The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
Overall: New enough and long enough. Hook fact is verified, interesting, and should hopefully draw some eyes to a much underappreciated area. Earwig shows 48% likelihood, but those appear to all be correctly attributed quotations. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 23:54, 28 November 2024 (UTC)