Jump to content

User:Kober/sandbox/Georgia 580–1008

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

1

[edit]

The momentous campaigns of the Byzantine emperor Heraclius against the Persian Sasanian Empire concluded the last Byzantine–Sasanian War of 602–628, with much of the South Caucasus under the Byzantine hegemony and the Sasanians critically weakened. This paved the way for a new force in the politics of the Middle East and Caucasus, one sweeping northwards from Arabia and destined to remain one of the leading claimants to regional hegemony for the centuries to come—the Islamic caliphate.

After the conquest of Syria and Mesopotamia, the Arabs made their first incursions in Armenia and Georgia in 642 or 643, followed by a definitive invasion under the command of Habib ibn Maslama al-Fihri in 654. In the wake of their occupation of Armenia, which was driven by strategic considerations in view of the Byzantine troop concentration in the region, the Arabs discovered new opportunities to expand northward, into the Georgian lands.[1] As Habib crossed into Iberia, the ruler at Tbilisi (Arabic: Tiflis), Stephen II—referred to as bațrīq in the Muslim sources[2]—sued for peace and was granted kitāb al-amān, a "charter of protection": Iberia had to pay jizya, a tax on non-Muslims of one dinar annually per household and respect and shelter Muslims in return of security of its people and inviolability of the Christian church.[3][4] Several areas in or around Iberia offered their surrender on similar terms; the Arab sources mention Khunan, Jardaman, Tharyalit, Samsakhi, Artahal, Shaushit, Kalarjit, Khakhit, Khukhit, Bazalit, Bāb al-Lān, al-Sanariyah, and al-Dudaniyah as following the suit of Tiflis.[4][note 1]

  1. Georgia in Arab sources (see Vacca); Arab rule in Georgia / Emirate of Tiflis
  2. Concept of Arminiya

2

[edit]

A civil war of 656–661, wherein the Umayyad Caliphate replaced the Rashidun, appears to have weakened the Muslim positions in the Caliphate's northern periphery, for the contemporaneous prince of Iberia is mentioned with the Byzantine title of patrician, implying his acceptance of the imperial suzerainty.[7] During the second civil war in the Caliphate, there was a revolt in Armenia and Iberia against the Umayyads in 681 or 682; the Iberian prince Nerses is reported by the 10th-century Armenian historian Hovhannes Draskhanakerttsi to have defeated an Arab commander in Armenia, named Barabay, an otherwise unknown personality.[7][8] This was followed, in 684, by a surprise attack by the Khazars, from across the Greater Caucasus, in which—according to Łewond—Armenian, Albanian, and Iberian princes were killed.[2]

In 685, the Byzantine emperor Justinian II resumed a bid, initially successful, to reclaim the Caucasus and made a short-lived peace treaty with the caliph Abd al-Malik ibn Marwan, which provided, among other things, for a condominium of the two empires in the Caucasus and their sharing the tribute from Armenia and Iberia.[9] Justinian's eastern adventure was made abortive by the defeat at Sebastopolis in Cilicia in 692; Armenia, Iberia, and Albania reverted to the Caliphate.[10] One consequence of these events was a change of the dynasty of presiding princes in Iberia: the Caliph transferred his favor from the Chosroids to the Guaramids; the remaining Chosroids—the Georgian chronicles assert—fled to the relative security of a then Byzantine-dominated Lazica.[11]

Further, in 696 or 697, Sergius, Patrician of Lazica, revolted from the Byzantine overlordship and acknowledged the Caliph's suzerainty.[12][10] By the early years of the 8th century, Iberia, Lazica with the exception of the maritime city of Phasis as well as Abasgia were in Arab hands as attested by the Byzantine historian Theophanes.[13] Phasis sheltered the exiled Armenian prince Smbat VI Bagratuni, who, however, having quarreled with the Byzantines, pillaged the city and returned to an Arab-controlled Armenia in 711.[10] Around 712, the Byzantines invoked the Alans to attack Abasgia and sent an army to recover Lazica, which after besieging Archaeopolis, was compelled to retreat before an Arab relief force; the remnants of the army were evacuated to safety by Leo the Isaurian, afterwards emperor.[14]

3

[edit]

The Arab successes made the Byzantines and Khazars natural allies against the common foe. Sporadic attacks and counterattacks such as the devastating Khazar raid in south Caucasus in 693[10] evolved into a more regular Arab–Khazar conflict around 722, the Caucasus being a major warfront. The main points of conflict were the two principal passes of Derbend (Bab al-Abwab or simply al-Bab) and the Darial (Bab al-Lan).[15] In the process, in 724, the Arab commander al-Jarrah ibn Abdallah had to resubdue Tbilisi and resumed the previous charter of rights to its people, but additionally imposed kharaj, a tax on agricultural land and its produce.[16] The disastrous defeat at Ardabil of the Muslim forces at the hands of the Khazars in December 730 enabled the Byzantines to recover Lazica and Abasgia.[10]

Following the Khazar containment of the counteroffensive north of the Caucasus by the Arab general Maslama ibn Abd al-Malik in 731, the Muslim forces held the line at al-Bab.[17] More than one military expedition was undertaken by the caliphate in the Georgian lands, but consolidation of the Umayyad hegemony became associated in the medieval Georgian historical tradition with the single event—an invasion commanded by Murvan Qru, "the deaf", that is, Marwan ibn Muhammad, eventually the last Umayyad caliph (r. 744–750).[18] This endeavor was a prelude to Marwan's large-scale Khazar campaign of 737.[18]

