User talk:Thirdright: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 22:33, 29 January 2012

This is Thirdright's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11: 61 days

A shield for you! (?)

		The Userpage Shield
		for removing the vandalism on my userpage. Thank you and happy editing!

Bosnian pyramids -- WP:3RR

I add some pictures to this Article, No harm. but User:Ronz just kept banning my adding, EXACT like He is the only one who eligible for editing this Article, I don't know How to do.Znorz (talk) 02:17, 11 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

User:Ronz provided explanation for his reverts in the edit summaries. Please review his edit summaries on the history tab of the page. It appears to me that the primary concern is that the references provided are not WP:Reliable sources, so I suggest you review that policy. Regarding [[WP:3RR], you have reposted the same information to the article repeatedly. That constitutes an edit war, even if you are sure you are correct. Read WP:3RR for next steps for you to take. I hope this helps. Tgeairn (talk) 22:31, 11 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

They are copyright violations and you appear to be a blocked editor evading their block. Dougweller (talk) 22:22, 11 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.

We have added information about the readership and quality of the suggested articles using a Low/Medium/High scale. For readership the scale goes from Low to High , while for quality the scale goes from Low to High .

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!


Stubs		Cleanup
	Wepre Park		George M. Hendee
	Calcoed		Keep Your Heart
	Coed Talon		Pentre Halkyn
	Waterford Precision Cycles	Merge
	Ross (bicycles)		Apocalypse
	Kuwahara (bicycle company)		Sustainability practices in organizations
	Schwinn Racer		Sexual orientation change efforts
	Sissy bar	Add sources
	Kalman J. Cohen		Bretton Bridge
	Cadole		Kashmir
	Dorel Industries		Ogof Nadolig
	Pacific Cycle	Wikify
	Milwaukee Bicycle Co.		Miyuki Tanobe
	Lehel (appliances)		Excelsior-Henderson Motorcycle
	Syncros		List of Dumbarton F.C. seasons
	Alyn Gorge	Expand
	Kálmán		Donny Atherton
	Leeswood		Mike Poulson
	Caerwys Rectory		1813 in the United States

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 02:23, 23 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Bun-sgoil Shlèite

I'm sorry for deleting your page, but when i was just a wee lad i went to this school and I know what i am talking about.

Although I appreciate your first-hand knowledge of the school, making extraordinary claims as you did with this edit requires verifiable sources. Please see WP:SOURCES for more information on what are usable sources. Thank you, and happy editing! --Tgeairn (talk) 01:36, 7 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

DID YOU REVERT MY CHANGES AGAIN!? I EVEN HAD MY BLOODY SOURCE THERE LAD! I OUGHT TO THROW HAGGIS AT YOU! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.55.255.27 (talk) 22:34, 7 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No, sorry, but that was not me reverting. Your haggis would be misdirected. Please be sure to check out WP:SOURCES before editing the article again though. See ye efter! --Tgeairn (talk) 23:43, 7 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	Thanks for protecting my user page <3 Abigail was here :D (Need Some Help? Click Me!) 00:55, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ivanka Trump

Greetings-

I work for the Trump Organization and have been asked by Ivanka Trump to update her Wiki page so we hope that you would be kind enough to allow the updates to stand?

Thank you,

Michael Martin The Trump Organization mmartin@trumporg.com — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mmartinnyc (talk • contribs) 16:57, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Mr Martin. Your contributions to Ivanka Trump are of course welcome. I reverted your changes which removed referenced material, but you should feel free to add the material you have as long as it is well cited, verifiable, and written from a neutral point of view. Please review those links, as well as the information on conflict of interest that I placed on your talk page. If you have any questions regarding specific content to add or remove, feel free to discuss it on the article discussion page and I or another editor will work with you. --Tgeairn (talk) 17:08, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the response, I'm just getting my feet wet on Wiki so I appreciate the feedback. Ivanka is interested in keeping her page up-to-date and accurate so I'll do the best I can under the guidelines.

Regards, Michael — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mmartinnyc (talk • contribs) 17:38, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

caltas im sorry i dindt know i have edited the wiki page i fall as sleep on it sorry.. anonymoust user thank you for protecting wiki. urs truly. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 41.212.209.23 (talk) 11:30, 9 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Oh no!

