Template talk:Editnotices/Group/Wikipedia:Arbitration

Advice

About half of the "advice" here seems pertinent only to the main RFAR page, but it in fact appears on all sub-pages as well. We should add a switch statement to display more specific advice, depending on whether the user is editing Evidence/Workshop/Proposed_decision/etc. — CharlotteWebb 16:43, 2 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Edit notice updating

I'd like to get the edit notice changes discussed here started. More suggestions? More comments? Also, taking into account the comment above this thread, I'd like to get some sort of advice, but maybe cut down on the wordiness so people are more clearly warned to edit in their own sections.--Tznkai (talk) 23:27, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

My advice (if there was any) is much as before. If you don't get much feedback (I hope you do), I'd say go ahead and make changes based on what others have said before. Maybe stuff like a "click this tick box to show you have read the notice" before clicking save might also help. I know, I know... Carcharoth (talk) 02:16, 28 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Minor edit request

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Someone please replace do not press "save." with do not press "Publish changes." to match the (not so recent) update in the interface. Thanks! – Uanfala (talk) 22:28, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Done — JJMC89 (T·C) 22:42, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Edit request for dark mode compatibility

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Kindly change

{{editnotice
    |id =arbpropdec
    | header = Arbitration proposed decision
    | headerstyle = font-size: 120%; background-color: #FFBABA;
    | image = [[File:Stop hand nuvola.svg|50px|center]]
    | imagesize = 50px
    | textstyle = font-size: 110%; background-color: #FFBABA;
    | text = '''Only arbitrators or clerks are permitted to edit this page.''' Non-arbitrators may comment on the [[{{TALKPAGENAME:{{FULLBASEPAGENAME|{{{demopage|}}}}}/Proposed decision}}|talk page]], or submit their own proposals to the [[{{FULLBASEPAGENAME|{{{demopage|}}}}}/Workshop|workshop]]. '''Errors''' may be brought to the attention of the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Clerks|clerks]] at [[Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Clerks|the clerks' noticeboard]] or on the [[{{TALKPAGENAME:{{FULLBASEPAGENAME|{{{demopage|}}}}}/Proposed decision}}|talk page]].
  }}

to

<templatestyles src="Template:Editnotices/Group/Wikipedia:Arbitration/styles.css" />
{{editnotice
    |id =arbpropdec
    | header = Arbitration proposed decision
    | headerstyle = font-size: 120%;
    | image = [[File:Stop hand nuvola.svg|50px|center]]
    | imagesize = 50px
    | textstyle = font-size: 110%;
    | text = '''Only arbitrators or clerks are permitted to edit this page.''' Non-arbitrators may comment on the [[{{TALKPAGENAME:{{FULLBASEPAGENAME|{{{demopage|}}}}}/Proposed decision}}|talk page]], or submit their own proposals to the [[{{FULLBASEPAGENAME|{{{demopage|}}}}}/Workshop|workshop]]. '''Errors''' may be brought to the attention of the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Clerks|clerks]] at [[Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Clerks|the clerks' noticeboard]] or on the [[{{TALKPAGENAME:{{FULLBASEPAGENAME|{{{demopage|}}}}}/Proposed decision}}|talk page]].
  }}

for dark mode compatibility. Make sure the edit request for Template:Editnotices/Group/Wikipedia:Arbitration/styles.css has gone through first though. Also change <div class="RfAr-editnotice plainlinks mw-no-invert notheme"> to <div class="RfAr-editnotice plainlinks"> further down - the noinvert seems to be unnecessary. Tested on Template:X5. —Matrix(!) {user - talk? - _uselesscontributions} 06:08, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done, thanks. SilverLocust 💬 09:37, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]