Jump to content

User:KarenKoepp7/sandbox

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Sexual Ethics

Weeks 4 & 5

Ethical concerns (Original)

[edit]

The application of these techniques to humans creates moral and ethical concerns in the opinion of some, while the advantages of sensible use of selected technologies is favored by others.

In contrast, in an interview study, sex-selection technology providers generally argued that sex selection is an expression of reproductive rights, was initiated and pursued by women, and was a sign of female empowerment that allowed couples to make well-informed family planning decisions, prevented occurrences of unintended pregnancy and abortion, and minimized intimate partner violence and/or child neglect. In contrast, primary care physicians questioned whether women could truly express free choice under pressure from family and community. In addition, primary care physicians voiced the concerns that sex selection led to invasive medical interventions in the absence of therapeutic indications, contributed to gender stereotypes that could result in child neglect of the lesser-desired sex, and was not a solution to domestic violence.

Post-conceptual selection by preimplantation testing (PGD) also involves preferential use of embryos, and termination of pregnancy for gender selection also raises many ethical questions of the abortion debate.

Ethical concerns (Edits in BOLD)

[edit]

The application of these techniques to humans creates moral and ethical concerns in the opinion of some, while the advantages of sensible use of selected technologies is favored by others.

In contrast, in an interview study, sex-selection technology providers generally argued that sex selection is an expression of reproductive rights, was initiated and pursued by women, and was a sign of female empowerment that allowed couples to make well-informed family planning decisions, prevented occurrences of unintended pregnancy and abortion, and minimized intimate partner violence and/or child neglect. The Ethics Committee of the American Society of Reproductive Medicine concluded that it is ethically appropriate to employ these new reproductive technologies to avoid the birth of children suffering from X-linked genetic disorders[1]. However, to use preimplantation genetic diagnosis and sex selection solely for non-medical reasons, the Committee claims, is morally inappropriate[2]. Alsoprimary care physicians questioned whether women could truly express free choice under pressure from family and community. In addition, primary care physicians voiced the concerns that sex selection led to invasive medical interventions in the absence of therapeutic indications, contributed to gender stereotypes that could result in child neglect of the lesser-desired sex, and was not a solution to domestic violence. In addition, social risks of sex selection outweigh the social benefits of sex selection[2]

Post-conceptual selection by preimplantation testing (PGD) also involves preferential use of embryos, and termination of pregnancy for gender selection also raises many ethical questions of the abortion debate.

Demographic concerns (Original)

[edit]

In addition to the ethical concerns mentioned, issues of demographics arise in societies where social sex selection is common. A society may exhibit a widespread bias towards having children of a specific gender, either due to cultural biases or economic concerns (e.g. male children may be more employable in the future and thus provide more financial support). When combined with frequent social sex selection, this bias may produce a gender imbalance that has undesirable consequences. This phenomenon has been observed in many nations in the Far East, such as India and China, where social sex selection has produced unnaturally high male/female ratios in the population. Sex selection has also been detected in several countries of Eastern Europe such as Albania or Azerbaijan. A 2012 report by UNFPA estimates that the total gender gap due to prenatal and postnatal gender discrimination amounts to 117 million women. China's gender imbalance is further increased by the One Child Policy, although applicable only in most urban populations. In these nations, a lack of opportunity for many men to marry is believed to be producing increases in crime, demand for prostitution, mass emigration, and the selling of brides.

Major demographic changes have occurred in China because of sex selection. Chinese government reports show that the sex ratio for newborns is 118:100 (boys:girls), higher in rural areas such as Guangdong and Hainan (130:100) compared to the average of 104:100 in developed countries. It is believed that the ratio would increase further to the point that, by 2020, men of marriageable age would be unable to find mates, resulting in large social problems.

