User:Liz/Whiteboard8

Category:Wikipedia arbitration templates

Template:ACA

Arbitrators active on this case

To update this listing, edit this template and scroll down until you find the right list of arbitrators. If updates to this listing do not immediately show, try .

Template:ACArchiveNav

Arbitration Committee Index of Cases (All Cases)
2024	January February March April May June July August September October November December
2023	January February March April May June July August September October November December
2022	January February March April May June July August September October November December
2021	January February March April May June July August September October November December
2020	January February March April May June July August September October November December
2019	January February March April May June July August September October November December
2018	January February March April May June July August September October November December
2017	January February March April May June July August September October November December
2016	January February March April May June July August September October November December
2015	January February March April May June July August September October November December
2014	January February March April May June July August September October November December
2013	January February March April May June July August September October November December
2012	January February March April May June July August September October November December
2011	January February March April May June July August September October November December
2010	January February March April May June July August September October November December
2009	January February March April May June July August September October November December
2008	January February March April May June July August September October November December
2007	January February March April May June July August September October November December
2006	January February March April May June July August September October November December
2005	January February March April May June July August September October November December
2004	January February March April May June July August September October November December

Template:ACImplNotes

Clerks and Arbitrators should use this section to clarify their understanding of the final decision—at a minimum, a list of items that have passed. Additionally, a list of which remedies are conditional on others (for instance a ban that should only be implemented if a mentorship should fail), and so on. Arbitrators should not pass the motion to close the case until they are satisfied with the implementation notes.

These notes were last updated by 17:21, 19 May 2023 (UTC); the last edit to this page was on 17:21, 19 May 2023 (UTC) by Izno.

Proposed Principles
Number	Proposal Name	Support	Oppose	Abstain	Status	Support needed	Notes
None proposed
Proposed Findings of Fact
Number	Proposal Name	Support	Oppose	Abstain	Status	Support needed	Notes
None proposed
Proposed Remedies
Number	Proposal Name	Support	Oppose	Abstain	Status	Support needed	Notes
None proposed
Proposed Enforcement
Number	Proposal Name	Support	Oppose	Abstain	Status	Support needed	Notes
None proposed

Notes

Template:ACImplNotes/Proposal

|- ! style="background:#FDEDED !important;" | {{{number}}} | bgcolor="#FDEDED" | [[#{{{name}}}|{{{name}}}]] | bgcolor="#FDEDED" | 0 | bgcolor="#FDEDED" | 0 | bgcolor="#FDEDED" | 0 | bgcolor="#FFCCCC" | | bgcolor="#FDEDED" | Cannot pass | bgcolor="#FDEDED" |

Template:ACVoting

|- style="vertical-align: top;" | style="font-size: 90%" | ([[Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/{{{1}}}|•]]/[[Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/{{{1}}}| t]]) | style="font-size: 90%" | ([[Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/{{{1}}}/Evidence|e]]/[[Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/{{{1}}}/Evidence| t]]) | style="font-size: 90%" | ([[Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/{{{1}}}/Workshop|w]]/[[Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/{{{1}}}/Workshop| t]]) | style="white-space: normal;" | [[Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/{{{1}}}/Proposed decision|{{{1}}}]] ([[Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/{{{1}}}/Proposed decision|t]]) | style="white-space: normal;" | | style="text-align: right;white-space: nowrap;" | {{{2}}}

Template:Arb declined

Request for Arbitration declined

This is a courtesy notice to inform you that a request for arbitration, which named you as a party, has been declined. Feel free to see the Arbitrators' opinions for potential suggestions on moving forward.

For the Arbitration Committee,{{safesubst:</includeonly#if:|| ~~~~}}

Template:Arb premature

In response to your request for arbitration, the Arbitration Committee has decided that arbitration is not required at this stage. Arbitration on Wikipedia is a lengthy, complicated process that involves the unilateral adjudication of a dispute by an elected committee. Although the Committee's decisions can be useful to certain disputes, in many cases the actual process of arbitration is unenjoyable and time-consuming. Moreover, for most disputes the community maintains an effective set of mechanisms for reaching a compromise or resolving a grievance.

In all cases, you should review Wikipedia:Dispute resolution to learn more about resolving disputes on Wikipedia. The English Wikipedia community has many venues for resolving disputes and grievances, and it is important to explore them instead of requesting arbitration in the first instance. For more information on the process of arbitration, please see the Arbitration Policy and the Guide to Arbitration. I hope this advice is useful, and please do not hesitate to contact me or a member of the community if you have more questions. ~~~~

Template:Arb premature/sandbox

Template:Arb-logo

Arbitration​Committee

Template:ArbCase

{{{1}}}

Template:ArbCom agenda item

{{{item}}}
Milestones:
Status:
No activity at this time

Template:ArbCom calendar day

{{Template:ArbCom calendar day}}

Template:ArbCom due

Due:

Template:ArbCom evidence length header

Current word length: 0; diff count: 0.

Template:ArbCom navigation

Template:ArbCom navigation/sandbox2

Template:ArbCom next month

Template:Arbcom notice

You are involved in a recently filed request for arbitration. Please review the request at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case# and, if you wish to do so, enter your statement and any other material you wish to submit to the Arbitration Committee. As threaded discussion is not permitted on most arbitration pages, please ensure that you make all comments in your own section only. Additionally, the guide to arbitration and the Arbitration Committee's procedures may be of use.

