This template is within the scope of WikiProject COVID-19, a project to coordinate efforts to improve all COVID-19-related articles. If you would like to help, you are invited to join and to participate in project discussions.COVID-19Wikipedia:WikiProject COVID-19Template:WikiProject COVID-19COVID-19
This template is within the scope of WikiProject Disaster management, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Disaster management on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Disaster managementWikipedia:WikiProject Disaster managementTemplate:WikiProject Disaster managementDisaster management
This template is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine
This template is within the scope of WikiProject Norway, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Norway on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NorwayWikipedia:WikiProject NorwayTemplate:WikiProject NorwayNorway
This template is within the scope of WikiProject Viruses, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of viruses on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.VirusesWikipedia:WikiProject VirusesTemplate:WikiProject Virusesvirus
Oh for heaven's sake. It's a daily log that hasn't been updated in six weeks. At this point, I suggest simply removing the page. Is that specific enough for you? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.52.207.45 (talk) 00:45, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Agree with my fellow anonymous contributor. This hasn't been updated in well over three months, and editors like me who might feel inclined to update it can't.
I understand that Wikipedia has to combat vandalism and non-constructive edits, and that this means that sometimes, editing has to be restricted. But this should never be done for extended periods of time without a clear and persistent need.
After all, Wikipedia is, or is supposed to be, the "encylopedia that anyone can edit". The burden of justification is therefore not on the one requesting the ability to edit a page; quite the opposite, it is the one who refuses to allow editing who must justify why this is, or continues to be, necessary. 188.96.168.255 (talk) 09:00, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 23 July 2020
@JzG: Could you please decrease the protection level of this template to semi to allow more editors to keep the chart updated? Edit requests have been proven insufficient... Alexiscoutinho (talk) 17:35, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]