Sorry for warning you by mistake! And thanks for reverting my user page! :) --Caltas ^(talk) 10:50, 9 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No problem... We're both pretty quick with the trigger finger... I thought maybe I had reverted something else on your user page. :) --Tgeairn (talk) 10:52, 9 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No, you didn't do anything that would have deserved a level 4 warning! ;) The problem was that I noticed a second too late, that you had beaten me to reverting Simon Katich, so I warned you instead of the vandalising IP. . . Keep up the good work! :) --Caltas ^(talk) 11:04, 9 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Admin Problem

Have you see any Admins on Wikipedia who are rude and stirring up trouble? I just be encountered an VERY RUDE admin who is threatening me that he is goin' to block my account 'cause they say I have bad English and may not be a US citizen yet. They rudly say that non US Citizens don't deserve to have a Wiki acount. I need help because they are bothering me! I can't believe how discriminating it can be on wikipedia!!!!!!!!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nycalex2012 (talk • contribs) 04:47, 10 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Although it is unlikely that a rude or abusive user was really an admin, they are people too and could make mistakes. If you are unable to resolve the issue with the editor on their talk page, you can take a look at Wikiquette assistance and certainly get any issues handled there. Thanks for asking! --Tgeairn (talk) 04:52, 10 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Just as a note, no such threats or claims have been made against Nycalex2012, though I think this vandalism that Nycalex2012 left on my userpage tells you everything you need to know about his/her intentions on Wikipedia. Sparthorse (talk) 04:56, 10 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nice - I believe the editor misinterpreted the templates that are landing on his talk page as a result of his -ahem- 'editing style'. I am, of course, always interested in enthusiasim though! :) --Tgeairn (talk) 05:00, 10 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Murata Jukō and Murata Shukō

There are two separate pages, Murata Jukō and Murata Shukō. They should be merged because they are the same person, only different pronunciations of his name! How can this be done? --Britannic124 (talk) 17:38, 11 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

To get started with the process of merging two or more articles, first see WP:Merge and Help:Merging. Those two articles give the details of how to propose and discuss a merge.

In short, you will want to a) first determine which article to keep, b) place proposed merge templates on the pages (pointing both to a discussion section in the target article's talk page), c) discuss the merger and get consensus (this should be pretty easy given the low number of editors on the articles), and d) once a concensus has been reached - perform the merge. Each of these steps are described in detail i nthe WP:Merge and Help:Merging articles.

Having said all of that, since you are the only editor of Murata Shukō, if your intention is for the merged article to be Murata Jukō then you can proceed boldly with the merge.

I hope this helps. Feel free to ask any questions if you run into trouble, and be sure to read the articles on merging carefully before starting. Happy editing! --Tgeairn (talk) 19:58, 11 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I don't want to sound lazy, but it appears very complicated. Could you or someone else willing to do it do it? I'm sorry… --Britannic124 (talk) 19:58, 31 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring

Your recent editing history at The Weeknd shows that you are in danger of breaking the three-revert rule, or that you may have already broken it. An editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Breaking the three-revert rule often leads to a block.

If you wish to avoid being blocked, instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to discuss the changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. You may still be blocked for edit warring even if you do not exceed the technical limit of the three-revert rule if your behavior indicates that you intend to continue to revert repeatedly. Jim1138 (talk) 07:38, 22 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Jim, please review the changes I am reverting. The link the editor is adding is a site to download copyrighted material, and requires reversion. I am in contact with WikiMedia Oversight to get the history blanked. Thanks! --Tgeairn (talk) 07:41, 22 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Why not block him at WP:AIV? Sorry for using the template! Cheers! Jim1138 (talk) 07:47, 22 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Done and done. Thanks! No prob with the template, dog knows I use 'em all the time! --Tgeairn (talk) 07:52, 22 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ravishankar (talk) 08:07, 22 December 2011 (UTC)Hi, Dear i added the information i got by visiting those cities.Since i am new here, i hope you people will guide me whenever i get mistaken.I promise to never vandalize with any page again. Thanking you[reply]

