Template:Did you know nominations/Wojciech Pietranik
- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Crisco 1492 (talk) 12:07, 19 September 2011 (UTC)
Wojciech Pietranik
[edit]- ... that Wojciech Pietranik was told to replace the Sydney Opera House with the Roman Colosseum in his design for the Sydney 2000 Olympic medals (pictured)?
Created/expanded by Violetriga (talk). Self nom at 18:13, 12 September 2011 (UTC)
| Format | Citation | Neutrality | Interest |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crisco 1492 (talk) | Crisco 1492 (talk) |
| Length | Newness | Adequate citations |
Formatted citations |
Reliable sources |
Neutrality | Plagiarism |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Crisco 1492 (talk) | Crisco 1492 (talk) | Crisco 1492 (talk) | Crisco 1492 (talk) | Crisco 1492 (talk) |
Couple things. His notable coin designs are uncited, and the hook is rather confusing. How about ALT1:- ... that Wojciech Pietranik attempted to replace the Roman Colosseum with the Sydney Opera House for the medals (pictured) for the 2000 Summer Olympics, but was declined?
- Might be better. Crisco 1492 (talk) 15:26, 18 September 2011 (UTC)
- Personally I find my version of the hook to be clearer and more concise. The notable coin design doesn't need citing as it is not part of the hook. violet/riga [talk] 15:55, 18 September 2011 (UTC)
- I'd rather have it cited just to be safe. Although that section is not under a heading, it is not cited elsewhere in the article so we shouldn't consider it part of the lead. Crisco 1492 (talk) 23:08, 18 September 2011 (UTC)
- I removed it earlier, pending addition when I have the opportunity. violet/riga [talk] 23:18, 18 September 2011 (UTC)
- K, just waiting on a QPQ. Crisco 1492 (talk) 02:34, 19 September 2011 (UTC)
- Personally I find my version of the hook to be clearer and more concise. The notable coin design doesn't need citing as it is not part of the hook. violet/riga [talk] 15:55, 18 September 2011 (UTC)
- Don't you owe a QPQ? Crisco 1492 (talk) 15:35, 18 September 2011 (UTC)
- I do indeed. violet/riga [talk] 15:55, 18 September 2011 (UTC)
Good to go now! Crisco 1492 (talk) 11:22, 19 September 2011 (UTC)
