User talk:Ronhjones

Tuesday

10

September

16:53 UTC

Welcome to Ronhjones' Talk page

on English Wikipedia

If you leave a new message on this page, I will reply on this page unless you ask me to reply elsewhere.

Ronhjones' Navigation bar

Home

Talk (Archives)

Contributions

EditCount

Sandbox

Sandbox2

Awards

Userboxes

Gallery

CSDlog

Subpages

Adminship

Hi there! To keep the flow of conversations, I like to keep threads on one page where possible. So, if you post a message here, I'll probably respond to it here. Conversely, if I post a message on your talk page, you can respond there if you wish; since I've edited your talk page I'll have it on my watchlist. Thanks!

If you wish to contact me privately you can email me

Leave me a message | Send me an email.

Note: To any interested parties. This is my only account, there are a few minor edits under my static IP address 87.127.178.158 and my work IP address (but that is shared) 193.113.135.87

All threads on this page will be archived after 14 days of non - activity.

Carl Sagan edit

First of all i hope this is the right place, i find it difficult to navigate these talk pages. Anyway, why did you remove the picture at the end of carl sagans page? I'm sure carl would have seen the funny side, he was a stoner anyway so it's not just nonesense. Please try to see the fun side of things =] —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.26.65.99 (talk) 23:38, 16 February 2010 (UTC)

It not a fun site. Try MySpace and Facebook.  Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 23:39, 16 February 2010 (UTC)

Why can't it be fun and informative at the same time? Isn't that what mr sagans series 'cosmos' was so popular for? Honestly, you wikipedia admins are basically the vorgons from hitchikers guide to the galaxy. It's depressing to see people actively destroy humour in articles. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.26.65.99 (talk) 23:41, 16 February 2010 (UTC)

Edit: i hope the message i sent got to you, a link to 'pale blue dot' (see here http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wupToqz1e2g) the line 'our imagined self importance' rings especially true. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.26.65.99 (talk) 23:51, 16 February 2010 (UTC)

Patent Nonesense

I am sorry Ron, but Campaign :smile: was not Patent nonesense. Nor was it a farce or any kind of "joke" other than it was created in the lightest of hearts.

I am sorry Ron, but I cannot conclude your deletion of a perfectly comprehensible article was a decision motivated by a disagreement of the principle of the article and no amount of "inability" to understand the content.

If at all possible could you please replace it. I have links to it, and hopefully so do other people. I am rather hurt that something I worked very carefully on was declared "Nonesense" ... it was not nonesense. Disagree with the need for Campaign :smile: if you want to, and feel free to pen a polemic against it - but please do not abuse your ability to delete perfectly comprehensible contributions to convey your opinion of my idea.

Yes. I am very serious. I am insulted.

Please alert me @ shea.reinke@gmail.com when you have had a chance to respond - I very rarely actually log into wikipedia. I rarely feel the need to. —Preceding unsigned comment added by SheaReinke (talk • contribs) 13:14, 31 January 2010 (UTC)

The page that was deleted did not have a snowballs chance of being able to stay on Wikipedia. It was declared "nonsense" by User:Andyjsmith. It is extremely unlikely that the page could ever be notable. Anyway I will userfy if for you at User:SheaReinke/Campaign :smile:, but it may not last long.  Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 23:57, 1 February 2010 (UTC)

Thank you for reconstituting my submission. May I ask that you weigh in on the "nonesense" verdict. It is a short article (for now) that I hope to eventually transform into a grammatical movement. Have you read the article and do you agree with "this andyjsmith's" opinion? If so could you take the time to explain in more detail than he did? I consider the article perfectly intelligible.