Thanks,

Template:Arbcom notice/sandbox

You are involved in a recently filed request for arbitration. Please review the request at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case# and, if you wish to do so, enter your statement and any other material you wish to submit to the Arbitration Committee. As threaded discussion is not permitted in most arbitration pages please ensure that you make all comments in your own section only. Additionally, the guide to arbitration and the Arbitration Committee's procedures may be of use.

Template:ArbCom previous month

Template:Arbcom proposed

Template:ArbCom vote

This user has voted in the {{{{1}}}} Arbitration Committee Elections.

Template:ArbComBlock

This account has been indefinitely blocked by the Arbitration Committee.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, then appeal by emailing the Arbitration Committee (direct address: arbcom-enwikimedia.org).

---

Administrators: This block may not be modified or lifted without the express prior written consent of the Arbitration Committee. Questions about this block should be directed to the Committee's mailing list.

User:ArbComBot/Party

[[Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/{{{1}}}]]

Hello,

An Arbitration case involving you has been opened: [[Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/{{{1}}}]]. Please add any evidence you may wish the Arbitrators to consider to the evidence sub-page, [[Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/{{{1}}}/Evidence]]. You may also contribute to the case on the workshop sub-page, [[Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/{{{1}}}/Workshop]].

On behalf of the Arbitration Committee, {{{2}}} delivered by ~~~~

Template:ArbComCivilityNotice

Template:ArbComOpenCase/Evidence

Anyone, whether directly involved or not, may add evidence to this page. Please make a header for your evidence and sign your comments with your name.

When placing evidence here, please be considerate of the arbitrators and be concise. Long, rambling, or stream-of-consciousness rants are not helpful.

As such, it is extremely important that you use the prescribed format. Submitted evidence should include a link to the actual page diff; links to the page itself are not sufficient. For example, to cite the edit by Mennonot to the article Anomalous phenomenon adding a link to Hundredth Monkey use this form: [https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Anomalous_phenomenon&diff=5587219&oldid=5584644] [1].

This page is not for general discussion - for that, see talk page.

Please make a section for your evidence and add evidence only in your own section. Please limit your evidence to a maximum 1000 words and 100 diffs, a much shorter, concise presentation is more likely to be effective. Please focus on the issues raised in the complaint and answer and on diffs which illustrate behavior which relates to the issues.

If you disagree with some evidence you see here, please cite the evidence in your own section and provide counter-evidence, or an explanation of why the evidence is misleading. Do not edit within the evidence section of any other user.

Be aware that the Arbitrators may at times rework this page to try to make it more coherent. If you are a participant in the case or a third party, please don't try to refactor the page, let the Arbitrators do it. If you object to evidence which is inserted by other participants or third parties please cite the evidence and voice your objections within your own section of the page. It is especially important to not remove evidence presented by others. If something is put in the wrong place, please leave it for the arbitrators to move.

The Arbitrators may analyze evidence and other assertions at [[Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/{{{1}}}/Workshop|/Workshop]]. /Workshop provides for comment by parties and others as well as arbitrators. After arriving at proposed principles, findings of fact or remedies voting by Arbitrators takes place at [[Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/{{{1}}}/Proposed decision|/Proposed decision]]. Only Arbitrators may edit /Proposed decision.

Evidence presented by {your user name}

First assertion

Place argument and diffs which support your assertion, for example, your first assertion might be "Jimmy Wales engages in edit warring". Here you would show specific edits to specific articles which show Jimmy Wales engaging in edit warring

Second assertion

Place argument and diffs which support the second assertion, for example, your second assertion might be "Jimmy Wales makes personal attacks". Here you would show specific edits where Jimmy Wales made personal attacks.

Evidence presented by {your user name}

First assertion

Place argument and diffs which support your assertion, for example, your first assertion might be "Jimmy Wales engages in edit warring". Here you would list specific edits to specific articles which show Jimmy Wales engaging in edit warring

Second assertion

Place argument and diffs which support the second assertion, for example, your second assertion might be "Jimmy Wales makes personal attacks". Here you would list specific edits where Jimmy Wales made personal attacks.

Evidence presented by {your user name}

First assertion

Place argument and diffs which support your assertion, for example, your first assertion might be "Jimmy Wales engages in edit warring". Here you would list specific edits to specific articles which show Jimmy Wales engaging in edit warring

Second assertion

Place argument and diffs which support the second assertion, for example, your second assertion might be "Jimmy Wales makes personal attacks". Here you would list specific edits where Jimmy Wales made personal attacks.

Template:ArbComOpenCase/Proposed decision

all proposed

After considering [[Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/{{{1}}}/Evidence|/Evidence]] and discussing proposals with other arbitrators, parties and others at [[Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/{{{1}}}/Workshop|/Workshop]] place proposals which are ready for voting here.

Arbitrators should vote for or against each point or abstain.

• Only items that receive a majority "support" vote will be passed.
• Items that receive a majority "oppose" vote will be formally rejected.
• Items that do not receive a majority "support" or "oppose" vote will be open to possible amendment by any Arbitrator if she/he so chooses. After the amendment process is complete, the item will be voted on one last time.

