User:Calistemon1/Archive

Speedy deletion of Amateurliga Nordbaden

A tag has been placed on Amateurliga Nordbaden requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. _└^and-rew_┘^┌_talk^┐ 13:02, 27 November 2007 (UTC)

Template Landesliga Bayern-Mitte

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Template Landesliga Bayern-Mitte, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Template Landesliga Bayern-Mitte. MTC (talk) 06:56, 10 December 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Fc1920gundelfingen.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:Fc1920gundelfingen.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 21:21, 30 December 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:SpVgg Lindau.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:SpVgg Lindau.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 22:43, 8 January 2008 (UTC)

Oberliga Nord (1947-63)

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Oberliga Nord (1947-63), and it appears to be very similar to another wikipedia page: Regionalliga Nord (1963-74). It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 05:58, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

2nd Oberliga West

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of 2nd Oberliga West, and it appears to be very similar to another wikipedia page: Regionalliga West (1963-74). It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 12:50, 10 January 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Deutschland-Lage-von-Westdeutschland.png

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Deutschland-Lage-von-Westdeutschland.png. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 14:50, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Tsg logo.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Tsg logo.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 11:01, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

EA

Thanks for fixing up my Wiluna article. It s only my second one, still learning. Also, my spelling isn t that great, english is only my second language. Ever been to Wiluna? —Preceding unsigned comment added by EA210269 (talk • contribs) 01:39, 31 October 2007 (UTC)

No, I haven't had the honor yet. Welcome to Wikipedia, and good luck editing. - CosmicPenguin (Talk) 01:49, 31 October 2007 (UTC)

German football leagues

Nice work on the German football league articles. Wiggy! 12:20, 5 November 2007 (UTC)

By the way: The plural of "Liga" is "Ligen" (not as used in english: "Ligas") ;-) --NiTeChiLLeR (talk) 12:48, 24 May 2008 (UTC)

Re: Amateurliga Nordbaden

My apologies! When I came across the article it was so small it provided very little context and did not sound notable. I find it is easier to start writing articles in a personal sandbox before moving them into the mainspace. That way the articles you create are more substantial and are much less likely to be tagged with speedy delete tags. If you do not know how to create a sandbox it is very simple, just start a new page with your username/Sandbox e.g. User:EA210269/Sandbox. Sorry for any inconvenience I caused! _└^and-rew_┘^┌_talk^┐ 18:43, 27 November 2007 (UTC)

Perth

Hallo. Nice work on your German amateur football league articles. Just wondering which Perth you're currently living in: the original or the slightly warmer namesake? - Dudesleeper · Talk 03:38, 2 December 2007 (UTC)

Regionalliga Nord

I think you might want to clarify that your new graphic shows the coverage of the Regionalliga from the season 2008/09 onwards. After all, no team just up and left come Janaury 1st. Besides, the league setup for the then tier-IV Regionalligas has not been finalised, so generally, I'd wait a bit longer. There are still issues about the allocation of some Lower Saxony clubs which might be put into Regionalliga West. --Madcynic (talk) 12:08, 6 February 2008 (UTC)

Nope, can't help you with the alignment. Got no clue in these things. Yeah, it doesn't apply to all teams from Lower Saxony, only the westernmost ones are potential candidates for Regionallig West, such as VfB Oldenburg or BV Cloppenburg. But that will be decided once it has become clear which teams form the new tier IV league. --Madcynic (talk) 12:45, 6 February 2008 (UTC)

Well, they aren't liking it at all, so you're quite on the spot with that feeling of yours ;) Madcynic (talk) 12:54, 6 February 2008 (UTC)

Currently, this is just all talk and speculation, largely. However, there is an error worth correcting in the map displaying the current league coverage - Thuringia is coverd by Regionalliga Nord, as Erfurt play in Nord now, not South as prior to their last promotion to Bundesliga 2. Madcynic (talk) 13:33, 6 February 2008 (UTC)

The same goes for this one only inverse, obviously. Madcynic (talk) 13:36, 6 February 2008 (UTC)

That league system on your userpage

You oughta put the Verbandsligen Holstein aso into tier V, coz that's where they are :) Madcynic (talk) 10:30, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

Yeah, I understand your qualms, however, from what I hear from the NFV (the North German FA), they do not plan to have an Oberliga any time soon. So, I'd personally edit that table to reflect reality. On the other hand, this can wait till fall. And I also use wiki to practise my English a little, so no speaking German for me here ;-)

Regionalliga images look good, too. Madcynic (talk) 11:40, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

Ouch

Ow. Well you've now unfortunately had a taste of Kay. Don't let it put you off. I'm thinking that the best way to eventually deal with the situation is to begin with a decent article on the history of East German football that ties into separate articles on each of the various broadly based sports associations (Dynamo, Chemie, Aufbau, Rotation, Stahl, Lokomotive, Wismut, Medizin, etc.) established there. That would establish a solid context for bashing the Dyanmo article into proper shape. Overall, the East German clubs are to this point under represented. Its somewhere on my list of things to do. One day. Wiggy! (talk) 01:17, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

Hey wiggy!, I'm not taking the guy to serious, from my point of view he suffers from some mental problem. Interessting how he gloryfies the old DDR-days when he is seemingly to young to have expierienced them. I guess, he must have had a father or grandfather in the old establishment who was fairly high up and tells him how "great" everything then was! I won't bother replying to his anonymus, unsigned rants. Anyway, I know what you are saying about the east German football, it is very under represented. I have tried a little bit of improvement by creating an article about the DDR-Liga and adding some stuff in the German football league system, however, I really think an article on the East German football league system is desperatly needed, might look into that some time soon. Regarding the clubs and sports associations, its a tricky one with the constant name changes and relocations. Hard to follow up, very time consuming! I wish you all the best there!EA210269 (talk) 01:27, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

Challenges are good and its an interesting aspect of the German game. Thanks and see you around. Keep on editing! :) Wiggy! (talk) 01:53, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for the heads-up.

There is no question in my mind that this is Kay. The Ostalgie / FRG-bashing and accusations of discrimination using "discriminate" as a transitive verb are dead giveaways. Since it's an IP he shouldn't be indef'ed, but feel free to revert his shenanigans and, if he starts trouble, I will block.

I also have my suspicions about a user who's not indef'ed, but will say more about that in the event that I bring it to SSP. - Revolving Bugbear 17:17, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

Yes, Dynamo is a troublespot because of Kay's relentlessness. But if the IPs (there's another one -- I'm assuming home and either work/school) cause trouble they can be blocked for evading an indef. I'll see what the user you mentioned does -- yes, he's the one I was thinking of. - Revolving Bugbear 15:09, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

Thanks/Danke

Just a note of thanks for the barnstar you placed on my page the other day (my birthday!). Much appreciated. I must say, though, that you beat me to the punch! You deserve a similar accolade for all your work on the German football leagues. So here you go:

		Football (soccer) barnstar
		For adding an important dimension to the collection of articles on German football by writing tons of stuff on both current and historical football leagues across the country (and just generally showing up throughout German football here to pitch in by adding an informed touch). AND for being such an easy editor to work with. Looking forward to more articles and future collaborations! User:Wiggy!

Wiggy! (talk) 13:10, 19 March 2008 (UTC)

patience = over

[1]

Gruss, - Revolving Bugbear 17:23, 19 March 2008 (UTC)

Appropriate. Thx from me, too. Wiggy! (talk) 19:17, 19

March 2008 (UTC)

Wiluna Airport

Thanks for the info regarding Maroomba Airlines. The reason I deleted the Maroomba flights is that I couldnt find anything current that said that they still fly to Wiluna. The Wiluna Shire website only mentions Skippers [2]. But if you can confirm that Maroomba flys a regular passenger service to Wiluna and that it not just a charter (for Wiluna Gold etc.), ill replace the content. Thanks for message, its good to get opinions from from people! Andrew Tazkal (talk) 03:41, 13 April 2008 (UTC)

DDR-Liga and East German football league system

First of all, thanks for creating the articles in the first place - I would never have gotten round to it. I fixed some language tidbits and also the formatting of the image (no putting a . between 100 and px ;-) ). Just keep those articles coming tho. Madcynic (talk) 19:27, 13 April 2008 (UTC)

Well, let's hope somebody who grew up with GDR football does actually add something. I've only been to one or two DDR-Oberliga matches in the late 80s and generally have no personal memory of the league system, being born in '82 and all that. Madcynic (talk) 11:16, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

