User:Farhansher/Sina plans to attack WP : Thread 2
Salam & peace to all
Plz dont delete these pages . They are a part of evidence . For more information see talk:Islam , & help us resolve this problem . Thanks for your cooperation .
Regards
Islam on Wikipedia.
Faith Freedom International Forum Index -> Comments on Current Affairs
View previous topic :: View next topic
Author Message
qasim
Joined: 25 Jul 2005 Posts: 1
Posted: Mon Jul 25, 2005 10:21 am Post subject: Islam on Wikipedia.
Hello, I am qassim, and I have been reading FFI for a very long time. This is my first time here. Excuse if I make mistakes. I am not good with computers. My little girl help me. She is very very smart. I was reading Islam at wikipedia and I saw fight going on to keep FFI link there. I like FFI. I do not find FFI hate site. I think Ali Sina is a very brave man and doing very good. Ali is helping my little girl. I hope she grows and makes a doctor and not fear mullahs. I make story short and post letters from Wikipedia that explain everything.
On 7/24/05, A. Qassim <qassimqassimqassim@yahoo.com> wrote: > When I go to edit I get message and I gave you in > first letter. > I have posted for last time on talk page. > You are muslim. You do not want to let people think > or talk. You threaten me to behave. You behave > yourself. I am not afraid of mullahs like you > anymore. I live in free country now. I will tell the > world about you slimvirgin how you threaten and want > adresses. You protect Islam page at wikipedia. I > will go to many sites and I will tell them all how you > push Islam at wikipedia. > > Goodbye. I will not post at your site anymore. So ban > me all you like. > > Neal. > > --- slimvirgin@gmail.com wrote: > > > Qassim, one final question: how did you know you > > were blocked? > > > > Sarah > > > > On 7/24/05, slimvirgin@gmail.com > > <slimvirgin@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Ok, Qassim, I'll give you the benefit of the doubt > > and unblock you, > > > but please note that if I see anything else that > > makes me think this > > > account is a sockpuppet, I'll block it > > indefinitely without further > > > discussion. > > > > > > While it's legitimate to include criticism of > > Islam, it must be done > > > carefully and with the cooperation of other > > editors. Revert warring is > > > not a good way to edit, and it has led to the page > > being protected so > > > that now no one can edit it. > > > > > > Also please note that your being blocked has > > nothing to do with > > > whether I'm a Muslim or not. It is solely because > > of the constant > > > reverting. > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > > > Sarah > > > > > > > > > On 7/24/05, A. Qassim > > <qassimqassimqassim@yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > I do not know if I am legitimate editor. You > > did not > > > > give me chance to find that. I do not know IP > > > > addresses. You said "Your IP address is > > > > xxxxxxxx." > > > > That must be my IP address. I do not have Sock > > > > Puppets. I am in North West USA. Why do you > > want to > > > > know? You want me to worry? My friend at work > > set up > > > > computer and tells me this is safe. I turn on > > > > computer to connect. I have been reading > > Wikipedia > > > > at work for two weeks. I saw fight on Ali Sina > > link. > > > > I like Ali Sina. I am exmuslim. I do not like > > > > mullahs, and I wanted to fight mullahs. Mullahs > > do > > > > not like critecism and any one telling them on > > Islam. > > > > Are you muslim? You want to ban me? It is OK, > > I have > > > > been banned by muslims many many many times. > > > > > > > > Neal. > > > > > > > > > > > > --- slimvirgin@gmail.com wrote: > > > > > > > > > Hi Neal, > > > > > > > > > > We've had a lot of trouble with that article > > and > > > > > people editing with > > > > > IP addresses and sock puppets. > > > > > > > > > > I'm happy to unblock you if you're a > > legitimate > > > > > editor. Could you let > > > > > me know which IP addresses you use, which part > > of > > > > > the country you're > > > > > editing from, and whether you've edited using > > any > > > > > other user accounts? > > > > > > > > > > Many thanks, > > > > > > > > > > Sarah > > > > > > > > > > On 7/24/05, A. Qassim > > <qassimqassimqassim@yahoo.com> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > What do you mean why more than one? I had > > just > > > > > signed > > > > > > up. It was my first day! I don't even get > > banned > > > > > > this fast from Muslim sites! Are you a > > muslim? > > > > > > I do not think FFI is a hate site. Is > > wikipedia a > > > > > > muslim site? > > > > > > > > > > > > Neal. > > > > > > > > > > > > --- slimvirgin@gmail.com wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Qasim, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I blocked the account for being a > > sockpuppet > > > > > created > > > > > > > to violate 3RR at > > > > > > > Islam. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Perhaps you could let me know how many > > accounts > > > > > > > you're using, and why > > > > > > > more than one, and we can take it from > > there. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sarah > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 7/23/05, Qasim666 > > > > > <qassimqassimqassim@yahoo.com> > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Why have you blocked me? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > "Your IP address is xxxxxxxx. Please > > > > > include > > > > > > > this address, along with your username, in > > any > > > > > > > queries you make." > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I posted on Islam page. I am an > > ex-muslim and > > > > > I > > > > > > > do want FFI link to be given on the Islam > > page. > > > > > Is > > > > > > > anything wrong with that? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Qasim666 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > __________________________________________________ > > > > > > Do You Yahoo!? > > > > > > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best > > spam > > > > > protection around > > > > > > http://mail.yahoo.com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ____________________________________________________ > > > > Start your day with Yahoo! - make it your home > > page > > > > http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ______________________________________________
I tell you this. Please tell others and do not let mullahs have power at wikipedia.