Some nations, such as India, have attempted to curtail these gender imbalances with criminal statutes. In contrast, bioethicist Jacob Appel of New York University has argued that governments should pay couples to choose to have female children. According to Professor Appel, "if female babies [were] worth their weight in rupees and yuan, economic and educational opportunities for girls would soon follow."[citation needed]

In contrast, actual experience in Western cultures provides no evidence for any degree of gender imbalance from technologies which have long been available and legal – such as selective abortion or preimplantation embryo testing. When used for family balancing indications in such countries as the United States, pre-conceptual sex selection is widely sought without any preferential selection of males. Thus the right of individual families to determine whether or not to balance gender of offspring in their families is not and will not become, in many countries, a demographic issue. Furthermore, in countries where such demographic issues exist because of strong gender preferences in a segment of the population, regulatory and legal control of, without denial of access to, sperm sorting technology can be utilized to provide individuals with choices while ensuring that equal numbers of boys and girls are produced for population demographic equality.[citation needed]

Demographic concerns (Edits in BOLD)

[edit]

In addition to the ethical concerns mentioned, issues of demographics arise in societies where social sex selection is common. A society may exhibit a widespread bias towards having children of a specific gender, either due to cultural biases or economic concerns (e.g. male children may be more employable in the future and thus provide more financial support). When combined with frequent social sex selection, this bias may produce a gender imbalance that has undesirable consequences. This phenomenon has been observed in many nations in the Far East, such as India and China, where social sex selection has produced unnaturally high male/female ratios in the population. Couples in these areas use reproductive technologies to choose the sex of their children, which ultimately leads to a skew the human sex ratio toward a disproportionately male population[3]. Sex selection has also been detected in several countries of Eastern Europe such as Albania or Azerbaijan. A 2012 report by UNFPA estimates that the total gender gap due to prenatal and postnatal gender discrimination amounts to 117 million women. China's gender imbalance is further increased by the One Child Policy, although applicable only in most urban populations. In these nations, a lack of opportunity for many men to marry is believed to be producing increases in crime, demand for prostitution, mass emigration, and the selling of brides.

China's 'one child family' policy is considered largely responsible for the substantial imbalance of the sex ratio[4]. Chinese government reports show that the sex ratio for newborns is 118:100 (boys:girls), higher in rural areas such as Guangdong and Hainan (130:100) compared to the average of 104:100 in developed countries. It is believed that the ratio would increase further to the point that, by 2020, men of marriageable age would be unable to find mates, resulting in large social problems.

Some nations, such as India, have attempted to curtail these gender imbalances with criminal statutes. In contrast, bioethicist Jacob Appel of New York University has argued that governments should pay couples to choose to have female children [5]. According to Professor Appel, "if female babies [were] worth their weight in rupees and yuan, economic and educational opportunities for girls would soon follow."[5]

In contrast, actual experience in Western cultures provides no evidence for any degree of gender imbalance from technologies which have long been available and legal – such as selective abortion or preimplantation embryo testing. When used for family balancing indications in such countries as the United States, pre-conceptual sex selection is widely sought without any preferential selection of males. A 1993 survey of more than 2300 pregnant women in the British population found no overall preference for either sex. These findings are largely consistent with other surveys conducted in the US[3]. Thus the right of individual families to determine whether or not to balance gender of offspring in their families is not and will not become, in many countries, a demographic issue. Furthermore, in countries where such demographic issues exist because of strong gender preferences in a segment of the population, regulatory and legal control of, without denial of access to, sperm sorting technology can be utilized to provide individuals with choices while ensuring that equal numbers of boys and girls are produced for population demographic equality.[citation needed]

Week 3

Sex selection

I plan to add more sources to the page, giving it a stronger foundation. There are some grammatical errors I noticed after reading the article that need to be addressed (minor edits). Also, The ethical concerns section of this article is scarce and need to be added to without using emotion. I am also very interested in the legality differences in different countries so I'd also like to add to the section.

Bibliography

Evans, Mark I., et al. "Attitudes on the ethics of abortion, sex selection, and selective pregnancy termination among health care professionals, ethicists, and clergy likely to encounter such situations." American journal of obstetrics and gynecology 164.4 (1991): 1092-1099.

Liu, P., and G. A. Rose. "Ethics of sex selection for family balancing. Sex selection: the right way forward. Debate." Human Reproduction 11.11 (1996): 2343-5.