Template looks good. Maybe the youth-league (u19) could be added in the future, but research needs be done in that direction first. Madcynic (talk) 21:51, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

Translation

Artis Rasmanis
Birth year : 1971.
Citizenship : Of Latvia
Residence : Cēsis district PRIEKUĻI county
Education : secondary
Job : SIA "Rasmanis & Dankers", manager
Graduated from : PRIEKUĻI AGRICULTURAL TEHNICAL

SCHOOL, 1990, Agricultural machinery mechanic

Self assessment of knowledge of Latvian language : Native speaker
Nationality : latvian

Judging from the contents he has been candidate in some election ~~Xil * 12:34, 16 April 2008 (UTC)

Thought so, I did a bit of searching afterwards and came across that page, however I can't find his birth place (except that Cēsis district homepage is saying he is from there, however that dosen't mean he was born there) ~~Xil * 14:30, 16 April 2008 (UTC)

Dynamo-hall of fame

You're welcome. I have also salted the title for a few months, i.e. protected against its re-creation. Your deletion reason was well stated, but I though you might like to know that we have a dedicated speedy deletion tag for these types of articles, {{db-g4}} in which you should always provide a link to the XfD discussion where it was deleted (here it would have been {{db-g4|Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dynamo-hall of fame}}). People are constantly misapplying G4 to articles only previousyl speedily deleted, so I, and I think most administrators, always have to search for the debate before deleting to make sure it wasn't just a prior speedy, if the past debate is not provided. Cheers.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 12:06, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

Please allow me to second this request. :) I was beginning to wonder if I would have to decline the speedy deletion request on Dynamo Hall of fame because I could not find a deletion discussion and, of course, it could not be found through the logs for the page. There was nothing in the deleted history of the creator. Fortunately, the thread here helped me find the relevant discussion so that I could handle this page properly. Given the number of speedy deletions we typically have to process at a given time, it would be very helpful if you could use the form above to link to the deletion debate in the future. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 19:27, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

Hello, Calistemon1. You have new messages at Moonriddengirl's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Image copyright problem with Image:TSV 1860 Rosenheim.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:TSV 1860 Rosenheim.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 14:52, 18 April 2008 (UTC)

quick and painless

[3], [4]

Cheers! - Revolving Bugbear 21:13, 19 April 2008 (UTC)

Artis Rasmanis

First guess (school) was correct, on Xil's talk. —PētersV (talk) 03:39, 20 April 2008 (UTC)

Dr. Jack de Sequeira

Will you relax?? Chill buddy! What do you expect? That every new article should be a 100 page thesis or something?? It takes time to write an article , okay? Maybe you have all the time in the world to sit and tag articles. Not everybody does. We have WORK to do, get it? --Deepak D'Souza (talk • contribs) 10:03, 25 April 2008 (UTC)

Im sorry that I was quite rude, but I hope you understand that you had been a bit hasty in tagging the article. I had planned to write this article nearly a year back, but due to various reasons I never started on it(Perhaps that is a curse that Dr Jack de Sequeira lives with. He has been forgotten by his own people). Until yesterday when I decided that I had to make at least a small start .Unfortunately, this is not a small problem since a lot of folks out there are over-eager to delete new articles without giving it time.

I'll keep your advice in mind and also return the favour. I have speed-delete tagged quite a few articles too, but they have mostly been obvious cases, such as some jilted shoolboy bitching about the girl who turned him down, etc. If you feel that some article is too short, watch it for at least a week before tagging it.

Revisit the article by next weekend and if you feel that the article deserves to be deleted, raise an AFD. I won't take it personally.

BTW your assumption that I am new to WP is incorrect I have been here for more than one and a half years.--Deepak D'Souza (talk • contribs) 10:04, 27 April 2008 (UTC)

re SC Dynamo Berlin

Thank you for your message at my talkpage. The ip block was the last thing I did before ending my lunchbreak, but I see that the next one was also blocked. I have quickly reviewed the above article and noted that ips are changing every time one gets blocked, replacing the vandalism. I subsequently reverted the last vandalism and have protected the article from editing by ip and new accounts for 3 days; I noted my actions at Talk:SC_Dynamo_Berlin#protection. I hope this brings a (temporary) end to this matter. LessHeard vanU (talk) 19:38, 25 April 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for your response. It may be best if the article is semi-protected long term - the good editors will create accounts, and any bad ones will be blocked and have to wait for four days before vandalising... However, it may be best to see if this (or perhaps a couple more) short protections will discourage the vandals. Thanks for keeping an eye on this. LessHeard vanU (talk) 22:36, 25 April 2008 (UTC)

Scott Ligertwood

Hey! I just referenced the Scott Ligertwood page you tagged as unreferenced. I've removed the tag, but thought I'd do the honourable thing of letting you know, so if you disagree you can put it back on there, but I'm pretty sure every fact on there is now cited. Thanks --rm 'w a vu 14:04, 27 April 2008 (UTC)

I know it's not mandatory, or even alluded to in the guidelines, but I feel it's a nice courtesy. It takes WP:CIVILITY one step further. Thanks for adding that website. To be honest, I just wasn't sure which one to use. I figured that'd be the one, though despite his contributions to the albums, the only name mentioned on the page (other than God, that is) is jth (Joel Houston), which makes sense, being the visionary and leader of the band. Anyway, I'm glad the article's looking a bit better (though arguably still very much a stub). --rm 'w a vu 23:27, 27 April 2008 (UTC)

1st Cavalry Division (Polish)

A stub exists on pl wiki pl:1 Dywizja Jazdy (1920-1924), from 1924-1930 pl:1 Dywizja Kawalerii (II RP). It does not have the operational history, only commanders and structure, and I couldn't find much useful info online.--_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk} 17:08, 29 April 2008 (UTC)

SV Dynamo

Hi, I nominated Template:Kinds of sport and sport associations of the SV Dynamo for deletion. You can probably guess who created this template. Your input on the deletion discussion would be appreciated. Novidmarana (talk) 20:05, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

Request New Article link

Good work on that. It'll be a handy tool. I've added a link to the page to the main project page. Thanks again. Wiggy! (talk) 01:27, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

No worries! EA210269 (talk) 01:39, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

Category fix

Quick category fix, typo: terretories=territories. I've patched up the category page and the five clubs tagged with the category. Wiggy! (talk) 10:59, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

SV Dynamo

Oh yeah, I know. I guess I will be alternatively a racist, a christian bastard or a Bundi (Du Bundi, du). Incidentally, I also nominated several related articles in the Category:Sports Club Dynamo for deletion, if you can weigh in on the deletion debate, that would be great. Novidmarana (talk) 05:55, 14 May 2008 (UTC)

Barnstar for the gullible

		The Hidden Page Barnstar
		I award you one for finding User:Trekphiler's page for people who always think that "new message" bar is real. Aren't you glad you checked your mail? Trekphiler (talk) 06:44, 17 May 2008 (UTC) (Didn't really believe it, huh? Sure... =])

Yeah, I lifted it in the "last change" form & didn't like it... Besides, it's just a gag. I was going to head it "I'm from AOL, I'm here to help you", but it didn't seem like it really needed a header. Ah, well. Enjoy being first. (At least you were gentle. =]) Trekphiler (talk) 07:14, 17 May 2008 (UTC)

Kurt Clemens

Oups! I forgot to change his date of birth. Sorry, my mistake. Thanks for letting me know this. Of course, the right date of birth was the one in the infobox. Keep up the good work!--Latouffedisco (talk) 10:15, 17 May 2008 (UTC)

Thanks again, problem is resolved!--Latouffedisco (talk) 10:19, 17 May 2008 (UTC)

Clubs from Alsace

Hi! I like your work on Gauligas. Here is what I know: SV Straßburg is currently AS Strasbourg. SV 06 Schlettstadt is known is France as SC Sélestat [5]. I will do more research, I promise.--Latouffedisco (talk) 08:49, 18 May 2008 (UTC)

Some other informations:

FC St. Ludwig is FC Saint-Louis in France (I think the club is defunct or has merged with another)
FC Kolmar is FC Colmar (I think the club is defunct or has merged with another)
SV Wittelsheim should be ASCA Wittelsheim (the club is still active)
FC Bischweiler is FC Bischwiller (the clubs is still active)--Latouffedisco (talk) 09:14, 18 May 2008 (UTC)

For information, most of this clubs now plays at a very low level in Alsace and informations are very hard to find out, especially for defunct teams.--Latouffedisco (talk) 09:33, 18 May 2008 (UTC)

My Vereinslexikon shows entries for each of those clubs playing at the Gauliga level. Would have to chase down the post-war histories of those clubs from other sources. Wiggy! (talk) 01:03, 20 May 2008 (UTC)

The "Ligue d'Alsace de football association" have a very good five volumes encyclopedia about all the clubs from that aera. The best work about "small clubs" I ever saw in my life... You have EVERYTHING (even the smallest club) in those five books published in 2002. I have those books, and I can help you if you need some stuff (my English is to bad to write on the articles...).