As recounted by the Georgian chronicle of Pseudo-Juansher, Marwan's appearance in Iberia displaced many of the Georgian nobles to the remote mountains. The Muslim army next marched to the west, in Lazica and Abasgia, reduced Archaeopolis—Tsikhe-Goji of the Georgian sources—and Tskhumi, and laid siege to Anacopia, defended by the Abasgians and Iberian fugitives. Marwan was forced to withdraw owing to an epidemic of dysentery which decimated his army.[19] Marwan's subsequent victorious campaign against Khazaria—described in Muslim sources—failed to completely eliminate the Khazar military power, but largely stabilized the Caucasus frontline and secured the Muslim control of the mountainous passes.[20]

4

[edit]

The civil war of 744–750 and concomitant Abbasid Revolution in the Caliphate opened up the way for a more aggressive stance by the Byzantine Empire and stirred up anti-Arab elements in the Caucasus. Around 748, the Guaramids of Iberia were replaced by a new dynasty, the Nersianids, represented by Adarnase III, whose title of kouropalates indicated a return to imperial allegiance. However, once at the helm of the Caliphate in 750, the Abbasids tightened their grip on Armenia and Iberia.[10]

The turmoil also pushed the Caliphate into a defensive position on the Khazar front. The Khazars struck Armenia in 762 and caused even greater damage to Albania, Iberia—including Tiflis—and Armenia in 764.[21] They made their last great inroad south of the Caucasus mountains around 799. According to the Georgian chronicles, Juansher, the last male scion of the Chosroid royal house of Iberia, was captured by the Khazars and had to spend seven years in captivity.[22][note 2] After 800, the Arab–Khazar relations changed dramatically. With the growing disarray in the South Caucasus, there was no more a centrally imposed overall policy towards the Khazars emanating from Baghdad. Rather, the relations with the Khazars were now largely determined by the Caucasian frontier rulers' parochial interests.[24]

Wars added to heavy taxation imposed by the Abbasids occasioned a series of uprisings in the Caucasus to which the Caliphate responded with heavy-handed repression. After the Armenian rebellion of 771–772 was crushed, Iberia proper and the Chosroid princedom of Kakheti remained principal foci of discontent.[25] Nerse, the Nersianid presiding prince of Iberia, was imprisoned in Baghdad from 772 to 775; after a sojourn in Khazaria and Abasgia, he was allowed to return to his country as a private citizen and disappeared, as did his dynasty, from history shortly after 780.[26] Nerse's nephew and successor as presiding prince, Stephen III, proved to be the last male Guaramid, apparently put to death by the Arab governor Khuzayma ibn Khazim in 786.[27] The Chosroids, too, approached their demise as Archil of Kakheti, eventually extolled as a martyr in the Georgian hagiography, was executed that same year; his two sons had no male descendants.[citation needed] After this, the office of presiding prince in Iberia, as well as in Armenia, was left vacant.[25]

The country was devastated, its elite reduced and decimated. Nobles and peasants alike were forced to seek refuge in safer places, such as a Byzantine-dominated Lazica.[28][29][note 3] The situation of oppression is vividly lamented in the Georgian hagiographic text Martyrdom of Saint Abo by Iovane Sabanisdze, composed at the end of the 8th century, shortly after its hero, Abo—a Christianized Arab and Prince Nerse's companion—was put to death at Tiflis in 786.[31][32]

5

[edit]

At the same time, this period of crisis was the turning point. The Arab demand that taxes and tribute be paid in money, not in kind, revitalized commerce and urban economy aided by the location of major Caucasian towns on the intersection of Eurasian trade-routes. Extermination and decline of many dynastic houses cleared the path to those who survived the crackdown and numerous small princely holdings began to coalesce into larger political formations.[25]

The most important of these newly elevated aristocratic families were the Bagratids, with branches in both Armenia and Iberia. Between 786 and 813, the Georgian Bagratids—descending from a fugitive Armenian prince and matrimonially related to the leading families of Iberia, while claiming a biblical descent from the king David—inherited holdings of their extinct Guaramid cousins in southwest, or Upper, Iberia, and built up a hereditary principality on the Byzantine frontier, comprising Klarjeti, Javakheti, and Tao.[33][28][note 4]

The Abbasids, facing a civil unrest at home and growing separatism among both Christian and Muslim vassals at the northern periphery of their empire, now sought allies among the native élites. They opted for the Bagratids and, in 813, allowed the Bagratid prince Ashot I to revive the dormant principate of Iberia, which the Guaramids had intermittently occupied. Eager to counterbalance the caliphate, the Byzantine court conferred upon Ashot the title of kouropalates. Under similar circumstances, the principate had been restored in Armenia for Ashot IV the Brave, an Armenian Bagratid, in 806.[28]

After the assassination of Ashot I in 826 or 830, the Iberian Bagratids were weakened by the division of his heritage among his three sons, whose posterity formed the three separate lines of the dukes of Tao, the dukes of Klarjeti, with the important city of Artanuji, and the princes, later kings, and kouropalates of Iberia.[35]

Besides, there were two other important entities in a now politically divided Iberia which eluded the Bagratid control: the Muslim-ruled enclave centered on Tiflis and the Christian principality of Kakheti.[36][37]

6

[edit]