Response to message

I saw that. I forgot to add in the cite, so I'm in the process of doing it right now. Booyahhayoob (talk) 21:08, 22 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, happy editing! --Tgeairn (talk) 21:09, 22 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Satellite state

You claim that Czechoslovakia was not Warsaw Pact Member between 1968 and 1969? --188.113.91.110 (talk) 21:11, 22 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No, I have no opinion or expertise in that area. I reverted your removal of a cited/sourced edit. Please be sure to provide an edit history, especially if you are removing sourced material. Thanks, and happy editing! --Tgeairn (talk) 21:15, 22 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Repetitive Stress Injury

Hi Tgeairn,

I have significant experience as a sufferer of RSI for more that 6 years.

Extended content

Here is my story.

Homeopathy literally saved me from the hell I was going through. It is up to you to decide, whether to look for "Scientific" evidence of Homeopathy until you include or help thousands out there that are suffering with it.

Here is my story....

I had Repetitive Stress Injury, where my arms were sore every day by end of day. Pain used to run from forearms to elbows. My shoulders used to have sharp shooting pains due to usage of Mouse.Doctors diagnosed it as Tendinitis.I used to apply Ice packs before going to bed. Gone through several Physio therapy sessions to “strengthen” muscles.

Gone to some of the best sports medicine doctors out there, including to the one who used to treat players of “Dallas Cowboys”, the football team of Dallas.

Six years passed by, with this pain with out any result. Yes that is 6 years of pain ..with no hope in sight.

Finally I tried Homeopathy ….The pain went away like a magic…. The medicine is called “Bellis Perennis”, it is made from a common plant called “English Daisy” a wild plant that is very commonly seen.

I have taken it three times in one day. Yes one day, for three times. ( 1m potency, 3 times in one day )

That’s it….

Now please guide me so that we can help save other RSI sufferers... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Srinikoganti (talk • contribs) 03:05, 31 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! As someone who also suffers from RSI (possibly due to way too many hours on Wikipedia!), I am also always interested in alternative ways to ease suffering. However, your edits did not provide a reliable source to back your claims. Your personal story is an interesting one, and I am glad that you are finding relief. Unfortunately, personal anecdotes are at best original research and can't be used as a source in an article. Please go ahead and locate reliable source(s) and add those to the RSI article. If you need help figuring out what kind of sources to use, or how to cite those sources, check out the links in this response. If you still need assistance, feel free to ask me here! Thanks, and happy editing. --Tgeairn (talk) 03:15, 31 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Element collecting, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mercury (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:33, 31 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Inappropriate editing

User IP 72.48.205.193 did this to the Wikipedia:Sandbox page:
http://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3ASandbox&action=historysubmit&diff=468814189&oldid=468813816

Didn't know how else to “report” this, I didn't want to get involved with warning them and stuff.

Britannic124 (talk) 19:42, 31 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

References for Homeopathy remedy medicine "Bellis Perennis"

Hi Tgeairn,

Here are some links to the Homepathy medicine "Bellis Perennis" that I was mentioning about.

http://www.homeopathyplanet.com/AudeSapere/Study%20Room/MMCharts/Bellis%20perennis.pdf http://www.homeoint.org/books/boericmm/b/bell-p.htm http://www.vithoulkas.com/en/books-study/online-materia-medica/2279.html http://hpathy.com/ebooks/boerickes-materia-medica/bellis-perennis/ http://abchomeopathy.com/r.php/Bell-p http://www.homeopathyandmore.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=355

I urge you to use it for yourself to get convinced.

We are so used to believing what allopathy doctors say and we think that is the whole truth.

As you know, our science is evolving and can't answer lot of questions.

And more over, drug companies want Homeopathy and other alternative medicine to die so that they can more profits. So it is very common to see the medical journals and research community bad mouth Homeopathy.

Please let me know if you need any further info.

I have no ulterior motive other than helping RSI sufferers.