Rasen SC Straßburg was Racing Club de Strasbourg (founded in 1906 ; still active in 2008)
SC Schiltigheim, was Sporting Club Schiltigheim (founded in 1914 ; still active in 2008)
SG SS Straßburg, was Sporting-Club Red-Star Strasbourg (founded in 1900 ; still active in 2008)
FC Hagenau, was Football Club Haguenau (founded in 1900 ; still active in 2008)
FK Mars Bischheim, was Cercle Sportif Mars 1905 Bischheim (founded in 1905 ; still active in 2008)
SV 06 Schlettstadt, was Sporting Club Sélestat (founded in 1906 ; still active in 2008)
SV Straßburg, was Association Sportive de Strasbourg (founded in 1890 ; still active in 2008)
FC Bischweiler, Football Club Bischwiller (founded in 1907 ; still active in 2008)
FC Mülhausen 93 was Football Club de Mulhouse (founded in 1893 ; still active in 2008)
SpVgg Kolmar was Sports Réunis Colmar (founded in 1920 ; still active in 2008)
SV Wittenheim was Union Sportive Wittenheim (founded in 1913 ; still active in 2008)
FC Kolmar, Football Club Colmar (founded in 1905 ; rename Stade de Colmar 77 in 1977 ; club disbanded in june 1986)
ASV Mülhausen was Association Sportive Mulhousienne (founded in 1903 ; rename Cercle Athlétique Mulhousien in 1928 ; rename Association Sportive Mulhousienne in 1945 ; still active in 2008 ; the club is now name ASSOCIATION SPORTIVE 90 MULHOUSE and not ASSOCIATION SPORTIVE 1990 MULHOUSE as you can read on the FFF website...)
SpVgg Dornach was Football Club Dornach (founded in 1910 ; still active in 2008)
SV Wittelsheim was Association Sportive des Colonies Amélie Wittelsheim (founded in 1925 ; still active in 2008)
FC St. Ludwig, was Football Club Saint-Louis (founded in 1911 ; merged with FC Neuweg in 1990)

be careful with the "de" (of in English) in the french club names. Some clubs use that word in their names, some don't : RC de Strasbourg or FC de Mulhouse are correct ; but FC Colmar, SR Colmar and others FC Haguenau don't have a "de" in their official name, for exemple. Clio64B (talk) 21:48, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

Collectif, 100 ans de football en Alsace (5 vol.), Strasbourg, LAFA, 2002, ISBN 2-911219-13-9 (the ISBN number is for the five volumes). Clio64B (talk) 22:06, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

DYK

On 19 May, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Gauliga, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--Gatoclass (talk) 06:45, 19 May 2008 (UTC)

Hey! Very cool! I'm jealous! :) Great work and continued congrats on your contributions. Nice to hear the buzz. Wiggy! (talk) 13:54, 19 May 2008 (UTC)

Gauliga Bayern

On 20 May, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Gauliga Bayern, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--BorgQueen (talk) 10:00, 20 May 2008 (UTC)

Welcome!

Welcome to WikiProject History!

Welcome to WikiProject History! We are a group dedicated to improving Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to history.

Now that you're a member you might want to drop by one of our Working Groups. It is also recommended that you watchlist our talk page as well.

Working Groups at WikiProject History:

Assessment · Collaboration · Review · Outreach · Task forces

Hamburg

Hi there, sorry I'm a little it uniformed about sports clubs (I'm a couch potato ;-), but will take a look. Hope, I'll find something to add. About the map : sure it's not the right one, but you are also right, it's better than nothing. Schönen Tag ;-) Greetings Sebastian scha. (talk) 05:45, 31 May 2008 (UTC)

Gauliga Pommern

Hi - there is an issue regarding this DYK nom which you may want to address. Question over the WP:RS of this website source, which is the sole one used for citations. If this is a reputable website, there shouldn't be a problem. Vishnava_talk 20:11, 31 May 2008 (UTC)

Hi - been through the site and it seems good. Another reviewer may choose to differ, but I've OK'd it. Happy editing! Vishnava_talk 01:07, 1 June 2008 (UTC)

References

Hey, thanks for adding the link as a reference. Coming from the German wikipedia (that had a different error but needed the same source), I must've forgotten. They're a bit more sloppy with the reference thing over there ;-) Madcynic (talk) 09:50, 1 June 2008 (UTC)

6/1 DYK

On 1 June, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Gauliga Pommern, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--Bedford ^Pray 03:50, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

Gauliga Mittelrhein

On 4 June, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Gauliga Mittelrhein, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--BorgQueen (talk) 13:04, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

Another DYK

On 6 June, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Eimsbütteler TV, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--Daniel Case (talk) 04:03, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

Image of the great german reich

this is a nice img for the gaue I think Sebastian scha. (talk) 13:42, 13 June 2008 (UTC)

Categories of German football clubs and leagues

Hello EA210269! Thanks for the kind words regarding my contributions. The reason that some articles are in both Bavarian/Swabian categories and the parent category is because I haven't gotten around to all of them yet; I have been going article by article. Since I am generally for subdividing categories to avoid having hundreds of articles in a category, I think it would be fine to add more categories (ie Category:Schleswig-Holstein football clubs), even if those articles do not receive as much as attention as Bavarian or Swabian clubs. I have no serious objections, however, if you want to restore duplicate categories. From a historical perspective, Category:Bavarian football clubs could also include clubs from the Palatinate, as that region was part of Bavaria prior to 1945. We could also make Category:Prussian football clubs, which could include clubs founded before that state's dissolution.

Good job on creating the Gauliga articles. FYI, the terminology Gauligas should be changed to Gauligen; the German word Gauliga is not commonly used in English, so the English plural system should not be used (unless that is how sources refer to them). Since it is a word borrowed from a foreign language, we should instead use the native plural term, Gauligen (similarly for Regionalligen, Oberligen, etc.). Cheers! Olessi (talk) 16:27, 16 June 2008 (UTC)

Article updates

Thanks for the updates. I guess I shouldn't be so lazy. I do enjoy the writing, though. Wiggy! (talk) 02:05, 19 June 2008 (UTC)

Lazy is hardly the right word, looking at all the new club articles you've created in the last days. I enjoy reading them a lot! EA210269 (talk) 04:05, 19 June 2008 (UTC)

6/19 DYK

On 19 June, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Bavarian football derbys, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--Bedford ^Pray 03:00, 19 June 2008 (UTC)

DYK

On 20 June, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Anif declaration, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--Gatoclass (talk) 09:24, 20 June 2008 (UTC)

Gauliga Ostmark

On 28 June, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Gauliga Ostmark, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--BorgQueen (talk) 08:04, 28 June 2008 (UTC)

Gau Schwaben

On 29 June, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Gau Schwaben, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--BorgQueen (talk) 09:36, 29 June 2008 (UTC)

Rupprecht Gerngroß

On 30 June, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Rupprecht Gerngroß, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--BorgQueen (talk) 13:01, 30 June 2008 (UTC)

Karl Wahl DYK

Hi. I've reviewed your DYK submission for the article Karl Wahl, and unfortunately found a problem with it. Please feel free to comment on the DYK submissions page. Olaf Davis | Talk 21:54, 2 July 2008 (UTC)

(reply copied from my talk page) Ach so! Apologies for not reading the whole thing. My German is just good enough to verify the ref, so I've approved it for DYK. Cheers, Olaf Davis | Talk 22:28, 2 July 2008 (UTC)

DYK

On 3 July, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Karl Wahl, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--Gatoclass (talk) 06:52, 3 July 2008 (UTC)

Hoffmann Photos

Hi,

Yes, they are in the public domain in the US!! They may not be in the public domain elsewhere. Actually, I am certain that in some European countries the photos are still protected under existing copyrights. However, in the US the photographs of Heinrich Hoffmann are considered to be in the public domain due to their status as seized Nazi property. Although in normal circumstances their copyrights would not yet have expired, you are free to use them on the US Wikipedia and other US sites.

For more information, please see: David Culbert (1997). "The Heinrich Hoffmann Photo Archive: Price vs United States (United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit, 20 November, 1995)".