Conditional votes for or against and abstentions should be explained by the Arbitrator before or after his/her time-stamped signature. For example, an Arbitrator can state that she/he would only favor a particular remedy based on whether or not another remedy/remedies were passed.

On this case, {M} Arbitrator(s) is/are recused and {N} is/are inactive, so {14-M-N} out of 14 arbitrators are available and {floor((14-M-N)/2)+1} votes are a majority.

For all items

Proposed wording to be modified by Arbitrators and then voted on. Non-Arbitrators may comment on the talk page.

Motions and requests by the parties

Place those on [[Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/{{{1}}}/Workshop|/Workshop]].

Proposed temporary injunctions

Four net "support" votes needed to pass (each "oppose" vote subtracts a "support")
24 hours from the first vote is normally the fastest an injunction will be imposed.

Template

1) {text of proposed orders}

Support:

Oppose:

Abstain:

Template

1) {text of proposed orders}

Support:

Oppose:

Abstain:

Template

1) {text of proposed orders}

Support:

Oppose:

Abstain:

Proposed final decision

Proposed principles

Template

1) {text of proposed principle}

Support:

Oppose:

Abstain:

Template

1) {text of proposed principle}

Support:

Oppose:

Abstain:

Template

1) {text of proposed principle}

Support:

Oppose:

Abstain:

Template

1) {text of proposed principle}

Support:

Oppose:

Abstain:

Template

1) {text of proposed principle}

Support:

Oppose:

Abstain:

Template

1) {text of proposed principle}

Support:

Oppose:

Abstain:

Template

1) {text of proposed principle}

Support:

Oppose:

Abstain:

Template

1) {text of proposed principle}

Support:

Oppose:

Abstain:

Proposed findings of fact

Template

1) {text of proposed finding of fact}

Support:

Oppose:

Abstain:

Template

1) {text of proposed finding of fact}

Support:

Oppose:

Abstain:

Template

1) {text of proposed finding of fact}

Support:

Oppose:

Abstain:

Template

1) {text of proposed finding of fact}

Support:

Oppose:

Abstain:

Template

1) {text of proposed finding of fact}

Support:

Oppose:

Abstain:

Template

1) {text of proposed finding of fact}

Support:

Oppose:

Abstain:

Template

1) {text of proposed finding of fact}

Support:

Oppose:

Abstain:

Template

1) {text of proposed finding of fact}

Support:

Oppose:

Abstain:

Template

1) {text of proposed finding of fact}

Support:

Oppose:

Abstain:

Template

1) {text of proposed finding of fact}

Support:

Oppose:

Abstain:

Proposed remedies

Note: All remedies that refer to a period of time, for example to a ban of X months or a revert parole of Y months, are to run concurrently unless otherwise stated.

Template

1) {text of proposed remedy}

Support:

Oppose:

Abstain:

Template

1) {text of proposed remedy}

Support:

Oppose:

Abstain:

Template

1) {text of proposed remedy}

Support:

Oppose:

Abstain:

Template

1) {text of proposed remedy}

Support:

Oppose:

Abstain:

Template

1) {text of proposed remedy}

Support:

Oppose:

Abstain:

Template

1) {text of proposed remedy}

Support:

Oppose:

Abstain:

Template

1) {text of proposed remedy}

Support:

Oppose:

Abstain:

Template

1) {text of proposed remedy}

Support:

Oppose:

Abstain:

Proposed enforcement

Template

1) {text of proposed enforcement}

Support:

Oppose:

Abstain:

Template

1) {text of proposed enforcement}

Support:

Oppose:

Abstain:

Template

1) {text of proposed enforcement}

Support:

Oppose:

Abstain:

Template

1) {text of proposed enforcement}

Support:

Oppose:

Abstain:

Discussion by Arbitrators

Motion to close

Implementation notes

Clerks and arbitrators should use this section to clarify their understanding of the final decision--at a minimum, a list of items that have passed. Additionally, a list of which remedies are conditional on others (for instance a ban that should only be implemented if a mentorship should fail), and so on. Arbitrators should not pass the motion until they are satisfied with the implementation notes.

Vote

Four net "support" votes needed to close case (each "oppose" vote subtracts a "support")
24 hours from the first motion is normally the fastest a case will close.

1. 
   
   

Template:ArbComOpenCase/Workshop

This is a page for working on Arbitration decisions. It provides for suggestions by Arbitrators and other users and for comment by arbitrators, the parties and others. After the analysis of [[Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/{{{1}}}/Evidence|/Evidence]] here and development of proposed principles, findings of fact, and remedies. Anyone who edits should sign all suggestions and comments. Arbitrators will place proposed items they have confidence in on [[Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/{{{1}}}/Proposed decision|/Proposed decision]].

