Template talk:Infobox anatomy
![]() | This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 180 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 3 sections are present. |
Uses Infobox and list template
[edit]This template needs a Uses Infobox template like {{Uses infobox person}}, {{Uses infobox sportsperson}}, or {{Uses Infobox settlement}}.
Also it needs a list template like {{Buildings and structures infobox templates}}.
If there is no objection, I can create them.
Regards Shkuru Afshar (talk) 05:00, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
Not done Shkuru Afshar, this edit hasn't been done because it's not clear why we need to make these edits. What is the purpose of the edits you are proposing? --Tom (LT) (talk) 03:17, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
Tom (LT)Hi. To tell users that templates bone, artery, vein, lymph, nerve, neuron, brain, muscle, embryology, and ligament are subtemplates (customized wrappers) of Template:Infobox anatomy.
Also it needs a list template like {{Buildings and structures infobox templates}} to be placed at the bottom of related templates. {{Buildings and structures infobox templates}} has been used at all template documtation pages. Example: {{Infobox airport}} Shkuru Afshar (talk) 03:50, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
- Ah, got it. In that case yes Shkuru Afshar, very happy for you to do this and also, thanks for your initiative. You can create something like {{Uses infobox anatomy}} and I'll have a double check regarding its accuracy when you're done, and {{Anatomy infobox templates}} as the navbox. Please make sure you're editing the documentation pages (that's /doc) rather than the templates themselves. --Tom (LT) (talk) 07:41, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
Tom (LT) I created these 2 templates. They are ready for your double check. Cheers Shkuru Afshar (talk) 10:58, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
- Thanks for that, I've edited one and the other template is fine to use. Please be careful to use them on the documentation pages and not the templates themselves :). --Tom (LT) (talk) 07:39, 1 March 2021 (UTC)
Template-protected edit request on 24 February 2021
[edit]![]() | This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Change this:
| label51 = [[Terminologia Histologica|TH]] | data51 = {{#if:{{{TH|{{#property:P1694}}}}} |[https://www.unifr.ch/ifaa/Public/EntryPage/ViewTH/THh{{Str rep|{{Str mid|{{{TH|{{#property:P1694}}}}}|2|4}}|.|}}.html {{{TH|{{#property:P1694}}}}}]}}
to this:
| label51 = [[Terminologia Histologica|TH]] | data51 = {{#if:{{{TH|{{#property:P1694}}}}} | {{TerminologiaHistologica|{{{TH|{{#property:P1694}} }}} }} }}
In order to use the TerminologiaHistologica template and match Terminologia Embryologica and Terminologia Anatomica links. Anton.t.gregersen (talk) 18:36, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
Done thanks for proposing this change - one discussed at WT:ANAT. I have implemented the change and having tested it can confirm it produces a more useful result than previous. --Tom (LT) (talk) 03:21, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
Reason for default italics?
[edit]Is there a reason why italics are automatically applied to this infobox's above field? This results in italics for terms/topics that aren't rendered with italics in prose, like Nervous system and Bone and Latissimus dorsi muscle. I plan on removing this if there isn't a reason. — Goszei (talk) 03:31, 20 June 2021 (UTC)
- I have removed this feature. Please ping me if a revert is needed. — Goszei (talk) 06:51, 3 July 2021 (UTC)
Thanks. I never even noticed these were italicised and don’t know any reason why they need to be. Tom (LT) (talk) 09:30, 3 July 2021 (UTC)
Add Cell Ontology IDs from Wikidata?
[edit]Hello! I currently cannot edit the template. It would be great to have the Cell Ontology IDs showing up in the "cell" subtemplate. The Wikidata property is https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Property:P7963 and it has a few thousand uses on Wikidata. CL is the most prominent source of cell type IDs currently; Wikipedia would benefit from having it in pages like https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Red_blood_cell.
I'd be happy to do anything needed, just let me know. All the best, TiagoLubiana (talk) 21:00, 7 February 2023 (UTC)