Hope this helps. Maria Mariaflores1955 (talk) 22:30, 3 July 2008 (UTC)

Excellent!! I look forward to see those... Maria Mariaflores1955 (talk) 22:48, 3 July 2008 (UTC)

- Great... No problem with the set up, it is after all in the public domain!! :) Mariaflores1955 (talk) 00:06, 4 July 2008 (UTC)

Template 3rd Liga

Ah, I see. Well, I figured it'd be better to just use direct links, but I understand your pov. Madcynic (talk) 23:41, 4 July 2008 (UTC)

I agree that there should be an article, although I think the real distress is the fact that there are reserve teams in 3rd Liga ;-) Madcynic (talk) 23:57, 4 July 2008 (UTC)

Reich Chancellery meeting of 12 December 1941

On 6 July, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Reich Chancellery meeting of 12 December 1941, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--BorgQueen (talk) 01:18, 6 July 2008 (UTC)

New German league names

I've changed Oberliga Bremen to Bremen-Liga on German football league system and in Regionalliga Nord. Just makes more sense to consistently use what seems to be the official name, I think. Otherwise things look good. Maybe one should add that the 2007-08 champion was not promoted in Bremen-Liga? Madcynic (talk) 09:14, 15 July 2008 (UTC)

German Mine Sweeping Administration DYK

On 15 July, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article German Mine Sweeping Administration, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Congratulations! --PeterSymonds (talk) 23:09, 15 July 2008 (UTC)

Offenburger FV DYK

Hi. I've reviewed your DYK submission for the article Offenburger FV, and made a comment on it at the submissions page. Please feel free to reply or comment there. Cheers, Olaf Davis | Talk 10:48, 21 July 2008 (UTC)

On 22 July, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Offenburger FV, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--JayHenry (talk) 05:38, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

Proposal for standard infobox for History of [country] templates

Hi there! You're a member of WikiProject History, so I'm just informing you about a proposal I've made about standardizing History of [country] templates (like Template:History of France). The discussion is located at the talk page for WikiProject History—your comments and criticism are welcome. Thank you. Mr. Absurd (talk) 05:15, 25 July 2008 (UTC)

Read the instructions

A warning? Did I miss something? Or do you mean TotD? TREKphiler ^{hit me ♠} 13:08, 27 July 2008 (UTC)

Not paranoid, just interested. Ciao. TREKphiler ^{hit me ♠} 13:15, 27 July 2008 (UTC)

WP AH

This user wants you to join
WikiProject
Alternate History.

Zombie Hunter Smurf (talk) 13:35, 29 July 2008 (UTC)

DYK

On 30 July, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Southern German football championship, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--Wafulz (talk) 14:33, 30 July 2008 (UTC)

Das Königsprojekt

On 12 August, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Das Königsprojekt, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--BorgQueen (talk) 08:34, 12 August 2008 (UTC)

On 13 August, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article German amateur football championship, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--Daniel Case (talk) 04:28, 13 August 2008 (UTC)

Re:Andorra CF

You're right, I automatically assumed the club was based in Andorra (the state), cheers! BanRay 10:22, 13 August 2008 (UTC)

DYK

On August 17, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article FC Büsingen, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--Nrswanson (talk) 20:09, 17 August 2008 (UTC)

Selected Payers

I noticed your edit here, whom is this player selected by? Fasach Nua (talk) 07:57, 18 August 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Logoleft.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:Logoleft.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 13:24, 3 October 2008 (UTC)

Regional German Cups

I'd say it is best to use the English names. Most, if not all of these cups are named simply after the region that their respective association represents. Many of them have sponsored names (i.e. in Saxony-Anhalt, the official name is "Lotto-Pokal"), but as those are subject to change, we ought to stick to the non-sponsored ones. Have you added an article request on the WP:FOOTY/Germany page yet? --Madcynic (talk) 17:51, 17 October 2008 (UTC)

FCN

Thanks. I keep making that error - Nürnberg is so much easier to remember. ArtVandelay13 (talk) 16:52, 19 October 2008 (UTC)

Bundesliga qualifying system

Hey, great addition to the Bundesliga article. Could you maybe give more details on the publication you found the info in? Maybe you could use Template:Cite? Madcynic (talk) 15:40, 3 November 2008 (UTC)

I think with the additional table it does merit its own article, yes. But on the other hand, it is a tad difficult, as there are not a whole lot of sources used in it. Your call, I'd say - or discuss at the Football in germany subproject. Madcynic (talk) 12:12, 4 November 2008 (UTC)

List of goalscoring goalkeepers

No worries. Wash the dishes? Pah. I've just been hoping mine might disappear all night long. 'Fraid not so far! Peanut4 (talk) 02:37, 9 November 2008 (UTC)

TSV hook

Hey, sorry if it seems like I was going out of my way to shoot your hook down at DYK. Really I was just trying to get the issues fixed so that the hook could be featured. If you would still like for the article to get on DYK, feel free to get in touch with me about it and we can see what needs to be added to the article to make it happen. —Politizer ^talk/_contribs 00:42, 12 November 2008 (UTC)

Your DYK submission of TSV Vestenbergsgreuth

Hello! Your submission of TSV Vestenbergsgreuth at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed. There still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Chamal ^talk 08:21, 12 November 2008 (UTC)

DYK for ASV Herzogenaurach & FC Herzogenaurach

On 14 November, 2008, Did you know? was updated with facts from the articles ASV Herzogenaurach, and FC Herzogenaurach, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Double DYK! --PFHLai (talk) 07:09, 14 November 2008 (UTC)

DYK for TSV Vestenbergsgreuth

On 14 November, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article TSV Vestenbergsgreuth, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Cirt (talk) 13:45, 14 November 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:SV Schalding-Heining.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:SV Schalding-Heining.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:18, 15 November 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:TSV Kottern.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:TSV Kottern.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:23, 16 November 2008 (UTC)

DYK for 17th Panzer Division (Germany)

On 19 November, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article 17th Panzer Division (Germany), which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

DYKBot (talk) 17:51, 19 November 2008 (UTC)

Your DYK submission of SV Alsenborn

Hello! Your submission of SV Alsenborn at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed. There still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! —Politizer ^talk/_contribs 21:08, 22 November 2008 (UTC)

DYK for SV Alsenborn

On 24 November, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article SV Alsenborn, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

BorgQueen (talk) 13:26, 24 November 2008 (UTC)

DYK for Under 19 Bayernliga

On 2 December, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Under 19 Bayernliga, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

BorgQueen (talk) 14:04, 2 December 2008 (UTC)

DYK for DGF Flensborg

On 3 December, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article DGF Flensborg, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

BorgQueen (talk) 14:21, 3 December 2008 (UTC)

Augsburger Allgemeine

Hi
Thanks for taking on Augsburger Allgemeine so quickly. I planned expanding it myself soonish, but I can put that off for a while longer now. :)
Cheers, Amalthea 00:55, 16 December 2008 (UTC)

Merry Christmas

Best of the season to you! Wiggy! (talk) 00:08, 28 December 2008 (UTC)

Medal

		The 25 DYK Medal
		I am pleased to give you this medal, meaning that you have amassed 25 contributions at Did You Know. We need good articles on the non-English-speaking world, and with you focusing on Germany we get a little better day by day. Thanks. Punkmorten (talk) 22:56, 18 January 2009 (UTC)

DYK for SC 1880 Frankfurt

On January 22, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article SC 1880 Frankfurt, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Dravecky (talk) 02:00, 22 January 2009 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with File:Kit body handschuhsheim.png

Thanks for uploading File:Kit body handschuhsheim.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 02:38, 24 January 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:DSV 78 Hannover.gif)

Thanks for uploading File:DSV 78 Hannover.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:15, 26 January 2009 (UTC)

BSC Erlangen

Please contact me by mail info@bsc-erlangen.de

Thanks

Bernd Hohenester 83.171.190.205 (talk) 10:50, 1 February 2009 (UTC)

DYK for DSV 78/08 Ricklingen

On February 2, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article DSV 78/08 Ricklingen, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Dravecky 13:33, 2 February 2009 (UTC)

DYK for Ferdinand-Wilhelm Fricke

On February 2, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Ferdinand-Wilhelm Fricke, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Dravecky 13:33, 2 February 2009 (UTC)

DYK for München RFC

On February 3, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article München RFC, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Dravecky (talk) 18:57, 3 February 2009 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Germany national rugby union team (sevens)

Hello! Your submission of Germany national rugby union team (sevens) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Dravecky (talk) 11:51, 4 February 2009 (UTC)

