Wgolf (talk) 18:43, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Jimmy Wachtel

Hello, Wgolf, I am messaging you to let you know that I haven't finished editing the page "Jimmy Wachtel", so please give me some time to complete my editing (2 hrs.), king regards :) (Joe Vitale 5 (talk) 20:25, 15 February 2014 (UTC)). It's cool, good luck, btw when starting a new article put at least one ref/link so it wont be deleted. Wgolf (talk) 20:26, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Henry Golding (television presenter)

I am in agreement for the time being. I initiated the article early today, but realised I lacked the necessary information to continue. I am disappointed that this has been your decision; but nonetheless I understand it.

--Mrsolan22 (talk) 02:03, 16 February 2014 (UTC) Ha oh sorry, well someone was going to do it anyway, but don't worry you still have a week to get it set! Good luck! Wgolf (talk) 02:14, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

In response to: Proposed deletion of Greg Cravens (cartoonist)

Greetings! I made a mistake in the spelling - it was a total accident, and not on purpose. This is a second attempt, I've gotten info direct from Greg, and will post links to some other work, and perhaps a bio page on his Hurbis! comics webcomic page. Please work with me, so the page can be made better. I'm just a single human, trying to make Wiki a bit better by the pages I work on and/or make. Help me, help you, help others, to help Wiki a better place. (P.S. I'm ADHD, so some of the things I do ... I kind of forget to check and recheck ... so take it easy on me please.)
AllanVS talk contribs 21:57, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Can you help me with the categories? I can't seem to find where they should go. Thanks

AllanVS talk contribs 22:13, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I've added some books that he's published ... I believe this can count as 'reliable sources' right? AllanVS talk contribs 20:51, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I want to translate the Doris Dana article from Spanish, I am not able, because if I start from scratch, someone deletes it, and if I start from the Spanish article, they also delete it, I don't know what to do, it is impossible, thanks for the help! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aamontoya (talk • contribs) 03:16, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ha thanks

Sorry I never noticed the links to other wikipedias on the side bar, so thanks for pointing that out. Wgolf (talk) 19:01, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Question

How do you upload images (or add rather) to wikipedia? I need this info to put in box art and screen shots. (There are lots of categories in the upload section, not sure which is correct.)

Also, how may screenshots are allowed per page? — Preceding unsigned comment added by TheKingsTable (talk • contribs) 22:08, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Any suggestions on how to fix mistakes on Cade Utterback article?

I understand some mistakes, but don't know how to fix them to make them OK. If you could help edit (if you want) it would help me understand. (You see, I am new to Wikipedia editing...) — Preceding unsigned comment added by CUEditman (talk • contribs) 04:43, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


You've been reviewing many articles I've started on topics in these areas. I'd be interested in any observations or comments you may have on them, or my approach, etc. I'm happy that at least SOMEBODY is looking at them, even for a few seconds each. ;-) Lou Sander (talk) 01:06, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

WP:AIV notice

Hi, I responded to your report with [1]. Please bring any suspected sock-puppet violations there instead. Cheers, Deville (Talk) 01:56, 17 February 2014 (UTC) Thanks Wgolf (talk) 02:00, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the edit to the London Sketchbook

Just wanted to say thank you, Wgolf. Have a nice night, friend :-). ZSNES (talk) 04:23, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

SPI

I accidentally put in a duplicate SPI report here, however as yours was not reported correctly (you put the puppeteer down a second time as a puppet) and didn't notify the editors, I removed yours and kept mine. I hope you don't mind as the result will be what you were looking for. Flat Out let's discuss it 04:36, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ordinarily, editors are not notified on SPI reports on them. It is highly preferred to not do that, so please do not repeat it.
TheOriginalSoni (talk) 08:58, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Please don't repeat it? Flat Out let's discuss it 01:38, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Special Barnstar
Thanks for reviewing most of my created articles. ミーラー強斗武 (talk) 22:14, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

n00b question regarding new page patrol

Nice to meet you, Wgolf! I got a notification saying you had reviewed the page I just made, Bluebird (DC Comics), but for the life of me I can't figure out how to see the review. As a relatively green user, I'd really value feedback from someone of your experience. Can you point me to where your review is, or is there anything to see?

Thanks for your efforts to keep Wikipedia shiny and good!

TI. Gracchus (talk) 23:09, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Spurious change notifications

At 22:23 UTC yesterday I received an update notification email titled Wikipedia page Hermann Nonnenmacher has been changed by Wgolf‏. However, the Hermann Nonnenmacher article had not been modified.

Similarly, on 15 February I received an email Wikipedia page Ian Macnab (disambiguation) has been changed by Wgolf‏, but the revision history of Ian Macnab (disambiguation) shows no changes by you.

What happened? Did you make changes without the history being changed? Or is Wikipedia broken? Verbcatcher (talk) 00:30, 18 February 2014 (UTC) I just verified the articles, that is all, I didn't edit them though. Wgolf (talk) 02:34, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A beer for you!

Well spotted on Ziegfeld, cheers! ♦ Dr. Blofeld 20:52, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


New user help

Im new to wikipedia i could use assistance in the pages I created.- thank you— Preceding unsigned comment added by Lisa Vaz (talk • contribs) 17:01, 19 February 2014


For always reviewing my articles. Thanks :-) →Enock4seth (talk) 15:46, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar
This is just to say thanks for all those love and support you have given to me. Cheers! Ashishlohorung (talk) 00:43, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

re: Templates for winners of best visuals, makeup and sound editing?

