User:RenamedUser jaskldjslak901/Archive28
Moron
Ben Shields
[edit]Can you please tell me why you don't think Australia's youngest ever politician dosent deserve a mention on Wiki? --Jez1985 11:44, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
Zoiper
[edit]Yesterday you deleted an article named Zoiper on the grounds that there is "No assertion of importance/significance". I would like to thank you for reviewing my article. I know that spam is surely a great nuisance and I can imagine how much useless stuff you need to wipe out during a single workday.
Now, I presume that a recognized site such as Wikipedia authorizes people of profound knowledge to decide which articles are worthy. That surely raises a couple of questions: Are you a VoIP expert? Are you in any way involved into Asterisk-related softphones? Are you aware that Zoiper is the second most popular independent SIP software phone (independent from service providers) and the most popular IAX softphone? Is this really not enough for Wikipedia users to be able to check some info in a reliable online encyclopedia about one of the fastest popularity-gaining software products in the VoIP world? Is there a way that you might consult the VoIP community about the importance of Zoiper? Because if Zoiper is not important, how come so many similar competition products, most of which less popular (BitWise IM, Abbeyphone, Coccinella, is-phone, Jabbin etc.) are allowed to stay in Wikipedia?
Please reconsider your positions concerning my article. I believe that people who are just interested in Zoiper as information would be pleased to view an article in a trusted online encyclopedia as Wikipedia. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Zoiper (talk • contribs) 07:53, August 30, 2007 (UTC)
Benn v Eubank
[edit]Thank you kindly for the whistle blowing. I wrote the article in a simple format, mere description in the style of a boxing review from any established boxing publication, not in 'poor tone'. I have since added what may be deemed 'a reliable source' to support my sentiments (though there are 15 million Britons among others who could), kindly withdraw your objection to the page I would not like to see it deleted having just written it. I would appreciate it, thank you —Preceding unsigned comment added by 1fletch (talk • contribs) 16:10, August 27, 2007 (UTC)
Let's Eat
[edit]You recently deleted the wikipedia article on "Let's Eat", a meal preparation business based in Florida. I was merely following the lead of other meal prep businesses listed on wikipedia; since the business is unique (not a restaurant, not a shopping mart), I explained the business process. Other similar businesses are Dream Dinners, which I used as a template. If you felt the language was spam-ish, why instead of deleting, didn't you flag the language, flag the article, or edit the text to exclude it to only basics? Deleting it seems rash. Let me know what can be done to re-instate this topic.
Barnstar
[edit]
|
The Original Barnstar | |
| I, Cavalry, do award you with the original Wikipedia barnstar, in view of your recent edits and as recognition that it's people like you that keep Wikipedia alive. Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry 23:16, 23 August 2007 (UTC) |
- NP! You kept deleting articles before I'd even tagged them with db! Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry 00:04, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
Could you please re-delete Devin Wayne Davis? You deleted it as I added a db tag to it, and it got recreated. :) Corvus cornix 23:39, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks. I think I'd rather wait a while, thanks, though. I don't have any major contributions, most of what I do is vandal hunting and cleanup. :) Corvus cornix 23:41, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
- Thank you, I appreciate it. Corvus cornix 23:44, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
Can you please undelete the Pinned TV page I just made? You noted it as being only a local TV show, but it will be airing in the Las Vegas market soon.
Can you provide some Reliable sources to prove it. Jaranda wat's sup 00:02, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
I guess not, would I have to wait for it to air in order for the page to stay up?
Hello,
An Arbitration case in which you commented has been opened: Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Jmfangio-Chrisjnelson. Please add any evidence you may wish the Arbitrators to consider to the evidence sub-page, Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Jmfangio-Chrisjnelson/Evidence. You may also contribute to the case on the workshop sub-page, Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Jmfangio-Chrisjnelson/Workshop.