Motions and requests by the parties

Template

1)

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

Template

1)

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

Template

1)

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

Proposed temporary injunctions

Template

1)

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

Template

1)

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

Template

1)

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

Template

1)

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

Proposed final decision

Proposed principles

Template

1) {text of proposed principle}

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

Template

1) {text of proposed principle}

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

Template

1) {text of proposed principle}

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

Template

1) {text of proposed principle}

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

Template

1) {text of proposed principle}

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

Template

1) {text of proposed principle}

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

Template

1) {text of proposed principle}

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

Proposed findings of fact

Template

1) {text of proposed finding of fact}

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

Template

1) {text of proposed finding of fact}

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

Template

1) {text of proposed finding of fact}

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

Template

1) {text of proposed finding of fact}

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

Template

1) {text of proposed finding of fact}

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

Template

1) {text of proposed finding of fact}

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

Template

1) {text of proposed finding of fact}

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

Template

1) {text of proposed finding of fact}

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

Proposed remedies

Note: All remedies that refer to a period of time, for example to a ban of X months or a revert parole of Y months, are to run concurrently unless otherwise stated.

Template

1) {text of proposed remedy}

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

Template

1) {text of proposed remedy}

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

Template

1) {text of proposed remedy}

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

Template

1) {text of proposed remedy}

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

Template

1) {text of proposed remedy}

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

Template

1) {text of proposed remedy}

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

Template

1) {text of proposed remedy}

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

Template

1) {text of proposed remedy}

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

Template

1) {text of proposed remedy}

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

Proposed enforcement

Template

1) {text of proposed enforcement}

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

Template

1) {text of proposed enforcement}

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

Template

1) {text of proposed enforcement}

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

Template

1) {text of proposed enforcement}

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

Template

1) {text of proposed enforcement}

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

Analysis of evidence

Place here items of evidence (with diffs) and detailed analysis

Template

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

Template

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

Template

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

Template

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

Template

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

Template

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

Template

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

General discussion

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

Template:ArbComOpenTasks

Arbitration Committee proceedings

• recent changes
• purge this page
• view or discuss this template

Case requests

Currently, there are no requests for arbitration.

[edit]

Open cases

Case name	Links	Evidence due	Prop. Dec. due
Palestine-Israel articles 5	(t) (ev / t) (ws / t) (pd / t)	14 Dec 2024	04 Jan 2025

[edit]

Recently closed cases (Past cases)

No cases have recently been closed (view all closed cases).

Clarification and Amendment requests

Currently, no requests for clarification or amendment are open.

Arbitrator motions

Motion name	Date posted
Arbitrator workflow motions	1 December 2024

Template:ArbComProposal

Template:ArbComTaskEvidence

|- style="vertical-align: top;" | style="font-size: 90%" | [[Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/{{{1}}}|(.)]] | style="font-size: 90%" | [[Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/{{{1}}}/Proposed decision|(p)]] | style="font-size: 90%" | [[Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/{{{1}}}/Workshop|(w)]] | style="white-space: normal;" | [[Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/{{{1}}}/Evidence|{{{1}}}]] | | style="text-align: right; white-space: nowrap;" | {{{2}}} |

Template:Arbdiscuss

Template:Arbitration amendment request

Amendment request: {{{title}}}

Initiated by Izno at ~~~~~

Case or decision affected

{{{decision}}}

Clauses to which an amendment is requested

1. {{{clause1}}}

List of any users involved or directly affected, and confirmation that all are aware of the request

• Izno (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) (initiator)

Information about amendment request

• {{{clause1}}}

• {{{clause1-request}}}

Statement by {other-editor}

Other editors are free to make relevant comments on this request as necessary. Comments here should address why or why not the Committee should accept the amendment request or provide additional information.

{{{title}}}: Clerk notes

This area is used for notes by the clerks (including clerk recusals).

{{{title}}}: Arbitrator views and discussion

Template:Arbitration CA notice

You are involved in a recently-filed request for clarification or amendment from the Arbitration Committee. Please review the request at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification and Amendment# and, if you wish to do so, enter your statement and any other material you wish to submit to the Arbitration Committee. Additionally, the Wikipedia:Arbitration guide may be of use.

Thanks,

Template:Arbitration case phase closed

Template:Arbitration case request

CASENAME

Initiated by ~~~ at ~~~~~

Proposed parties

• Izno (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log), filing party

Confirmation that all parties are aware of the request

Confirmation that other steps in dispute resolution have been tried

• Link 1
• Link 2

Statement by {Non-party}

Other editors are free to make relevant comments on this request as necessary. Comments here should address why or why not the Committee should accept the case request or provide additional information.

CASENAME: Clerk notes

This area is used for notes by the clerks (including clerk recusals).

CASENAME: Arbitrators' opinion on hearing this matter <0/0/0>

Vote key: (Accept/decline/recuse)

Template:Arbitration clarification request

Clarification request: {{{title}}}

Initiated by Izno at ~~~~~

Case or decision affected

{{{decision}}}

List of any users involved or directly affected, and confirmation that all are aware of the request:

• Izno (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) (initiator)

Confirmation that all parties are aware of the request

Statement by {other-editor}

Other editors are free to make relevant comments on this request as necessary. Comments here should opine whether and how the Committee should clarify or amend the decision or provide additional information.

{{{title}}}: Clerk notes

This area is used for notes by the clerks (including clerk recusals).