Tiflis was the seat of an Arab emirate, the early history of which is poorly documented, but the establishment of some form of Muslim administration in the city is indicated by coins issued locally in the Caliph's name in AH 85 (704/705 CE).[38] Already in the early years of the 9th century, the Muslim rulers of Tiflis veered towards separatism; shortly after al-Amin's accession to the caliphate in 809, the governor of Arminiya, Asad ibn Yazid al-Shaybani, had to respond militarily to the insubordination of Ismail ibn Shu'ayb, mawla ("client") of the Umayyads, in Iberia (Jurzan). By 833, the wayward ruler's son, Ishaq ibn Isma'il—known under the nisba al-Tiflisi—succeeded in carving himself out a principality, based in Tiflis and dominating parts of Inner and Lower Iberia.[39] By that time, the city of Tiflis had become largely a Muslim enclave, "a town beyond which there is no Islam" and "a great thaghr ("outpost"), with many enemies from every direction"—as the contemporaneous Muslim authors put it.[40]

7

[edit]

Kakheti, in the east of Iberia, once the appanage of the Chosroids, became, after their extinction around 800, an independent principality, initially ruled by elective princes bearing the style of chorepiscopus. The Tsanars, a people in northern Kakheti, were at the forefront of local resistance to the Muslim encroachments, and al-Ṣanāriyya, the name derived from this tribal group, was used by the Arabs to designate Kakheti in general.[41] At times, the princes of Kakheti laid claim to parts of Inner Iberia and, across the Kura, to Gardabani in Lower Iberia.[citation needed]

Immediately southeast of Kakheti, in a politically fragmented landscape of Caucasian Albania, a branch of the ancient Aranshahik dynasty took control of the territories on the left bank of the Kura—"trans-Cyran" Albania—Shaki and Hereti around 821.[42] The latter toponym was used in medieval Georgian sources to denote both a district on the Iberian–Albanian frontier as well as far western Albania in general.[43] The rulers of Shaki–Hereti in 893 restored the abeyant Albanian kingship, which endured until c. 958; the dynasty was eventually superseded by Kakheti in 1010.[42][44]

8

[edit]

In the meantime, as the major Arab–Khazar conflict neared its end, the growing Byzantine–Khazar rivalry along the northern and northeastern Black Sea littoral[45] resulted in breaking away, with the Khazar help, of Abasgia from the Byzantine control around 790. Leon of Abasgia, an imperial duke and son of a Khazar princess according to the Georgian chronicles, was able to extend his rule to Lazica-Egrisi as far inland as the Likhi mountains and thus established the Kingdom of Abasgia (Ap'xazeti), virtually independent from the Byzantine Empire.[46] The legitimist Georgian chronicler emphasizes that Leon assumed the royal title because the Iberian Chosroid royals neared their extinction.[47] For the later monarchs of Abasgia, the Constantinopolitan court reserved the style of exousiastes of Abasgia.[48]

9

[edit]
Caucasus, 884-962

Thus, in the early 9th century the Caucasus became a patchwork of Christian and Muslim principalities with varying degrees of dependence on the imperial powers. Loyalties and allegiances changed frequently, transpassing ethnic and confessional boundaries, and alliances were formed and dissolved expediently as these polities fought for survival and vied with each other.[49][50]

Having acceded to the principate of Iberia, the Georgian Bagratids, from their base in Upper Iberia, made moves, with varying success, to expand into other parts of Iberia, especially its core region, Inner Iberia, which was also claimed by the emirs of Tiflis, at times coveted by the princes of Kakheti and, soon, by the kings of Abasgia.[citation needed] In the meanwhile, the Abbasids spared no effort to curb the growing Christian and Muslim independencies in the northern periphery.[51] In 829, the Caliph's general Khalid ibn Yazid al-Shaybani forced Muhammad ibn Attab, a rebellious Muslim emir at Tiflis, into submission and defeated his allies, the Tsanars.[39] A Georgian chronicler reports Khalid conquering Armenia, Iberia, and Albania.[52]

In the reign of the caliph al-Wathiq (r. 842–847), Muhammad, son and successor of Khalid, battled inconclusively with the self-minded emir of Tiflis, Ishaq ibn Isma'il, and his Kakhetian allies, while the Bagratids, who feared the distant Abbasid imperial center less than the increasingly powerful emir of Tiflis, supported the caliph's general.[39]

In 852, the caliph al-Mutawakkil dispatched Bugha al-Kabir with a large army bent on bringing the Caucasus into submission. Once again Muslims and Christians fought on both sides of the battle lines.[53] After reducing the Armenian lands, Bugha took Tiflis by siege, deploying naphtha against the city's wooden buildings, and had Ishaq ibn Isma'il captured and beheaded in August 853.[54] Bugha then defeated the Abasgian king Theodosius II in Inner Iberia, but failed in the highlands of Kakheti.[55]

The Abbasid authority was, for the time being, reasserted in Iberia and Armenia, Bugha's campaign terminating, in the words of the British historian W. E. D. Allen, "the chance of Tiflis becoming the centre of an Islamic state in the Caucasus".[56] Several leading Caucasian princes were deported to the caliph's court in Samarra.[51] A medieval Georgian hagiographic source, corroborated by a stone inscription on the Ateni Sioni church, has one seasoned Iberian dignitary, Konstanti-Kakhay, being captured by Bugha's troops and then decapitated for his unrelenting Christianity on the caliph's order.[57] The Bagratids of Iberia, particularly, the kouropalates Bagrat I, who was loyal to the caliph and had helped Bugha defeat the Abasgians, remained intact.[51]

10

[edit]

After al-Mutawakkil's death in 861, the Abbasid control over the outlying parts of the caliphate crumbled, while the Byzantine power was at its ascent. The caliphs now deemed it necessary to court the Caucasian princes in order to bolster whatever influence they still had in the region. This policy change primarily benefited the Armenian Bagratids who gained de facto independence from the caliph. They, in the person of Ashot I, restored the indigenous kingship in 885 and endeavored to extend their influence over their Iberian cousins, who—weakened by internal dissensions—became also vulnerable to the expansionism of their Abasgian in-laws.[citation needed]