On behalf of the Arbitration Committee, Daniel 00:21, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
Nick Smith
[edit]OI - I just posted a {{hangon}} on that page and listed my argument on the talk page. What gives? Moro 00:23, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
A hangon doesn't protect the page from being deleted, Wikipedia is not a plot summarry Jaranda wat's sup 00:24, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
That doesn't answer my question - I said on the talk page that I planned to edit the article soon and that at the very least you could just remove the material I copied. Moro 00:25, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
You said why the article was deleted, I gave you the reason Jaranda wat's sup 00:26, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
You did not, however, tell me why you paid no heed to my argument for keeping it. Moro 00:27, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
I saw it, again wikipedia isn't a plot summarry, which that was, won't stand a chance in AFD unless you do a major rewrite, won't undelete it because of the copyvio. Thanks Jaranda wat's sup 00:36, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
Peter Bailey
[edit]Greetings, Convicted murderer (of a young woman), paroled, released, rapes 12 year-old girl. Yes, there are other cases like this one. I would like to document them all, and place them in the catagory "Hawaii Murderers". Does that sound like a bad idea? HawaiiRegistry 00:32, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
To tell you the honest truth, unless the murders reached national media for a while, like the Laci Peterson case, they won't stand a chance in WP:AFD, as there has been thousands of murders every year and that will be noted, some good national sources will help (like the New York Times or CNN reporting on those murders, not only local media). I hope that helps. Jaranda wat's sup 00:35, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
Thank you for the rapid reply. There is no registry of convicted murderers in Hawaii, but I was attempting to create one, based on documented sources. Of course there is no national reporting of Hawaii's murders, so I would never be able to meet that criteria. Do you think it would be possible for me to create one WP article that lists every known person convicted of murder since statehood (1959)? HawaiiRegistry 00:39, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
There should be a few that could be in national media, you could always check in google, and also I don't see the harm of that list. Thanks Jaranda wat's sup 00:41, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
Ani-Botics
[edit]Humm a bit confused, did you look at the website and read anything it's just it seems to have got deleted rather quickly, it might be an idea to look at http://www.anibotics.co.uk/welcome/project-mission/ and check if you can resurrect the Anibotics article I was linking it too as I'm new to this and just discovered you could contact the person doing the deleting.
It's also defining a completely new field, see http://www.anibotics.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2007/08/ma_proposal_15-03-07.pdf
And it's not a company website despite the unfortunate .co.uk extension and I was obviously going to expand it with more time, big hugs, Samantha --Samlhamer 02:08, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
A new concept, see WP:N Jaranda wat's sup 17:53, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
Zdeněk Bažant
[edit]i find your hasty deletion of the zdeněk bažant page precipitous. on its own, his status as one of the most highly regarded engineers in the world and someone elected to both the NAS and the NAE makes his biography encyclopedic material.
furthermore, his analysis of the structural collapse of the WTC is at the core of NIST's WTC report, which has brought him into the public eye. i plan to expand the article to summarize his analysis whle also adding citations for sources of the biographical information that i provided. Peterhoneyman 01:39, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
Judy Lee Klemesrud
[edit]Can you send me back the list of awards and list of publications for her. They are at the bottom of the deleted article. --Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) 02:47, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
Samantha Imafidon
[edit]A student of eieprogramme.com has been in the British press for the past 3 years. Her achievements are such that some people have never achieved in a lifetime, and she has been recognised world wide for her talents. Why can't I upload an entry for her? Google her name to learn more or visit eieprogramme.com/imafidon/samantha.htm. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Edith55 (talk • contribs) 18:40, August 24, 2007 (UTC)
Just because some student was on a newspaper that doesn't mean WP:BIO fame instantly, many students had the same types of achivements and doesn't meet wikipedia guidelines. Jaranda wat's sup 18:42, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
WWE Ratings
[edit]Hi i recently created a page named wwe ratings which you deleted for having a very short article with little or no context the reason was because i just created it.