SheaReinke (talk) 05:35, 7 February 2010 (UTC)

There are a limited number of types of WP:CSD - G1 is just one of them. The page (as it stands) could very easily be thought to be nonsense, I know that some editors would call such a page a G3 (hoax), or A1 (No context) or A3 (No content). I doubt is A7 (No indication of importance (individuals, animals, organizations, web content)) is allowed for such a page, as it's range is limited. What tag is used for the CSD is not that important, so long as it approximates to the content. A proper notable page with appropriate sources, is very unlikely to be given a CSD tag, and if it was, it would be refused. The page as it stands will not pass those tests, and if it was seen in Article space would be deleted one way or the other (If no suitable CSD was appropriate then it would soon end up in Articles for deletion).  Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 23:15, 7 February 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 8 February 2010

• News and notes: Commons at 6 million, BLP taskforce, milestones and more

• In the news: Robson Revisions, Rumble in the Knesset, and more

• Dispatches: Fewer reviewers in 2009

• WikiProject report: WikiProject Olympics

• Features and admins: Approved this week

• Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 03:17, 9 February 2010 (UTC)

Replaced image

Hello -

I have been creating an article on Joel Iskowitz, which is still in sandbox form. I had uploaded an image given to me by the artist - the file is Iskowitz_SL_stamp_Scott_589.jpg - and I had limited license granted by the artist. The edit history of the image shows that you deleted it with the code "F3: Media file with improper license."

I've now replaced the image with my own original scan from a stamp I purchased, and have granted free public use - no claims of copyright - for the image.

I left the file name the same - not sure if that was a good idea or not - but I'm not clear about how it can be shown again on my sandbox, which I wish to publish ASAP.

Could you please help me? I'm not sure if I did the correct thing here, and I don't know what step to take next. Maxschlepp (talk) 14:06, 9 February 2010 (UTC)

Tricky (images often are...) Limited licenses are not allowed - because Wikipedia's license is basically that "anyone can copy the content", so any image must be released (or donated) on a full Creative Commons license, except fair use images. Your scan of a stamp might fall into "fair use" (may depend on how old it is). But note that Fair use images can only be used for the Articles that they claim on the image page - cannot be used in a sandbox! Can I suggest you post a question at the appropriate help page (WP:IMAGEHELP), there will be more editors with better knowledge of the Wikipedia copyright rules who will be only to glad to help you.  Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 20:15, 9 February 2010 (UTC)

Fraud is Fraud

http://www.google.com/search?client=safari&rls=en&q=yes+men+fraud&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8 Fascist 173.139.90.196 (talk) 22:36, 9 February 2010 (UTC)

Sorry about the edits...

Hi there, Sorry about the edits on the Mary Janice Davidson book - I was just really surprised to read the stub about the novel. It contains the entire plot, every twist, including the ending. I've never run into this on Wiki before and it was very disappointing.

72.93.92.213 (talk) 22:55, 9 February 2010 (UTC)

OK, Note that there are plenty of books/films full of spoilers - see WP:SPOILERS  Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 22:56, 9 February 2010 (UTC)

Richard Kastle

You have probably seen the Speedy Deletion message on the Richard Kastle talk page but I haven't seen one reaction at all. Therefore a message or a vote one way or the other is lacking. Richard Kastle is a wannabe pianist, unknown beyond his extremely limited viewing on youtube.

He now plays Holiday Inns and nursing homes for free.

His attempts to play the piano are a joke to any serious pianist.

Unfortunately, so few view his wikipedia article to justify the normal deletion process by vote.

Juri Koll is the only present editor of the Kastle article, and has caused immeasurable damage to the talk pages of other editors such as User Prof.rick, who, as a final measure had to delete his own talk page.

PLEASE, look into the Richard Kastle page and decide fairly if its presence in wikipedia can possibly be justified.

Why does Juri Koll claim to be the creator of this article while the page history indicates that Mike Caffey created the article? I suspect sock puppetry, probably conducted by Kastle himself. I therfore URGE a thorough investigation of the article by wikipedia administrators.