Both Abasgians and Armenians interfered militarily in support of opposing factions in a Bagratid civil war in Iberia, which was triggered by the murder of the kouropalates David I by his cousin, Nasr, brother-in-law of Bagrat I of Abasgia, in 881. David's son, Adarnase IV, aided by the Armenians, emerged victorious in 888 and, having Armenia's example before him, he assumed the title of king. The Byzantine emperor, who had earlier sympathized with Adarnase's opponents, adapted to the new circumstances and conferred upon the new king the title of kouropalates in 891. The Armenian recognition of Adarnase's royal status occurred in 899.[citation needed]

The kingdom of Iberia was thus recovered from the abeyance of more than three hundred years, but the Bagratids suffered a major setback in 904, when Constantine III of Abasgia, competing with Adarnase IV for hegemony in the Georgian lands, divested him of his crownland in Inner Iberia. As a result, until the end of the Abasgian domination of the region in 975, the Iberian kings were relegated to their portion of the hereditary Bagratid lands in Upper Iberia, of which Lower Tao was held by them in an uninterrupted succession.[58]

In the meantime, the Armenian Bagratid king Smbat I made significant territorial gains in Gogarene and Lower Iberia including the ancient city of Samshvilde. The Abasgians and Armenians clashed again, but Smbat's subsequent overtures to Constantine of Abasgia alienated his hitherto loyal ally, Adarnase IV.[citation needed] This break came in the face of rising power of the Sajid dynasty of Azerbaijan, largely autonomous vassals of the Caliphate, and weakened the Christian Caucasian monarchies.[citation needed] Between Yusuf ibn Abi'l-Saj's renewed onslaught against Armenia in 908 and his final conquest and execution of Smbat in 914, the Sajid forces also raided the Georgian lands, conquering some Kakhetian fortresses, rampaging Iberia, and subduing the fortress of Queli in the Bagratid territories; its youthful commander Gobron was captured and put to death.[59] Another Sajid expedition is reported by the Georgian chronicles as having taken place sometime between 918 and 923,[60] in the course of which Kakheti was ravaged, the ancient Iberian capital of Mtskheta was taken and the Monastery of the Holy Cross was pillaged.[61] Muslim sources are unaware of these expeditions.[60] After the Sajid-led efforts, the Abbasid hold of the caliphate's northern periphery irreversibly ebbed away.[citation needed]

11

[edit]

Shortly after the Sajid invasion, around 915, there was a combined Abasgian–Kakhetian attack on Shaki–Hereti, whose ruler, Adarnase, had to buy peace by ceding three fortresses to the allies.[62] In general, Hereti experienced growing influence from its Georgian neighbors, exemplified by the conversion of Ishkhanik (fl. 955 – c. 962) from Armeno–Albanian non-Chalcedonian Christianity to the Chalcedonian creed through the ministry of his Georgian mother Dinar, a Bagratid princess of Tao.[62][44]

Under two successive kings, George II (r. 923–957) and Leon III (r. 957–967), Abasgia was at the height of its power and prestige.[citation needed] Beyond western Georgia, it held sway over Inner Iberia, conquered from the Bagratids, but the local nobility— such as the great house of Tbeli—were prone to rebellion.[citation needed] One such insurrection, in 926, was led by King George II's own son and viceroy (eristavi) of Inner Iberia, Constantine, whom the king defeated with the help of the Bagratids of Tao and the Kakhetian chorepiscopus Padla II.[citation needed]

In addition, Abasgia must have acquired Achara and Nigali upon partition of the inheritance of the late Bagratid prince Gurgen II of Tao in 941.[63] The kings of Abasgia were also in possession of parts of Javakheti as evidenced by the inscription of 964 on the Kumurdo cathedral.[64] Farther to the east, the Abasgians encroached on Kakheti several times bettween 923 and 967, but the Kakhetian dynasty was able to maintain their independent existence.[citation needed] The kingdom of Abasgia, thus, in the words of the historian Cyril Toumanoff, "came close to achieving a unification of all the Georgian lands". However, repeated occasions of dynastic strife and civil unrest eroded the Abasgian monarchy by the end of the 10th century.[65]

12

[edit]

Tiflis remained a Muslim enclave ruled by a succession of emirs and surrounded by the resurgent Christian states. After a period of the caliph's reimposed suzerainty following Bugha's destructive campaign of 853, the banu Jafar—the Jafarids—acceded to the emirate around 880 and grew virtually independent of the caliphate. Still later, they boasted their autonomous status by displaying their own name, alongside with that of the caliph, on dirhams of the Tiflis mint. The first known coin of this kind, with the names of the emir Mansur ibn Jafar and the caliph al-Muti on it, was stuck in AH 342 (953/954). The Jafarid family was to possess Tiflis for nearly 200 years.[60][66]

13

[edit]

[Fragmentation of political authority in Armenia] One of these was the kingdom of Lori, also known as Tashir-Dzoraget, set up around 980 in northern Armenia and the eastern Armeno-Georgian marchlands for a cadet branch of the Armenian Bagratids. This kingdom was in possession of the key fortress of Samshvilde and acquired some more lands in Lower Iberia at the expense of the emirate of Tiflis. Also, by virtue of holding the formerly Albanian principality of Gardman, the kings of Lori claimed the royal title of Albania.[67][68][note 5]

14

[edit]