No because it was a short article with little or no content, not because you created it. Anyways an article on that subject won't survive WP:AFD Jaranda wat's sup 18:56, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
Re Deletion of Sheduled Passengers Carried
[edit]Hi Jaranda. You just deleted Scheduled Passengers Carried, but i don't understand why. You say "blantant copyright infringement", because, i assume, you can find the same information elsewhere on the web. However, facts are not copyrightable, even if they are numerical facts. Can you please explain in more detail? Fudoreaper 23:07, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
Someone tagged it as copyvio, it also had very little content, so it's also a A1 Jaranda wat's sup 18:03, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
page deletion question
[edit]Hi, You "kindly" deleted my MicroMonitor page entry twice. I'm assuming it is because a book and a company website are mentioned (true?). These two items are mentioned because they are relevant to the topic. Micromonitor (something similar to Das uBoot, which has a Wikipedia page) originated in the mentioned book, and the *free* source code is available at the website of the mentioned company. If I remove the company and book reference, will that make this page legal? Edsut 23:37, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
See WP:CORP Jaranda wat's sup 18:04, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
Hi, I'm processing an OTRS ticket for someone who created this article, they claim in email that the theatre has 40,000 subscribers. As I'm not a WP admin I can't see what the content used to be, so I am not able to answer them as to what may have been wrong with the article. --Brianmc 08:31, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
It read like advertising, and no reliable sources to boot. Thanks Jaranda wat's sup 18:02, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
another page deletion question
[edit]Magic Crayon is a real brazilian indie-rock-pop band. As one of its original members i can ensure it. Wikipedia should include every possible article containing information on all branches of knowledge, shouldn't it? I am not an advanced internet user, i can't reproduce the deleted outlook page. This is absolutely unfair. Could you kindly explain me why you deleted my Magic Crayon page entry? --Waldenzanin 17:13, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
See WP:MUSIC Jaranda wat's sup 17:57, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
How can you (Wikipedia "masters") label indistinctly like this? Do you know the brazilian indie rock scene? Don't Wikipedia's users and readers deserve to know about it? Or isn't the brazilian indie-rock scene remarkable to Wikipedia? So if the band isn't famous in the USA or Europe or Australia Wikipedia considers it unremarkable... Shame on you! Now i see that Wikipedia isn't about informing people, it is about judging and electing - with ethnocentric methods (or just ignorance)... Well, i saw WP:MUSIC. Here we go: "A musician or ensemble is notable if has had a charted hit on any national music chart." (Criteria for musicians and ensembles, n.2) Are you kidding?! This is stupid! All the underground scenes around the world, aren't they notable or remarkable for Wikipedia? There's more than RIAA outside your windows... "A musician or ensemble is notable if has had a record certified gold or higher in at least one country" (Criteria for musicians and ensembles, n.3) Worse! Music isn't (only) commerce, or at least not every notable musician needs to be certified gold to be considered notable. Come on, there are so many good exemples... The Velvet Underground never had a record certified gold. Do you know how notable are The Velvet Underground?!? Oh my god, i can't continue just because all these criteria are shameful. It seems that it was RIAA that wrote WP:MUSIC. For shame! Anyways, i can ensure you that the band Magic Crayon meets at least 3 items of your shameful criteria (items 1, 6 and 10)... --Waldenzanin 10:30, 26 August 2007 (UTC)—Preceding unsigned comment added by Waldenzanin (talk • contribs) 10:27, August 26, 2007 (UTC)
Talk page cleansing
[edit]What is the justification of purging a blocked user's past comments on a talk page? It looks unnecessary to me and does not serve any good purpose in furthering an open debate. --Pkchan 03:38, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
I crossed out instead, user was blocked indef for very abusive sockpuppetry. Thanks Jaranda wat's sup 14:46, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
Article Deletion
[edit]Your deletion of article on Turbobricks under the criteria of speedy deletion. The critera for deletion of groups reads, "Unremarkable people, groups, companies and web content. An article about a real person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content that does not assert the importance or significance of its subject, neither directly nor by verifiable association with notable subjects. If controversial, or if there has been a previous deletion discussion that resulted in the article being kept, list the article at Articles for deletion instead."
With that being said, the moderators knowledge of a subject or lack there of is not a reason to freely remove content personally unremarkable. What would the moderator consider to be significant?
This is an article written on the subject from the NY Times dated March 4, 2005. http://www.swedishbricks.net/NYTimes030405/NYTimesArticle.html
On this subject, Volvo performance and maintainence, you will not find another resource able to make the claim of being, not for profit, no advertising or membership fees and soley run on contributions from members.
If necessary I can provide a list of other groups & orginizations with subjects on wikipedia, who can not make these same claims, that are allowed to keep and maintain the information listed.