DYK for Iffland-Ring

On February 19, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Iffland-Ring, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Gatoclass (talk) 14:52, 19 February 2009 (UTC)

WikiProject Mining

Hi, I saw your Template:Infobox Gold Mine and was interested in it. I was trying to make in infobox for mines in general, not just gold, it had a lot of the material that you have in your template but also included a spot for a map and for type (surface or underground) and products (gold, copper etc.) Here was my attempt, but it never got beyond this and never got introduced, partially because of my lack of knowledge of the subject. So my message is twofold, I would like to invite you to join WikiProject mining (but keep in mind we are not very organized). My second question is can you help me create a infobox for mines in general, I had originally thought that production wasn't a great idea, but looking at your inclusion of a financial year section it would make more sense. Also in the template in the production section is ounces of gold per year or total?--kelapstick (talk) 18:48, 20 February 2009 (UTC)

Excellent, welcome aboard, and happy birthday!--kelapstick (talk) 23:22, 20 February 2009 (UTC)

Also I hope you don't mind but I borrowed your "User works in mining" userbox...--kelapstick (talk) 23:53, 20 February 2009 (UTC)

The infobox looks good to me, I was hoping to get a map like they have in Bancroft, Ontario, with a movable dot to show the location so a new map doesn't have to be uploaded for each infobox (like I had done at Raglan Mine), but if it is too much don't worry about it, I like it as is too. You may be interested to know that I have created Category:Underground mines and Category:Surface mines, long missing categories. Thanks again and welcome to the project!--kelapstick (talk) 17:46, 22 February 2009 (UTC)

One more thing, can the state item be variable (state or province) or changed to State/Province? --kelapstick (talk) 17:50, 22 February 2009 (UTC)

Wow, am I ever thinking slowly today, maybe city/settlement should be nearest city, for places that are not located in a town? Ekati Diamond Mine comes to mind, it is usually refered to in disance from Yellowknife, Northwest Territories.--kelapstick (talk) 20:38, 22 February 2009 (UTC)

That state and territory and province was what I was thinking, if a mine operates as both surface and underground I woudl enter it in both, that is what I have been doing.--kelapstick (talk) 00:50, 23 February 2009 (UTC)

I would clasify it as both underground and surface, since it was both. You are probably right with the UG mine by country/region, maybe once we see how big the category gets, right now it is 34 pages which is manageable, but I can see it getting much larger, I would wait until there are about 150-200 pages. --kelapstick (talk) 03:10, 23 February 2009 (UTC)

This and this may interest you, I enlisted a guy who knows a little about maps and locater dots to take a look at adding a map to the infobox, he seems to be onto something.--kelapstick (talk) 19:41, 23 February 2009 (UTC)

Nice, he is going to move it up below the image, and remove the framing that it does with the map, but there shouldn't be much of a change to it. I like it.--kelapstick (talk) 00:19, 24 February 2009 (UTC)

Another birthday wish

Happy birthday! Enjoy yourself when you re-surface. Wiggy! (talk) 03:28, 22 February 2009 (UTC)

Tasmania

Is not off the planet - the Australian map is a bit of a mistake I would suggest - most geographically challenged readers could track back - in WP:AGF Henty Gold Mine needs a better closer tighter map than that surely Satu Suro 09:04, 5 March 2009 (UTC)

Ignore above - I have seen you have done that for the other gold mines you have edited - I dont agree - but I will not revert - youre pandering to the geographically challenged - I still think a Tasmania state map would be a better choice :) - cheers Satu Suro 09:07, 5 March 2009 (UTC)

Oh hell me and my big mouth - I dont have one to hand so the australian one is probably a good idea - as for the warner brother cartoon issue - some other time - maybe we can convince you to come to a Perth:Meetup and we can hava drink or three over whether tassie exists :) Satu Suro 09:15, 5 March 2009 (UTC)

I'm fairly sure Tassie does exist!? :) It may even have a city or two. Aaroncrick^{(Tassie Boy talk)} 10:34, 5 March 2009 (UTC)

Good to see you've been to Tasmania. It's bigger than you think.. or is it? Aaroncrick^{(Tassie Boy talk)} 10:37, 5 March 2009 (UTC)

Tiny compared to WA! It Rains in Launceston and Hobart a lot less then in Perth though. Not that wet unless you dare to travel to the wild west coast. Aaroncrick^{(Tassie Boy talk)} 19:45, 5 March 2009 (UTC)

Hello, Calistemon1. You have new messages at Kelapstick's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Never been to Strahan, as the weather is a bit of turn off. Aaroncrick^{(Tassie Boy talk)} 04:42, 6 March 2009 (UTC)

I went there once in mid-summer. It was 13 degrees andf very wet. Orderinchaos 07:42, 7 March 2009 (UTC)

Hadnt followed this thread closely enough - I used to live in Queenstown a very long time ago - when i first got there it rained for 10 days in a row without stopping - i was there last november and I got hailed on when I was in queenstown - phew it is good to get that off my chest - now back to reality :( Satu Suro 07:57, 7 March 2009 (UTC)

That even makes Tassie's weather sound bad. I Love the East Coast, especially Bay of Fires and Freycinet. Went there on the weekend, so might upload some images. :) Aaroncrick^{(Tassie Boy talk)} 09:57, 9 March 2009 (UTC)

Hope the snake encounter wasn't too serious! ;) BTW the Bay of Fires goes alright. Aaroncrick^{(Tassie Boy talk)} 11:27, 9 March 2009 (UTC)

Haha! Not funny for you though. Wonder how long they stopped by? Aaroncrick^{(Tassie Boy talk)} 12:09, 9 March 2009 (UTC)

FC 04 Inglostadt

I can't find any discussion regarding this move you just carried out, can you point me in the right direction for it? Nothing on the talk page. To my knowledge, the clubs name is FC Ingolstadt 04 and its website says as much. I strongly advocate the article be moved back to its proper name! EA210269 (talk) 04:16, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

Since when does there need to be discussion before a move? The club's name is Fußball-Club 2004 Ingolstadt e.V. How can that be abbreviated to FC Ingolstadt 04? The 2004 is before Ingolstadt in the club's name. What is there to discuss? -- Grant .Alpaugh 04:24, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

Have you had a look at the clubs own website? If not, come along. When you open it, it tells you in the top right-hand corner when and where its next game is, in the current case it says: F.C. Hansa Rostock vs. FC Ingolstadt 04.

The go across to the bottom left, where the 2nd Bundesliga table sits, and on 15th place there sits FC Ingolstadt 04, not FC 04 Ingolstadt. I think, we should stick with what the club thinks its name is and return to FC Ingolstadt 04. EA210269 (talk) 04:30, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

I think we should stick with what the club's actual name is. -- Grant .Alpaugh 04:36, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

I fully agree, FC Ingolstadt 04. I went through a fair bit of the website and not once is it called FC 04 Ingolstadt, even in the history section its FCI 04. It really can't be any clearer. Where did you get FC 04 Ingolstadt from, if I may ask? EA210269 (talk) 04:39, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

The article infobox says the club's name is "Fußball-Club 2004 Ingolstadt e.V." If from what you see on the website, that is incorrect, then move the page back and revert my changes, but correct the infobox to list the 2004 at the end. -- Grant .Alpaugh 04:43, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

Hang on mate, the articles infobox is certainly not a reliable source of information and we can't just move pages on the pretext of that. What if somebody wrote FC Sauerkraut in there , would we move the article to its new name then? And since it was your mistake moving it, its your job undoing it, I reckon. Don't get upset, but thats the way I see it. EA210269 (talk) 04:48, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

I'm worried about the article being internally consistent. I made it so. You corrected me. If you have reason to believe that the full name of the club is otherwise, then change it. Otherwise the change I made was correct. I'm not upset, I just think that there are way too many cases of articles that are all over the place. I won't be moving the article back, or reverting my changes in the article, but I won't revert you if you do so. Have a good one. -- Grant .Alpaugh 04:53, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

I don't just have reason to believe FCI 04 is correct, the website of the club says so about 30 to 40 times. The only source that calls it FC 2004 Ingolstadt is the abseits guide, I great website but with no garantie to be right and certainly not more reliable that the clubs side. What you are saying is, that you are happy knowingly to leave a page name incorrect. Have you even looked at the club site? You claim internally consistentcy but, as a matter of fact, we now have an article FC 04 Ingolstadt and a category Category:FC Ingolstadt 04. How inconsistent is that? EA210269 (talk) 05:01, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

