User talk:Mufka

This is a Wikipedia user talk page. This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user to whom this talk page belongs may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia itself. The original page is located at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Mufka.

This is the user talk page for User:Mufka, where you can send messages and comments to Mufka.

PLEASE READ - Thank you Comments on my edits to date pages? Please leave comments on the respective page's talk page. I will see the message there. If the message is left here, I will move it to the subject's talk page. If I posted a message on your talk page, please reply there to keep the conversation together, I will see it. Please sign and date your posts by typing four tildes (~~~~). Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.

Removed your PROD of Khwaja Najamuddin Ahmed

Hi Mufka, you seem to be a meticulous editor, so I'm sorry I had to remove your PROD of this somewhat weird article. Your reason is very, very short. I'm unable to establish notability myself, but deletion of a historic person ((i'm not really sure if it's a hoax) should at least go through an AfD. The PROD is for uncontroversial deletions, an AfD will ensure more scrutiny Power.corrupts (talk) 22:01, 4 February 2009 (UTC)

I don't disagree. I had speedied several similar other articles by the author, but this one had the claim of "Khwaja Najamuddin Ahmed was a very famous saint of his time". I figured speedy would be shot down right away. I'll AfD it. -- Mufka ^{(u) (t) (c)} 00:36, 5 February 2009 (UTC)

To administrators of Wikipedia

These articles are for the purpose of better understanding of the spread of Islam over the ages.If any one of them is deleted , it becomes very difficult for the reader to understand the rest.The people who have been described in these articles, are the corner stones of Islamic progression from one area to another But most of the literature about them is limited to the sub-continent,and is written by local authors.It is very difficult to find international books,particularly about the lesser known individuals(which in my opinion is no excuse to stop further research into a better understanding of their role in spread of Islam) Therefore, the books that have been used as references for these articles are mainly local books but complete information is provided about them in said articles.

It is difficult for a western author to understand asian culture,neither are there books availible in English about every aspect of it.Here a new language is spoken every 100 kilometers and it is not possible to find english translation of books in all these languages.Opinion about articles by asian authors should not be only taken from american or european authors. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Maqsoodshah01 (talk • contribs) 14:36, 9 February 2009 (UTC)

As I said I would...

I don't know if you know yet (maybe?) but I was convicted of sock puppetry and found guilty after I admitted it about this whole January 14/15/17 edit war. I'm actually here to both thank-you and apologize for you putting up with this. I was unblocked after a lengthy discussion and I will no longer be vandalizing any pages.. but contributing good edits to the Wikipedia and I invite you to monitor my contributions.

Sorry and Thankyou!

--SamB135 (talk) 05:14, 5 February 2009 (UTC)

Help me please and thanks for the message

I need to know how to align things. I also need to know how to cite work. If you could leave me a couple of messages regarding this then thanks!

Bb515200000001 (talk) 20:19, 7 February 2009 (UTC)

Your deletions

Mufka: I am having trouble understanding the basis for your sweeping deletions of of my article on Craig Mullaney. On some of the language that comes from his website, I see that it is under copyright to him - so, with his permission, it could be posted, yes? Even so, there were a number sections that were not taken from the website and were independently cited. E.g., the paragraph about his marriage. These too you deleted. If your concern is (legitimately) with copyrighted material, I ask that you only delete that. If you have a legitimate basis for deleting other material, please make me aware of it.

Lippmanlee (talk) 05:05, 9 February 2009 (UTC)

You are correct that I removed some text that was not copied, but since copyright infringement is a serious issue, it was better to be safe than sorry in removing the content. Removing only the copied sentences would have left the article with a lot of incomplete thoughts. You may obtain permission from the author to use the copyrighted material but you must follow the rules at WP:PERMISSION. It is always better to rewrite things in your own words so obtaining permission is not necessary. There isn't much value in having exact copies of other web sites here. -- Mufka ^{(u) (t) (c)} 11:43, 9 February 2009 (UTC)

Thank you for the clarification, both here and on my page. I take it from fact that the rewritten and cited text that is currently on the article for Craig Mullaney that it meets the (minimum) standards? One question I do have is about stubs. You had added that the article is an author stub. Now that I have added additional cited information drawn from external sources, does this make it no longer stub? If not, what needs to happen to it to make it no longer a stub? I read the Wikipedia:Stub page but couldn't quite ascertain where the line is drawn. Lippmanlee (talk) 18:11, 9 February 2009 (UTC)

As you have seen, there is no clear policy on identifying what is and is not a stub. I would consider the article to still be a stub because it consists of not much more than a few sentences of general information about the subject. I would generally consider removing a stub tag from an article when the article has been developed into several sections that illustrate significant areas of the subject's notability. Usually the sections would be something like intro, early life, career, accomplishments/awards, etc. The stub tag is not a bad thing and it does not indicate a poorly written article, it just indicates an article that needs more attention. Have a look at WP:BIOG. -- Mufka ^{(u) (t) (c)} 18:34, 9 February 2009 (UTC)

Deleted my page

I didn't get 3 minutes to edit my page fully and you removed it!? —Preceding unsigned comment added by JoshinWinnipeg (talk • contribs) 02:39, 11 February 2009 (UTC)

If you'd like to try to contribute constructively, have a look at WP:FIRST. -- Mufka ^{(u) (t) (c)} 02:45, 11 February 2009 (UTC)

Stephen Fowler

Correct I do not know how AFD works that is because I do not have problems with pages. I will put it like this enjoy the page buddy all yours have fun I wash my hands of it I have to much to do then to worry about bickering over what people think. Thank You no need to worry about me as far as I am concerned Stephen Fowler does not exist. Reallmmablogger (talk) 12:33, 12 February 2009 (UTC)

Seems like this is not an uncommon ending to your discussions. If you change your mind and you'd like some help making your way around, let me know. -- Mufka ^{(u) (t) (c)} 13:56, 12 February 2009 (UTC)

Thank you for the offer pal but like I said he is all yours enjoy have a good day.Reallmmablogger (talk) 16:02, 12 February 2009 (UTC)

Build wiki page

Thank you for your message re:Build wiki page. However, I did not create this page. It was created by Bamsy1105 talk at 18:23, 16 February 2009 (UTC). I simply moved the text to Reston Public Library. -- Marek.69 ^talk 18:36, 16 February 2009 (UTC)

That is very odd. Looks like another bug in Twinkle. -- Mufka ^{(u) (t) (c)} 18:39, 16 February 2009 (UTC)

Tag Happy

I feel you are being a bit tag happy adding a Speedy tag to Toddington Services, please research the subject before being so quick to add tags to articles. Jenuk1985 | Talk 00:54, 18 February 2009 (UTC)

Are you sure? Seems like it has been deleted. -- Mufka ^{(u) (t) (c)} 00:55, 18 February 2009 (UTC)

Oops. I was confused by the typo above. We can discuss it on that article's talk page. -- Mufka ^{(u) (t) (c)} 00:57, 18 February 2009 (UTC)

I misspelled the wikilink.. so shoot me! Jenuk1985 | Talk 00:58, 18 February 2009 (UTC)

I was admitting my mistake. Hopefully you don't take it as a poke at you. -- Mufka ^{(u) (t) (c)} 01:05, 18 February 2009 (UTC)

I think it is worthy of it's own page because although 17 dose not apear much in the game he is still an integral part of the game and the story of 47 so If he is to be redirected it should be to the Hitman 47 page I will do that now. —Preceding unsigned comment added by AK-196 (talk • contribs) 17:15, 18 February 2009 (UTC)

Well at least let me expaned the Mr. 17 then.