Thank You for listening,

Randyrhoads1fan (talk) 23:07, 9 February 2010 (UTC)

There is no CSD tag on the article page, that's why no one has taken any action - see WP:CSD for how to tag for speedy deletion. However, with so many references, it is unlikely to survive a CSD. The only option to delete it would be to nominate for deletion - see WP:AfD.  Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 23:12, 9 February 2010 (UTC)

Thanks

For reverting the vandalism on my talk page. All that because I reverted some vandalism! Dear me! Hope your eye is better :) --5 albert square (talk) 23:09, 9 February 2010 (UTC)

No problem. (and slowlyyyy healing!)  Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 23:12, 9 February 2010 (UTC)

dude thx alot 4 rattin me out. i can't make any more funnies. leave a message on my page —Preceding unsigned comment added by Guitarluvr21 (talk • contribs) 23:29, 9 February 2010 (UTC)

The Association for Akha Education and Culture in Thailand

I'm curious as to your reasoning for reverting what appears to be an attempt to remove the copyvio text. 76.102.12.35 (talk) 23:46, 9 February 2010 (UTC)

Because we have not got a crystal ball to know why an editor is deleting material from an article - that's the function of the edit summary, when left blank, we have to make up our own minds (and large deletes, with no summary are 99.9% vandalism). Vandal fighters do not "see" the whole page, just the changes and the edit summary - see File:Huggle.png for an example.  Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 23:54, 9 February 2010 (UTC)

Perhaps I wasn't clear. I haven't edited the article, I'm aquainted with Huggle (and it's drawbacks), and you haven't explained why you reintroduced copyvio material when the previous editor removed it. (Unless you're blaming Huggle?)76.102.12.35 (talk) 23:58, 9 February 2010 (UTC)

Hi - copyright material info

Dear wikipedia. I would like to inform that I am the copyright owner of the written material found here- http://www.akhaasia.org/index-7.htm I am the NGO's coordinator and author of the material and its webpage. Many thanks Jacob Lane —Preceding unsigned comment added by Afect (talk • contribs) 23:56, 9 February 2010 (UTC)

No good telling me, I'm afraid. I have no way of checking if you are really the copyright owner. The material must be donated correctly. Please see WP:DCM for instructions.  Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 23:59, 9 February 2010 (UTC)

Hi. Ok. How about I put something on the page http://www.akhaasia.org/index-7.htm now that proves I am the copyright owner. I will open dreamweaver and type something which can be changed later. What would you like me to type?

Tnx

Jacob —Preceding unsigned comment added by Afect (talk • contribs) 00:04, 10 February 2010 (UTC)

You can find data at http://creativecommons.org/choose/ - which will give you the the following html to add to the page bottom <a rel="license" href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/"><img alt="Creative Commons License" style="border-width:0" src="http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by/3.0/88x31.png" /></a><br />This work is licenced under a <a rel="license" href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/">Creative Commons Licence</a>.

Many thanks. I think its best I email permissions-en@wikimedia.org because I don't want to put a license statement on the site.

Im in England now and want to sleep so Ill do it tomorrow!

Many thanks

Jacob —Preceding unsigned comment added by Afect (talk • contribs) 00:21, 10 February 2010 (UTC)

OK. No problem. Sleep? It's only half past midnight! :-)  Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 00:25, 10 February 2010 (UTC)

Block of user:Lordgodable

The user was removing rape allegations which he himself earlier inserted, and which was referenced to a dead link. Was that removal enough reason for a block ? (well, the user created an AFD-nominated the article in the first place, but many editors start this way :-) Materialscientist (talk) 00:09, 10 February 2010 (UTC)

It was a bit odd. One link was just fine. He had been well warned by User:antiuser, and told to discuss on talk page, I only managed the last and fifth revert (3RR could have been also used here!).  Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 00:25, 10 February 2010 (UTC)

Clark Middle School

Hey there -- just noting that you seemed to have rolled Clark Middle School back to the wrong version. There is an IP editor who's reverting the vandalism, and it seems that you may have mistaken it as vandalism. I fixed it, though! Happy editing :] -- GorillaWarfare ^talk 01:45, 10 February 2010 (UTC)

There was so many vandal edits, it was hard to sort out the wood from the trees.  Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 01:46, 10 February 2010 (UTC)

