Template talk:Did you know/Morris Meyerfeld Jr.

Morris Meyerfeld Jr.[edit]

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Panyd^{The muffin is not subtle}

... that Morris Meyerfeld Jr. was called "the Rockefeller of Vaudeville" by an unknown person?

Reviewed: Stella Maris polytechnic ([1])

Created by Jfbarlow (talk). Nominated by Rcej (talk) at 08:52, 28 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Please add a comment and signature (or just a signature if endorsing) after each aspect you have reviewed:
Hook

Length, format, content rules: Though I suggest my proposed ALT hook below. Gamaliel (talk) 15:55, 28 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Source: Unable to access cited source, but this quote also appears in footnote number 4. Gamaliel (talk) 15:55, 28 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Interest: Gamaliel (talk) 15:55, 28 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image suitability, if applicable: n/a
ALT hooks, if proposed: My suggestion: ... that Morris Meyerfeld Jr. was called "the Rockefeller of Vaudeville" Gamaliel (talk) 15:55, 28 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Article

Length: Gamaliel (talk) 15:55, 28 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Vintage: Gamaliel (talk) 15:55, 28 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Sourcing (V, RS, BLP): We need a fuller citation on some of these sources. Where did you access funeral billing records? And what is "Life of Salomon Dannebaum"? Gamaliel (talk) 15:55, 28 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Neutrality: Gamaliel (talk) 15:55, 28 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Plagiarism/close paraphrasing: Unknown, was not able to access most sources used. Gamaliel (talk) 15:55, 28 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Copyvio: Unknown, was not able to access most sources used. Gamaliel (talk) 15:55, 28 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Obvious faults in prose, structure, formatting: This is a fine and promising first draft, and vaudeville is something that definitely needs more coverage on Wikipedia, but I don't feel this is ready for the front page yet. (I will defer to those more experienced at DYK if they feel it is ready to go, however.) Aside from the issues noted above, there is precious little in this article about what makes this person notable and too much minutiae about relatives and the disposition of his remains. There appear to be a number of good texts on vaudeville in Google Books, that may be a good source of further information. Gamaliel (talk) 15:55, 28 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comments/discussion: Hello, I've added page numbers and more specific details to my source materials . If there is more that needs to be done please let me know. For clarification can you tell me why the list or Orpheum theatres was removed?John F. Barlow (talk) 00:07, 5 August 2011 (UTC)John F. Barlow (talk) 00:18, 5 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Section was removed per the manual of style. Panyd^{The muffin is not subtle} 00:51, 5 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]