The Bagratids of Iberia, in the meantime, relegated by the Abasgian conquest of Inner Iberia to their hereditary lands in Upper Iberia, remained divided in the three, frequently rivaling, lines of the dukes of Tao with their principal demesne in Upper Tao, the dukes of Klarjeti, with the strategic city of Artanuji, and the kings of Iberia, invested with Lower Tao, Kola, and Javakheti, and having the Byzantine court title of kouropalates attached to their office.[70]

Sometime between 923 and 941, the expansionist duke Gurgen II of Tao seized Artanuji from the Bagratids of Klarjeti. He interfered in dynastic conflicts in Abasgia and made an attempt, ultimately unsuccessfully, to seize Samshvilde from the Armenians. With Gurgen's death in 941, the line of Tao became extinct and his possessions were partitioned between his relatives and neighbors; of these, Klarjeti reverted to its original ruling line, while Gurgen's patrimonial Upper Tao passed to the royal house of Iberia. Within two decades, the latter became divided into two lines. The elder line, "the second house of Tao"—stemming from the magistros Bagrat I—held the kouropalatate and most of the family's hereditary lands, including Upper Tao, and overshadowed the younger line, "the house of Iberia"—stemming from the kouropalates Sumbat I—whose heads remained titular kings of Iberia and ruled their demesne of Lower Tao.[71]

15

[edit]
A c. 980 monumental asomtavruli inscription on the Zarzma monastery, recounting the Iberian role in defeating Bardas Skleros.[72]

The last prince of the elder line of Tao, the kouropalates David III of Upper Tao, rendered important service to the Byzantine emperor Basil II at the time of a great revolt of Bardas Skleros in 979. David reinforced the imperial commander and an old friend of his, Bardas Phokas, with 12,000 troops under the command of his vassal Tornikios, who temporarily abandoned his monastic cell on Mount Athos to resume the role of a general. In reward, David received, for lifetime possession, a vast tract of land in Byzantine Armenia stretching from Tao towards Lake Van and including the city of Theodosiopolis. Another reward for David's loyalty was the allocation of imperial funds for the foundation of a Georgian monastery on Mount Athos, a foundation known by the Greek appellation Iviron, "of the Iberians".[73]

David's most enduring legacy was his role in setting stage for the political unification of Georgia. In putting into force the carefully assembled plan of the Abasgian viceroy of Inner Iberia Ivane Marushis-dze, David, being childless, adopted his young cousin Bagrat, the future Bagrat III, of the Bagratid line of Iberia. Bagrat was the son of Gurgen and the grandson of the titular king of Iberia, Bagrat II the Simple; his mother, Gurandukht, was sister of Theodosius III, king of Abasgia, who was childless and unpopular with the nobility. In the person of Prince Bagrat, thus, three major successions were to converge: Lower Tao and the crown of Iberia through his father, the crown of Abasgia through his mother, and the kouropalatate and Upper Tao through his adoptive father, David.[74]

Theodosius had fought his brother Demetrius and had been blinded by him before acceding to the long-coveted throne of Abasgia c. 975, only to see his kingdom crumbling. The Abasgian control of Inner Iberia faded away and passed to a loose confederation of local feudal aristocracy. With the Abasgian monarchy in disarray, in 975, Ivane Marushis-dze ceded Inner Iberia to David of Tao, who forced the encroaching Kakhetians to withdraw and promulgated Bagrat's right to the three successions before the nobility at Uplistsikhe. The nucleal Iberian territory was thus restored to the Bagratid rule, but it was offered, not to its legitimate and titular king, Bagrat II the Simple, but to his grandson, Bagrat. As the latter was still a minor, his father Gurgen was made his regent and put in charge of Inner Iberia in the de jure capacity, as Cyril Toumanoff assumes, of a co-king with his father, Bagrat the Simple.[75]

Three years later, in 978, Marushis-dze secured the support of David III of Tao and Smbat II of Armenia for a coup in Abasgia; Bagrat, now of age, was mounted on the throne, while the deposed king Theodosius the Blind was sent off to the court of Tao. Bagrat then went ahead with reinforcing the Bagratid authority in Inner Iberia, where he defeated an army of aristocratic opposition led by the Tbeli family.

The Bagratids moved from strength to strength, but their successes were marred by an outbreak of infighting in 988; a quarrel between the leading members of the dynasty led to a brief war, in which Bagrat III of Abasgia and Gurgen were defeated by David III of Tao, Bagrat II the Simple, and their Armenian allies, and were forced to sue for peace. This conflict coincided with a revolt, between 987 and 989, against the Byzantine emperor Basil II, in which David was on the rebels' side, the insurgency being led by his friend, Bardas Phokas. Upon Phokas's defeat, David, fearing a reprisal, appeased the emperor by making him heir of all his lands instead of his adopted son, Bagrat III.

David of Tao spent his last years fighting the neighboring Muslim rulers. He recaptured Manzikert from the Muslim Marwanid dynasty in 993 and, at the head of an Iberian-Armenian alliance, defeated two invasions from Azerbaijan's Rawadids, the second time decisively at Arjesh in 998.

Meantime, Bagrat III was able to consolidate his rule in Abasgia and also brought his fractious vassals, the Liparitids of Trialeti, into submission. In 994, the old Bagrat II the Simple died and his son Gurgen succeeded him to the crown of Iberia and the land of Lower Tao, assuming the title of King of Kings, the designation that had been an Armenian Bagratid monopoly since c. 922 and meant to emphasize the supremacy over other Caucasian dynasts.