If you think I was wrong, then change it. If you think you know better, then as an editor you have the ability to correct what you percieve to be my mistake. Go for it. It's fun. -- Grant .Alpaugh 05:04, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

Sorry mate, your mistake, your fix, not my job. I'm heading to the beach now, its far to nice a day here in Perth to spent on the computer and its my last day off before going back to work. Have fun and slow down a bit on your page moves, a little bit of discussion with other editors might save a lot of grieve! See yer later, EA210269 (talk) 05:07, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

So, when you see vandalism, do you revert it, or do you track the vandal down and torture them until they revert themselves? I'm leaving the article the way it is, as I think it is correct. Bye. Have fun at the beach. -- Grant .Alpaugh 05:12, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

I've fixed up the little mess you created at FC Ingolstadt 04, send the flowers to my home addresse! By the wording of your last message I assume you would like to be treated like a vandal in the future and not like a fellow editor, not my favorite approach torwards somebody who has been on wikipedia longer then me. Anyway, the beach was great! EA210269 (talk) 08:39, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

I don't expect to be treated like a vandal. I expect you to do what you're here to do. I was BOLD, you should have reverted, and then we should have discussed. Since I had no interest in a discussion, your reversion would have stood, and we both would have had the hour we spent arguing back. Just because I've been here longer than you doesn't mean you can't revert me. You know what you're doing, so feel free to revert me if you think I made a mistake. No hard feelings, nothing personal. Anyway, I'm glad you enjoyed the beach, but I have to get to school. See you later. -- Grant .Alpaugh 15:09, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

I copied my replies accross to my talk page as User:Grant.Alpaugh has a habit of deleting his talk page regulary and not keeping an archive.

Mount Keith, Western Australia

Should this be at Mount Keith Mine or Mount Keith (mine)? Mount Keith is in California. Is it a mine or a region with a mine in it? I am not sure, figured you might have some insight.--kelapstick (talk) 15:23, 13 March 2009 (UTC)

And I think you were right in the first place about the category underground mines and surface mines by country, if we don't start sorting them like that right off the bat it is going to be a nightmare to resort, I am going to start the categories for Canada the United States and Australia (maybe Africa too) since that seems to be where the most articles about mines are.

Actually I see it listed in some of the references as the Mount Keith Mine, I am going to move it. Also you can see I did create Category:Surface mines in Australia and Category:Underground mines in Australia.--kelapstick (talk) 16:33, 13 March 2009 (UTC)

DYK for Pitomnik Airfield

On March 15, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Pitomnik Airfield, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Gatoclass (talk) 13:12, 15 March 2009 (UTC)

Pitomnik airfield

Why do you consider my changes in this article as vandalism? First of all, correct spelling is Питомник, not ПИТОМНИК (see, e.g. the map from the article). This airfield was named after a near-lying settlement of the same name Питомник (Pitomnik), which was named after a plant nursery that grew orchard trees (Russian: Питомник плодовых деревьев, pitomnik plodovykh derev'yev).--92.39.175.52 (talk) 22:58, 15 March 2009 (UTC)

DYK for Wild Rugby Academy

On March 20, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Wild Rugby Academy, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Royal broil 03:08, 20 March 2009 (UTC)

Mining Barnstar

		The Mining Barnstar
		For the creating of long overdue infoboxes, (namely {{Infobox Gold Mine}} & {{Infobox Mine}}), I award you the Mining Barnstar, keep up the good work.--kelapstick (talk) 18:20, 20 March 2009 (UTC)

I'd second that Satu Suro 02:51, 21 March 2009 (UTC)

Mount lyell (the company is sysnonymous with the mine) was the biggest bloody copper mine at one stage in australia - and as such if you look at the entry in the category for copper mines - I have dealt with that - please check! Satu Suro 07:46, 22 March 2009 (UTC)

Oh hell I am trying to snuff out what might be a sock in a totally different subject area- trying to convince a newbie to take care - and I realise I had left the answer on my talk - clearly need to jump into my pool while I still can :( - as for the WA mines and stuff - I would suggest that we have either a longer chat about that soon - I have a few ideas that stem from the regions of Wa viz http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Regions_of_Western_Australia and the mining fields viz http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Mining_fields_in_Western_Australia can help frame the issue - I also have a heap of older mines dept material (somewhere) Satu Suro 08:08, 22 March 2009 (UTC)

The dead ones will be bigger list :( - i gotta go off now - until later Satu Suro 08:11, 22 March 2009 (UTC)

Very good start - we tend to go to ballistic at english deprived eds in the Indonesian project when we see the web links column - I think we might need to tone that one down slightly one way or other - other than that, a good start! Satu Suro 13:09, 22 March 2009 (UTC)

It is all to do with WP:NOT and directory issues Satu Suro 13:13, 22 March 2009 (UTC)

Oh hell - oh well keep at the map - I'll have an off wiki chat with a couple of wa eds to see what they think we can do to keep it kosher :) Satu Suro 13:19, 22 March 2009 (UTC)

Take your pick (hahaha geologist joke that one) http://www.ga.gov.au/bin/gazm01?placename=telfer&placetype=0&state=0 Satu Suro 13:27, 22 March 2009 (UTC)

Sorry at this time of night I aint gonna spill the beans of my professional ineptitudes and lack of qualifications - some other time maybe or off wiki :) Satu Suro 13:32, 22 March 2009 (UTC)

Too many jokes etc to think of amongst all this - some other time - cheers Satu Suro 13:39, 22 March 2009 (UTC)

Further haha - soon to get off indeed - there should be enough of us in wa for a 12 step rehabilitation for wikiholics :( Satu Suro 14:11, 22 March 2009 (UTC)

Hate to butt in to a conversation that looks like it has already worked itself out, but we are having a discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Mining about putting the category in a redirect (in this case Mount Lyell copper mine) which would list the mine in the category but not have the category included in the company article. This would promote expansion (right now it looks like we don't need an article about the mine because we already have one, which we do not). Nothing has been decided yet but Springhill Mine is an example of what I am talking about.--kelapstick (talk) 14:13, 22 March 2009 (UTC)

For me nder no common sense does Mount Lyell copper mine make any sense - it was a large lease with at least 8 separate underground and above ground ore bodies all worked at different stages and with very specific names (see the Mount Lyell company article which I put the operations in) Mount Lyell copper mine is to my mind a furphy as last tuesday was st patricks day. I have been tying to get off for the last 2 hours - if need be will follow this up Satu Suro 14:23, 22 March 2009 (UTC)

Hi EA, see the continued discussion at my talk page.--kelapstick (talk) 14:59, 22 March 2009 (UTC)

BTW sent a welcome to your wifes talk page - and a link to the wa project - our previous in house geol at wa wp was User:Zamphuor he has more or less dropped out Satu Suro 02:56, 23 March 2009 (UTC)

Yeah well I have a long abandoned one (PhD) - being a wp ed is a state of mind :)

Ok at the list i have questioned the tanami/coyote being in - maybe a NT list?

Satu Suro 03:02, 23 March 2009 (UTC)

OK agreed - cheers Satu Suro 03:12, 23 March 2009 (UTC)

Re: Axis order of battle at Stalingrad

When I removed the WP Croatia tag from the talk page, I explained in the edit summary that the "link to Croatia is tenuous", and that's what everything boils down to. It is tenuous. IIRC, even Battle of Stalingrad was at one time categorized as Category:Battles involving Croatia, but this was removed because Croatian forces were entirely under German command. Be as it may, in the article in question, a single line of text - a mention of the 369th Reinforced Infantry Regiment - is the entire link to Croatia. Now, the objective of WP Croatia is "to improve the coverage of articles related to Croatia on Wikipedia" - but what's there to improve that is Croatia-related in this article? It doesn't make sense to me any more than putting a WP Croatia tag on ER just because there was Goran Visnjic in it.

It is not my intention to whitewash history; if that was my intention, I would not have added the WP Croatia tag to 369th Reinforced Infantry Regiment just minutes after removing it from the Stalingrad order of battle article. Neither I nor WP Croatia can change history - whether we wanted to or not - but we can direct our limited resources toward articles that are fundamentally Croatia-related.