{{{title}}}: Arbitrator views and discussion

Template:Arbitration Committee Elections statement

[[User:{{subst:REVISIONUSER}}|{{subst:REVISIONUSER}}]]

{{{2}}}

• [[User:{{subst:REVISIONUSER}}|{{subst:REVISIONUSER}}]] ([[User talk:{{subst:REVISIONUSER}}|talk]] · [[Special:Contributions/{{subst:REVISIONUSER}}|contribs]] · count · logs · target logs · block log · lu · [[Wikipedia:Requests for adminship#{{subst:REVISIONUSER}}|rfa]] · [[Wikipedia:Requests for bureaucratship#{{subst:REVISIONUSER}}|rfb]] · [[Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration#{{subst:REVISIONUSER}}|arb]] · rfc · [[Wikipedia:Long term abuse#{{subst:REVISIONUSER}}|lta]] · [[Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser#{{subst:REVISIONUSER}}|checkuser]] · [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations#{{subst:REVISIONUSER}}|socks]] · rights · blocks · protects · deletions · moves)

{{Arbitration Committee candidate/{{subst:CURRENTYEAR}}|{{subst:REVISIONUSER}}}}

Template:Arbitration talk archive navbox

Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Amendment/Header

Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Header

Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification and Amendment/Header

Use this section to request clarification or amendment of a closed Arbitration Committee case or decision.

• Requests for clarification are used to ask for further guidance or clarification about an existing completed Arbitration Committee case or decision.
• Requests for amendment are used to ask for an amendment or extension of existing sanctions (for instance, because the sanctions are ineffective, contain a loophole, or no longer cover a sufficiently wide topic); or appeal for the removal of sanctions (including bans).

Submitting a request: (you must use this format!)

1. Choose one of the following options and open the page in a new tab or window:
   • Click here to file a request for clarification of an arbitration decision or procedure.
   • Click here to file a request for amendment of an arbitration decision or procedure (including an arbitration enforcement action issued by an administrator, such as a contentious topics restriction).
   • Click here to file a referral from AE requesting enforcement of a decision.
   • Click here to file a referral from AE appealing an arbitration enforcement action.
2. Save your request and check that it looks how you think it should and says what you intended.
3. If your request will affect or involve other users (including any users you have named as parties), you must notify these editors of your submission; you can use {{subst:Arbitration CA notice|SECTIONTITLE}} to do this.
4. Add the diffs of the talk page notifications under the applicable header of the request.

Please do not submit your request until it is ready for consideration; this is not a space for drafts, and incremental additions to a submission are disruptive.

Guidance on participation and word limits

Unlike many venues on Wikipedia, ArbCom imposes word limits. Please observe the below notes on complying with word limits.

• Motivation. Word limits are imposed to promote clarity and focus on the issues at hand and to ensure that arbitrators are able to fully take in submissions. Arbitrators must read a large volume of information across many matters in the course of their service on the Committee, so submissions that exceed word limits may be disregarded. For the sake of fairness and to discourage gamesmanship (i.e., to disincentivize "asking forgiveness rather than permission"), word limits are actively enforced.
• In general. Most submissions to the Arbitration Committee (including statements in arbitration case requests and ARCAs and evidence submissions in arbitration cases) are limited to 500 words, plus 50 diffs. During the evidence phase of an accepted case, named parties are granted an automatic extension to 1000 words plus 100 diffs.
• Sectioned discussion. To facilitate review by arbitrators, you should edit only in your own section. Address your submission to arbitrators, not to other participants. If you wish to rebut, clarify, or otherwise refer to another submission for the benefit of arbitrators, you may do so within your own section. (More information.)
• Requesting an extension. You may request a word limit extension in your submission itself (using the {{@ArbComClerks}} template) or by emailing clerks-llists.wikimedia.org. In your request, you should briefly (in 1-2 sentences) include (a) why you need additional words and (b) a broad outline of what you hope to discuss in your extended submission. The Committee endeavors to act upon extension requests promptly and aims to offer flexibility where warranted.
  • Members of the Committee may also grant extensions when they ask direct questions to facilitate answers to those questions.
• Refactoring statements. You should write carefully and concisely from the start. It is impermissible to rewrite a statement to shorten it after a significant amount of time has passed or after anyone has responded to it (see Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines § Editing own comments), so it is often advisable to submit a brief initial statement to leave room to respond to other users if the need arises.
• Sign submissions. In order for arbitrators and other participants to understand the order of submissions, sign your submission and each addition (using ~~~~).
• Word limit violations. Submissions that exceed the word limit will generally be "hatted" (collapsed), and arbitrators may opt not to consider them.
• Counting words. Words are counted on the rendered text (not wikitext) of the statement (i.e., the number of words that you would see by copy-pasting the page section containing your statement into a text editor or word count tool). This internal gadget may also be helpful.
• Sanctions. Please note that members and clerks of the Committee may impose appropriate sanctions when necessary to promote the effective functioning of the arbitration process.

General guidance

• Arbitrators and clerks may summarily remove or refactor discussion without comment.
• Requests from blocked or banned users should be made by e-mail directly to the Arbitration Committee.
• Only arbitrators and clerks may remove requests from this page. Do not remove a request or any statements or comments unless you are in either of these groups.
• Archived clarification and amendment requests are logged at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Index/Clarification and Amendment requests. Numerous legacy and current shortcuts can be used to more quickly reach this page:

Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement/Header

Click here to add a new enforcement request
For appeals: create a new section and use the template {{Arbitration enforcement appeal}}
See also: Logged AE sanctions

Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Motions/Header

Template:Arbreq

CASENAME

Initiated by ~~~ at ~~~~~

Proposed parties

• Izno (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log), filing party

Confirmation that all parties are aware of the request

Confirmation that other steps in dispute resolution have been tried

• Link 1
• Link 2

Statement by {Non-party}

Other editors are free to make relevant comments on this request as necessary. Comments here should address why or why not the Committee should accept the case request or provide additional information.