If not I would like to see the actual criteria for something considered to be "significant". —Preceding unsigned comment added by Robwing (talk • contribs) 15:46, August 27, 2007 (UTC)
One very trival mention doesn't equal an instant article. See WP:N and WP:V Jaranda wat's sup 15:49, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
This is contrary to what is stated in the wikipedia cotability pages provided.
From the page you provided Wikipedia:Notability, "Within Wikipedia, Notability is an article inclusion criterion based on encyclopedic suitability. The topic of an article should be notable, or "worthy of notice". This concept is distinct from "fame", "importance", or "popularity". A subject is presumed to be sufficiently notable if it meets the general notability guideline below, or if it meets an accepted subject specific standard listed in the table to the right.
These guidelines pertain to the suitability of article topics but do not directly limit the content of articles."
and this from page Wikipedia:Notability (organizations and companies) "Simply stated, an organization is a group of more than one person formed together for a purpose. This includes commercial and non-commercial activities including, but not limited to, charitable organizations, educational institutions, institutions, interest groups, organizations, social clubs, companies, partnerships, proprietorships, religious denominations, sects, etc.
This guideline does not cover small groups of closely related people such as families, entertainment groups, co-authors, and co-inventors covered by WP:Notability (people).
Notable means "worthy of being noted" or "attracting notice". It is not synonymous with "fame" or "importance". Please consider notable and demonstrable effects on culture, society, entertainment, athletics, economies, history, literature, science, or education. Large organizations are likely to have more readily available verifiable information from reliable sources that provide evidence of notability; however, smaller organizations can be notable, just as individuals can be notable, and arbitrary standards should not be used to create a bias favoring larger organizations."
This taken directly from information provided to me, how does a group with several thousand active members not constitiue importance?
Familys and small groups should be met by WP:BIO, is there any reliable sources at all that is not one word mentions or the group website, forums are under WP:WEB as well. 284 exact google hits aren't much for a forum with 2,000 members Jaranda wat's sup 16:14, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
In regard to web significance, this is only partially true, there are annual gatherings by regional members worldwide. Including, The US, Australia, UK and Sweden, among others.
By the criteria provided in Wikipedia:Notability (web), the acticle would be allowed if expanded to "describe the site in an encyclopedic manner, offering detail on a website's achievements, impact or historical significance", correct? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Robwing (talk • contribs) 16:32, August 27, 2007 (UTC)
With Reliable sources Jaranda wat's sup 19:28, 27 August 2007 (UTC) It seems you can't count. "Results 1 - 10 of about 29,200 for "turbobricks" with Safesearch on. (0.12 seconds" —Preceding unsigned comment added by 140.160.216.107 (talk) 18:15, August 27, 2007 (UTC)
- But after discounting the duplicate pages, it's just over 200 Jaranda wat's sup 19:28, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
What is it you meant by "It seems you can't count"? The only thing I have referenced in regard to any counting are the 2000 active members out of nearly 19,000 registered. Please clairify. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Robwing (talk • contribs) 21:48, August 27, 2007 (UTC)
Taking your previous statment into consideration,
"With Reliable sources"
in reply to my question of:
"By the criteria provided in Wikipedia:Notability (web), the acticle would be allowed if expanded to "describe the site in an encyclopedic manner, offering detail on a website's achievements, impact or historical significance", correct? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Robwing (talk • contribs) 16:32, August 27, 2007 (UTC) "
We are attempting a rewrite of the page in question citing the types of sources requested. This however would require the work not be deleted while the required data and reference information is aquired.
Your help in the matter is appreciated. Robwing 02:16, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
Hello,
An Arbitration case in which you commented has been opened: Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/SevenOfDiamonds. Please add any evidence you may wish the Arbitrators to consider to the evidence sub-page, Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/SevenOfDiamonds/Evidence. You may also contribute to the case on the workshop sub-page, Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/SevenOfDiamonds/Workshop.
On behalf of the Arbitration Committee, Picaroon (t) 22:33, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
Please help.
[edit]I was under the impression that Wiki wanted more information and other views, you may classify what happened to Musial's page as a "revert" but really let's call it what it is: a deletion. Maybe I was wrong in my view of a revert, maybe you can use it on more then just vandalisim, jibirish or obviously incorrect information.
