User:2020tabracey/Abortion in Germany/Bibliography

You will be compiling your bibliography and creating an outline of the changes you will make in this sandbox.

Bibliography

As you gather the sources for your Wikipedia contribution, think about the following:

Is the source from a reliable publication?
- Reliable publications include established newspapers, academic journals and books, textbooks, and other published sources with reputations for accuracy and fact-checking.
- Unreliable sources include blog posts and other self-published works, press releases, and social media posts.
Is the source verifiable?
- In order for a source to be considered verifiable, other editors should be able to consult the source.
Is the source independent of the subject?
- Is the source connected in any way to the subject? This is especially important when writing biographies or about organizations.
- For example, if you were writing a biography, sources like the person's webpage or personal blog would not be considered independent.
Is the source primary or secondary?
- Primary sources include first-hand accounts, autobiographies, and other original content.
- Wikipedia allows limited use of primary sources, but typically only for straightforward, descriptive statements of facts, and only if they are published and verifiable without requiring specialized knowledge.
- Secondary sources should be the main basis for a biography on Wikipedia.
If you're working on a topic related to medicine or psychology, ensure that your sources follow these special guidelines.
If you're creating a new article, consider the following:
- Ensure that your topic meets Wikipedia's notability guidelines.
- In order for a topic to meet the notability requirement, you must be able to identify 2-3 sources that are reliable, verifiable, and independent of the subject you're writing about.
- Finding sufficient sources to establish notability can be especially hard when writing about people or organizations.
- Sources that are not independent of the subject might be useful additions, but don't count towards the notability requirement.
- Wikipedia has developed special guidelines for writing about living persons. Please follow these carefully.
- Wikipedia has a series of guidelines for writing about different categories of people, such as academics and artists. If you're trying to create a new entry about a living person, please look at these carefully.

If you're not sure whether a source is reliable, ask a librarian! If you have questions about Wikipedia's sourcing rules, you can use the Get Help button below to contact your Wikipedia Expert.

Get Help

Bibliography

Newspaper Article:

Glenza, Jessica. "Anti-abortion Movement Achieved Goal of Reversing Roe – but It Is Far from Done." The Guardian, Jul 2022.

This article talks about how people who are against abortion in the United States are getting closer to changing a big law called Roe v. Wade. It explains what they've done so far and what they want to do next. The author, Glenza, discusses the things of the anti-abortion movement in the United States. She really shows their progress towards changing the Roe v. Wade law. Glenza also explains the actions taken by these individuals and groups and their goals for future legal and social changes for abortion rights. The article just really looks on the current state of the abortion debate and the impact of these movements on women's reproductive rights in the country. It provides good information into the things surrounding abortion legislation and the attempts of people trying to influence it.

Book:

May, William E., Ph.D. The Ethics of Abortion: Women's Rights, Human Life, and the Question of Justice. 2012.

This book just goes into different ways on abortion ethics. The book askes questions about the right and wrong of abortion and examines different opinions on the topic. May's work helped me understand more about the good and bad of abortion, looking at arguments from both sides. By showing these arguments clearly and in a way that's easy to understand. He encourages readers to think carefully about the tricky questions involved. Therefore, the book is helpful for people who want to understand the right vs wrong side of abortion and learn about different opinions on the topic.

Journal Article:

Niţă, Andreea Mihaela, and Cristina Ilie Goga. "A Research on Abortion: Ethics, Legislation and Socio-Medical Outcomes. Case Study: Romania." London: Routledge, 2020.

This offers information about how people in Romania see and do abortion. It talks about the rules about abortion in Romania and how it affects people's health and feeling good. Niţă and Goga look at how the culture and society in Romania affect what people think about abortion. They use real research and their opinions to explain the issues with abortion in Romania. Their work helps me understand how laws, culture, and health are all connected when it comes to abortion from a different place.Whereas this article was from Germany. It shows why we need to think carefully about how we make rules about abortion and how we talk about it.

References

https://www.theguardian.com/law/2022/jul/01/anti-abortion-movement-roe-reversal-what-next 
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7728127/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6027077/ 
2020tabracey (talk) 14:43, 16 March 2024 (UTC) trinity bracey