CASENAME: Clerk notes

This area is used for notes by the clerks (including clerk recusals).

CASENAME: Arbitrators' opinion on hearing this matter <0/0/0>

Vote key: (Accept/decline/recuse)

Template:AuditSubcommitteeChart

User:Callanecc/ArbCom collapse

Collapsed content
The following discussion has been closed by an arbitration clerk. Please do not modify or continue it.
Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/preload {{subst:Arbitration case request	CASENAME = Very brief and neutral name describing the topic of the dispute	admin = yes or no	party2 = Username	P2 admin = yes or no	party3 = Username	P3 admin = yes or no	otherDRsteps = Link 1 Link 2	statement = Replace this comment with your statement. }} User talk:Kharkiv07/sandbox {{subst:Arbitration case request	CASENAME = A case name	admin = no	party2 = example	P2 admin = no	party3 = example	P3 admin = no	otherDRsteps = [google.com] [cnn.coml]	statement = My statment }} Template:Casenav Main case page (Talk) — Evidence (Talk) — Workshop (Talk) — Proposed decision (Talk) Case clerk: TBD Drafting arbitrator: TBD Template:Casenav/data Template:Casenav/review Main review page (Talk) — Evidence (Talk) — Proposed decision (Talk) — Original case page Review clerk: [[User:|]] ([[User talk:|Talk]])  Drafting arbitrator: TBD Template:Casenav/sandbox2 Main case page (Talk) — Evidence (Talk) — Workshop (Talk) — Proposed decision (Talk) Case clerk: TBD Drafting arbitrator: TBD Template:Casenav/shortcut Template:ArbitrationCommitteeChart Template:ArbitrationClerksChart Template:ArbitrationCommitteeChartRecent Template:ArbitrationCommitteeChartRecent/sandbox Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification and Amendment/preload-amendment {{subst:Arbitration amendment request	case = Name of the affected arbitration case. If your request does not concern a case please remove this line.	decision = If your request does not concern a case, provide a link to the arbitration decision affected.	title = Short title of the arbitration decision (plain text only, no links here please).	clause1 = Link to the principle, finding, remedy, section, etc for which you are requesting amendment	clause1-request = State the desired modification	clause2 = Link to the principle, finding, remedy, section, etc for which you are requesting amendment	clause2-request = State the desired modification	admin = yes or no	party2 = Username	P2 admin = yes or no	party3 = Username	P3 admin = yes or no	statement = The rationale for the requested amendment, comprising no more than 1000 words. }} Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification and Amendment/preload-clarification {{subst:Arbitration clarification request	case = Name of the affected arbitration case. If your request does not concern a case please remove this line.	decision = If your request does not concern a case, provide a link to the arbitration decision affected.	title = Short title of the arbitration decision (plain text only, no links here please).	admin = yes or no	party2 = Username	P2 admin = yes or no	party3 = Username	P3 admin = yes or no	statement = Replace this comment with your statement. Describe the nature of your request, and any explanation or evidence why clarification is needed. }} Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions/Log/Courtesy blanked Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions/Log/Header This is the central log for all sanctions issued pursuant to an Arbitration Committee contentious topics remedy in Whiteboard8 as well as any appeals or modifications made to sanctions issued in Whiteboard8. The required information is the user or page the sanction is being applied to, enforcing administrator, date, nature of sanction, including expiry date (if applicable), basis or context (such as link to AE request), and a diff of the user notification (if applicable). “ All sanctions and page restrictions must be logged by the administrator who applied the sanction or page restriction at Wikipedia:Arbitration enforcement log. Whenever a sanction or page restriction is appealed or modified, the administrator amending it must append a note recording the amendment to the original log entry. To be valid, sanctions must be clearly and unambiguously labelled as an arbitration enforcement action (such as with "arbitration enforcement", "arb enforcement", "AE" or "WP:AE" in the Wikipedia log entry or the edit summary). If a sanction has been logged as an arbitration enforcement action but has not been clearly labelled as an arbitration enforcement action any uninvolved administrator may amend the sanction (for example, a null edit or reblocking with the same settings) on behalf of the original administrator. Labelling a sanction which has been logged does not make the administrator who added the label the "enforcing administrator" unless there is confusion as to who intended the sanction be arbitration enforcement. A central log of all page restrictions and sanctions (including blocks, bans, page protections or other restrictions) placed as arbitration enforcement (including contentious topic restrictions) is to be maintained by the Committee and its clerks at Wikipedia:Arbitration enforcement log. ” — Arbitration Committee Procedures on logging sanctions Yearly Logs (Full Log) 2024 • 2023 • 2022 • 2021 • 2020 • 2019 • 2018 • 2017 • 2016 • 2015 • 2014 • 2013 • 2012 • 2011 • 2010 • 2009 • 2008 • 2007 • 2006 • 2005 Template:EvidenceTooLong Hello {{subst:BASEPAGENAME}}. Your evidence on the above page stands at over words. The limit is 1000. Please refactor it within the next 24 hours or a clerk will do it for you. Regards, Template:ArbComOpenTasks/Subpage Template:NUSER Example [[Template:ArbComOpenCase Case Opened on ~~~~~ Please do not edit this page directly unless you wish to become a participant in this request. (All participants are subject to Arbitration Committee decisions, and the ArbCom will consider each participant's role in the dispute.) Comments are very welcome on the Talk page, and will be read, in full. Evidence, no matter who can provide it, is very welcome at /Evidence. Evidence is more useful than comments. Arbitrators will be working on evidence and suggesting proposed decisions at /Workshop and voting on proposed decisions at /Proposed decision. Involved parties Requests for comment Statement by party 