Template:Did you know nominations/White-throated robin-chat
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by — Crisco 1492 (talk) 07:51, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
White-throated robin-chat
[edit].jpg)
- ... that the white-throated robin-chat (pictured) is sometimes parasitised by the red-chested cuckoo?
- Reviewed: Schloss Weimar
5x expanded by Cwmhiraeth (talk). Self nominated at 09:14, 10 June 2014 (UTC).
Article's 5x expansion is confirmed, and was undertaken very recently. Article's prose section is also over 1,500 characters long, having been a stub before the expansion. It is sufficiently referenced, to reliable sources, and neutral, and I found no close paraphrasing or other copyright issues. Hook is short enough, sufficiently interesting, and supported by an inline citation. Image is properly licensed, and looks good at small size. QPQ review has been done. Good to go. SJ Morg (talk) 07:04, 12 June 2014 (UTC)
Per DYK Reviewing guide In addition to at least 1,500 characters of readable prose, the article must not be a stub. This requires a judgement call, since there is no mechanical stub definition (see the Croughton-London rule). If an article is, in fact, a stub, you should temporarily reject the nomination; if the article is not a stub, ensure that it is correctly marked as a non-stub, by removing any stub template(s) in the article, and changing any talk-page assessments to start-class or higher.
— Maile (talk) 21:50, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
- Thanks for pointing that out. It wasn't marked as a stub on the article page, but was assessed as a stub, having not been reassessed by anyone since the 5x expansion. For the subject, it's definitely no longer a stub, and I've now upgraded the assessment to start-class. SJ Morg (talk) 03:35, 17 June 2014 (UTC)