Why did you delete my article about Mgem? This is a serious topic about a slang term used in the Philadelphia area. I live here and feel discriminated against by you deleting this page. Mind you I also spent around an hour working on that page's contents. Don't take offense to this but strictly according to your username, you obviously have no idea what its like living in Philadelphia. Please tell me why. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Loggy616 (talk • contribs) 02:16, 10 February 2010 (UTC)

I feel discriminated by the fact that you deleted my article discussing Mgem. Judging from your username, I believe you have no idea what its like growing up in Philadelphia. I want an explanatory reason as to why it was deleted. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Loggy616 (talk • contribs) 02:22, 10 February 2010 (UTC)

Swockmusic

I have counseled Swockmusic (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) with respect to conflict of interest and created iamchrisstone (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) for them to use to edit with. Fred Talk 14:45, 10 February 2010 (UTC)

OK fine, I was just about to reply to an e-mail from him (obviously sent some time earlier) - I'll skip that task now.  Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 19:21, 10 February 2010 (UTC)

Mgem

Why did you delete my article about Mgem? This is a serious topic about a slang term used in the Philadelphia area. I live here and feel discriminated against by you deleting this page. Mind you I also spent around an hour working on that page's contents. Don't take offense to this but strictly according to your username, you obviously have no idea what its like living in Philadelphia. Please tell me why. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Loggy616 (talk • contribs) 16:46, 10 February 2010 (UTC)

Where do I start...

1. It was tagged for speedy deletion as a hoax by User:Simon-in-sagamihara
2. It was not laid out as per Manual of style
3. There was not a single reference to back it up - therefore it was always likely to be deleted, articles must be notable to survive.

To help you proceed with editing I will..

1. Move the deleted article into your user space - it will be found at User:Loggy616/Mgem, when I finished doing it.
2. I'll add a standard welcome template to your talk page, which has many useful links to Wikipedia policies, to assist you in ensuring that your page will be suitable.

When you have finished your page, then all you need to do is move the page.

P.S. I have worked in the Philadelphia area for a short time.  Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 19:31, 10 February 2010 (UTC)

Aziz

My edits weren't "unconstructive", that's how the character's name is spelled. 24.21.198.16 (talk) 23:18, 10 February 2010 (UTC)

So it it, how confusing. My apologies. Template removed from your talk page.  Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 23:22, 10 February 2010 (UTC)

Thanks. Would you mind reverting your edits as well? 24.21.198.16 (talk) 23:25, 10 February 2010 (UTC)

Vandalism?

What vandalism? I was just trying to help people understand how fascism works. 70.3.55.12 (talk) 23:59, 10 February 2010 (UTC)

Another vandal just itching for a block...  Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 00:09, 11 February 2010 (UTC)

Now, I know you can block this IP, but shouldn't you have a REASON first? Come on...I just want to make a couple reasonable edits, and you're making my points for me, gentlemen? 70.3.55.12 (talk) 00:13, 11 February 2010 (UTC)

Edits were not reasonable. End of story. Now stop WP:NOTFORUM  Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 00:16, 11 February 2010 (UTC)

WP:RBI  Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 00:27, 11 February 2010 (UTC)

Tenacious little shit...

...innit he? HalfShadow 00:28, 11 February 2010 (UTC)

There's always one...  Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 00:29, 11 February 2010 (UTC)

The beauty of it is, all he's doing is adding to my edit count... HalfShadow 00:40, 11 February 2010 (UTC)

LOL. I don't need it - My automated count almost killed my RFA.  Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 00:41, 11 February 2010 (UTC)

My first in awhile

Because you have dealt with so much shit lately, I give this to you....