Gurgen I and Bagrat III, a father and son, now sat on the thrones of Iberia and Abasgia, respectively. When David III of Tao died on 31 March 1000, the emperor Basil II hurried with a Byzantine army to gather his inheritance and annexed David's hereditary state of Upper Tao and all his lifetime possessions in Armenia to the empire. Bagrat III, David's former heir, and his father reconciled with the accomplished fact and were recompensed with the Byzantine court titles: Bagrat becoming a kouropalates and Gurgen a magistros. Gurgen did try to take hold of Upper Tao in the campaign of 1002–1003, but he was forestalled by the Byzantine commander Nikephoros Ouranos.

16

[edit]

On the death of Gurgen in 1008, Bagrat succeeded him in Iberia, thus bringing both Abasgia and Iberia under his helm. With the key western and eastern realms united into a single state, the unified monarchy was, henceforth, to become known as the Kingdom of Georgia—natively, sak'art'velo.

Of the erstwhile territories of the Late Antique Iberia, four remained outside the newly-born kingdom: Klarjeti, a hereditary principality in Upper Iberia run by a Bagratid branch; Kakheti, now also a hereditary principality in far eastern Georgia with its own dynasty; parts of Gogarene and of Lower Iberia within the kingdom of the Armenian Kwirikids of Lori; and the Muslim emirate of Tiflis.

Notes

[edit]
  1. ^ The Georgian chronicle of Pseudo-Juasher, written c. 800, mentions the advent of Islam and the Arab conquests of the Sasanian empire and Syro-Mesopotamia, but Habib's arrival and the subsequent peace arrangement is missing from the chronicle; the Arab commander referred to as Murvan Qru is instead made the inaugural conqueror of Kartli.[5][6]
  2. ^ According to an account found in the anonymous Georgian Chronicle of Kartli, the Khazar invasion of eastern Georgia was occasioned by the khagan's unrequited love for Juansher's sister Shushan, who, after being captured by the Khazar commander Bluchan, committed suicide on their way to Khazaria.[23]
  3. ^ These waves of migration, as proposed by the 20th-century Georgian historian Ivane Javakhishvili, were responsible for the appearance of the Georgian-speaking regions, such as Imereti and Guria, in a largely Laz-Mingrelian-speaking western Georgia.[30]
  4. ^ The earliest Georgian forms of the Bagratid dynastic surname were "Bagratuniani" and its variant, "Bagratoniani". The final and currently used form is "Bagrationi", first appearing in the 1475 royal charter.[34]
  5. ^ In the 9th and 10th century, the kingdoms ruled by the Armenian dynasties were: Greater Armenia (886–1045), Vaspurakan (908–1021), Vanand or Kars (963–1064), Lori or Tashir (979–1256), Syunik (970–1091), and Parisos (dissolved 1003). There were also the principalities of Bagaran and Taron and various Muslim emirates.[37][69] After the Sajid period, the principal Muslim dynasties claiming suzerainty over various Armenian territories were the Hamdanids of Diyar Bakr and later, the Marwanids; the Sallarids of Azerbaijan and their successors, the Rawwadids; and, also, the Shaddadids of Arran.[citation needed]

Citations

[edit]
  1. ^ Kaegi 1992, p. 181.
  2. ^ a b Toumanoff 1963, p. 394.
  3. ^ Rayfield 2012, p. 55.
  4. ^ a b Tchanturishvili 2018, #12.
  5. ^ Toumanoff 1963, pp. 393–394.
  6. ^ Rapp 1997, pp. 483–484.
  7. ^ a b Toumanoff 1963, p. 398.
  8. ^ Maksoudian 1987, p. 256.
  9. ^ Toumanoff 1963, pp. 404–405.
  10. ^ a b c d e f Toumanoff 1966, p. 607.
  11. ^ Toumanoff 1963, pp. 399–403.
  12. ^ Toumanoff 1963, pp. 255–256.
  13. ^ Blankinship 1994, p. 316, n. 35.
  14. ^ Stratos 1980, p. 151.
  15. ^ Blankinship 1994, p. 106.
  16. ^ Blankinship 1994, pp. 122–123.
  17. ^ Blankinship 1994, pp. 152, 170–171.
  18. ^ a b Bíró 1975, p. 296.
  19. ^ Bíró 1975, pp. 296–299.
  20. ^ Blankinship 1994, pp. 174–175.
  21. ^ Czeglédy 1960, pp. 83–86, 88.
  22. ^ Toumanoff 1963, p. 411.
  23. ^ Tskitishvili 1983, pp. 329–331.
  24. ^ Noonan 1984, pp. 249.
  25. ^ a b c Toumanoff 1966, p. 608.
  26. ^ Tooumanoff 1963, p. 399.
  27. ^ Toumanoff 1963, p. 410.
  28. ^ a b c Toumanoff 1966, p. 609.
  29. ^ Lordkipanidze 1994, p. 26.
  30. ^ Church 2001, pp. 110–111.
  31. ^ Bíró 1977, pp. 249–250.
  32. ^ Shurgaia 2009, pp. 335–336.
  33. ^ Toumanoff 1963, p. 416.
  34. ^ Toumanoff 1961, pp. 10–11.
  35. ^ Toumanoff 1963, pp. 488–489.
  36. ^ Toumanoff 1963, pp. 416–417 n. 37.
  37. ^ a b Toumanoff 1966, p. 610.
  38. ^ Paghava 2014, p. 253.
  39. ^ a b c Minorsky & Bosworth 1986, p. 488.
  40. ^ Vacca 2017a, pp. 78–81.
  41. ^ Toumanoff 1963, pp. 408 n. 10, 417 n. 37, 486 n. 217.
  42. ^ a b Toumanoff 1984, pp. 88–89.
  43. ^ Toumanoff 1984, pp. 28–29.
  44. ^ a b Toumanoff 1985, p. 285.
  45. ^ Noonan 1992, p. 11.
  46. ^ Toumanoff 1963, pp. 256, 401 n. 45.
  47. ^ Toumanoff 1963, p. 411 n. 22.
  48. ^ Toumanoff 1963, p. 107 n. 165.
  49. ^ Vacca 2017b, pp. 68, 72.
  50. ^ Lordkipanidze 1994, p. 31.
  51. ^ a b c Toumanoff 1966, p. 611.
  52. ^ Thomson 1996, p. 259.
  53. ^ Vacca 2017b, p. 82.
  54. ^ Vacca 2017b, pp. 81–82.
  55. ^ Vacca 2017b, pp. 84–86.
  56. ^ Suny 1994, p. 30.
  57. ^ Abashidze & Rapp 2004, pp. 140–141.
  58. ^ Toumanoff 1963, pp. 492, 496–497.
  59. ^ Thomson 1996, p. 266.
  60. ^ a b c Minorsky & Bosworth 1986, p. 489.
  61. ^ Thomson 1996, p. 268.
  62. ^ a b Minorsky 1953, pp. 511–512.
  63. ^ Toumanoff 1963, p. 496.
  64. ^ Eastmond 2015, p. 79.
  65. ^ Toumanoff 1956, p. 76.
  66. ^ Turkia & Paghava 2008, p. 6.
  67. ^ Toumanoff 1966, p. 617.
  68. ^ Toumanoff, 1984 & 89.
  69. ^ Rapp 1997, p. 550 fn. 214.
  70. ^ Toumanoff 1963, pp. 488–492.
  71. ^ Toumanoff 1963, pp. 495–497.
  72. ^ Eastmond 2015, pp. 88–89.
  73. ^ Rapp 2003, p. 414.
  74. ^ Rapp 2003, pp. 414–415.
  75. ^ Toumanoff 1951, pp. 204–205.