I really hope you find this explanation satisfactory. Regards, GregorB (talk) 14:35, 22 March 2009 (UTC)

No problem. I meant "tenuous" as in "thin", not as in "doubtful". There's certainly no doubt about the regiment's involvement, which is in fact already described in some detail in its separate article. Same could apply to Romanian forces, but in this issue I'm going to defer to judgment of WP Romania. GregorB (talk) 15:05, 22 March 2009 (UTC)

Re: German football templates

The display error was very likely caused by a non-implementation of {{Football box start}} and {{Football box end}} on the target site. If I have read the discussion on the main project discussion page correctly, all current football boxes will eventually be fully converted, but the process will be applied gradually, from current width over some intermediary width to full size. The reason for this way of doing it is that most of the fb boxes have not been converted yet. So in order to avoid display errors, box sizes will have to stay the same.

Sorry if I might sound a little unclear above, but my brain is not fully awake yet. ^^ If there are any more issues on any articles, just contact me. --Soccer-holic (talk) 10:10, 27 March 2009 (UTC)

AEG

No problems, I've found a few problems with the de:wikipedia articles myself - though I still like to use them as a basis for article creation - if only as notes - especially as the writers have an 'in country' perspective that I don't have - they're usually 90% correct though I have found mistakes when it comes to referencing the information.

I will check and reference the chronology in the coming days. On this article I don't expect to find any mistakes - I have found that more popularist articles tend to have the greater number of mistakes - AEG is a relatively dry subject so shouldn't be subject to vague "point of view" edits. (Hopefully).FengRail (talk) 14:57, 28 March 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Heidelberger RK.gif)

⚠

Thanks for uploading Image:Heidelberger RK.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 05:29, 7 April 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:TSV Handschuhsheim.gif)

⚠

Thanks for uploading Image:TSV Handschuhsheim.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 05:29, 7 April 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:RK Heusenstamm.gif)

⚠

Thanks for uploading Image:RK Heusenstamm.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 05:29, 7 April 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:RK 03 Berlin.gif)

⚠

Thanks for uploading Image:RK 03 Berlin.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 05:30, 7 April 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Post SV Berlin rugby.gif)

⚠

Thanks for uploading Image:Post SV Berlin rugby.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 05:30, 7 April 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Victoria Linden.gif)

⚠

Thanks for uploading Image:Victoria Linden.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 05:33, 7 April 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:German Rugby Eagle.gif)

⚠

Thanks for uploading Image:German Rugby Eagle.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 05:39, 7 April 2009 (UTC)

Your page

I am not sure of the page, as I do not speak German. The template at the bottom is riddled with incorrect links. They need to be fixed, or the template needs to be removed.keystoneridin! (talk) 15:05, 16 April 2009 (UTC)

Note: User:Willisis2 and User:Keystoneridin very similar in edits and behaviour. Same user?

Mine

Hi. Mm I do like silver but I thought it made the infobox look a little bland. I choose a copper color is this OK? I thought it was the closest thing to actual mining Copper (color)? If you disagree perhaps we could propose some color choices in the talk page of the infobox? Dr. Blofeld ^{White cat} 09:54, 17 April 2009 (UTC)

Very glad you started that infobox though! Thats one less thing I have to attend to. Dr. Blofeld ^{White cat} 09:57, 17 April 2009 (UTC)

Yes indeed it was very much needed, especially if we are to provide a decent coverage of the subject. I've started a number of mining articles by country myself and know how much is missing. OK lets propose some possible choices in the talk page. Dr. Blofeld ^{White cat} 10:02, 17 April 2009 (UTC)

Hey amigo. Problem fixed. I've now rstored the slate grey and white. Have a look at Jwaneng diamond mine. Look OK? Dr. Blofeld ^{White cat} 09:31, 19 April 2009 (UTC)

A henchman of mine fixed the block background. If he didn't yes suddenly the elvator he is in would lose its floor and he would be sent down the plastic tunnel into the piranha/shark tank. I sorted the grey and white. OK? Dr. Blofeld ^{White cat} 09:45, 19 April 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (File:VfL Neustadt.jpg)

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:VfL Neustadt.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. SchuminWeb (Talk) 04:31, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

Kreisliga Pfalz

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Kreisliga Pfalz, and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: Kreisliga Württemberg. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally moving or duplicating content, please be sure you have followed the procedure at Wikipedia:Splitting by acknowledging the duplication of material in edit summary to preserve attribution history.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 16:09, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Kreisliga Pfalz

A tag has been placed on Kreisliga Pfalz, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

it is a copy of Kreisliga Württemberg

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Ŵïllî§ï$2? (^Talk!/_Sign) 20:20, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

Re: German football championship 1933

Hi EA210269!

Firstly, thanks for your comments about the DFB-Pokal articles. It's always nice when somebody recognizes your work. Actually I have to admit that I copied lots of the stuff from other articles and adapted it to my needs. While I guess this is common practice I think I have learned enough (especially when doing all those cup articles), that I could do this stuff myself today. If I had the time and zest to actually rework those articles I would do a few things different, but nevermind.

Regarding the German football championship 1933 I think the article looks very good. There are really just a few minor things I can tell you:

Scores use ndashes ("–") as seperators (not "-"). Generally the format for scores should be "x–y", with no spaces in between.
Are the flags in the infobox really necessary? It's an all-German competition, isn't it? I know that there might be a few foreign clubs considering themselves to be ethnically German, but still I think they are redundant.
If you use "aet" you should link it. I know it is tedious and appears to be somewhat superfluos, but people have asked me what aet is supposed to mean...
Do you really want to link every player and the referee? I know that I did it in the cup articles, but I'm not sure that it was a good idea. Will there ever be an article about that referee? Probably not. Just make up your mind and stick with it, I guess both solutions are fine.
Is it really a good idea to have seperate "sources" and "references"? As far as I know the references are supposed to be your sources.
The introduction to the final is a bit clumsy.
Don't forget to rank the article on quality and importance scale when it is done.

I cannot think of any other useful thing I could tell you right now. If you think I might be able to help you with anything, please don't hesistate to ask. Regards, OdinFK (talk) 07:38, 21 April 2009 (UTC)

Regarding: "I don't rank quality or importance of my own artilces because it wouldn't be an unbiased assessment."

Your choice and perfectly okay. I don't think it is problematic though. Most of the time I rate my own articles. Why do I do it? It's just a snap judgment to have the article categorized. Thus it is easier to get an overview over the project. I would not (and cannot) award my own article a GA-class or something, but if you honestly think your article is C-class and someone else thinks it is Start-class, well, there is not really any harm done. Regarding importance: The criteria are quite objective. For example seasonal articles like the ones we are discussing are always of low importance. Still I don't want to push you or anything, just give you a different opinion on the matter. OdinFK (talk) 09:03, 21 April 2009 (UTC)

DYK for Polar 3

On April 26, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Polar 3, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Gatoclass (talk) 13:08, 26 April 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of AYR

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article AYR, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Tagged for months with notability concerns, still lacks reliable 3rd party references

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. RadioFan (talk) 12:08, 1 May 2009 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Calistemon1. You have new messages at Subash.chandran007's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Subash.chandran007 (talk) 12:34, 14 May 2009 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Calistemon1. You have new messages at Subash.chandran007's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Subash.chandran007 (talk) 12:38, 14 May 2009 (UTC)

FC Metz - SpVgg Metz

Quite a complex question, I would say yes and no, I hope you will understand my explanations. SpVgg Metz was founded in 1905, changed its name to SV Metz in 1912 after merging with another club from Metz (Métis Metz). When Metz came back to France, it was founded Cercle Athlétique Messin, with lots of players from SV Metz. This club took the name FC Metz in 1932. There are some discussions about the foundation of the club: some said 1932, some 1919, some 1912. Officially, the club was founded in 1932 (professionalism and adoption of the current name). I think because of the wars between France and Germany, French tend to hide this German past, but a continuation can be seen between the German and the French club. I hope this will help you.Cheers.--Latouffedisco (talk) 08:16, 17 May 2009 (UTC)

That's OK. I rephrased your sentence a bit, so that there is no ambiguity.--Latouffedisco (talk) 09:34, 17 May 2009 (UTC)

SpVgg Greuther Fürth

Hi. I added the recentism tag to the Recent Seasons of SpVgg Greuther Fürth because I originally deleted the section (as it is by its very nature recentist and so doesn't fall in line with Wikipedia policy) only for it to be reinstated. Dancarney (talk) 16:37, 29 May 2009 (UTC)

Overdue Barnstar

		German football/Deutscher Fußball Barnstar
		Awarded in recognition of your contributions in the area of German football. For an insane number of articles on German football leagues (which add a ton of depth to the topic area), team articles, team updates, logos, etc., usw. And for high spirit and initiative. Wish I had your energy. Wiggy! (talk) 14:34, 9 June 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:FC Penzberg.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:FC Penzberg.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:53, 11 June 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Amicitia Viernheim.gif)

Thanks for uploading File:Amicitia Viernheim.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:06, 12 June 2009 (UTC)

Rhineland Cup

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Rhineland Cup, and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: South West Cup. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally moving or duplicating content, please be sure you have followed the procedure at Wikipedia:Splitting by acknowledging the duplication of material in edit summary to preserve attribution history.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 11:57, 13 June 2009 (UTC)

Dueling DYKs!