Hi. The easiest thing to do is copy the layout of one of the existing ones, and then populate it with the relevant names. A bit time consuming, but worth doing. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 18:21, 23 February 2014 (UTC) Thanks, I think I'll do makeup as that would be the easiest one. Wgolf (talk) 18:23, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Livetecs.com

The article is about a time tracking software, don't has esternal links, i rewrited the article to have a good point of view, i want to know why you want to deleted this page? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Scortyro (talk • contribs) 22:35, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I have unreviewed a page you curated

Hi, I'm Randykitty. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Eventing (magazine), and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you. Randykitty (talk) 17:46, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Article creators

Hi again Wgolf, thanks for reporting all these foreign-language pages at WP:Pages needing translation into English, and thanks for the thankyou concerning Hoërskool Jim Fouché. Someone else found references to add. But I'd like to remind you that the editors who create these pages - in particular the foreign-language ones - are very often new. Could you try hard not to bite them, please? And especially, let them know when you change tack and remove the speedy deletion template? Being told your article is up for speedy deletion must be very frightening, especially if your English is weak enough that you uploaded it in a foreign language, so it's nice to tell them when it's no longer at risk of that. (I did this for the Afrikaans-speaking editor. There are also some non-English welcome messages listed here that may be useful.) Thanks for understanding. Yngvadottir (talk) 18:39, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed that your user page has a WP:Vandalism epidemic. Here's a pittance. ミーラー強斗武 (talk) 14:28, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism reports

Hey I want to offer you some help with your vandalism reports. try and link your reports to either vandalism after final warning, or vandalism only accounts and supply diffs. Vague reports about disruptive editing when the editor has not received or exceeded a level 4 warning will not result in a block. Let me know if you need help. Flat Out let's discuss it 04:52, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

Thank you for reviewing the LookTracker page I created. I hope it now meets Wikipedia's standards. If you have any suggestions moving forward regarding page creation and editing, please let me know! Thanks, --Alvb (talk) 00:14, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank You :)

Hey Wgolf

Thanks for reviewing the two articles,which I created.MediaJet talk 05:34, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

Dear Wgolf, Thanks for reviewing my article on Merchants Bank Building Baltimore. User:RufusL1948 15:12, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

Dear Wgolf, Thanks for reviewing my article about Proffesour zi-qiang zhu, I have added sevral referances from reliable sources (Univeristy press and conferences news webpage). Best regards I am Mahirmjalani

Review of Villafranchian article

Just a quick thanks for your review of the Villafranchian article. Yours, Wikiuser100 (talk) 01:14, 28 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A kitten for you!

Hello

IsaacLeija (talk) 03:07, 28 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Shawn Jones Page

Hey I'm in the process of having someone create my Wikipedia page and you deleted me from my hometown page. Is there a reason? I'm in the middle of getting him the references — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shawnjuan02 (talk • contribs) 17:45, 28 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Peter King (make-up artist)

Hello Wgolf,

This is just a courtesy visit to inform you that I took the liberty to slightly expand your article,supporting it by a relevant source. Hope you'd approve of it. Best regards, (MrNiceGuy1113 (talk) 18:25, 28 February 2014 (UTC))[reply]

Account confirmation

Hello, im trying to upload some pictures, but Wikipedia says that my account has not been confirmed yet (although 4 days have already passed and i have more than 10 edits) and that i should ask an admin. Can you confirm my account please ? User:SpongebobLawyerPants (User talk:SpongebobLawyerPants)

Wgolf

For Helping
See I know you don't know me and you are still trying to help me and i appreciate that and I like all the work your doing, but im not that young Mi$$secret 01:33, 2 March 2014 (UTC)

Wgolf

Shining bright like a diamond
KEEP SHINING Mi$$secret 01:48, 2 March 2014 (UTC)

thx

hey r u a boy or girl — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mizzsecret21 (talk • contribs) 01:54, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Walter's Christmas

About two weeks ago, you proposed an article, Walter's Christmas, for deletion. The PROD tag was then removed. I have now nominated the article for deletion via the AFD process. Robert McClenon (talk) 02:38, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of Corbettmaths

There is a category on Wikipedia called Mathematics Websites, therefore as a Mathematics Website I am unsure as to exactly why a few sentences on a Mathematics Website could not be added. As per the guidelines, I ensured it satisfied the rule "The article may remain if you have enough humility to make it neutral."

Furthermore, the inclusion of the external link I do not feel contravenes "Please do not try to promote your product or business. Please do not insert external links to your commercial website unless a neutral party would judge that the link truly belongs in the article," as firstly the link is important to identify what the entry is about and secondly it is not a commercial website.

If I am mistaken on any of these guidelines, please advise. However as there are 21 other Mathematics Websites, I would appreciate guidance on how to ensure mine is the 22nd.

Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Corbettmaths (talk • contribs) 03:10, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

SPI

Wgolf, when you file reports at WP:SPI, don't include the master in the list of puppets. Thanks.--Bbb23 (talk) 20:50, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

My sandbox

Hey Wgolf. Would you mind reviewing the edits I've made to my sandbox and reviewing your decision to place the suggested deletion for promotionalism? I've added some references that might help you review better, and I've tried to address some of the promotional tone concerns. Many of the company's references are in Portuguese, and some of the archived articles are hosted on the company's website, yet I still think that notability is ok. I would value your input. I should also note that I will place this article at articles for creation for review rather than creating the article myself. Thank you in advance. Nika Navow (talk) 19:52, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  1. ^ Scorpio on Discogs.web
Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Wgolf&oldid=598427243"