Sources

[edit]
  • Abashidze, Medea D.; Rapp, Stephen H., Jr. (2004). "The Life and Passion of Kostanti-Kaxay". Le Muséon. 117 (1): 137–173. doi:10.2143/MUS.117.1.504581.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  • Bíró, Margaret B. (1975). "Marwān ibn Muḥammad's Georgian Campaign". Acta Orientalia Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae. 29 (3): 289–299. JSTOR 23682072.
  • Bíró, Margit (1977). "Abo's Georgian Vita". Acta Orientalia Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae. 31 (2): 247–260. JSTOR 23682676.
  • Blankinship, Khalid Yahya (1994). The End of the Jihâd State: The Reign of Hishām ibn ʻAbd al-Malik and the Collapse of the Umayyads. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press. ISBN 978-0-7914-1827-7.
  • Church, Kenneth (2001). From dynastic principality to imperial district: the incorporation of Guria into the Russian Empire to 1856 (Ph.D.). University of Michigan. UMI Number 3029320.
  • Eastmond, Antony (2015). "Textual Icons: Viewing Inscriptions in Medieval Georgia". In Eastmond, Antony (ed.). Viewing Inscriptions in the Late Antique and Medieval World. Cambridge University Press. pp. 76–98. ISBN 9781316136034.
  • Czeglédy, Károly (1960). "Khazar raids in Transcaucasia in 762–764 A. D.". Acta Orientalia Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae. 11 (1): 75–88. JSTOR 23656684.
  • Kaegi, Walter E. (1992). Byzantium and the early Islamic conquests. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 9780511470615.
  • Lordkipanidze, Mariam (1994). Essays on Georgian History. Tbilisi: Metsniereba. ISBN 5520015473.
  • Maksoudian, Krikor H. (1987). Yovhannes Drasxanakertc'i. History of Armenia. Translated and Commentary. Atlanta, GA: Scholars Press. ISBN 0-89130-952-7.
  • Minorsky, Vladimir (1953). "Caucasica IV". Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies. 15 (3): 504–529. doi:10.1017/S0041977X00111462. JSTOR 608652. S2CID 246637768.
  • Minorsky, Vladimir; Bosworth, Clifford Edmund (1986). "al-Kurd̲j̲". In Bearman, P.; Bianquis, Th.; Bosworth, C.E.; Donzel, E. van; Heinrichs, W.P. (eds.). Encyclopaedia of Islam (2nd ed.). Leiden: Brill. pp. 487–497. ISBN 9004078193.
  • Noonan, Thomas S. (1984). "Why dirhams first reached Russia: the role of Arab-Khazar relations in the development of the earliest Islamic trade with Eastern Europe". Archivum Eurasiae Medii Aevi. 4: 151–282.
  • Noonan, Thomas S. (1992). "Byzantium and the Khazars: a special relationship?". In Shepard, Jonathan; Franklin, Simon (eds.). Byzantine Diplomacy: Papers from the Twenty-fourth Spring Symposium of Byzantine Studies, Cambridge, March 1990. Aldershot, England: Variorium. pp. 109–132. ISBN 9780860783381.
  • Paghava, Irakli (2014). "საქართველოში არაბთა ბატონობის პერიოდიზაცია (ნუმიზმატიკური მონაცემების გათვალისწინებით)" [Periodization of Arab Sway in Georgia (In View of the Numismatic Data)]. ახლო აღმოსავლეთი და საქართველო [The Near East and Georgia] (in Georgian [English summary]). 8: 250–257, 342.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: unrecognized language (link)
  • Rapp, Stephen H., Jr. (1997). Imagining history at the crossroads: Persia, Byzantium, and the architects of the written Georgian past (PhD). University of Michigan. UMI Number 9722070.{{cite thesis}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  • Rapp, Stephen H. (2003). Studies in medieval Georgian historiography: early texts and Eurasian contexts. Leuven: Peeters. ISBN 90-429-1318-5.
  • Rapp, Stephen H.; Crego, Paul, eds. (2012). Languages and Cultures of Eastern Christianity: Georgian. Aldershot: Ashgate. ISBN 9780754659860.
  • Rapp Jr, Stephen H. (2014). The Sasanian world through Georgian eyes: Caucasia and the Iranian Commonwealth in Late Antique Georgian literature. Ashgate. ISBN 9781472425522.
  • Shurgaia, Gafa (23 October 2009). "Ioane Sabanisdze". In Thomas, David (ed.). Christian-Muslim Relations. A Bibliographical History. Volume 1 (600–900). Brill. pp. 334–337. ISBN 9789047443681.
  • Stratos, Andreas Nikolaou (1980). Byzantium in the seventh century: Justinian II, Leontius and Tiberius, 685–711. Hakkert. ISBN 9789025608521.
