Template talk:Taxonomy/Asparagaceae
 | This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
Template-protected edit request on 2 May 2016 - Ornithogalum umbrellatum Family
[edit] | This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
I know that Ornithogalum umbrellatum is in the family Liliaceae, please verify. 87.9.232.55 (talk) 14:54, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
- See Liliod monocots – many plants used to be placed in the family Liliaceae, but are not now. Ornithogalum is a member of the subfamily Scilloideae of the family Asparagaceae in one treatment (APG), or of the family Hyacinthaceae in another. Either way, it's in an entirely different order, Asparagales, from Liliaceae, which is in Liliales. Peter coxhead (talk) 08:08, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
Template-protected edit request on 4 October 2017
[edit] | This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
change Asparagaceae to Agavaceae 96.89.153.91 (talk) 20:32, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
- Why? — JJMC89 (T·C) 04:21, 5 October 2017 (UTC)
Template-protected edit request on 15 March 2019
[edit] | This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
The Jepson Herbarium has changed the family name from Asparagaceae to Themidaceae. http://ucjeps.berkeley.edu/eflora/eflora_display.php?tid=22848 Hpy2bsal (talk) 18:16, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
- Pinging Peter coxhead. Care to look at this one? Should this be moved, changed, redirected? – Jonesey95 (talk) 08:01, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
- Hpy2bsal's comment is incorrect; the Jepson Herbarium recognizes Asparagaceae – see here. The difference is that we use the APG system, currently APG IV, in which Themidaceae is reduced to the subfamily Brodiaeoideae of Asparagaceae. See the taxobox at Dichelostemma, which Jepson puts in Themidaceae at the link given above. Jepson uses a narrower circumscription of Asparagaceae, I suspect equivalent to Asparagoideae, though I haven't checked. Peter coxhead (talk) 09:21, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
Template-protected edit request on 8 April 2019
[edit]The family name is lily, found this out under the USDA site under Muscari botryoides where it is listed as an invasive species in Tennessee. I found it in Washington state.
| This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
This species is in the lily family. Check the USDA site under Muscari botryoides and its listed as the lily family 2600:100F:B009:FFCF:EC44:B217:9496:4265 (talk) 00:55, 8 April 2019 (UTC)
Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. DannyS712 (talk) 02:04, 8 April 2019 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 3 June 2020
[edit] | This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
change Asparagaceae to Agavaceae 47.156.231.156 (talk) 09:22, 3 June 2020 (UTC)
Not done: Why? Mdaniels5757 (talk) 16:50, 4 June 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 26 April 2021
[edit] | This edit request to Template:Taxonomy/Liliaceae has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
The family of Asparagus racemosus wild is not asparagaceae, but Liliaceae according to 'A textbook of Dravyaguna Vijnana' by Dr Prakash. L. Hegde. Santhanu808 (talk) 20:42, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
Asparagus racemosus wild belongs to Liliaceae family Santhanu808 (talk) 20:43, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
- To editor Santhanu808: Not done: that is from an earlier classification system. The family "Asparagaceae" is correct; please see Asparagaceae#Taxonomy. Thank you very much for your input! P.I. Ellsworth ed. put'r there 16:47, 27 April 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 30 July 2021
[edit] | This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
I see the family name is/may be wrong. I have it on good authority (am looking at a tree book now) that the family name is actually Agavaceae 115.188.58.25 (talk) 10:50, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
- Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 13:01, 30 July 2021 (UTC)