Sincerely, Srini — Preceding unsigned comment added by Srinikoganti (talk • contribs) 00:09, 1 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Mirror

I'm really sorry, I forgot to add my reference — Preceding unsigned comment added by Maximuman (talk • contribs) 19:42, 5 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No problem... I see you've added it now. Thanks! --Tgeairn (talk) 19:47, 5 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Barnstar of Diligence
	Thanks for pointing out my mistake, wouldn't have noticed otherwise Maximuman (talk) 19:48, 5 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

		The Userpage Shield
		Thanks for reverting vandalism on my user page and standing in the line of fire. SMS ^Talk 19:48, 5 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Reliable Sources

One more question, there's been arguments surrounding http://www.buzzjack.com/, is that site reliable for singles' sales figures — Preceding unsigned comment added by Maximuman (talk • contribs) 19:51, 5 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Per WP:USERG, I would consider the Buzz Jack site a Self-Published site (therefore not a WP:Reliable source) as it contains "...content [that] is largely user-generated." The exception would be if the referenced material is clearly posted by a credentialed member of the site's editorial staff (in this context, that means a credentialed member of the press). A quick review of the site didn't clearly indicate if the moderators are credentialed (and I would think it is unlikely). So... if there is any controversy, I don't think Buzz Jack stands up as a reliable source. --Tgeairn (talk) 20:05, 5 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, thanks for that, I think the main editor is a person called vidcapper, I'm currently messaging him on where he retrieves the information from, even though from my point of view buzzjack's sales are accurate, you're right, we cannot tell — Preceding unsigned comment added by Maximuman (talk • contribs) 20:13, 5 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

"Prophecy" edit

I added the reference to the Prophecy edit ... Thank you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kevinkleint (talk • contribs) 20:57, 5 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

"Fan Death"-Super Smash Brothers

"Fan Death" is the term from the popular Nintendo 64 game "Super Smash Brothers" wherein a person's character is disposed via "The Fan". This is generally considered the most embarrassing way to die in the game. The humiliation is two sided. First, death via a fan is almost impossible because the fan does such little damage to a character. Secondly, it's a fan. Compared to the other weapons in the game i.e. Hammer, Bat, Green Shell etc, this is by far the weakest and least fought over weapon. All of this adds to the overall charm and distinction of actually meeting defeat at the hands of someone wielding a fan. All you can do is lower your head and walk away in shame. And if your friends make fun of you mercilessly, pull out the game cartridge while they are playing, and try to break it against the dumpster behind your house. This insures no more humiliation of death via The Fan. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 140.254.45.34 (talk) 21:17, 5 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I have no opinion or argument with your depiction of "Fan Death" in the game. However, you will need to provide a reliable source for the information if you want to include it in the article. Possibly a better location would be in the article about the game itself? Thanks! --Tgeairn (talk) 21:25, 5 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If I provide a link, can you add it to the page? I'm having a hard time referencing it properly? The second portion is more just for fun but the first portion is absolutely true and quite a cult phenomenon in gamer circles http://super-smash-bros.wikia.com/wiki/Fan — Preceding unsigned comment added by 140.254.45.34 (talk) 22:06, 5 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The code you will want to include after your text is:

<ref>{{Citation | url = http://super-smash-bros.wikia.com/wiki/Fan | accessdate = 2012-01-05 }}</ref>

Just put the above after your addition to the article and a reference will be added to the list at the bottom.

HOWEVER! The article you have been adding the text to is about the Korean Myth Fan Death. I suggest you look for another article more appropriate to the addition (maybe Super Smash Bros., but I'm not a gamer so I don't know). --Tgeairn (talk) 22:18, 5 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Frisch School

Hi, I believe you locked the page entitled The Frisch School. Currently it is inaccurate and I am unable to change it. Can you revert it back to what it was a few days ago? Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Iamnostalgic (talk • contribs) 00:21, 6 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! The protection for the Frisch School article expires 23:18, 12 January 2012 (UTC). Until then, certain users will be unable to edit the page. Your edits here and here appear to be vandalism and will not be restored. Please review the links I have placed on your talk page for more information on effectively contributing to Wikipedia. Happy Editing! --Tgeairn (talk) 00:32, 6 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I don't blame you for taking out my additions, but the new version is missing information found on the page a few days ago before there was a barrage of edits. Please look back in the history. Thanks for you time and the information on my talk page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Iamnostalgic (talk • contribs) 02:28, 6 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

KK

Re: your note on my talk page: yes, you are correct. Explanation is at User_talk:LadyofShalott & User_talk:Drmies - my apologies. Off to MC32's page now. - Sitush (talk) 01:55, 6 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thanks for reverting my user talk page yesterday.

