Template:Did you know nominations/Victorian era
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Bruxton (talk) 02:01, 24 May 2023 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Victorian era
Photograph of a mother and baby by Alfred Capel-Cure (c. 1850s or 60s)
- ... that only 45% of the babies born in 1851 in Victorian era Liverpool lived to be 20 years old? Source: Cook, Bernard A. (2011). "Poverty". In Mitchell, Sally (ed.). Victorian Britain An Encyclopedia. Routledge. pp. 622–625. ISBN 9780415669726.
- ALT1: ... that only 45% of the babies born in 1851 in Victorian era Liverpool, England lived to be 20 years old? Source: Cook, Bernard A. (2011). "Poverty". In Mitchell, Sally (ed.). Victorian Britain An Encyclopedia. Routledge. pp. 622–625. ISBN 9780415669726.
- Reviewed:
Improved to Good Article status by Llewee (talk). Self-nominated at 12:06, 17 May 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Victorian era; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.
- Support. Would also be nice to know what that number was towards the end of the era in the DYK note. Nerd271 (talk) 15:04, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
Article was nominated within 7 days of passing GAR. Article is long enough, neutral, and cites reliable sources. Only pings on Earwigs are for properly attributed quotes. Hooks are short enough, cited, and interesting; AGF on offline sources. Image feels somewhat superfluous and doesn't really reproduce well at a small size, but it is properly licensed. Nominator is QPQ exempt. Morgan695 (talk) 16:00, 23 May 2023 (UTC)