		The Barnstar of Diligence
		For pissing off so many IP addresses his talk page has been vandalized :) DustiSPEAK!! 00:56, 11 February 2010 (UTC)

Iditarod Trail Sled Dog Race

he is from switzerland not alaska —Preceding unsigned comment added by 138.73.70.93 (talk) 00:56, 11 February 2010 (UTC)

So he is, sorry, now reverted all.  Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 01:01, 11 February 2010 (UTC)

Hereford High School (Parkton, Maryland)

Hi, lately I have been trying to update my high school's page with factual information. I see that you reverted my updates, so if you could please accept them it would be much appreciated. Thanks —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.107.98.137 (talk) 19:22, 15 February 2010 (UTC)

The only edit of yours I reverted was "[pronounced-Shmeg-meh]", which is obviously incorrect. If there are any others then you must have used a different IP address, and I cannot therefore comment on other errors.  Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 22:47, 15 February 2010 (UTC)

Whales

I replied on my talk: Ucucha 23:23, 15 February 2010 (UTC)

Scott Green (American football official)

According to WP:Requested moves/Closing instructions, you are supposed to evaluate the discussion at Talk:Scott Green (American football official)#Requested move "just like any other discussion on Wikipedia", keeping in mind that "the quality of an argument is more important than whether it comes from a minority or a majority." Since all you wrote when you closed the request was "Page Not Moved" it is unclear whether you performed the evaluation mentioned in the instructions. I could re-open the request in order to get more details on your rationale but I wanted to check with you first to better understand the reason for your decision. Thanks. 68.165.77.188 (talk) 12:42, 16 February 2010 (UTC)

Please reply at Talk:Scott Green (American football official). Thanks. 68.165.77.188 (talk) 12:43, 16 February 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 15 February 2010

• News and notes: New Georgia Encyclopedia, BLPs, Ombudsmen, and more

• In the news: Labor squeeze revisited, journalist consultations, philosophy bungles, and more

• WikiProject report: WikiProject Singapore

• Features and admins: Approved this week

• Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation

• Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 13:31, 16 February 2010 (UTC)

User:Stipstap1983, block IP as well?

Hello, I see you blocked User:Stipstap1983 regarding edits at Bill Handel. It might be appropriate to block 24.14.68.100 as well since that appears to be where Stipstap1983 started. Wine Guy~Talk 23:09, 16 February 2010 (UTC)

It maybe one and the same. We cannot tell for sure. IP is up to Warning3, only two more edits needed...  Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 23:11, 16 February 2010 (UTC)

OK, I was just thinking along the lines of WP:DUCK. I'll be watching. Cheers! Wine Guy~Talk

Jeffrey Hunter

Hi,

I don't understand why you edit the article on Jeffrey Hunter that i add. He was known as Hank McKinnies from a young age right through school, and ever after to his very close friends. Why do you have a problem with this.

Regards

Paul —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rebok2001 (talk • contribs) 00:14, 17 February 2010 (UTC)

So you say, if it was so common then it would be easy to provide a reference that uses it.  Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 00:19, 17 February 2010 (UTC)

Jeffrey Hunter.

Hi again,

Ok i am new at this, advise me on what i must do to add genuine articles. There is much more about Jeff Hunter that is not mentioned. All good. My uncle met him while serving in the Royal Navy in 52. They made Sailor Of The King USA( Single Handed ) UK.

Regards

Paul —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rebok2001 (talk • contribs) 00:30, 17 February 2010 (UTC)

Just find a good reference (on the web, or a text book, etc. - but no blog sites, as they are written by anybody), and add that data with your edit by adding <ref>Reference Details</ref> after it - for correct formatting of the reference details, see the page at WP:CITE which shows how to set it up for different media. (P.S. Avoid leading spaces in lines - it causes Wikipedia to put grey boxes around the text, and it won't wrap.)  Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 00:40, 17 February 2010 (UTC)

Wilfred Owen

Sorry there was an edit conflict. I was removing one of the earlier bits of vandalism in the poetry section, and didn't see that the image was screwed up. NtheP (talk) 22:19, 17 February 2010 (UTC)

I already guessed it was something like that. Anyway, the vandal is blocked now.  Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 22:20, 17 February 2010 (UTC)

nothing really

this website is inaccurate because people can post opinions and kids like me use this as a fact website! So with that being said i think that you shoul make this a facts only website! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.114.218.233 (talk) 04:55, 18 February 2010 (UTC)

I could not agree more. That is why you will see that the last userbox on my page is {{User anti-anon}}  Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 20:53, 18 February 2010 (UTC)