Macklin, Ruth. "The ethics of sex selection and family balancing." Seminars in reproductive medicine. Vol. 28. No. 04. © Thieme Medical Publishers, 2010.

Pennings, Guido. "Ethics of sex selection for family balancing: family balancing as a morally acceptable application of sex selection." Human Reproduction 11.11 (1996): 2339-2345.

Savulescu, Julian, and Edgar Dahl. "Sex selection and preimplantation diagnosis A response to the Ethics Committee of the American Society of Reproductive Medicine." Human Reproduction 15.9 (2000): 1879-1880.

Week 2

Original: Sexual Ethics

Flirting is an expression of sexuality and a common form of social interaction whereby one person obliquely indicates a romantic and/or sexual interest towards another. However, flirting undertaken for amusement, with no intention of developing any further relationship, poses ethical dilemmas and sometimes faces disapproval from others, either because it can be misinterpreted as more serious, or it may be viewed as "cheating" if the person flirting is already in a romantic relationship with someone else; or if the person to whom flirting is directed is in an exclusive or a serious relationship.

Edited:

Flirting is an expression of sexuality and a common form of social interaction whereby one person obliquely indicates a romantic and/or sexual interest towards another. However, flirting undertaken for amusement, with no intention of developing any further relationship, poses ethical dilemmas and sometimes faces disapproval from others, either because it can be misinterpreted as more serious, or it may be viewed as "cheating" if the person flirting is already in a romantic relationship with someone else; or if the person to whom flirting is directed is in an exclusive or a serious relationship. Flirting between individuals happens for a variety of reasons including the desire to interact sexually[6]. Similarly, when an individual chooses not to engage in flirtation with another, it reflects the lack of sexual desire[6]

  1. ^ Ethics Committee of the American Society of Reproductive Medicine (1999) Sex selection and preimplantation genetic diagnosis. Fertil. Steril,72 595–598.
  2. ^ a b "Sex selection and preimplantation diagnosis: A response to the Ethics Committee of the American Society of Reproductive Medicine". Human Reproduction. 15 (9): 1879–1880. 2000-09-01. doi:10.1093/humrep/15.9.1879. ISSN 0268-1161. {{cite journal}}: |first= missing |last= (help)
  3. ^ a b P, Liu; GA, Rose (1996-11-01). "Ethics of sex selection for family balancing. Sex selection: the right way forward. Debate". HUMAN REPRODUCTION. 11 (11).
  4. ^ "https://oup.silverchair-cdn.com/oup/backfile/Content_public/Journal/humrep/11/11/10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a019109/2/11-11-2339.pdf?Expires=1487709244&Signature=GbfXMNdic1CvZzKYc-sb~NX~X2jKbNSCqTKByeeFjGDryuKMgLOFTnc6ko73whVCEad1wmJBjlqEWhigIOs3VR2AzTE~B2VHo5r4xmy-Xl6q3jJZrUnPM-YJRCOgE9fIPE7xq~84~gqnV7qA1ArSkY5zyAmvMYJbx063PzN5eulIOcCaxY2TgBNQ9zDxUFX2JhXKa2g1kqZBnFX4W5HgiA1ioVsRmSsCmSyOf1mMDsnSir19pgLdUpNsIMhkHUUhtHpmFI8Kq47HBS2z~lZlwFTA28zABzcbe9PcJ1oc5mSs~eQp~xLh2C~4w0pdD5qDZnQnBsBovSgHldN9dtKnsA__&Key-Pair-Id=APKAIUCZBIA4LVPAVW3Q" (PDF). doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a019109/2/11-11-2339.pdf. {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help); External link in |title= (help)
  5. ^ a b Karlan, Dean; Appel, Jacob (2011-04-14). More Than Good Intentions: Improving the Ways the World's Poor Borrow, Save, Farm, Learn, and Stay Healthy. Penguin. ISBN 9781101476383.
  6. ^ a b Henningsen, David Dryden. "Flirting with Meaning: An Examination of Miscommunication in Flirting Interactions". Sex Roles. 50 (7–8): 481–489. doi:10.1023/B:SERS.0000023068.49352.4b. ISSN 0360-0025.