Template:Did you know nominations/Twerking

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: rejected by — Crisco 1492 (talk) 23:51, 22 January 2013 (UTC)
Length

Twerking

(

)

Add caption text!

... that the word twerking was formed by the contraction of "twist" and "jerk"?

Reviewed: Lebanese general election, 1968 in Beirut I

Created/expanded by Yerevanci (talk). Self nom at 21:07, 20 December 2012 (UTC)

This article is nominated for deletion. --George Ho (talk) 18:21, 24 December 2012 (UTC)

Video was removed from Commons because it originated in http://www.powerbrokerent.com/. --George Ho (talk) 22:48, 27 December 2012 (UTC)

Currently, there are two "keep" votes. Youtube is still used as inline citation, but it is unreliable, as statistics may change. Speaking of statistics, either they must be removed, or non-primary sources must be found to determine statistics. Even when it passes 1,500-character minimum, issues about Youtube still may arise. --George Ho (talk) 06:51, 4 January 2013 (UTC) Removed "?"

Although I corrected one information, I found out more that websites that consist of copyrighted lyrics are cited, and rap quotes, cited by copyvio links, do not make this topic generally notable. --George Ho (talk) 06:57, 4 January 2013 (UTC)

AfD has closed as "keep"; full review now needed. BlueMoonset (talk) 01:06, 9 January 2013 (UTC)

I don't know. Even after changes and unsuccessful AFD, Youtube is still used, as well as Twitter. Frugivore Magazine is no longer considered reliable, yet is used still. --George Ho (talk) 19:27, 10 January 2013 (UTC)

I think there are other text issues too. In particular, there is some unnecessary quoting, and these quotes are given without context. Also, the criticism section begins "Many", but only references a campus newspaper whose article is currently tagged as a possible non-notable. Moswento ^talky 08:58, 11 January 2013 (UTC)

Remove those mounds of quotes and the article is too short. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 12:41, 20 January 2013 (UTC)