Re. User:24.29.233.163

You might want to revoke talk access while they're blocked... see [1]. XXX antiuser ^eh? 23:40, 18 February 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for the information, now blocked.  Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 23:44, 18 February 2010 (UTC)

Question about oversight

Should something like this be oversighted? I've reverted it, but it's pretty nasty stuff. Cheers, XXX antiuser ^eh? 23:52, 18 February 2010 (UTC)

Not nice is it. Do you think it's a hoax? There's not a mention in the Daily Mail when I searched it here, also the next one at this diff quotes The Sun, again nothing there here. You could ask for Oversight if you like OR I can selectively delete them. They are not lost on a selective delete - they are moved to a new page and deleted, an admin could find them if they wanted. Let me know if you want me to do that (I've just had a play in one of my Sandboxes and it worked OK.)  Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 20:01, 19 February 2010 (UTC)

Yeah, I checked Google and Google News and didn't find anything so it's quite obviously a hoax. I've emailed User:Alison about it, since she's got Oversight permissions, let's see what she says. Cheers, XXX antiuser ^eh? 20:08, 19 February 2010 (UTC)

OK, I'll do nothing for now. Come back to me if you need the selective deletion.  Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 20:09, 19 February 2010 (UTC)

Will do, thanks for the help. Hope your eye gets better quickly! XXX antiuser ^eh? 20:41, 19 February 2010 (UTC)

Thanks, Actual eyes are now fine, it's a remaining allergic rash (to fusidic acid) on the eyelids which is being a pain to shift - upset skin takes a while to recover.  Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 20:46, 19 February 2010 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for the user page revert the other day. =) -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 05:08, 19 February 2010 (UTC)

Another vandal raised his head above the parapet... and I see is now blocked. :-)  Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 19:35, 19 February 2010 (UTC)

Caribou and Dick Manitoba

First of all. Thank you, Zhang He, GB, and D!2000 for your attention. If you did nothing else, I'd be grateful to all of you. Next, 66.65.94.122 and his likely sockpuppet, Richeye, did it again. Is a blocking and protection possible? Thanks. Note, you might as well reply to me here as my IP is that of a Library computer.

-) Thanks again.205.189.194.208 (talk) 14:30, 19 February 2010 (UTC)

About the Caribou and Dick Manitoba vandal and sockpuppet
I’ve asked this question:

How do I deal with this edit fight?

I’ve also pasted this message on to the following talk pages:
User talk:Dl2000
User talk:GB fan
User talk:Richeye
User talk:Zhang He,
and, of course,
User talk:66.65.94.122.
70.54.181.70 (talk) 17:55, 19 February 2010 (UTC)

A couple of suggestions. Have a read of WP:GAIAV, also look at some of the links at the top, they may be of assistance - possibly WP:AN - as to a better place to post this problem. That would bring your problem to the attention of many more administrators, experienced in those problems, than just picking a few to talk to. Also do consider making an account - it's quite free and can be used on any computer that you wish to log in - it's sometimes hard to follow who is doing what, when the IP addresses keeps changing, in addition one will then build up an account history to show their quality and policy knowledge (you just have to remember to log out - and, at login, not check the "remember for 30days box"!). Should you manage to prove a high degree of IP vandalism, then you would be a position to ask for semi-page protection at WP:RFPP - thus blocking all IP edits.  Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 19:32, 19 February 2010 (UTC)

Hmm

All this time I've seen you on my watchlist, I didn't realize you were an administrator until the Dudemeister raised his vandal-ridden head! Wildhartlivie (talk) 21:21, 19 February 2010 (UTC)

Only for a few months now My RfA (and only just made it!).  Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 21:24, 19 February 2010 (UTC)

sorry

sorry for vandilizing guild wars. it just ticks me off that it coppied world of warcraft and please dont erase my article about Taco-Man cause it is really true —Preceding unsigned comment added by Monkey1378 (talk • contribs) 21:29, 19 February 2010 (UTC) fuck you