Beyond the obvious information that belongs on his dad's page or mom's page, and information that DID NOT occur in his early life (Idol in St. Louis at age 19??, an honory member of a fraternal organization while in Donora?), to randomly take legit information that is properly classified and "revert" it away without a note or discussion isn't a practice you would appreciate I am sure. Please help me better understand why you feel his early life spans the 1960's but also the 1890's, but not who he played ball with during his early life. I guess I am also lacking in the wisdom of "reverting" away ligitimate--though not a personal favorite--information from wikiarticles, especially without a note or discussion. Thanks Hholt01 00:08, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
Spamming "sum of all human knowledge"
[edit]I Didn't relise using a quote TWICE was spamming... Fosnez 02:15, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
Pandorea pandorana deleted?
[edit]Hi, I just spent a lot of time researching and typing out an article on Pandorea pandorana only to find it erased by you moments later. Can you please explain why you feel it should be deleted?
Hi, you were rather quick to delete my article however not so quick to tell me why. I can't get the article back that I've written so I'd appreciate an explanation, a rather bad introduction to Wikipedia I would say. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lacunacoiled (talk • contribs) 07:37, August 29, 2007 (UTC)
Bmedley block
[edit]I don't agree with your one-week block of User:Bmedley Sutler. It is not at all clear that there is community consensus for the action you took. There is consensus that there is a problem of some kind, but certainly not that Bmedley is primarily responsible for anything or needs to be blocked, let alone for a week. I request that you let him off now with time served. Everyking 13:41, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
There was consensus for a month block, I was genorus enough to give a week block, did you even read the disruption he was casusing in WP:AN/I. Thanks Jaranda wat's sup 19:36, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
A-class
[edit]What is the meaning of this edit and does it belong in the article history?--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/tcfkaWCDbwincowtchatlotpsoplrttaDCLaM) 19:52, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
A class meants that it's rather close to FA, higher quality than a common GA. Thanks Jaranda wat's sup 19:55, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
- Yes I know that. How official is this rating? Does it belong in {{ArticleHistory}}? Please respond at my talk page so I don't forget about this.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/tcfkaWCDbwincowtchatlotpsoplrttaDCLaM) 20:18, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
Running gags on Around the Horn
[edit]Since you were the closing admin for this AfD, could you please recover the article for me so I could possibly work on it, and move the most notable parts back into the main ATH article? If you could put it on my sandbox, that would be great. bmitchelf•T•F 21:39, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
I been busy I can't answer to every comment, I'll do it when I have time (1 AM) isn't time. Jaranda wat's sup Sports! 05:22, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
See User:Bmitchelf/Gags, I don't know how you could do that without dealing with the OR concern Jaranda wat's sup Sports! 20:30, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks for the help. I just wanted more time to address it. bmitchelf•T•F 21:33, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
Ice Hockey Notability
[edit]You can see out notability guidelines for the project here. --Djsasso 23:26, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
Request
[edit]Can I get a copy of the discussion page for the Star Trek vs Star Wars page? Just place it in my sandbox if you please. Alyeska 23:52, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
- Heh. I am asking for the discussion page from the deleted page Star Trek vs Star Wars. Kinda hard to pick a copy of that. Alyeska 23:57, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
- Never mind. Yeah, thats what I wanted. Thank you. Alyeska 00:17, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
Guideline suggestions
[edit]It is good that you've taken up the notability issue, I was hoping someone would. In a similar fashion, I have taken up the issue of how people use dates and wikilinks within infoboxes. There is nothing written so i started User:Jmfangio/Manual of Style (dates and numbers) a few days ago to work on the content. I have not added anything yet to it, but when done, i would like to get it moved to WP:DATE. There doesn't seem to be a lot of traction in getting widespread input so should i just do it and then "move the content" into wp:date?? or what? People love to argue over when to link date ranges in infoboxes but nobody wants to talk about establishing some "guidelines" for other users. I've marked this page for watching. Juan Miguel Fangio| ►Chat 00:47, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