1 Please limit your statement to 500 words Statement by party 2 Please limit your statement to 500 words Preliminary decisions Arbitrators' opinions on hearing this matter (0/0/0/0) Temporary injunction (none) Final decision (none yet) All numbering based on /Proposed decision (vote counts and comments are there as well) Principles Findings of Fact Remedies Note: All remedies that refer to a period of time, for example to a ban of X months or a revert parole of Y months, are to run concurrently unless otherwise stated. Enforcement Log of blocks and bans Log any block, ban or extension under any remedy in this decision here. Minimum information includes name of administrator, date and time, what was done and the basis for doing it. User:ArbComBot/Comment [[Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/{{{1}}}]] Hello, An Arbitration case in which you commented has been opened: [[Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/{{{1}}}]]. Please add any evidence you may wish the Arbitrators to consider to the evidence sub-page, [[Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/{{{1}}}/Evidence]]. You may also contribute to the case on the workshop sub-page, [[Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/{{{1}}}/Workshop]]. On behalf of the Arbitration Committee, {{{2}}} delivered by ~~~~ User:ArbComBot/Noticeboard [[Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/{{{1}}}]] opened An Arbitration case, [[Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/{{{1}}}]], has been opened. Please add any evidence you may wish the Arbitrators to consider to the evidence sub-page, [[Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/{{{1}}}/Evidence]]. You may also contribute to the case on the workshop sub-page, [[Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/{{{1}}}/Workshop]]. On behalf of the Arbitration Committee, {{{2}}} delivered by ~~~~ Template:ArbComOpenedComment You recently offered a statement in a request for arbitration. The Arbitration Committee has accepted that request for arbitration and an arbitration case has been opened at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Example. Evidence that you wish the arbitrators to consider should be added to the evidence subpage, at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Example/Evidence. Please add your evidence by December 16, 2024, which is when the evidence phase closes. You can also contribute to the case workshop subpage, Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Example/Workshop. For a guide to the arbitration process, see Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Party Guide/Introduction. For the Arbitration Committee, ~~~~ Template:ArbComOpened You were recently listed as a party to a request for arbitration. The Arbitration Committee has accepted that request for arbitration and an arbitration case has been opened at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Example. Evidence that you wish the arbitrators to consider should be added to the evidence subpage, at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Example/Evidence. Please add your evidence by December 16, 2024, which is when the evidence phase closes. You can also contribute to the case workshop subpage, Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Example/Workshop. For a guide to the arbitration process, see Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Party Guide/Introduction. For the Arbitration Committee, ~~~~ Template:ArbComPD Hi {{subst:BASEPAGENAME}}, in the open Example arbitration case, a remedy or finding of fact has been proposed which relates to you. Please review this decision and draw the arbitrators' attention to any relevant material or statements. Comments may be brought to the attention of the committee on the proposed decision talk page. For a guide to the proposed decision, see Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Party Guide/Proposed decision. For the Arbitration Committee, ~~~~ Template:Evidence
([[Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/{{{1}}}|•]]/[[Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/{{{1}}}| t]])	([[Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/{{{1}}}/Proposed decision|p]]/[[Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/{{{1}}}/Proposed decision| t]])	([[Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/{{{1}}}/Workshop|w]]/[[Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/{{{1}}}/Workshop| t]])	[[Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/{{{1}}}/Evidence|{{{1}}}]] ([[Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/{{{1}}}/Evidence|t]])		{{{2}}} Template:Motion to close
([[Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/{{{1}}}|•]]/ [[Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/{{{1}}}|t]])	([[Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/{{{1}}}/Evidence|e]]/ [[Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/{{{1}}}/Evidence|t]])	([[Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/{{{1}}}/Workshop|w]]/ [[Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/{{{1}}}/Workshop|t]])	[[Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/{{{1}}}/Proposed decision#Motion to close|{{{1}}}]] ([[Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/{{{1}}}/Proposed decision|t]])		{{{2}}} Template:Recently closed
			[[Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/{{{1}}}|{{{1}}}]]		{{{2}}} Template:Under review This template is only intended for use in mainspace. Template:PD no threaded discussion Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Header {{Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Header}} Template:RFAR WP:RFAR/Example (evidence · workshop · proposed decision) Template:RFARlinks [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/{{{1}}}|{{{1}}}]] arbitration case ([[Wikipedia talk:Arbitration/Requests/Case/{{{1}}}|t]]) ([[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/{{{1}}}/Evidence|ev]] /[[Wikipedia talk:Arbitration/Requests/Case/{{{1}}}/Evidence| t]]) ([[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/{{{1}}}/Workshop|w]] /[[Wikipedia talk:Arbitration/Requests/Case/{{{1}}}/Workshop| t]]) ([[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/{{{1}}}/Proposed decision|pd]] /[[Wikipedia talk:Arbitration/Requests/Case/{{{1}}}/Proposed