Hey EA, looks like we are one after another at DYK, race you to the main page! Cheers. --kelapstick (talk) 16:36, 25 June 2009 (UTC)

Neve underestimate the allure of an NGO being told "Suck it up princess". Your's is an interesting article by the way.kelapstick (talk) 04:22, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

funny indeed, but i don't think they will both go up, but not on the same day. Did you see the bacon challenge? We colaborated and got 10+ bacon articles nominated at the same time, but alas they have some "rule" aginst themes and try to keep the hooks varied. Although one is in the US and one in Australia. kelapstick (talk) 04:47, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

The 2010 challenge is set to go on National Pig Day or March 1. I had proposed the idea to the Bacon Cabal (myself and three others) as a lark, and ChildofMidnight ran with it, the details of 2009 are at User:ChildofMidnight/Baconchallenge2009. It was quite fun and saw the addition of bacon martini, Mitch Morgan (bourbon and bacon), Maple bacon donut, Turkey bacon, Seduced by Bacon among others. As I had said they frown upon theme DYKs for any event and there was even talk of it offending vegetarians/those who don't eat pork...what is the world coming to...Well as of right now there is no action on the DYK race...Maybe if you had a picture of one of the Gold Cops in uniform it might push you over the edge! Cheers.--kelapstick (talk) 15:16, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

Those are pretty bad odds, considering your location v. the Loch Ness Monster's (unless (s)he winters in Australia)...If I were a betting man I would not take them. You could try stealing some gold...that might make them appear pretty quickly, then just snap a picture before the haul you off to the klink...Just tell them it was for Wikipedia, I am sure they will understand. If your wife can get a picture of the building I think that would be a great addition, also a fair use image of their logo could go in the infobox, but I have been having trouble finding one. Full agreement on the bacon issue...--kelapstick (talk) 15:32, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

Well it looks like...No action at DYK yet...maybe we aren't as interesting as we think we are. --kelapstick (talk) 22:24, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

Your's was signed off on 15 minutes before mine so your Gold Bandit theory has gone to pot. We shall see who gets put into the queue first!--kelapstick (talk) 16:09, 30 June 2009 (UTC)

AEG

You're right. Sorry about that. (although I did know that they were a defunct white goods manufacturer - I thought Anschutz bought the rights to it for concert promotions - that still may be correct, but I don't have proof).

Re: List of closed stadiums by capacity

Thanks for the kind words! Ok, I deleted Munich's Olympic Stadium. I didn't realize it still hosted sporting events. I would have no problem if a table of soon to be closed stadiums were added. There's only a few other stadiums I know of that would be qualify other than Rosnaustadion; Giants Stadium and Estadio Mestalla. I don't know what will happen to some of the other stadiums that are being replaced, however. Thanks! Patken4 (talk) 11:56, 28 June 2009 (UTC)

DYK for Gold Stealing Detection Unit

On July 3, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Gold Stealing Detection Unit, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page _{(here's how)} and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Giants27 (

c|s 05:43, 3 July 2009 (UTC)

Well done for that - the GSDS acronym and the usage of the local Kalgoorlie slang names for it and the police involved are not related to the GSDU or 'unit' - its a johnny come lately name that one. Pity you have used only online sources - the paper/book based sources have some amazing stuff - specially the royal commission and the issues surrounding Kavanagh and the appearance of the claims that started the royal commission and the squad in the first place - any ways keep the good work up! Satu Suro 16:06, 3 July 2009 (UTC)

There are about 3 or four books in the public library system with reasonable refs to gold stealing I think...

I am overseas and off wiki for over close to 5 months - but - I once considered doing an honours degree/thesis on the subject and have a large amount of paper about it - unfortunately I think it is unlikely that I will uncover it before I go - if I do I am prepared to lend it to you (about 3 boxes) - otherwise if I cannot find it - maybe a coffee or two if I am back on wiki sometime in January 2010 :) Satu Suro 00:40, 4 July 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for your response - will probably book a 'beer/coffee' whatever sometime january 2010 :) Satu Suro 05:55, 4 July 2009 (UTC)

German locator maps

Hi, I've recently made a proposal to convert to regional maps or at least feature both regional and national maps.See Template talk:Infobox German location at the bottom. The changes will have to be implemented before you can get it to work. Another reason why we should stick to using standard settlemenrs infoboxes!! Your response at the template talk page would be welcome though. Hopefully Kirill can make the changes whe he has time. Dr. Blofeld ^{White cat} 09:48, 11 July 2009 (UTC)

Try Template:Location map Germany Bavaria. You can find them in Category:Germany location map templates Dr. Blofeld ^{White cat} 09:54, 11 July 2009 (UTC)

Ideally we need both maps to assist people who are not familiar with German geography (most of us). If we can use a regional map which has a small national indicator at the side then I think we should us it. Dr. Blofeld ^{White cat} 09:57, 11 July 2009 (UTC)

You're welcome amigo!! Yeah I agree, I'll make a note to switch to the G versions. Dr. Blofeld ^{White cat} 10:02, 11 July 2009 (UTC)

Fortuna Babelsburg

Just enough to satisfy the Wikipedia's requirement for a beginning club page like this:

Club Manual Article

Thank you very much! John

Rakuten06 (talk) 15:49, 15 July 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for your help. I will leave it as "work-in-progress" on my page for a while until it's good enough to be moved from it to "Completed Articles"

Rakuten06 (talk) 12:22, 16 July 2009 (UTC)

DYK for Jürgen Wilhelm

On July 23, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Jürgen Wilhelm, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page _{(here's how)} and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Wizardman 00:01, 23 July 2009 (UTC)

Call out

WikiProject Alternate History is currently holding a roll call, which we hope to have annually. Your username is listed on the members list, but we are unsure as to which editors are still active within the project. If you still consider yourself an active editor, please add your name back to the Active members list. You can also list yourself as a Supporter if you feel you cannot dedicate the time necessary to be an active member.

Please also see the Project talk page for more information concerning this Call Out. Zombie Hunter Smurf (talk) 13:53, 24 July 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:SpVgg 07 Ludwigsburg.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:SpVgg 07 Ludwigsburg.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 07:38, 29 July 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Tsf ditzingen.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Tsf ditzingen.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 07:38, 29 July 2009 (UTC)

List of active gold mines in Western Australia

I think you had better either make the table usnortable, or un-merge the merged sections. Take a look at what happens when you sort by owner. We had the same issue at List of honorific titles in popular music.--kelapstick (talk) 16:29, 5 August 2009 (UTC)

By the way, I nicked your formatting/idea for a project at User:Kelapstick/List of active gold mines in Nevada. cheers--kelapstick (talk) 16:34, 5 August 2009 (UTC)

cfd

support for FA on German Unification

Last month German Unification was not promoted to FA because, apparently, not enough people had taken the time to read and comment. If I nominate it again, will you read it (it's lengthy) and comment? Auntieruth55 (talk) 16:55, 16 August 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (File:TBVfL Neustadt.jpg)

⚠
Thanks for uploading File:TBVfL Neustadt.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. FileBot (talk) 23:11, 22 August 2009 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:SVO Germaringen.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:SVO Germaringen.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Skier Dude (talk) 05:37, 24 October 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (File:FSV Bayreuth.jpg)

⚠
Thanks for uploading File:FSV Bayreuth.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Zoo Fari 01:38, 22 November 2009 (UTC)

File:17 Panzerdivision.JPG listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:17 Panzerdivision.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. User:Zscout370 ^{(Return Fire)} 08:32, 28 December 2009 (UTC)

Irish Rugby flag

You are receiving this message as you previous participated in a Irish rugby flag related discussion (WP:RUIRLFLAG). There are two ongoing discussions which may interest you here and here GnevinAWB (talk) 00:43, 29 January 2010 (UTC)

We miss you

We miss you hugely. Hope you're still good. Keep well. Belated birthday greetings. Wiggy! (talk) 15:35, 5 March 2010 (UTC)

Will you ever return? Geschichte (talk) 19:19, 9 April 2010 (UTC)