Filmography of Mohanlal
[edit]Could this be a copy/paste job? Google turns up nothing, but the poorly done parenthesis and such makes me thing the lists were lifted from somewhere. -WarthogDemon 00:51, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
- I feel rather foolish for forgetting to check IMDB.com, though I'm surprised Google didn't help. :P Anyways, thanks. -WarthogDemon 00:55, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
hi why you have deleted this article?? there are lot of article exactly similar. i have created these article because article Mohan Lal is becoming too large Naveenpf 07:48, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
Missing block template
[edit]I see you blocked User:Wflynn12. Could you add an appropriate template to User talk:Wflynn12? DMacks 17:22, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
I don't place indefblockeduser tags in userpages. Thanks Jaranda wat's sup 21:59, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
Tuzrakter deleted
[edit]Can you please explain why the Tuzrakter article has been deleted? It is not a club neither a group, but a significant cultural centre in Hungary. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Zagyvalaszlo (talk • contribs) 18:25, August 30, 2007 (UTC)
Sources please? Jaranda wat's sup 00:26, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
Ok, so if I write again and specify sources in hungarian as well, will it be ok? User:Zagyvalaszlo —Preceding unsigned comment added by Zagyvalaszlo (talk • contribs) 13:35, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
North Dakota Sports
[edit]Explain yourself, don't ignore me. Leopold Samsonite 00:24, 31 August 2007 (UTC)Leopold Samsonite
I reverted your last edit because it was a personal attack, see WP:NPA it doesn't matter if the articles are florida or north dakota based, if it fails wikipedia polices, it should not have indiviual articles. Jaranda wat's sup 00:26, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
I apologize for the attack, but there some things that can be overlooked. Everyone on here has things that are important that others think are utter crap. Opions are like buttholes, everyone has one. Leopold Samsonite 00:39, 31 August 2007 (UTC)Leopold Samsonite
This mall was included in the AFD nom for Champlain Centre North, which you closed as a delete [1]. I am tabulating and tracking the outcomes of mall AFDs at Wikipedia talk:News articles and note that Champlain Centre South still is shown as nominated for deletion, even though the AFD is finished. I had suggested it be nominated separately. What do you think should be done to get rid of the handing status of Champlain Centre South? Take it out of the nomination, delete it, or keep it? Thanks. Edison 15:06, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
Nominated seperately is my opinion as well, I didn't delete it because of the prior no consensus, and it was loosely mentioned. Thanks Jaranda wat's sup 21:59, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
- The Champlain Centre South Mall article still has an AFD tag on it. Could you please remove the AFD template? Thanks. Edison 02:30, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
Sports notability
[edit]Thanks for setting up the page, so we can finally make some progress on a working guideline. The status quo was pretty un-tenable. -Hit bull, win steak(Moo!) 17:02, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
Shiraz Mayors
[edit]OK, I will stop creating those pages and wait for the others to be deleted. If they are not deleted I will continue creating those pages.Manu kian maheri93 22:38, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
P.S.:Cool userpage and I hope you enjoy your wikibreak!Manu kian maheri93 22:38, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
Ok I just deleted them all, mayors don't meet WP:BIO, please use that guideline in the future. Thanks Jaranda wat's sup 22:42, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
Assistance requested
[edit]Jaranda, I request your assistance in looking at the article Mexicans in Omaha, Nebraska. It appears the author would like to create other articles: "African Americans in Omaha, Nebraska and Greeks in Omaha, Nebraska, and plan to continue with a series that includes American Indians in Omaha, Czechs, Germans, Irish, Italians, Jews, Latinos, Poles, Scandavians, Sudanese, and Slovaks, all of which in Omaha." I can not believe there is anything notable to these articles, but these are topics that can engender strong passion on the part of editors.