decision| t]]) Template:ArbComSize Hi, {{subst:BASEPAGENAME}}. I'm an arbitration clerk, which means I help manage and administer the arbitration process (on behalf of the committee). Thank you for making a statement in an arbitration request at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case. However, we ask all participants and commentators to limit the size of their initial statements to 500 words. Your statement significantly exceeds this limit. Please reduce the length of your statement when you are next online. If the case is accepted, you will have the opportunity to present more evidence; in any event, concise, factual statements are much more likely to be understood and to influence the decisions of the arbitrators. Requests for extensions of the word limit may be made either in your statement or by email to the clerks email list. For the Arbitration Committee, User:L235/ArbClerk/Templates/EvidenceSize Hi, {{subst:BASEPAGENAME}}. The Arbitration Committee has asked that evidence presentations at [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/{{{2}}}/Evidence]] by parties be kept to around 1000 words and 100 diffs. Your presentation is over {{{1}}}. Please edit your section to focus on the most relevant evidence. If you wish to submit over-length evidence, you must first obtain the agreement of the arbitrators by posting a request on the /Evidence talk page. For the Arbitration Committee, Template:Arbitration standard provisions Enforcement of restrictions 0) Should any user subject to a restriction in this case violate that restriction, that user may be blocked, initially for up to one month, and then with blocks increasing in duration to a maximum of one year. In accordance with the procedure for the standard enforcement provision adopted 3 May 2014, this provision did not require a vote. Appeals and modifications 0) Appeals and modifications This procedure applies to appeals related to, and modifications of, actions taken by administrators to enforce the Committee's remedies. It does not apply to appeals related to the remedies directly enacted by the Committee. Appeals by sanctioned editors Appeals may be made only by the editor under sanction and only for a currently active sanction. Requests for modification of page restrictions may be made by any editor. The process has three possible stages (see "Important notes" below). The editor may: ask the enforcing administrator to reconsider their original decision; request review at the arbitration enforcement noticeboard ("AE") or at the administrators’ noticeboard ("AN"); and submit a request for amendment at "ARCA". If the editor is blocked, the appeal may be made by email through Special:EmailUser/Arbitration Committee (or, if email access is revoked, to arbcom-enwikimedia.org). Modifications by administrators No administrator may modify or remove a sanction placed by another administrator without: the explicit prior affirmative consent of the enforcing administrator; or prior affirmative agreement for the modification at (a) AE or (b) AN or (c) ARCA (see "Important notes" below). Administrators modifying sanctions out of process may at the discretion of the committee be desysopped. Nothing in this section prevents an administrator from replacing an existing sanction issued by another administrator with a new sanction if fresh misconduct has taken place after the existing sanction was applied. Administrators are free to modify sanctions placed by former administrators – that is, editors who do not have the administrator permission enabled (due to a temporary or permanent relinquishment or desysop) – without regard to the requirements of this section. If an administrator modifies a sanction placed by a former administrator, the administrator who made the modification becomes the "enforcing administrator". If a former administrator regains the tools, the provisions of this section again apply to their unmodified enforcement actions. Important notes: For a request to succeed, either (i) the clear and substantial consensus of (a) uninvolved administrators at AE or (b) uninvolved editors at AN or (ii) a passing motion of arbitrators at ARCA is required. If consensus at AE or AN is unclear, the status quo prevails. While asking the enforcing administrator and seeking reviews at AN or AE are not mandatory prior to seeking a decision from the committee, once the committee has reviewed a request, further substantive review at any forum is barred. The sole exception is editors under an active sanction who may still request an easing or removal of the sanction on the grounds that said sanction is no longer needed, but such requests may only be made once every six months, or whatever longer period the committee may specify. These provisions apply only to contentious topics placed by administrators and to blocks placed by administrators to enforce arbitration case decisions. They do not apply to sanctions directly authorised by the committee, and enacted either by arbitrators or by arbitration clerks, or to special functionary blocks of whatever nature. All actions designated as arbitration enforcement actions, including those alleged to be out of process or against existing policy, must first be appealed following arbitration enforcement procedures to establish if such enforcement is inappropriate before the action may be reversed or formally discussed at another venue. In accordance with the procedure for the standard appeals and modifications provision adopted 3 May 2014, this provision did not require a vote. Template:Subpage evidence In relation to your evidence submissions at [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/You did not declare the name of the case!/Evidence#Section title was not declared in the template!]], please be aware that the Arbitration Committee does not take evidence on subpages into account. Please remove the link to all such subpages from the Evidence page, and transfer what material you want to submit for consideration to your own section (within the confines of the word limit). Thank you, Template:User wikipedia/Arbitrator This user is an arbitrator on the English Wikipedia. Template:User wikipedia/former arbitrator This user was an arbitrator on the English Wikipedia from {{{1}}} to {{{2}}}. Template:ArbCom calendar month {{Template:ArbCom calendar month}}