-- RandorXeus. 15:24, 6 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

your warning

the content removal was explained detailly on the talkpage.--MThekkumthala (talk) 01:54, 8 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

re:January 2012

It is foolish of me to try to contribute to wiki and take the time to source information when users undo any information that is new. I placed an update on the Uwe Boll page and provided a link to a 96 page legal document that verified my every word, also, my summery used much kinder wording than the document by keeping it neutral. I just don't see the point of being a user here anymore, thank you and good day. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fishmilk4all (talk • contribs) 15:15, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please see my reply at your talk page. --Tgeairn (talk) 18:03, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

?

What was wrong with the edit i made? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jamesfield1994 (talk • contribs) 18:19, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you are going to assert that 'something' tastes like 'something else', then please provide a reliable source. Also, your edit removed other sourced content. Thanks for asking! --Tgeairn (talk) 18:22, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Pot

The facts that the government distributes are lies at best and should not be taken seriously. In fact the most important facts about cannibis(marijuana) are often left out of government approved websites. For example, in order to overdose on pot you would need to smoke your body weight in pot within an hour. For those of you who don't know, 1 gram of pot can make 16 cigarrettes and there are 453 grams in a pound — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chicken516 (talk • contribs) 18:41, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

And I care because...? Your contribution history doesn't show any editing related to cannibis, so I'm not sure why you're giving me unsourced facts here. As an aside, I consider your assertion highly dubious. --Tgeairn (talk) 18:45, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thank you for helping out on my page. Rm1271 ^talk_contribs 02:52, 11 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

2018 Commonwealth Games

Why can't we mention that the Gold Coast is the host of the 2018 Commonwealth Games? And that our national sporting teams play in our two major new stadiums at Carrara Stadium and Robina Stadium? There are pages about all of these facts already - why can't they be added to the Gold Coast page. The gold coast is trying to grow its reputation as a serious city but does not have a lot going for it besides its tourism and beaches - the stadiums and the commonwealth games may not seem like a big deal to you - but for the Gold Coast I feel they are worth a mention to help people to understand the city and its idenity. What is your reason to exclude the information from the page? 124.185.161.243 (talk) 07:08, 11 January 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.185.161.243 (talk) 07:05, 11 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

..

ok — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.28.206.232 (talk) 19:41, 12 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

..

ok — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.28.206.232 (talk) 20:09, 12 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

2012 BRIT Awards

I have reverted your edit to this page, as the content you removed is sourced and the person is indeed nominated for the award under which he is listed so whether he is notable according to Wikipedia guidelines is irrelevant.12bigbrother12 (talk) 20:33, 12 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It looks like Ethan Jones was not nominated. Ethan Johns was. I have updated the article accordingly. --Tgeairn (talk) 20:37, 12 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding the page Gestapo

Hello.

Recently, a large amount of content was removed from Gestapo (by another IP editor). You reverted the removal as "unexplained removal of content", however, the removal was explained as libel, therefore, in my opinion, it should not be speedily reverted, however, since the removal was indeed large, I suggest starting a discussion on the corresponding talk page in order to contest the removal.

Please correct me if I'm wrong. Thank you. 75.53.212.214 (talk) 22:14, 12 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your message. I don't have an opinion one way or the other on the issue, although it is unlikely that so much sourced material could be considered libel. A quick perusal of the talk page indicated that there has been some discussion over time to arrive at the current version of the article. I will not be starting an additional discussion on the material, but given the visibility of the article, I am sure other editors will. I left a message on the talk page of the editor who removed the content as well. Thanks again, and happy editing! --Tgeairn (talk) 22:20, 12 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