  • Suny, Ronald Grigor (1994). The making of the Georgian nation (2 ed.). Bloomington: Indiana University Press. ISBN 0253209153.
  • Tchanturishvili, Pavle (2018). "The Seventh Century Conquest of Kartli by Habib ibn Maslamah within the Context of the Arabic Wars". Spekali. 12. ISSN 1987-8583.
  • Thomson, Robert W. (2002) [1996]. Rewriting Caucasian history: the medieval Armenian adaptation of the Georgian chronicles; the original Georgian texts and the Armenian adaptation. Oxford: Clarendon Press. ISBN 0198263732.
  • Toumanoff, Cyril (1951). "The Fifteenth-Century Bagratids and the Institution of Collegial Sovereignty in Georgia". Traditio. 7: 169–221. doi:10.1017/S0362152900015142.
  • Toumanoff, Cyril (1956). "Chronology of the Kings of Abasgia and Other Problems". Le Muséon. 1–2: 73–90.
  • Toumanoff, Cyril (1961). "The Bagratids of Iberia from the eighth to the eleventh century". Le Muséon. 74: 5–42, 233–316.
  • Toumanoff, Cyril (1963). Studies in Christian Caucasian history. Washington: Georgetown University Press.
  • Toumanoff, Cyril (1984). "The Albanian Royal succession". Le Muséon. 97: 87–94.
  • Toumanoff, Cyril (1985). "Problems of Aṛanšahikid Genealogy". Le Muséon. 98 (3): 281–292. doi:10.2143/MUS.98.3.2011486.
  • Tskitishvili, Otar (1983). "Concerning Certain Historical Facts: Recorded in the Chapter on Bag̱ẖdād in the Mas̱ẖhad MS of Ibn al-Faqīh al-Hamadānī's Work". Arabica. 30 (3): 325–332. doi:10.1163/157005883X00580. JSTOR 4056432.
  • Turkia, Severian; Paghava, Irakli (2008). "The Coinage of Ja'far III B. 'Alī, Emir of Tiflis". Journal of Oriental Numismatic Society. 197: 5–11.
  • Vacca, Alison (2017a). Non-Muslim provinces under early Islam: Islamic rule and Iranian legitimacy in Armenia and Caucasian Albania. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 9781107188518.
  • Vacca, Alison M. (2017b). "Conflict and Community in the Medieval Caucasus" (PDF). Al-ʿUṣūr al-Wusṭā. 25: 66–112.
Extended content
Leo the Isaurian's mission in Lazica: in 697-8 after the incursion of Walid ben Malik into Asia Minor and the revolution which took place in Constantinople against Justinian, Sergius, the patrician of Lazike, revolted and acceded to the Arabs. The whole of Lazike with the exception of the city Poti (Phasis) and the area around had acceded as well as Abasgia, Iberia and "Apsilia". Justinian wished to bring these dominions within the Byzantine sphere of influence again. In the meantime, several courtiers who resented the power and influence which Leo had acquired over the king began to slander and defame him. At first Justinian payed no attention to these slanders and entrusted Leo with the mission of regaining the lost areas from the Arabs. He gave him money and sent him to the Alans in the hope that with their help Leo would regain control in Abasgia and Lazike. In the course of this expedition Leo showed his military genius. He left the money to people in his confidence at Phasis, traversed Caucasus and arrived at Alania. There he won the confidence of the people and with their assistance invaded Abasgia but as it appears was unsuccessful in conquering it. Justinian, in the meantime, had sent to Phasis to get back the money Leo had left there and so Leo was left exposed to the Alans. Shortly after, Leo was informed that a Byzantine army was besieging Archaeopolis, which had willingly acceded to the Arabs. Though his forces were modest Leo hastened to the spot. However, the Arab army had already arrived and had defeated the Byzantines. Leo managed to save part of the Byzantine force and proceeded to the sea in order to return to Byzantium. By fraud Leo succeeded in occupying the stronghold Sideron, which was an obstacle on his way, and destroyed it completely. When he reached the sea the Apsilians [Apsilian chief Marinus] helped him and his army to embark on ships and by way of Trebizond return to Constantinople.[1] Attempt of the Byzantine dipomacy, in the second reign of Justinian II (705-711), to undermine, with the help of the Alans, Saracen control of Lazica, its dependency of Abasgia, and also Iberia failed: Theophanes.[2]

Further reading

[edit]

See also

[edit]

<< >>

  1. ^ Stratos 1980, p. 151.
  2. ^ Touamnoff 1963, p. 405, n. 52.