My concern is though there may be some references for Mexicans in Omaha, I go back and forth on the question of notability. There is nothing unique about this/these ethnic divisions relative to Omaha, Nebraska. They exist just as they have existed in the ohter 18,000 cities in the United States. Some of the references used are broader in scope while two others are focused on Omaha. I think it would be best to merge all of these into the Omaha, Nebraska article, but I want to see how others might feel. I would appreciate your review. If this is something where action should be taken, I would hope to do it now before this single editor expends a great deal of effort. Thanks. --Storm Rider (talk) 23:41, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
Check if you could merge them to a ethecity in Omaha article, if that fails, place an AFD tag on it, no reason why it needs it's own article. Thanks Jaranda wat's sup 17:15, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
Gah the person is creating everything he could find about Omaha, I managed to AFD the obvious List of articles related to Omaha, Nebraska one, but there is still more Omaha articles that doesn't meet notabilty out there. Jaranda wat's sup 18:09, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
Larry Craig on ITN
[edit]Sorry I didn't notify you of this discussion before removing. I removed Larry Craig from ITN persuant to comments (mostly my own) at Template_talk:In_the_news#Larry_Craig. Please revert if there's something crucial I missed and/or contribute to the discussion. Thanks.--Chaser - T 21:05, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
Small AfD request
[edit]Hi Jaranda, I've noticed that when you've been nominating articles for deletion, such as at 2006 Hawaii Bowl, you've been leaving out the standard template that forms the subheader underneath, such as:
{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|b}}
<div class="infobox" style="width:50%">AfDs for this article:<ul class="listify">{{Special:Prefixindex/Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eugene Armstrong}}</ul></div>
:{{la|Eugene Armstrong}} – <includeonly>([[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eugene Armstrong (2nd nomination)|View AfD]])</includeonly><noinclude>([[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2007 September 2#{{anchorencode:Eugene Armstrong}}|View log]])</noinclude>
which includes categorization and within-AfD navigation, as illustrated in the nomination above for Eugene Armstrong. It would be great if you could start including it for your nominations. Thanks! Eliz81(talk)(contribs) 21:49, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
I need to update my monobook, I'm not the expert in that though, maybe another admin can help. Thanks Jaranda wat's sup 22:19, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
Bob Meusel
[edit]I agree that it would be too bad if it closed with no more comments. Why don't you ask User:Tony1. He seemed to like it. Just say on his page exactly what you said on the nomination page. Do you have an wiki friends (sports people) you could ask to check it out? Maybe a personal plea to User:SandyGeorgia as that user seems to over see FAC issues. --Mattisse 03:01, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
- P.S. I really liked the article and I hardly know anything about baseball. I think you did a beautiful job. --Mattisse 03:07, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
DRV notification
[edit]An editor has asked for a deletion review of Star Trek versus Star Wars. Since you closed the deletion discussion for this article or speedy-deleted it, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Balancer 04:20, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
I notice that you have apparently speedied this article for a reason not among those provided in WP:CSD, "useless list, consensus exists for deletion" I agree it is a useless list, but that isn't a criterion. As the article has been re-created several times, perhaps you could undelete and send it to AfD.--this will have the advantage of preventing recreation. DGG (talk) 05:12, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
RFA
[edit]I am sorry to have lost your support. I also regret somewhat having not asked for a nom, but I doubt it would have made a difference.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/tcfkaWCDbwincowtchatlotpsoplrttaDCLaM) 23:08, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
Request for patience
[edit]I see that there is an edit conflict on the sports notability page. I think some patience and discussion rather than outright reverting would be much better. Thanks for your time. Juan Miguel Fangio| ►Chat 03:47, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
- I think we should slow down. You made a statement on the talk page and then made an adjustment to the article based on that statement. Nobody had a chance to respond. Additionally, citing "per talk page" might make it appear to the uninvolved editor as if the discussion on the talk page resulted in support for that edit. Juan Miguel Fangio| ►Chat 04:32, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
NBDL and CBA players
[edit]Thanks for letting me know about the discussion. Minor-league basketball players are a varied bunch, so I'll need some time to articulate my thoughts. I'll respond at the proposal talk page shortly.Zagalejo 05:26, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
Deletion: Wauwatosa West High School
[edit]There is at least one "notable" occurrence in the school's history - perhaps it was not in the article. In 1993, an Associate Principal, Dale Breitlow, was shot and killed in the school by a former student.
Mr Dr Dave 21:53, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
Deletion review for LAPD in media
[edit]I initiated a DRV review here for the LAPD in media article. I'm notifying you because you closed the AFD.--Chaser - T 02:32, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
Bob Meusel
[edit]I believe User:Tony1 voted "Support". He accidentally changed one of my comments to "Support", so it looked like I had voted twice. I changed it to what I think he meant to do. Now the article has two "Support"s and no "Oppose". That should do it I think. Regards, --Mattisse 15:15, 5 September 2007 (UTC)