As a lawyer, 75.53.212.214, I can tell you there is no "libel" going on herein. This is no untruth about another which will do harm to that living person; they are all long since dead. The article is not about a living person but of an organization of members which was condemned as a criminal organization. The article is well written and much of it is well cited; I have been a major author of the article. Kierzek (talk) 14:06, 13 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank You

I am sorry. I couldn't find a source. Next time I will put it in the talk page so someone might be able to find a source. Thank you and have a good day! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.22.126.189 (talk) 16:35, 14 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your input is needed on the SOPA initiative

Hi Tgeairn,

You are receiving this message either because you expressed an opinion about the proposed SOPA blackout before full blackout and soft blackout were adequately differentiated, or because you expressed general support without specifying a preference. Please ensure that your voice is heard by clarifying your position accordingly.

Thank you.

Message delivered as per request on ANI. -- The Helpful Bot 16:44, 14 January 2012 (UTC) [reply]

FYI

Re your talk page message here, you should take a look at this - there's a substantial back-story that I suspect you may not be aware of. Prioryman (talk) 11:02, 15 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Burbank High School (Burbank, California)

Just had to say that the source there was beyond unreliable, more like foul! Calabe 1992 04:37, 18 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah... wasn't really worth the click to check. Now I gotta go clean cookies up. ;) --Tgeairn (talk) 04:38, 18 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Already done here... way more than what I needed to see this evening... Calabe 1992 04:40, 18 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

:c

I didn't do anything wrong, did I? D': — Preceding unsigned comment added by Grievous-Is-Mine (talk • contribs) 21:55, 19 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your help

in cleaning up my talk page—I appreciate it. --Old Moonraker (talk) 22:44, 19 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disney Info

Hi,

I notice you've edited some updates I've placed on these articles. I appreciate that you're and admin and just doing your job, however as you cannot have knowledge of everything, I feel my updates should stand.

Thanks.

Tekilla sunrize (talk) 11:12, 22 January 2012 (UTC)Tekilla Sunrize[reply]

List of Australian artists

I see I was busily adding entries in violation of WP:NLIST while you were removing them! Should have removed mine too as I don't bite. A note to let me know would work too. Thanks for cleaning up List of Australian artists! Cheers! Jim1138 (talk) 05:34, 25 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

LOL. You know, I got about halfway through the list, and then decided to come back later and see if there were any objections. I saw you added hers back and second (even triple) guessed myself. I'll finish the list tomorrow. Yours was good faith trying to help a new editor, and I surely understand. Thanks for the note! --Tgeairn (talk) 06:46, 25 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism

Hi, check out the edit history of The Goonies - someone has it in for you!. Regards Denisarona (talk) 07:16, 26 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Formal mediation has been requested

The Mediation Committee has received a request for formal mediation of the dispute relating to "Helter Skelter (Manson scenario)". As an editor concerned in this dispute, you are invited to participate in the mediation. Mediation is a voluntary process which resolves a dispute over article content by facilitation, consensus-building, and compromise among the involved editors. After reviewing the request page, the formal mediation policy, and the guide to formal mediation, please indicate in the "party agreement" section whether you agree to participate. Because requests must be responded to by the Mediation Committee within seven days, please respond to the request by 5 February 2012.

Discussion relating to the mediation request is welcome at the case talk page. Thank you.
Message delivered by MediationBot (talk) on behalf of the Mediation Committee. 15:48, 29 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

youj daskfhg dfslshfkjdsfh

Chris Ferguson

why do you shield the ferguson page, present information is outdated and mine is not an opinion — Preceding unsigned comment added by 178.85.32.172 (talk) 22:03, 29 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You should feel free to update the article as needed, however you will need to provide sources for your statements. Also, I suggest you review the Wikipedia policies regarding biographies of living persons before proceeding. Thanks for asking, and Happy Editing! --Tgeairn (talk) 22:06, 29 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 593: / Line 593: @@
 <small>Message delivered by [[User:MediationBot|MediationBot]] ([[User talk:MediationBot|talk]]) on [[Wikipedia:Mediation Committee#MediationBot|behalf]] of the Mediation Committee. 15:48, 29 January 2012 (UTC)</small>
 }}
+youj daskfhg dfslshfkjdsfh
 == [[Chris Ferguson]] ==