Neal Qasim. Neal and not Mohammed. Neal for first man on moon. He is my hero.
Back to top
Halal Pork
Joined: 23 Nov 2004 Posts: 292 Location: Porkistan
Posted: Mon Jul 25, 2005 10:42 am Post subject:
Maybe this will be a good argument:
Christianity:
Quote: Criticisms Why I am not a Christian by Nobel Prize laureate Bertrand Russell. Christian Resources - The real teachings of Jesus A Hindu, or at least Hindu-influenced, understanding of Jesus.
There is a section dedicated for criticism of Christianity.
I can't find one on Islam. Wakeypedia is BIAS! _________________ "...civilization is a precious good, whose delicate complex order and freedom can at any moment be overthrown by barbarians invading from without and multiplying from within." -- William J. Durant
Back to top
Richard_The _Lionheart
Joined: 07 Sep 2004 Posts: 1670 Location: England Posted: Mon Jul 25, 2005 11:32 am Post subject:
That has to change immediately. _________________ The Crusades were no more aggressive than the Normandy landings in 1944.
Back to top
piggy
Joined: 13 Feb 2004 Posts: 2955 Location: Godwana
Posted: Tue Jul 26, 2005 12:47 am Post subject:
Halal Pork wrote: Maybe this will be a good argument:
Christianity:
Quote: Criticisms Why I am not a Christian by Nobel Prize laureate Bertrand Russell. Christian Resources - The real teachings of Jesus A Hindu, or at least Hindu-influenced, understanding of Jesus.
There is a section dedicated for criticism of Christianity.
I can't find one on Islam. Wakeypedia is BIAS!
Go to Wikipedia and point this out HP.
Back to top
Brave Steed
Joined: 21 Nov 2004 Posts: 11
Posted: Tue Jul 26, 2005 7:47 am Post subject:
Halal Pork wrote:
There is a section dedicated for criticism of Christianity.
I can't find one on Islam. Wakeypedia is BIAS!
A similar problem such as this doth exist at Scam.com in their "Religious Scams" section.
http://scam.com/forumdisplay.php?f=8
If one is critical against Christianity there, one is encouraged by many to elaborate. Nearly all threads there are against Christianity. No threads in this section are locked, save but one. The one thread there that hast been locked (by a moderator, ironically known as "Lance", who before locking the thread didst maketh the absurd claim that Islam was not spread to multi-continents by the sword) before it ended on its own is the sole thread critical of Islam.
http://scam.com/showthread.php?t=3717
As for Wikipedia, I wish participants there good luck in re-establishing the link to the FaithFreedom links page in the article on Islam.
I read the discussion page and one of the old guards there made a point which I found most interesting, namely that there are many articles about Islam that are not entitled Islam, but sub-topics.
http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/List_of_Islamic_and_Muslim_related_topics
It struck me as doable, for those with the time and the will for doing, to put links from these sub-articles to matching external links to relevant articles here at FaithFreedom.org when on topic. The more links to FaithFreedom.org that exist on the internet anywhere, be it from Wikipedia.org or Scam.com or what-have-you, the higher FaithFreedom.org will rank in accord with formulae search engines use, for indeed, Google doth count every link a website haveth given unto it. Praise Google!